Topic: Pre-ICO bonuses - page 9. (Read 4564 times)
Pre-ICO bonuses are the biggest. This is basically to catch the eyes of the investors waiting for huge bonuses of newly launched tokens. It would be highly profitable to invest in pre-ICOs. But it should be done only after a serious and thorough checking of the project is done.
reOrder offers 40% bonus during their pre-ICO.
I agree with you but I would also advise you that instead of regretting about those people who are investing money in pre ICO with 100% bonus you should be taking the place of these people and making the profits. That's the strategy which you know very well but you regret it because you don't invest like them after knowing that you can get huge profits from it.
To tell shortly, before investing in any ICO or pre-ICO, a thorough research should be done; otherwise, it would be highly risky to become an investor in one or another ICO or pre-ICO if I were you. A reasonable bonus could attract attention of potential investors, though it could also dis-engage them and raise suspicion whether this pre-ICO is promising enough to be successful in future.
as developer works with the message delivery to future investors, that the details of project should gives with the
chance on coins buyer to defines of decision, as the use of spares on numbers with the coins bonus to turns
as if buyer to follows on further as managing with the higher scales on risks distribution as keeping of stable value to moves with
rising progress with the beginning entrance as entering market.
Bonuses for early investors aren't necessarily a bad thing if the percentage is reasonable. I usually avoid any project that offer 50% bonus or more during the ICO or Pre-ICO. I feel 20% to 30% is the perfect amount for early investors which is the standard for many projects.
Agreed, though a lot of startups use ICOs to get around seed-funding and having to deal with VCs so they do need to raise as much $$$ as possible to take their operation through to the next round. Many reputable ICOs have offered over 50% but at the same time, they tend to be the ones who haven't marketed their project as effectively as they should have.
Hi
In most of ICOs, investors can get some bonuses, if they invest sooner. In my opinion these bonuses not only don't cause the ICO to be successful, but also cause the ICO to fail. In some ICOs there is up to 100% bonus.
If I see that there are some people have gotten 100% bonus in pre-ICO, I don't invest in that ICO, Because they will dump their coins after crowdsale and cause the price to fall.
Do you agree with me? What are your opinions?
50% bonus is good for me. I think. They accept the risk. Not every ICO they invest is success. Some scam, some fail. So bonus is fair but I think 50% is the best rate In most of ICOs, investors can get some bonuses, if they invest sooner. In my opinion these bonuses not only don't cause the ICO to be successful, but also cause the ICO to fail. In some ICOs there is up to 100% bonus.
If I see that there are some people have gotten 100% bonus in pre-ICO, I don't invest in that ICO, Because they will dump their coins after crowdsale and cause the price to fall.
Do you agree with me? What are your opinions?
Early investors at pre-ICO have much higher risks so bonuses are strongly necessary! Bad thing is that many ICO make bonuses during token sale aka ICO, ITO. Some of them reach 50-100%. I think this kind of ICO politics is very harmful for success of project.
Pre sale ICO bonuses are like the traditional investment round rewards. Think about angle investors or venture capitalists that buy in very early rounds of development in a business and buy the shares very cheap. This is what is happening in token ICOS. Only the difference here is where the traditional investor might wait it out 2-3 years or more to see his investment mature, in cryptocurrency investing everyone wants to go to the moon exceptionally fast, which is the main problem.
If an investor wants to go to the moon fast, he can try Forex 
Me personally consider investements as a support for a project which has perspective and real chances to win, but not at once... Modern life accelerates its tempo, but world isn't concentrated only in one point (in amy dimension) . Somewhere there is a future, where everything we 're doing now has its effect. Maybe it's worth to invest in the future? 
Pre sale ICO bonuses are like the traditional investment round rewards. Think about angle investors or venture capitalists that buy in very early rounds of development in a business and buy the shares very cheap. This is what is happening in token ICOS. Only the difference here is where the traditional investor might wait it out 2-3 years or more to see his investment mature, in cryptocurrency investing everyone wants to go to the moon exceptionally fast, which is the main problem.
I think it is a great way to raise money and also give something back to the investors who showed loyalty and belief in the project.
ICO's are the not the first to reward "early bird" investors / clients, and i am sure they will not be the last.
ICO's are the not the first to reward "early bird" investors / clients, and i am sure they will not be the last.
Pre-sale special prices are actually good in a way. It shows that VC's will put money into a project that has almost nothing to back them.
But yeah, you pointed out correctly that the incentives are sometimes too much. Like 100 or even 500% difference is there.
But yeah, you pointed out correctly that the incentives are sometimes too much. Like 100 or even 500% difference is there.
Bonuses in general on pre-sale or ICO are not a bad idea.
BUT of course not 100%.. I wouldnt trust that ICO project.
I know that one ICO did a good system for bonuses. By time and by amount of ETH.
looks like this
BUT of course not 100%.. I wouldnt trust that ICO project.
I know that one ICO did a good system for bonuses. By time and by amount of ETH.
looks like this
On the topic of pre-ICO bonuses, one can get a x7 token bonus for supporting this project:
https://lust.agency
Our financial model and the roadmap can be seen here
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B2Au0kLZOVYRMmw1cGJqODJ5dlU/view
https://lust.agency
Our financial model and the roadmap can be seen here
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B2Au0kLZOVYRMmw1cGJqODJ5dlU/view
yes I agree with you that it's not a good strategy to give 100% bonus at pre-ico, it's not rationable to me. But many investors are waiting for a successful pre-ico then they will use their money for ico.
IMO, Bonuses = marketing expenses. It is normal to put some money in marketing, but if there are too many bonuses = too many expenses and you need to think if this project can stay afloat this way.
Hi
In most of ICOs, investors can get some bonuses, if they invest sooner. In my opinion these bonuses not only don't cause the ICO to be successful, but also cause the ICO to fail. In some ICOs there is up to 100% bonus.
If I see that there are some people have gotten 100% bonus in pre-ICO, I don't invest in that ICO, Because they will dump their coins after crowdsale and cause the price to fall.
Do you agree with me? What are your opinions?
In most of ICOs, investors can get some bonuses, if they invest sooner. In my opinion these bonuses not only don't cause the ICO to be successful, but also cause the ICO to fail. In some ICOs there is up to 100% bonus.
If I see that there are some people have gotten 100% bonus in pre-ICO, I don't invest in that ICO, Because they will dump their coins after crowdsale and cause the price to fall.
Do you agree with me? What are your opinions?
I agree with your opinion.
we need to know the assessment of an ico should be backgrounded with knowledge.
that's why many investors are stuck on very ineffective coins.
and the result is a loss.
so about an assessment like what you say, it needs a high understanding and confidence to judge an ico.
Hi
In most of ICOs, investors can get some bonuses, if they invest sooner. In my opinion these bonuses not only don't cause the ICO to be successful, but also cause the ICO to fail. In some ICOs there is up to 100% bonus.
If I see that there are some people have gotten 100% bonus in pre-ICO, I don't invest in that ICO, Because they will dump their coins after crowdsale and cause the price to fall.
Do you agree with me? What are your opinions?
In most of ICOs, investors can get some bonuses, if they invest sooner. In my opinion these bonuses not only don't cause the ICO to be successful, but also cause the ICO to fail. In some ICOs there is up to 100% bonus.
If I see that there are some people have gotten 100% bonus in pre-ICO, I don't invest in that ICO, Because they will dump their coins after crowdsale and cause the price to fall.
Do you agree with me? What are your opinions?
I agree with your opinion.
we need to know the assessment of an ico should be backgrounded with knowledge.
that's why many investors are stuck on very ineffective coins.
and the result is a loss.
so about an assessment like what you say, it needs a high understanding and confidence to judge an ico.
I feel like pre-ICO bonuses somekinda kill the purpose. Devs let early investors to quickly dump their coins right after ICO. It may be attractive but its killing coins later on market. Sell supports are too huge.
Bonuses are good incentives for early buyers and even if there is no bonus, if a whale buyer will dump, it will crash as well. Maybe there should be a limit and if they are giving too much bonus,it will look like a scam for it is too good.
Most ICOs I know until today have bonus in pre-ico not much, because they also understand the risk and benefit from pre-ico. That is reason they usually have limit or hard cap when open pre-ico, example some projects recently: Atlant, Utrust, BitClave ... Jump to: