Proof that God exists - page 39. | Bitcointalksearch.org

Moloch

hero member

Activity: 798

Merit: 722

Quote from: af_newbie on February 19, 2016, 06:15:19 PM

This is getting more ridiculous...

from Christian site:
http://lifehopeandtruth.com/bible/holy-bible/?utm_campaign=Bible+Silo&utm_medium=Holy+Bible&utm_source=PPC&utm_term=Who+Wrote+the+Bible

Quote

God tells us He inspired the Holy Bible. Even though the 66 books of the Holy Bible were written over a period of 1,500 years by about 40 authors, each with a personal style, there is an amazing consistency to its message and teaching that displays the ultimate authorship of God (2 Timothy 3:16 ).

So the God tells them he inspired it because people who wrote it said that God inspired it? Makes sense; like the rest of it.
Fuck me and call me Tracy.

Interesting choice of words there in 2 Timothy...

Quote from: 2 Timothy 3:16

All Scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness

Moloch

hero member

Activity: 798

Merit: 722

Quote from: af_newbie on February 19, 2016, 05:54:35 PM

Regarding Bible, to all the Christian fruit cakes, can you point me to any of your pseudo scientific sources that have any proof of who actually
wrote these vile books. Here is your chance to blame someone else and defend your God.

Nobody actually knows who wrote each book... some are obvious forgeries (the true author is not the person claiming to be the author)... the 4 gospels clearly plagiarized vast sections from each other...

Even the first 4 books, commonly attributed to Moses, are thought to have been written by 4 separate people... mixed together... taking turns writing different lines... it is quite clear when you study the different writing styles:

It also explains the redundancies... like why God repeats the exact same command multiple times... or why God created the universe in Genesis 1, then he does it all over again in the next fucking chapter... (notice chapter 1 is blue and chapter 2 is red?)

Moloch

hero member

Activity: 798

Merit: 722

Quote from: af_newbie on February 19, 2016, 05:27:55 PM

Quote from: valta4065 on February 19, 2016, 05:04:41 PM

Quote from: Moloch on February 19, 2016, 04:44:23 PM

Quote from: youdamushi on February 19, 2016, 04:40:24 PM

Quote from: Moloch on February 19, 2016, 04:23:10 PM

Quote from: eon89 on February 19, 2016, 04:21:12 PM

And in the Middle Ages people were afraid of tomatoes because they were red. We learn and grow. Same thing.

Hahaha... The Middle Ages were not even that long ago... and they used leeches as medicine... to suck that evil blood out of your body... because, yeah, that makes sense...

Then ya think... hmmm... the bible was written 1500+ years BEFORE THE MIDDLE AGES

And is responsible for midle age in fact. Without the Bible there would have been no Midle age when you think about it

Close... without the bible there would be no Dark Ages... though, you could argue that the Dark Ages are the Middle Ages... so I suppose you are partially correct...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_Ages_(historiography)

I however, would have preferred to skip the Dark Ages... full of Christians killing everyone... the Crusades... the Inquisition... good times, eh?
Probably only set scientific progress back by 500 years

Well thanks to the Bible doctors thought for 1000 years that women had two vaginas. Anything more to add? ^^

Too many things to list....It is mind boggling.

How do they think the Bible was written? Angels whispered wisdom to whoever was listening, then those people actually wrote this down?
Or they believe God came down, became human and wrote this down, or the books just appeared?

Seriously, I'd like to know. Moloch, do you know? What is the story behind this story.

I'm not clear who actually wrote this shit.

Christians used to believe that God wrote it himself... basically through spirit possession of Moses, etc (nevermind the fact that the bible was put together in 331CE, after some dudes in a dark room voted on which books to include... how can you vote on which books God wrote?)

Then science came along and proved a few things are factually incorrect in the bible...

This led Christians to start calling it, "divinely inspired"... because it can't be God's perfect word if it isn't perfect, right?

Reminds me of Global Warming changing the name to Climate Change... After 14 years of no warming... they had to change the name...
(yeah, I'm one of those guys who doesn't believe CO2 causes global warming... basically for the same reason I deny religion, lack of scientifically acceptable evidence)

Note: Global Warming/Climate Change also uses similar tactics to religion... like, "97% of scientists believe it, so you should too" (hint: this is not an acceptable form of evidence, also a lie... complete lie... twisting of words... that statement is not factually accurate in any way)

Moloch

hero member

Activity: 798

Merit: 722

Would any self-respecting God write a book where he kills millions of people (many of them innocent)?

Seriously now... God is the worst supervillian in the bible... Satan kills 1 person, and God kills 10,000,000...

What makes you think God wrote the bible? Is there any evidence that God wrote it?

Judging by how evil this God character is portrayed in the book... It sounds it was written by his enemy, to make him sound like a murdering lunatic

valta4065

hero member

Activity: 826

Merit: 500

Join @Bountycloud for the best bounties!

Quote from: Moloch on February 19, 2016, 04:44:23 PM

Quote from: youdamushi on February 19, 2016, 04:40:24 PM

Quote from: Moloch on February 19, 2016, 04:23:10 PM

Quote from: eon89 on February 19, 2016, 04:21:12 PM

And in the Middle Ages people were afraid of tomatoes because they were red. We learn and grow. Same thing.

Hahaha... The Middle Ages were not even that long ago... and they used leeches as medicine... to suck that evil blood out of your body... because, yeah, that makes sense...

Then ya think... hmmm... the bible was written 1500+ years BEFORE THE MIDDLE AGES

And is responsible for midle age in fact. Without the Bible there would have been no Midle age when you think about it

Close... without the bible there would be no Dark Ages... though, you could argue that the Dark Ages are the Middle Ages... so I suppose you are partially correct...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_Ages_(historiography)

I however, would have preferred to skip the Dark Ages... full of Christians killing everyone... the Crusades... the Inquisition... good times, eh?
Probably only set scientific progress back by 500 years

Well thanks to the Bible doctors thought for 1000 years that women had two vaginas. Anything more to add? ^^

Moloch

hero member

Activity: 798

Merit: 722

af_newbie

legendary

Activity: 2702

Merit: 1468

Quote from: BADecker on February 18, 2016, 06:03:47 PM

Quote from: af_newbie on February 18, 2016, 06:01:13 PM

Quote from: BADecker on February 18, 2016, 05:57:39 PM

Quote from: af_newbie on February 18, 2016, 05:29:01 PM

Quote from: CreativeCarol on February 18, 2016, 05:20:05 PM

Religion can be a touchy subject. We don't know if a god exists or not, so in my belief it's best to stay in between which would be agnostic.

The point is it should not be. There is nothing, absolutely nothing sacred about these irrational beliefs.

If someone can demonstrate that God physically (not just in their mind) exist, we can all move on and accept it.

If he existed we would not need faith.

Especially about the religious beliefs of the atheism religion. Cool

Making new definitions as we go along....

BTW, I'm a humanist and anti-theist. I'm pretty sure I'm not religious.

You believe that God exists? Starting when? Cool

No wonder you have problem with Bible verses. You cannot read and understand my posts. But I'm not judging....I'll give a minute to google the terms...

Moloch

hero member

Activity: 798

Merit: 722

Quote from: youdamushi on February 19, 2016, 04:40:24 PM

Quote from: Moloch on February 19, 2016, 04:23:10 PM

Quote from: eon89 on February 19, 2016, 04:21:12 PM

And in the Middle Ages people were afraid of tomatoes because they were red. We learn and grow. Same thing.

Hahaha... The Middle Ages were not even that long ago... and they used leeches as medicine... to suck that evil blood out of your body... because, yeah, that makes sense...

Then ya think... hmmm... the bible was written 1500+ years BEFORE THE MIDDLE AGES

And is responsible for midle age in fact. Without the Bible there would have been no Midle age when you think about it

Close... without the bible there would be no Dark Ages... though, you could argue that the Dark Ages are the Middle Ages... so I suppose you are partially correct...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_Ages_(historiography)

I however, would have preferred to skip the Dark Ages... full of Christians killing everyone... the Crusades... the Inquisition... good times, eh?
Probably only set scientific progress back by 500 years

youdamushi

sr. member

Activity: 392

Merit: 250

Quote from: Moloch on February 19, 2016, 04:23:10 PM

Quote from: eon89 on February 19, 2016, 04:21:12 PM

And in the Middle Ages people were afraid of tomatoes because they were red. We learn and grow. Same thing.

Hahaha... The Middle Ages were not even that long ago... and they used leeches as medicine... to suck that evil blood out of your body... because, yeah, that makes sense...

Then ya think... hmmm... the bible was written 1500+ years BEFORE THE MIDDLE AGES

And is responsible for midle age in fact. Without the Bible there would have been no Midle age when you think about it Wink

Moloch

hero member

Activity: 798

Merit: 722

Quote from: eon89 on February 19, 2016, 04:21:12 PM

And in the Middle Ages people were afraid of tomatoes because they were red. We learn and grow. Same thing.

Hahaha... The Middle Ages were not even that long ago... and they used leeches as medicine... to suck that evil blood out of your body... because, yeah, that makes sense...

Then ya think... hmmm... the bible was written 1500+ years BEFORE THE MIDDLE AGES

eon89

sr. member

Activity: 308

Merit: 292

★YoBit.Net★ 350+ Coins Exchange & Dice

And in the Middle Ages people were afraid of tomatoes because they were red and are from the devil. We learn and grow. Same thing.

af_newbie

legendary

Activity: 2702

Merit: 1468

Quote from: BADecker on February 18, 2016, 05:57:39 PM

Quote from: af_newbie on February 18, 2016, 05:29:01 PM

Quote from: CreativeCarol on February 18, 2016, 05:20:05 PM

Religion can be a touchy subject. We don't know if a god exists or not, so in my belief it's best to stay in between which would be agnostic.

The point is it should not be. There is nothing, absolutely nothing sacred about these irrational beliefs.

If someone can demonstrate that God physically (not just in their mind) exist, we can all move on and accept it.

If he existed we would not need faith.

Especially about the religious beliefs of the atheism religion. Cool

Making new definitions as we go along....

BTW, I'm a humanist and anti-theist. I'm pretty sure I'm not religious.

youdamushi

sr. member

Activity: 392

Merit: 250

Quote from: Moloch on February 19, 2016, 03:48:29 PM

Quote from: eon89 on February 19, 2016, 03:39:44 PM

It's sad that he has to.
How about if they would've named it the huckelberry particle?
Jeez...

The joke is that, "The God Particle", is science making fun of religion...

Quote

Lederman explains in the book why he gave the Higgs boson the nickname "The God Particle":

This boson is so central to the state of physics today, so crucial to our final understanding of the structure of matter, yet so elusive, that I have given it a nickname: the God Particle. Why God Particle? Two reasons. One, the publisher wouldn't let us call it the Goddamn Particle, though that might be a more appropriate title, given its villainous nature and the expense it is causing. And two, there is a connection, of sorts, to another book, a much older one...

Yeah that's the point with God Particle. They don't even know what it is!
To be honest I'm not even sure of what it is neither, but I don't pretend it's the proof of the existence of God xD

eon89

sr. member

Activity: 308

Merit: 292

★YoBit.Net★ 350+ Coins Exchange & Dice

He couldn't have been more obvious than that.

af_newbie

legendary

Activity: 2702

Merit: 1468

Quote from: CreativeCarol on February 18, 2016, 05:20:05 PM

Religion can be a touchy subject. We don't know if a god exists or not, so in my belief it's best to stay in between which would be agnostic.

The point is it should not be. There is nothing, absolutely nothing sacred about these irrational beliefs.

If someone can demonstrate that God physically (not just in their mind) exist, we can all move on and accept it.

If he existed we would not need faith.

Moloch

hero member

Activity: 798

Merit: 722

Quote from: eon89 on February 19, 2016, 03:39:44 PM

It's sad that he has to.
How about if they would've named it the huckelberry particle?
Jeez...

The joke is that, "The God Particle", is science making fun of religion...

Quote

Lederman explains in the book why he gave the Higgs boson the nickname "The God Particle":

This boson is so central to the state of physics today, so crucial to our final understanding of the structure of matter, yet so elusive, that I have given it a nickname: the God Particle. Why God Particle? Two reasons. One, the publisher wouldn't let us call it the Goddamn Particle, though that might be a more appropriate title, given its villainous nature and the expense it is causing. And two, there is a connection, of sorts, to another book, a much older one...

yugo23

sr. member

Activity: 476

Merit: 252

Quote from: eon89 on February 19, 2016, 03:39:44 PM

It's sad that he has to.
How about if they would've named it the huckelberry particle?
Jeez...

They don't care about what this particle means (and it's not a really important particle anyway). There is just the name that's enough for them.

eon89

sr. member

Activity: 308

Merit: 292

★YoBit.Net★ 350+ Coins Exchange & Dice

It's sad that he has to.
How about if they would've named it the huckelberry particle?
Jeez...

af_newbie

legendary

Activity: 2702

Merit: 1468

Quote from: valta4065 on February 18, 2016, 01:31:21 PM

Quote from: af_newbie on February 18, 2016, 12:15:19 PM

Even if you eradicate the hosts, you still did not kill the virus.

You have to kill the idea. That is your virus.

So that nobody in their right mind would believe in these myths in the future.

Today, nobody would believe Zeus has any power. In the future, same thing will happen to Allah, Christian God(s) or thousands of other Gods.

That's an interesting idea.
What would happen if you'd kill all the religious?
Would another religion emerge?
The religions today survive nearly only from tradition. If you destroy them and the tradition, do you think the virus could come back?

It depends on the culture/community. Religions are usually developed in that context. Education is the key.
If you leave parts of the world behind science and technology, then yes, people will revert to ancient belief systems because there will be nothing to explain the world they observe.

Religion is a survival mechanism we used to explain unexplained, potentially dangerous situations.

yugo23

sr. member

Activity: 476

Merit: 252

Quote from: ?? on ??

Quote from: yugo23 on February 19, 2016, 09:45:55 AM

Quote from: srinikethan on February 19, 2016, 02:07:29 AM

yes god does exists...there are many proofs that god exists...even after the discovery of god partical many people still questions the existance of god:(

DUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUDE xD

You're so deep in the stupidity that I don't even understand how you can do? xD

You're doing quite well, and you know that, don't you? You are doing the only thing you have left that you can do, pick on poor srinikethan. I mean, since God has been proven to exist, and since you are too chicken to go out and commit suicide to get it over with faster, you do the only thing you have left... badmouth poor srinikethan, and anybody like him.

Cool

It's just that he says something incredibly stupid. It's obvious that scientists named it the God particle in a sarcastic way...

Topic: Proof that God exists - page 39. (Read 62273 times)