I had to re-install one machine and that was fine afterwards, the other still acts weird,
I'll check things out later on
Topic: python OpenCL bitcoin miner - page 10. (Read 1239060 times)
Clue - '-f' value (rise it)
I have them at -f40 at first and -f2 on second card
I have them at -f40 at first and -f2 on second card
Best miner I've ever used. Hands down. Thank you so much!
I've just started up a couple of machines with ubuntu 11.04 and dual ATI card on each - the machines are used for general work ,
however both of them using
the latest everything seem only to use one GPU core
I start 2 miners off .
start the 1st miner - it runs OK - 98% GPU usage - good temps
start the 2nd miner off , and it only uses about 7-15% GPU and the 1st miner slows down to a corresponding amount
any clues ?
This means new version no longer uses old kernel? Or is there any option to select it? (If no please add one, cuz Im getting better results with version one on one card and better with old version on other one AND I still want to use guiminer)
In GUIminer folder, go to kernels ->phatk & in kernel.cl edit the line as said in other post.Also, you can edit, kernels -> poclbm , kernel.cl
No need to download or wait for new GUIminer for this performance increase.
I know how to do it and I already done it. Thing is that new version has build-in fallover system, but phatk kernel causes lower GPU usage than old one (while using 2 cards). So after all its slower for me.
This happend after changing the miner with the latest version, Windows 7 x64:
GUIMiner won't starts
Quote
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "guiminer.py", line 14, in
ImportError: No module named wx
File "guiminer.py", line 14, in
ImportError: No module named wx
GUIMiner won't starts
New release (2011-06-27) : https://github.com/downloads/m0mchil/poclbm/poclbm_py2exe_20110627.7z
Added an improvement in kernel (use phatk with modification of Ma formula).
+3% hashrate in average.
Added an improvement in kernel (use phatk with modification of Ma formula).
+3% hashrate in average.
Can you re-add the old kernel as an optional kernel? My mac doesn't appear to work with the phatk kernel (lots of failed validation messages).
For now, I just am using the previous revision from SVN, but would like to continue to receive other future improvements and don't really want to maintain my own fork.
Thanks!
New version is up.
It doesn't work:Code:
mining.eligius.st:8337 28/06/2011 00:53:49, Setting pool 1GEJfZRPrK2BLSSx3r6gwtuFxCUvq3QytN @ mining.eligius.st:8337
Killed
It incorporates improvements from many developers.
You forgot mine.Phateus - phatk kernel 124RraPqYcEpX5qFcQ2ZBVD9MqUamfyQnv
This is probably the problem. Phoenix with phatk also Killed-crashes.laanwj - sleep per frame
What does this actually do? 
Gigabyte 5870 875gpu,300mem,1.140v went from 384 to 399
Gigabyte 5830 875gpu,333mem,1.140v went from 264 to 280
Gigabyte 5830 899gpu,333mem,1.140v went from 274 to 287
I liked the statistical displays of the FPGAMINER, Luke-Jr and tweeks by ULEE
Thanks to all of you-Great Work
Gigabyte 5830 875gpu,333mem,1.140v went from 264 to 280
Gigabyte 5830 899gpu,333mem,1.140v went from 274 to 287
I liked the statistical displays of the FPGAMINER, Luke-Jr and tweeks by ULEE
Thanks to all of you-Great Work
This means new version no longer uses old kernel? Or is there any option to select it? (If no please add one, cuz Im getting better results with version one on one card and better with old version on other one AND I still want to use guiminer)
In GUIminer folder, go to kernels ->phatk & in kernel.cl edit the line as said in other post.Also, you can edit, kernels -> poclbm , kernel.cl
No need to download or wait for new GUIminer for this performance increase.
This means new version no longer uses old kernel? Or is there any option to select it? (If no please add one, cuz Im getting better results with version one on one card and better with old version on other one AND I still want to use guiminer)
also got a performance hit on nvidia.
New release (2011-06-27) : https://github.com/downloads/m0mchil/poclbm/poclbm_py2exe_20110627.7z
Added an improvement in kernel (use phatk with modification of Ma formula).
+3% hashrate in average.
Added an improvement in kernel (use phatk with modification of Ma formula).
+3% hashrate in average.
For me 275 gtx mining, from previous 20110428 to current 20110627 -> -12% performance.
New version is up. It incorporates improvements from many developers.
Kudos go to:
Phateus - phatk kernel 124RraPqYcEpX5qFcQ2ZBVD9MqUamfyQnv
fpgaminer - Using poclbm With The phatk Kernel 1NT4RyJMqtRuDRr6zHdXdKSpmX3SR5he6z
bitless, rethaw - 3% faster mining 15igh5HkCXwvvan4aiPYSYZwJZbHxGBYwB
Kyle Gibson - Fallback mining pool(s) 1BdWJEUCkm6on231iX2ThXZHXZDfQny69R
laanwj - sleep per frame
Kudos go to:
Phateus - phatk kernel 124RraPqYcEpX5qFcQ2ZBVD9MqUamfyQnv
fpgaminer - Using poclbm With The phatk Kernel 1NT4RyJMqtRuDRr6zHdXdKSpmX3SR5he6z
bitless, rethaw - 3% faster mining 15igh5HkCXwvvan4aiPYSYZwJZbHxGBYwB
Kyle Gibson - Fallback mining pool(s) 1BdWJEUCkm6on231iX2ThXZHXZDfQny69R
laanwj - sleep per frame
I found an error in newest GIT (June 17, 2011).
which error
I found an error in newest GIT (June 17, 2011).
Code:
deepbit.net:8332 23/06/2011 19:01:15, 8617ca99, accepted
deepbit.net:8332 23/06/2011 19:02:50, 665986ba, accepted
deepbit.net:8332 23/06/2011 19:05:20, long poll: new block 000003d711afefc1
deepbit.net:8332 23/06/2011 19:05:27, Using new LP URL /listenChannel
deepbit.net:8332 23/06/2011 19:05:27, LP connected to deepbit.net:8332
deepbit.net:8332 23/06/2011 19:05:37, long poll: new block 0000110787893cdb
deepbit.net:8332 23/06/2011 19:05:43, Using new LP URL /listenChannel
deepbit.net:8332 23/06/2011 19:05:43, LP connected to deepbit.net:8332
deepbit.net:8332 23/06/2011 19:07:22, long poll: new block 0000065c454db6b4
deepbit.net:8332 23/06/2011 19:07:28, Using new LP URL /listenChannel
deepbit.net:8332 23/06/2011 19:07:28, LP connected to deepbit.net:8332
deepbit.net:8332 23/06/2011 19:08:56, long poll: new block 000004edee027877
deepbit.net:8332 23/06/2011 19:09:02, Using new LP URL /listenChannel
deepbit.net:8332 23/06/2011 19:09:02, LP connected to deepbit.net:8332
deepbit.net:8332 23/06/2011 19:11:37, d3627bf3, accepted
deepbit.net:8332 23/06/2011 19:12:30, long poll: new block 00001214acf5b4c8
deepbit.net:8332 23/06/2011 19:12:36, Using new LP URL /listenChannel
deepbit.net:8332 23/06/2011 19:12:36, LP connected to deepbit.net:8332
deepbit.net:8332 23/06/2011 19:12:48, 4b7aea48, accepted
deepbit.net:8332 23/06/2011 19:13:30, 26100840, accepted
deepbit.net:8332 23/06/2011 19:13:44, 4196b69e, accepted
deepbit.net:8332 23/06/2011 19:14:35, c64e9b09, accepted
deepbit.net:8332 23/06/2011 19:14:48, 66bc4256, accepted
deepbit.net:8332 23/06/2011 19:20:00, long poll: new block 00000df42b538904
deepbit.net:8332 23/06/2011 19:20:01, Using new LP URL /listenChannel
deepbit.net:8332 23/06/2011 19:20:01, LP connected to deepbit.net:8332
deepbit.net:8332 23/06/2011 19:23:46, long poll: new block 0000009efde53e3e
deepbit.net:8332 23/06/2011 19:23:53, Using new LP URL /listenChannel
deepbit.net:8332 23/06/2011 19:23:53, LP connected to deepbit.net:8332
deepbit.net:8332 31526 khash/s^C
Is target difficulty of 1 hardcoded into this client? I'm experimenting with pools that vary share difficulty and am getting unexpected results.
As an update, they have added poclbm as a false positive in their next update; so anyone using Malwarebytes will not accidentally remove their bitcoin miner. 
So, it would appear that Malware-bytes has listed Poclbm as a trojan. I've taken the liberty of sending in a false positive report already. If anyone wants to back me up, the post is here http://forums.malwarebytes.org/index.php?showtopic=87882. It'll also keep you up-to-date on what's going on with them. Should they deny the request, feel free to ask them again yourselves since I know many of these anti-malware companies get a little headstrong and need some convincing.
Jump to: