I don't think the government's furious approach to ICO regulation is the best way to get rid of scams. To implement the search for good projects, it is necessary to create an intermediary organization that will be independent of the government, but will provide arbitration services and protection of ICO investors.
ICO regulation might just stop some of the scammers who are fake developing the project. But what about other normal people who scams through various ways? They need to be stopped, but the only was is to be careful. If you involve an intermediary organization, you are just making the system somewhat centralized. This also causes issue for those who want to stay private. We just need to bring out a better solution. 
Topic: Reducing scam - page 12. (Read 17916 times)
It is likely that over time, something in this industry may change. But while the main rule for reducing the risk of fraud and losing money is that we must continue to learn, be attentive to the choice of suitable projects for investment. So we can significantly complicate the lives of fraudsters.
I think that this problem can be solved once and for all only through the creation of relevant legislation within each country, these laws should also comply with the policies of all other countries so that it does not happen that one side has some one position and the second country - have is radically opposite position about this.
Reduction of fraud will occur only after a tight regulation of the work of ICO projects begins in the crypto space. First of all, the United States, China and Russia should be involved in this process. This will move the crypto market into a big leap up.
Kind time of the day, with every day in ICO we meet more and more fraud. It is clear that no one forces us to invest in these projects. But the idea of a cryptocurrency does not imply any regulatory department. What do you think that could help in solving this problem? I just see only that the advisors were responsible, or they took a pledge from the projects they are entering.
Sometimes a team is only one crook, and it restores the game just before the end of the ICO. This means that investors may not be aware of it before.
i think its very hard to deal with this one - reducing scam, everyday new project are coming out but we cannot determine properly which one is fraud or which one is true.. i think the best term is avoiding them..
Yet there is much that can be done in this regard. ICO scams continue to exist and to be able to avoid or anticipate this is not an easy thing to do. scam keeps popping up and the policy for this does not yet exist. Maybe if the crypto will have become increasingly large naturally there would be regulation in this regard.
Hi guys!
I would love to connect with your professional network. I hope you are fine.
I'm Michael Zasidkevich, co-founder TOPExperts.io. It's the first transparent rating of experts and projects in the ICO/STO market.
Please give us your feedback about usability TOPExperts - https://app.usabilityhub.com/do/81a697bcc809/936
So we can make TOPExperts ratings more convenient and understandable.
Your opinion is very important to us. Thanks
I would love to connect with your professional network. I hope you are fine.
I'm Michael Zasidkevich, co-founder TOPExperts.io. It's the first transparent rating of experts and projects in the ICO/STO market.
Please give us your feedback about usability TOPExperts - https://app.usabilityhub.com/do/81a697bcc809/936
So we can make TOPExperts ratings more convenient and understandable.
Your opinion is very important to us. Thanks
Kind time of the day, with every day in ICO we meet more and more fraud. It is clear that no one forces us to invest in these projects. But the idea of a cryptocurrency does not imply any regulatory department. What do you think that could help in solving this problem? I just see only that the advisors were responsible, or they took a pledge from the projects they are entering.
The market is getting worse, and the ICOs are getting less and fewer scam projects as they are no longer as good as 2017. ICO projects are always available, but investors are investing in one. How stupid and uninterested in verifying whether a project exists or not, they look at the promise of profit. 
Kind time of the day, with every day in ICO we meet more and more fraud. It is clear that no one forces us to invest in these projects. But the idea of a cryptocurrency does not imply any regulatory department. What do you think that could help in solving this problem? I just see only that the advisors were responsible, or they took a pledge from the projects they are entering.
I have written an article about here: rICO - an ICO where you can reclaim your ETH?It's a new concept of ICO where you can get back your ETH after the ICO was closed if you are not confident in the project anymore. I hope some ICOs will try it, it will reduce scams for sure.
Kind time of the day, with every day in ICO we meet more and more fraud. It is clear that no one forces us to invest in these projects. But the idea of a cryptocurrency does not imply any regulatory department. What do you think that could help in solving this problem? I just see only that the advisors were responsible, or they took a pledge from the projects they are entering.
I guess the people should be more responsible personally, and also, there should be some regulations that will restricts the ICO to just implement their product without further test. In this case, there would be limited ICO in the market but is surely not scam.
The crypto space is a decentralized network and it will e hard to stop it then some measures can be applied to reduce it by applying regulations which is happening currently though it won't apply for every country.
It may take time till we have a systematic decentralized framework through which we can detect scam projects and ICOs. There are some simple ways we can use to know the true and authentic projects and ICOs by reading the whitepaper, for example, and the roadmap which have detailed technical info.
Yes, unclear regulations about Ico make many fraudsters easy to commit fraud. We must be careful, so we don't get trapped easily. In-depth analysis of realistic projects, competent teams, etc. must be maximized. Don't forget to check the sub forum Scam Accusations for consideration.
I don't think the government's furious approach to ICO regulation is the best way to get rid of scams. To implement the search for good projects, it is necessary to create an intermediary organization that will be independent of the government, but will provide arbitration services and protection of ICO investors.
It may take time till we have a systematic decentralized framework through which we can detect scam projects and ICOs. There are some simple ways we can use to know the true and authentic projects and ICOs by reading the whitepaper, for example, and the roadmap which have detailed technical info.
Do you know the Centra Card? this is one of the best and most popular platforms of its time. They have concepts, roadmaps, and whitepapers which is very clear, even their tokens have been listed in several large exchanges such as binance, but in fact it is a fraudulent project. So I think to determine whether an ICO is scam or not, just looking at the document is not enough. Kind time of the day, with every day in ICO we meet more and more fraud. It is clear that no one forces us to invest in these projects. But the idea of a cryptocurrency does not imply any regulatory department. What do you think that could help in solving this problem? I just see only that the advisors were responsible, or they took a pledge from the projects they are entering.
Decentralized cryptocurrency does not imply regulation only in the basic principles of its existence. However, states can fully regulate the order and conditions of cryptocurrency circulation on their territory. Moreover, fraud in the ICO is a crime and the state is obliged to intervene in the process of the ICO, in order to prevent the commission of new crimes. Therefore, the activities of the ICO will be regulated by the states in any case, and many states have already begun to create the appropriate bills. 
Kind time of the day, with every day in ICO we meet more and more fraud. It is clear that no one forces us to invest in these projects. But the idea of a cryptocurrency does not imply any regulatory department. What do you think that could help in solving this problem? I just see only that the advisors were responsible, or they took a pledge from the projects they are entering.
you think that we should find responsible? i guess it's us who are responsible because it is our decisions. it's up to us to investigate what is fraud and what is not, don't you think so?Kind time of the day, with every day in ICO we meet more and more fraud. It is clear that no one forces us to invest in these projects. But the idea of a cryptocurrency does not imply any regulatory department. What do you think that could help in solving this problem? I just see only that the advisors were responsible, or they took a pledge from the projects they are entering.
you think that we should find responsible? i guess it's us who are responsible because it is our decisions. it's up to us to investigate what is fraud and what is not, don't you think so? Kind time of the day, with every day in ICO we meet more and more fraud. It is clear that no one forces us to invest in these projects. But the idea of a cryptocurrency does not imply any regulatory department. What do you think that could help in solving this problem? I just see only that the advisors were responsible, or they took a pledge from the projects they are entering.
scamming is a serious problem and i would even say one of the most serious right now as many people suffering from this lose money It may take time till we have a systematic decentralized framework through which we can detect scam projects and ICOs. There are some simple ways we can use to know the true and authentic projects and ICOs by reading the whitepaper, for example, and the roadmap which have detailed technical info.
Jump to: