Topic: ▄▀▄▀▄ Remove Corruption From DT - Union Trust List ▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀&#9604 - page 11. (Read 8058 times)

At least you appreciate the work I did It's not exactly how I imagined it to be used, but hey, it's something
But you're not using it's full potential: I've added a link to BBCode for posting here. Don't forget to include the reference link though (it's at the bottom), I'd hate to get you banned.

Trust list for: Deena (37 Merit earned) (Trust feedback) (BPIP)
Back to index (created 2019-02-03 Sun 00.08h)

Deena is Trusted by:
Thule (20 Merit earned) (Trust feedback) (Trust list) (BPIP)
endlasuresh (3 Merit earned) (Trust feedback) (Trust list) (BPIP)
DutchFinity (2 Merit earned) (Trust feedback) (Trust list) (BPIP)
Danica22 (0 Merit earned) (Trust feedback) (Trust list) (BPIP)
ac2eugenio (1 Merit earned) (Trust feedback) (Trust list) (BPIP)
mr.creampie (10 Merit earned) (Trust feedback) (Trust list) (BPIP)
chickinini (11 Merit earned) (Trust feedback) (Trust list) (BPIP)
cryptorgasm (4 Merit earned) (Trust feedback) (Trust list) (BPIP)
TinaMoran (10 Merit earned) (Trust feedback) (Trust list) (BPIP)
Pablojob (10 Merit earned) (Trust feedback) (Trust list) (BPIP)
PiningGarcia (10 Merit earned) (Trust feedback) (Trust list) (BPIP)
PingGermoco (10 Merit earned) (Trust feedback) (Trust list) (BPIP)
NilaMutac (10 Merit earned) (Trust feedback) (Trust list) (BPIP)
cryptopov (4 Merit earned) (Trust feedback) (Trust list) (BPIP)
poypototoy (10 Merit earned) (Trust feedback) (Trust list) (BPIP)
BRAHN (0 Merit earned) (Trust feedback) (Trust list) (BPIP)
Zin-Zang (10 Merit earned) (Trust feedback) (Trust list) (BPIP)
H8bussesNbicycles (5 Merit earned) (Trust feedback) (Trust list) (BPIP)
gwsukabokepjepang (0 Merit earned) (Trust feedback) (Trust list) (BPIP)

Trust list: backscratchers: users agree, they trust or distrust each other.
Trust list: backstabbers: users disagree, one user trust the other, while the other doesn't trust him.

Source: LoyceV's Trust list viewer.
Get your own Trust list in BBCode at loyce.club/trust

I don't get why I'm on your list though. I'm Switzerland

very nice
will push a couople of the list to dt1 surely
not bad start for few days


may fundraise for 250 votes if need


clean merits expensive
dirty merits cheap

Nice to hear you take this as an entertaining show about the abusive behavior you personally support in these days.

Only this sentence of yours show's that you want to have control of the trust system and you know most of the people are ass lickers here and afraid to speak against your abusive activities.

You should not worry anyway as this will surely stop when theymos realizes you're manipulative tack-ticks on trust.


I would be very happy to do so.

Are you afraid anyone will get there very soon and put all of you lauda ass-lickers down ?

I can feel your fear by the way!

---

Its a pleasure!

dont know how trust system work ?
many on list have 250 merit votes but need 10s



more 250s will come or i will buy them

very honorable stingers thank you i will not forget you


as the creator of this thread i am starting this cause and need 5more merit to have a vote
deena needs 2 more merit only for another vote


if you would like to contribute merit to the effort here is a good list

fucking decent




stingers added to list




on the list

Sorry, for late support but I am also a victim of the trust abuse in the past. You can check my case on my trust feedback. It was a total harassment by DT and especially Lauda on me to put me down and out of this business.

A contribution from my side would be a bunch of merits, as per the discussion in this thread merit is one of the most important part to vote for the DT and change it. I have some smerits to award for all the trust abuse supportive here.

You need 10 earned merits to vote right?

I can provide you with that to be eligible for voting. Not many but some of the supportive and abused, Jr.member and newbies can vote because of my help which is an honour for me.

Thule, don't let this  untrustworthy individual by his own definition/diagnosis bother you.

He supports proven liars on DT. I mean he even supports Tman --- enought said.

Calls me a lunatic but can not present anything that I have said that is incorrect. Whilst he has been demonstrated to make some of the most ludicrous statements ever and then stick by them even when given the opportunity to pretend it must be a typo or some other (meta board only) believable excuse.

You simply can not be nice or trust this person at all. I once tried to treat him with some respect and be nice to him but sadly that did not work out well it seemed to upset him even more and inspire more caustic treatment in return. He is like a lot of persons bullied in RL -- deeply damaged and upset. You can tell this by his posting style. He is mostly a very aggressive poster always ready to deride noobs and those he feels he can get away with it.

His English is more than reasonable hence why he is quite able to fool many that his posts contain some value. However once you pull them apart his mind is quite fragile and defensive. He will then often just break down and start spurting nonsense.

Best to not waste time on his bile. Immediately bitch slap him with observable truth that demonstrates his double standards and untrustworthy nature. Present the evidence of Lauda lying, then ask him to validate in public that evidence and that it clearly demonstrates a lie and untrustworthy behaviour then ask why he is supporting lauda on DT. Same for asking him in public to comment on his other inclusions like the pharmacist aka huge black woman and tman a self confessed trust abuser.

Keep in mind Suchmoon red trusts people for supporting/promoting "possible scams". Suchmoon himself meanwhile supports a proven liar, a self confessed trust abuser and a sneaky greedy racist trolling sock puppet user.  Then just offer to debate it all in public step by step before you can accept anything he says as truth and enter any other discussion or debate. Soon you will hear nothing more from suchmoon.

He targets the weak and tries to use the only tool at his disposal (reasonable command of English) coupled with his caustic tone and cherry picking "parts" of your post to mislead people into believing his arguments have some kind of substance. When that fails he just collapses into making ludicrous statements. I have often felt sorry for him and told him to have a rest and relax after a much heated demonstration of his mind collapsing from either fatigue or just some part of it is likely defective. I have genuinely worried about him in the past.

which reply ?I haven't deleted anything

Making money online is no shame.Its just about the way you get it.

They had a similar moron like you on that forum.

He was the so called "youtube" guru.
Made thousands of posts without real value had tons of reputations thanks to his buddies and sold crap services.

Since you are spending most of the time on that forum it must be benficial for you.Else i doubt you would be able to spend so much time here.
Based on your info it seems you live in a country with lower average income.
Would make sense to spend so much time here to create an online income.

Isn't it ?


Oh forgat to mention it.
He tried hard to get a Mod but never made it.
You know services of Mod's are highly trusted and increase massivly the demand.

He is not dirty.He allowed to buy ad space for the special thread.I would claim myself he has not much experience in running big forums even he runs BCT since every owner which forum gets main stream has the same issues like BCT.
And its always the same what is happing.A small group (mainly losers) who are abusing the reputation system to gain massiv reputation in the community for only 3 purposes.
1)Milking the community
2)Destroying competition
3)Controlling their market and defaming anyone who is a threat.

I mean i'm working online fulltime since 1998 and have seen so many forums getting successfull and onces it goes mainstream these rats always come and try to take a big part of the cake.
I remember the marketing forum which is now the biggest online marketing forum in the world.I was a member there since 2007 (it was created 2006) and what happened is the owner changed and the forum went thanks to massiv marketing and its high quality content to the mainstream.Since noob flooded the forum people started selling their massivly overpriced marketing shit and every of these shit sellers tried to look like the biggest king who knows everything and has the biggest success where everyone of the senior knew these are just punks trying to milk the community.What they did is they created a reputation cycle and the reputation points started to explode.Normly people had to gain these points for really awesome posts.If you made an awesome post you got like 2-7 rep points depending on how good the thread was.
They instantly changed it and a single reputation vote of them was worth first 50 and later 100 reputation points.These fuckers had the highest reputation points and most amount of posts and thanks because of rehashed shit content they posted.
Its like a 1:1 copy with BCT.

And what happened at the end was that the abuse was so massiv so many old seniors got false banned that all seniors stopped posting on that forum.That forum turned completly into a noob forum cause seniors are not going to post for the benefit of a small group of punks.
Just have a look at that forum a few years ago you paid $100 for access to VIP Content produced by seniors.Today you pay $100 to support that forum since the content in the VIP Section is now worth shit.
The owner of that forum banned all of these abusers which later have been proofen there were in reputation cicle and made a lot of big scams where members mostly Buy/Sell/Trade members how been scammed out of big money and were all sitting calm because they knew once they say something they will lose their income.

How similar it is isn't it ?

To me he is. All the trust system and merit system designs were and are constructed to keep the scamming clique on top a the hierarchical ladder, even at the cost of the on this forum well cherised decentralisation. He's not a total idiot, is he? He can see the faul games that are being played on this forum. He's fully aware of it, no doubt. And he supports it to the full! He's got no principles and no integrity. Sad but true.

The army grows!

Long post but perhaps worth a read for anyone feeling they too are victims of trust abuse and that it is quite astounding how others seems to sanction it here even the admin.


For this entire system to work as theymos wants it to work he made a fatal error with the 250 earned merits. Therefore handing total control from his own seemingly fair hands into the hands of a gang of quite ruthless and blatantly untrustworthy members that have demonstrated in the past in black and white what they really are.


This has allowed the proven cyclers (whom I believe are mostly dishonest ratbags anyway for cycling it and now further backed up by the fact nobody on DT1 will even look at the evidence of a lie and admit it is indeed a lie, I mean that is evident many times when I have challenged or asked them in public to review the evidence with me- can they not see how blatantly broken that makes DT look) to gain the immediate control of both merit and trust.

Theymos originally proposed 100 earned merit which was a sensible amount because as I have clearly illustrated once you remove the top 0.13% of the boards self awarded merits many lose around 60-90% of their earned merits and only a handful would have 250 making it very very centralised, and actually centralised to the same group that you can see are very "gang" like on every thread if one of them gets challenged. We could all name them here with ease. They are riddled in each others bpip fans and recipients and all include exclude in a gang on the DT lists.

You have to wonder who pushed him to the 250 earned merits and why he even considered it and did not (if he wanted to tighten it up a bit ) add in some kind of activity threshold. WTF is merit to do with trust is another debate anyway. Some of these DT have been here 5 mins compared to years and years of history if he had put an activity threshold and lowered the earned (cycled merits). This again seems illogical. Since having years of activity to review vs 5 mins is like an obvious blunder.

Anyway forget DT - merit is the key here. Without 2 members having 250 earned merits DT is a no go unless we can ask theymos to explain in public whom pushed him to 250 earned merits and why he believes that does not centralise it to the same group that observably gang up and are guilty of lying, trust abuse and other proven shady devious acts.

Theymos to me is not dirty or corrupt ( i mean what does he gain ..he just wants a nicely functioning forum right) but he takes almost a machine approach to things - lauda is possibly net useful (i don't agree) so he allows the proven collateral damage lauda causes along the way for the possibly greater good.

 For me that is a mistake because negative events that are viewed as completely unfair and unjust by the victims cause huge energies of negativity much much more even than people who get scammed by a shit Ico they likely knew was huge risk to start with. People will not accept moral judgements (often immoral) from someone whom is proven a liar and very shrouded in dirty deeds himself.  That will just create an atmosphere of double standards and unfairness that will rage on and on.

Failing that we need to locate merit sources that are fair and are also annoyed at the double standards and blatant dishonest of the DT1 clan. Point them toward posts that are made by fair and honest individuals that are worthy of merit.


Right now the only method to stop them is as I have previously suggested above. Whenever possible (ie on topic and relevant) present the facts of their untrustworthy ways and provable lies at them. Eventually it will spoil their party here. People whom are proven liars do not get to call other people liars without presenting evidence. People whom are proven sock puppet racist trolls sig spammers simply do not get to lecture to people for financially motivated posting without that fact being presented. Sorry that double standards dirt is not going to wash. Imagine jeffrey dahmer in his prime years telling you how evil you are and you need red trust for not being a vegetarian.


The risk is of course is  more red tags (they can give them at this time for presenting facts demonstrating their own wrongdoing with no comeback) and even a ban if they pressure mods and theymos enough with the complaints about being factually reminded on topic that they are scum bags FOR REAL. 

Of course you more than likely have many friends that can join and voice their new facts that you were banned for presenting on topic and relevant facts and observable events that demonstrated untrustworthy behaviour.  Then again what is a lost account or 2 in the fight for freedom of speech and freedom from these trust abusers and their supporters and will give more ammunition for the corruption argument.

Also I know it is frustrating to see such injustice towards honest members like ourselves that have done many great things for this community in the past .... however I am now approaching the task of getting these scumbags off DT or at the very least crushing their abilities to abuse other persons unanswered with a less aggressive style. I think it works better and allows them less opportunity to cast off facts and observable events as the fabrications or inventions of a raging aggressive member who needs to be avoided even if they do have facts of abuse to present.

Sorry for the long post but it is something for us to consider if we are really serious about bringing about a fairer system here.

we are winning against the abusers
have made many votes
you can help if you add this list yourself too @BitcoinSupremo
your defeatist attitude with no vote will lose
VOTE


pms keep rolling in
more list adders every day and updaters
new dt1 any day now
vote while you still can for this month

Please add Timelord2067 to the abuse list.
He is making false tagging and also refuses to delete it instead is giving addiotional negative trust by simply copy past of old negative trust of other people

We can certainly win. Never give up.

As the number of abused increases then a union can be formed.

We can push for an entire change of the system that permits and even enforces this abuse of honest members.


1. find the threads they post in.
2. present only on topic and relevant facts demonstrating their untrustworthy natures and provide evidence to invalidate their future abuse of others.

There are going to be more abused than abusers.

This must continue until the system itself is altered and criteria given that eliminates this subjective and selfishly motivated abuse of honest members.

This is just the start. Abusers will not stop abusing until it is taken out of their control.

We must be careful of .

1. real scammers and untrustworthy must never join our union and that we NEVER defend their actions.
2. we stick only to presentation of facts and observable events that are relevant and on topic.
3. We do not just think of ourselves. We will not permit abuse of any honest person here. We will speak up and defend this abuse where it is clear abuse is taking place.
4. Not giving up or giving into to their  threats and gang tactics.

This union should have one clear mandate.

Ensure that the same fair and honest treatment is applied to ALL members of this board.

You can't win against abusers and by the way very few persons on DT are not trust abusers , this is a well known fact since 2016. I think you can spend your time more wisely rather than dealing with trust abusers. Just my two cents as a victim of trust abuse.

lets throw off these clowns!

vote against them!!!