It's reasonable to say that users dealing with him would be at risk, at the very least. If this one isn't within the guidelines, nothing is.
Topic: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! - page 25. (Read 49805 times)
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=64
It's reasonable to say that users dealing with him would be at risk, at the very least. If this one isn't within the guidelines, nothing is.
It's reasonable to say that users dealing with him would be at risk, at the very least. If this one isn't within the guidelines, nothing is.
I don't want to be the party stopper, and believe me, I want to see the scammers flagged once again, just make sure you do it right / valid.
I've read this and, while I'd like to see it widened (under certain limits/rules), currently it's a big "hmmm"...
It's just dumb. Anyone who was scammed, e.g. by an exchange has no direct contract and the third option can never be used. Also if no victim speaks out / creates a flag = no scam occurred. Astounding logic. Look at this request: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.51440061. Nobody who got scammed by YoBit as a exchange user can rightfully make this flag. I've read this and, while I'd like to see it widened (under certain limits/rules), currently it's a big "hmmm"...
Support this (weakest-flag type): https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=47.
You failed. The list of opposers will grow
How about someone who is advertising to sell bitcointalk accounts on a locked thread. Do they also apply in this case?
Lemme look for the link of some account seller i have just seen
If I understood correctly, you can only give him the first type of flag "Due to various concrete red flags, I believe that anyone dealing with this user has a high risk of losing money" - which is only shown to guests/newbies.Lemme look for the link of some account seller i have just seen
The other 2 cases are only valid if you are a victim of OP (scammed, deceived, etc). If he "violated a casual or implied agreement with me, resulting in damages" or "violated a written contract with me, resulting in damages".
How about someone who is advertising to sell bitcointalk accounts on a locked thread. Do they also apply in this case?
Assuming you haven't been scammed, you can use the Newbie warning Flag for those:Quote
Due to various concrete red flags, I believe that anyone dealing with this user has a high risk of losing money. (This flag will only be shown to guests/newbies.)
How about someone who is advertising to sell bitcointalk accounts on a locked thread. Do they also apply in this case?
Lemme look for the link of some account seller i have just seen
Sorry i have been away for some hours and I am just still learning about the new development.
Lemme look for the link of some account seller i have just seen
Sorry i have been away for some hours and I am just still learning about the new development.
TradeFortress flag: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=58
I have created a flag: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=58
I planned on creating a new scam accusation but I found an open topic that had my quote in the OP, which I have used as a reference: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/scam-accusation-tradefortress-inputsio-theymos-326879
Here is a post from my previously hacked account (couldn't quote it since it was posted in a locked thread):
That address leads to the inputs.io wallet, proving that I actually had funds stored there/lost money: https://www.walletexplorer.com/wallet/Inputs.io?from_address=1LH3aGsw5BzhPwbSANgfCnUXoS7XkK8fQM
I cannot recall the exact amount I had stored there. I contacted TF about a refund but I have never received a reply.
I planned on creating a new scam accusation but I found an open topic that had my quote in the OP, which I have used as a reference: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/scam-accusation-tradefortress-inputsio-theymos-326879
Here is a post from my previously hacked account (couldn't quote it since it was posted in a locked thread):
That address leads to the inputs.io wallet, proving that I actually had funds stored there/lost money: https://www.walletexplorer.com/wallet/Inputs.io?from_address=1LH3aGsw5BzhPwbSANgfCnUXoS7XkK8fQM
I cannot recall the exact amount I had stored there. I contacted TF about a refund but I have never received a reply.
I don't want to be the party stopper, and believe me, I want to see the scammers flagged once again, just make sure you do it right / valid.
I've read this and, while I'd like to see it widened (under certain limits/rules), currently it's a big "hmmm"...
It's just dumb.I've read this and, while I'd like to see it widened (under certain limits/rules), currently it's a big "hmmm"...
It's not me who you have to argue with. I wrote from start that "I'd like to see it widened (under certain limits/rules)". What I meant was exactly that under certain limits/rules some others should be able to also add flags.
I added the "rule" into discussion for 2 reasons:
1. Avoid (for now!) doing work that could be invalidated.
2. Discuss (with Theymos?) for better rules.
I don't want to be the party stopper
That's the part under "conditions apply". It has some strong limitations, but I assume theymos created those to restrict the use of Flags. It makes red trust a bit less strong, and the stronger Flag shouldn't be used for everything.Support this (weakest-flag type): https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=47.
In between all his red trust, he Repaid another 0.2 BTC no collateral loan. Therefore, I can't Support this Flag (but I won't Oppose it either). I don't want to be the party stopper, and believe me, I want to see the scammers flagged once again, just make sure you do it right / valid.
I've read this and, while I'd like to see it widened (under certain limits/rules), currently it's a big "hmmm"...
It's just dumb. Anyone who was scammed, e.g. by an exchange has no direct contract and the third option can never be used. Also if no victim speaks out / creates a flag = no scam occurred. Astounding logic. Look at this request: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.51440061. Nobody who got scammed by YoBit as a exchange user can rightfully make this flag. I've read this and, while I'd like to see it widened (under certain limits/rules), currently it's a big "hmmm"...
Support this (weakest-flag type): https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=47.
I don't want to be the party stopper, and believe me, I want to see the scammers flagged once again, just make sure you do it right / valid.
I've read this and, while I'd like to see it widened (under certain limits/rules), currently it's a big "hmmm"...
Correct.
I've read this and, while I'd like to see it widened (under certain limits/rules), currently it's a big "hmmm"...
Just to confirm, you are not allowed to create a contract violation flag unless you were personally harmed, correct?
Correct.
I ask at least 3 DT-members to support these Flags
Done for all 4 Accounts and supported.
I'll be the first:
I ask at least 3 DT-members to support these Flags
Theymos introduced Trust flags, which can be created by anyone (conditions apply!), but need support from at least 1 or 3 DT-members.
It looks like this:
How
Before creating a flag, please create a topic in Scam Accusations to use as Reference link. It can't be self-moderated, and it can't be locked.
I've seen many Flags that point to a generic topic, which makes it much more work to check the evidence. Stick to the facts, and keep it as short as possible without leaving things out.
If your Flag doesn't have enough support, feel free to post it here.
To anyone: please check the reference topic before deciding to Support or Oppose the flag. When in doubt, don't do anything.
Identify Flag types
Trust Flag viewer
See LoyceV's (Personal) Trust Flag viewer [daily updates] for details, or go to http://loyce.club/trust/flags/?C=M;O=D directly for the data. There's a very convenient "BBCode for Bitcointalk" link on top of the page, use the most recent one to post the Flag here.
You can now add comments to my Trust Flag viewer, see Post here to add comments to LoyceV's Trust Flag viewer.
No spam
Self moderated to stop spam.
Don't go off-topic.
Don't challenge the accused in this topic, do that in your Scam Accusation.
If this topic proves useful, I'll make a nicer OP. If not, I'll lock it.
It looks like this:
How
Before creating a flag, please create a topic in Scam Accusations to use as Reference link. It can't be self-moderated, and it can't be locked.
I've seen many Flags that point to a generic topic, which makes it much more work to check the evidence. Stick to the facts, and keep it as short as possible without leaving things out.
If your Flag doesn't have enough support, feel free to post it here.
To anyone: please check the reference topic before deciding to Support or Oppose the flag. When in doubt, don't do anything.
Identify Flag types
type 1. Newbie warning: 'alleges: Due largely to the factors mentioned'
Sample: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=29
WITHDRAWN: 'alleged the following, but later withdrew it: Due largely to the factors mentioned in'
Sample: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=37
type 2. Violated implied agreement: 'violated a casual or implied agreement, resulting in damages, in the specific act referenced'
Sample: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=30
WITHDRAWN: 'alleged the following, but later withdrew it:'
Sample: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=9
type 3. Violated written contract with damages: 'violated a written contract, resulting in damages, in the specific act referenced'
Sample: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=41
WITHDRAWN: 'alleged the following, but later withdrew it:'
Sample: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=35
Sample: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=29
WITHDRAWN: 'alleged the following, but later withdrew it: Due largely to the factors mentioned in'
Sample: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=37
type 2. Violated implied agreement: 'violated a casual or implied agreement, resulting in damages, in the specific act referenced'
Sample: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=30
WITHDRAWN: 'alleged the following, but later withdrew it:'
Sample: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=9
type 3. Violated written contract with damages: 'violated a written contract, resulting in damages, in the specific act referenced'
Sample: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=41
WITHDRAWN: 'alleged the following, but later withdrew it:'
Sample: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=35
Trust Flag viewer
See LoyceV's (Personal) Trust Flag viewer [daily updates] for details, or go to http://loyce.club/trust/flags/?C=M;O=D directly for the data. There's a very convenient "BBCode for Bitcointalk" link on top of the page, use the most recent one to post the Flag here.
You can now add comments to my Trust Flag viewer, see Post here to add comments to LoyceV's Trust Flag viewer.
No spam
Self moderated to stop spam.
Don't go off-topic.
Don't challenge the accused in this topic, do that in your Scam Accusation.
If this topic proves useful, I'll make a nicer OP. If not, I'll lock it.
Jump to: