Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! - page 26.

TheNewAnon135246

legendary

Activity: 2198

Merit: 1989

฿uy ฿itcoin

TradeFortress flag: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=58

Quote from: TheNewAnon135246 on June 12, 2019, 10:25:11 AM

I have created a flag: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=58

I planned on creating a new scam accusation but I found an open topic that had my quote in the OP, which I have used as a reference: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/scam-accusation-tradefortress-inputsio-theymos-326879

Here is a post from my previously hacked account (couldn't quote it since it was posted in a locked thread):

That address leads to the inputs.io wallet, proving that I actually had funds stored there/lost money: https://www.walletexplorer.com/wallet/Inputs.io?from_address=1LH3aGsw5BzhPwbSANgfCnUXoS7XkK8fQM

I cannot recall the exact amount I had stored there. I contacted TF about a refund but I have never received a reply.

Quickseller

copper member

Activity: 2996

Merit: 2374

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/--1046791

All of the people linked in the above thread.

Lauda

legendary

Activity: 2674

Merit: 3000

Terminated.

Quote from: Lauda on June 12, 2019, 06:53:04 AM

Support this (weakest-flag type): https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=47.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=49
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=50
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=51

NeuroticFish

legendary

Activity: 3668

Merit: 6382

Looking for campaign manager? Contact icopress!

Quote from: Lauda on June 12, 2019, 06:53:04 AM

Quote from: NeuroticFish on June 12, 2019, 06:47:45 AM

I don't want to be the party stopper, and believe me, I want to see the scammers flagged once again, just make sure you do it right / valid.
I've read this and, while I'd like to see it widened (under certain limits/rules), currently it's a big "hmmm"...

It's just dumb.

It's not me who you have to argue with. I wrote from start that "I'd like to see it widened (under certain limits/rules)". What I meant was exactly that under certain limits/rules some others should be able to also add flags.
I added the "rule" into discussion for 2 reasons:
1. Avoid (for now!) doing work that could be invalidated.
2. Discuss (with Theymos?) for better rules.

LoyceV

legendary

Activity: 3290

Merit: 16489

Thick-Skinned Gang Leader and Golden Feather 2021

Quote from: NeuroticFish on June 12, 2019, 06:47:45 AM

I don't want to be the party stopper

That's the part under "conditions apply". It has some strong limitations, but I assume theymos created those to restrict the use of Flags. It makes red trust a bit less strong, and the stronger Flag shouldn't be used for everything.

Quote from: Lauda on June 12, 2019, 06:53:04 AM

Support this (weakest-flag type): https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=47.

In between all his red trust, he Repaid another 0.2 BTC no collateral loan. Therefore, I can't Support this Flag (but I won't Oppose it either).

Lauda

legendary

Activity: 2674

Merit: 3000

Terminated.

Quote from: NeuroticFish on June 12, 2019, 06:47:45 AM

I don't want to be the party stopper, and believe me, I want to see the scammers flagged once again, just make sure you do it right / valid.
I've read this and, while I'd like to see it widened (under certain limits/rules), currently it's a big "hmmm"...

It's just dumb. Anyone who was scammed, e.g. by an exchange has no direct contract and the third option can never be used. Also if no victim speaks out / creates a flag = no scam occurred. Astounding logic. Look at this request: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.51440061. Nobody who got scammed by YoBit as a exchange user can rightfully make this flag.

Support this (weakest-flag type): https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=47.

NeuroticFish

legendary

Activity: 3668

Merit: 6382

Looking for campaign manager? Contact icopress!

I don't want to be the party stopper, and believe me, I want to see the scammers flagged once again, just make sure you do it right / valid.
I've read this and, while I'd like to see it widened (under certain limits/rules), currently it's a big "hmmm"...

Quote from: theymos on June 11, 2019, 11:09:00 PM

Quote from: DarkStar_ on June 11, 2019, 11:08:31 PM

Just to confirm, you are not allowed to create a contract violation flag unless you were personally harmed, correct?

Correct.

Lafu

legendary

Activity: 3220

Merit: 3509

Quote from: LoyceV on June 12, 2019, 04:40:44 AM

I ask at least 3 DT-members to support these Flags

Done for all 4 Accounts and supported.

LoyceV

legendary

Activity: 3290

Merit: 16489

Thick-Skinned Gang Leader and Golden Feather 2021

I'll be the first:

Quote from: LoyceV on March 20, 2019, 12:40:26 PM

I ask at least 3 DT-members to support these Flags

Quote from: LoyceV on June 12, 2019, 03:59:17 AM

Flags
Flag on BetKing.io
Flag on BetKing Support
Flag on PocketRocketsCasino
Flag on dean nolan

LoyceV

legendary

Activity: 3290

Merit: 16489

Thick-Skinned Gang Leader and Golden Feather 2021

Theymos introduced Trust flags, which can be created by anyone (conditions apply!), but need support from at least 1 or 3 DT-members.

It looks like this:

Quote from: hd49728 on June 11, 2019, 10:45:28 PM

How
Before creating a flag, please create a topic in Scam Accusations to use as Reference link. It can't be self-moderated, and it can't be locked.
I've seen many Flags that point to a generic topic, which makes it much more work to check the evidence. Stick to the facts, and keep it as short as possible without leaving things out.

If your Flag doesn't have enough support, feel free to post it here.
To anyone: please check the reference topic before deciding to Support or Oppose the flag. When in doubt, don't do anything.

Identify Flag types

Quote from: LoyceV on August 07, 2019, 08:41:49 AM

type 1. Newbie warning: 'alleges: Due largely to the factors mentioned'
   Sample: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=29
   WITHDRAWN: 'alleged the following, but later withdrew it: Due largely to the factors mentioned in'
   Sample: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=37

   type 2. Violated implied agreement: 'violated a casual or implied agreement, resulting in damages, in the specific act referenced'
   Sample: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=30
   WITHDRAWN: 'alleged the following, but later withdrew it:'
   Sample: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=9

   type 3. Violated written contract with damages: 'violated a written contract, resulting in damages, in the specific act referenced'
   Sample: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=41
   WITHDRAWN: 'alleged the following, but later withdrew it:'
   Sample: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=35

Trust Flag viewer
See LoyceV's (Personal) Trust Flag viewer [daily updates] for details, or go to http://loyce.club/trust/flags/?C=M;O=D directly for the data. There's a very convenient "BBCode for Bitcointalk" link on top of the page, use the most recent one to post the Flag here.
You can now add comments to my Trust Flag viewer, see Post here to add comments to LoyceV's Trust Flag viewer.

No spam
Self moderated to stop spam.
Don't go off-topic.
Don't challenge the accused in this topic, do that in your Scam Accusation.

If this topic proves useful, I'll make a nicer OP. If not, I'll lock it.

Topic: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! - page 26. (Read 50527 times)