Topic: Rewarding signature campaign, are you satisfied? - page 2. (Read 3945 times)
We have to follow their rules otherwise, they will not give any stakes but recently we have seen many companies are not allocating huge amounts to the Signature Campaign, because now many people are spreading the word but most of the people are spamming the forum based on this managers are closely watching people who are spread the word by wearing the signature. It is our wish whether to join the campaign or not.
15 posts a weeks is pretty easy if you really an active forum member, but it's hard if you are just looking for monry through bounty campaigns. By making 3 posts a day, you are able to complete your tasks, is that too hard? I have ever managed a bounty campaign and when my participant can't complete minimum amount of post, usually I will ask them to create more posts next week (In case they only created 9 posts this week while the minimum is 10 posts, I will credit them stakes for this week. Then next week they need to create minimum 11 posts to be able to get stakes)
This kind of rules should ease the campaign proccess, and need to be implemented for all campaign so that participants be able to earn what they should earn and also a project doesn't lose their influencers.
Being too strict sometimes would really give out some negative impressions as you as a manager.Im impress on how other managers do have consideration into their participants but as a bounty hunterThis kind of rules should ease the campaign proccess, and need to be implemented for all campaign so that participants be able to earn what they should earn and also a project doesn't lose their influencers.
complying rules or just following it is a really must thing for you not to be able to experience problems or lost of stakes. Rewards would vary yet each project would be entirely different and when it comes to price
it vary on the projects potential.
15 posts a weeks is pretty easy if you really an active forum member, but it's hard if you are just looking for monry through bounty campaigns.
If you are refering active forum member, I think no one continuously post, at least not those member who are here for learning. Only people who are earning post daily, this is why 15 posts is quite high for me. 
15 posts a weeks is pretty easy if you really an active forum member, but it's hard if you are just looking for monry through bounty campaigns. By making 3 posts a day, you are able to complete your tasks, is that too hard? I have ever managed a bounty campaign and when my participant can't complete minimum amount of post, usually I will ask them to create more posts next week (In case they only created 9 posts this week while the minimum is 10 posts, I will credit them stakes for this week. Then next week they need to create minimum 11 posts to be able to get stakes)
This kind of rules should ease the campaign proccess, and need to be implemented for all campaign so that participants be able to earn what they should earn and also a project doesn't lose their influencers.
This kind of rules should ease the campaign proccess, and need to be implemented for all campaign so that participants be able to earn what they should earn and also a project doesn't lose their influencers.
It's a hassle if there is a fixed amount more than 10, I would not join any of the altcoin signature campaign if they require to post atleast 15 per week because I may have been away and would not able to continue. However, I think good managers do some care sometimes.
15 post a week is not that hard to do, that's only 2 posts a day with only one day where you are going to post three if you cannot follow an easy and simple rule then better not participate in a signature campaign, 15 post to me is fair if they ask 30 to 40 then we can ask for percentage of the stakes.
15 post is the lowest max post for any sig campaigns including the ones that pays on bitcoin and etherium . other campaigns are more harder than this because their target qouta per week is 25 to 35 post . while other campaigns have a max 60 post per week , higher than this are consider inapropriate anymore as they can cause a massive spam to the forum . right now im a campaign that pays good and im going to say that im satisfied with it .
Are you participating in a signature campaign? You observe that there is a condition that you have to meet.
(a) You must make 15 constructive posts per week. (b) You must make 10 constructive posts per week! as it may apply. I am not against this condition but the next one is what I am concerned with.
If you don't reach 10/15 (as the case may be) posts before the end date, you will not receive any stake for the current week.
My question is, what happens to someone who makes 9 posts in case (a), and 13 posts in case (b)? Is it fair to deny anyone who has made more than 75% post for the week? Could there be a somewhat reward for such people?
Please share your thoughts. What will be the best way to reward signature campaign?
(a) You must make 15 constructive posts per week. (b) You must make 10 constructive posts per week! as it may apply. I am not against this condition but the next one is what I am concerned with.
If you don't reach 10/15 (as the case may be) posts before the end date, you will not receive any stake for the current week.
My question is, what happens to someone who makes 9 posts in case (a), and 13 posts in case (b)? Is it fair to deny anyone who has made more than 75% post for the week? Could there be a somewhat reward for such people?
Please share your thoughts. What will be the best way to reward signature campaign?
15 post a week is not that hard to do, that's only 2 posts a day with only one day where you are going to post three if you cannot follow an easy and simple rule then better not participate in a signature campaign, 15 post to me is fair if they ask 30 to 40 then we can ask for percentage of the stakes.
Signature campaigns in service sections changed a lot,more managers prefer paying to number of posts people creating rather than setting a weekly target and ask the people to make to get rewards so if you want that then join on btc signature campaigns.
I regularly recommend my friends to participate in various reliable signature campaigns. Because work in this direction really provides attractive opportunities for generating income and achieving success. But for such a result, it is necessary to study the rules and requirements of a particular project.
Are you participating in a signature campaign? You observe that there is a condition that you have to meet.
(a) You must make 15 constructive posts per week. (b) You must make 10 constructive posts per week! as it may apply. I am not against this condition but the next one is what I am concerned with.
If you don't reach 10/15 (as the case may be) posts before the end date, you will not receive any stake for the current week.
My question is, what happens to someone who makes 9 posts in case (a), and 13 posts in case (b)? Is it fair to deny anyone who has made more than 75% post for the week? Could there be a somewhat reward for such people?
Please share your thoughts. What will be the best way to reward signature campaign?
(a) You must make 15 constructive posts per week. (b) You must make 10 constructive posts per week! as it may apply. I am not against this condition but the next one is what I am concerned with.
If you don't reach 10/15 (as the case may be) posts before the end date, you will not receive any stake for the current week.
My question is, what happens to someone who makes 9 posts in case (a), and 13 posts in case (b)? Is it fair to deny anyone who has made more than 75% post for the week? Could there be a somewhat reward for such people?
Please share your thoughts. What will be the best way to reward signature campaign?
Signature campaign, is same goes like you are applying for a job in a company and its just temporarily only, but the payment is very rewarding depending on the rank you're applying for. And having a rules was a normal things I guess. So, as a bounty hunter we have no right to complaint, because before you submit your application there's a rules that you need to accept if you want to be a part of promoting the project then if you don't like the rules you can ignore and don't try to attempt to participate anyway.
I wanna ask if youre always reading the rules before joining in a bounty campaign. It is so clear that if you do not reach the required post within a week you wont get any stakes, and 2 conseccutive weeks will result into elimination in some bounty.
< Snip >
I've seen some campaign managers that occasionally give rewards even they don't reach the required posts. But for me, they really shouldn't receive any at all. Rules are rules and it's very easy to reach the quota in 2-3 days because some of the guidelines are very lenient. And if you don't like that then you should not apply in the first place and demand things you are not forced to accept.
If you are the manager , you are strict . while other managers will still give a chance to their participants if ever they missed some post because there are many reasons that can affect the post count of a user . it maybe get deleted by mods , the user might be busy , the user reach the qouta but some post are on different boards . etc , thats why we must give them a second chance if they still fail thats the time that you will removed them or not pay them .
My question is, what happens to someone who makes 9 posts in case (a), and 13 posts in case (b)? Is it fair to deny anyone who has made more than 75% post for the week? Could there be a somewhat reward for such people?
Please share your thoughts. What will be the best way to reward signature campaign?
Most likely you will not get a payment, usually bounty manager will use the rules as a basic so they will ignore any complaint form anyone who is not reach minimal post per week.Please share your thoughts. What will be the best way to reward signature campaign?
For another case, I like the concept pay per post but most of this concept has been done by signature campaign who pay participants with bitcoin, I don't see any bounty managers ICO who do this concept.
Are you participating in a signature campaign? You observe that there is a condition that you have to meet.
(a) You must make 15 constructive posts per week. (b) You must make 10 constructive posts per week! as it may apply. I am not against this condition but the next one is what I am concerned with.
If you don't reach 10/15 (as the case may be) posts before the end date, you will not receive any stake for the current week.
My question is, what happens to someone who makes 9 posts in case (a), and 13 posts in case (b)? Is it fair to deny anyone who has made more than 75% post for the week? Could there be a somewhat reward for such people?
Please share your thoughts. What will be the best way to reward signature campaign?
Some.bounty campaigns are not accepting those who dont meet the required post per week while some bounty managers if you do not meet the required post each you will still be given stakes but it will be lessen. (a) You must make 15 constructive posts per week. (b) You must make 10 constructive posts per week! as it may apply. I am not against this condition but the next one is what I am concerned with.
If you don't reach 10/15 (as the case may be) posts before the end date, you will not receive any stake for the current week.
My question is, what happens to someone who makes 9 posts in case (a), and 13 posts in case (b)? Is it fair to deny anyone who has made more than 75% post for the week? Could there be a somewhat reward for such people?
Please share your thoughts. What will be the best way to reward signature campaign?
Are you participating in a signature campaign? You observe that there is a condition that you have to meet.
(a) You must make 15 constructive posts per week. (b) You must make 10 constructive posts per week! as it may apply. I am not against this condition but the next one is what I am concerned with.
If you don't reach 10/15 (as the case may be) posts before the end date, you will not receive any stake for the current week.
My question is, what happens to someone who makes 9 posts in case (a), and 13 posts in case (b)? Is it fair to deny anyone who has made more than 75% post for the week? Could there be a somewhat reward for such people?
Please share your thoughts. What will be the best way to reward signature campaign?
(a) You must make 15 constructive posts per week. (b) You must make 10 constructive posts per week! as it may apply. I am not against this condition but the next one is what I am concerned with.
If you don't reach 10/15 (as the case may be) posts before the end date, you will not receive any stake for the current week.
My question is, what happens to someone who makes 9 posts in case (a), and 13 posts in case (b)? Is it fair to deny anyone who has made more than 75% post for the week? Could there be a somewhat reward for such people?
Please share your thoughts. What will be the best way to reward signature campaign?
I've seen some campaign managers that occasionally give rewards even they don't reach the required posts. But for me, they really shouldn't receive any at all. Rules are rules and it's very easy to reach the quota in 2-3 days because some of the guidelines are very lenient. And if you don't like that then you should not apply in the first place and demand things you are not forced to accept.
To be honest, I'm not very happy with the latest bounty companies, since the problem of most companies is that there are a lot of participants and a small pool, but the most important problem is that most of the projects turn out to be a scam and this is the most offensive.
It is your wish whether to join those campaigns because if you don't like the allocation better don't join those campaigns. Not only look for allocation but also check the potential about the project which you are working, if you get the coins is not enough the company should start developing otherwise those coin will surely will not help you to make money.
Are you participating in a signature campaign? You observe that there is a condition that you have to meet.
(a) You must make 15 constructive posts per week. (b) You must make 10 constructive posts per week! as it may apply. I am not against this condition but the next one is what I am concerned with.
If you don't reach 10/15 (as the case may be) posts before the end date, you will not receive any stake for the current week.
My question is, what happens to someone who makes 9 posts in case (a), and 13 posts in case (b)? Is it fair to deny anyone who has made more than 75% post for the week? Could there be a somewhat reward for such people?
Please share your thoughts. What will be the best way to reward signature campaign?
(a) You must make 15 constructive posts per week. (b) You must make 10 constructive posts per week! as it may apply. I am not against this condition but the next one is what I am concerned with.
If you don't reach 10/15 (as the case may be) posts before the end date, you will not receive any stake for the current week.
My question is, what happens to someone who makes 9 posts in case (a), and 13 posts in case (b)? Is it fair to deny anyone who has made more than 75% post for the week? Could there be a somewhat reward for such people?
Please share your thoughts. What will be the best way to reward signature campaign?
You've reached the rank of Sr. member and yet you are asking like novice dude. Okay, lets change the question do you think if you buy a ticket in the airplane were the price cost 100$ and in your cash on hand is only 99$, will the cashier will allow you to give the ticket? Always remember that rules is a rule which is equivalent of constitution. So if you want to get the stakes, I guess you better comply it perfectly the task weekly, just very simple as that.
The logic that you give to the question that is asked is indeed acceptable, but there is no harm in expressing it like the colleague above.
because I have experienced the reality of what the partners questioned above, when one time I followed the signature because I could not complete the post according to the rules that had been made.
whether it was because of the kindness of the manager's bounty at that time, I also did not know but the fact that the manager bounty only gave a number of posts that did not match the amount but still gave value, even though it was not full.
only the number of posts at that time was shared with the conditions.
So actually back to the manager bounty too.
Are you participating in a signature campaign? You observe that there is a condition that you have to meet.
(a) You must make 15 constructive posts per week. (b) You must make 10 constructive posts per week! as it may apply. I am not against this condition but the next one is what I am concerned with.
If you don't reach 10/15 (as the case may be) posts before the end date, you will not receive any stake for the current week.
My question is, what happens to someone who makes 9 posts in case (a), and 13 posts in case (b)? Is it fair to deny anyone who has made more than 75% post for the week? Could there be a somewhat reward for such people?
Please share your thoughts. What will be the best way to reward signature campaign?
(a) You must make 15 constructive posts per week. (b) You must make 10 constructive posts per week! as it may apply. I am not against this condition but the next one is what I am concerned with.
If you don't reach 10/15 (as the case may be) posts before the end date, you will not receive any stake for the current week.
My question is, what happens to someone who makes 9 posts in case (a), and 13 posts in case (b)? Is it fair to deny anyone who has made more than 75% post for the week? Could there be a somewhat reward for such people?
Please share your thoughts. What will be the best way to reward signature campaign?
In the first place pal, as a bounty hunter we do search first about the ico campaign here through reading the WP/road map they have. Second before we join if you read their bounty thread there is a rules and condition which is to those participants who have interest to join they will accept it. Meaning, we agree on that rules they had, whatever post a week we need to comply into that particular requirements. If You fail, well we do nothing about it, due to its our fault because rules is a rules.
Are you participating in a signature campaign? You observe that there is a condition that you have to meet.
(a) You must make 15 constructive posts per week. (b) You must make 10 constructive posts per week! as it may apply. I am not against this condition but the next one is what I am concerned with.
If you don't reach 10/15 (as the case may be) posts before the end date, you will not receive any stake for the current week.
My question is, what happens to someone who makes 9 posts in case (a), and 13 posts in case (b)? Is it fair to deny anyone who has made more than 75% post for the week? Could there be a somewhat reward for such people?
Please share your thoughts. What will be the best way to reward signature campaign?
(a) You must make 15 constructive posts per week. (b) You must make 10 constructive posts per week! as it may apply. I am not against this condition but the next one is what I am concerned with.
If you don't reach 10/15 (as the case may be) posts before the end date, you will not receive any stake for the current week.
My question is, what happens to someone who makes 9 posts in case (a), and 13 posts in case (b)? Is it fair to deny anyone who has made more than 75% post for the week? Could there be a somewhat reward for such people?
Please share your thoughts. What will be the best way to reward signature campaign?
You've reached the rank of Sr. member and yet you are asking like novice dude. Okay, lets change the question do you think if you buy a ticket in the airplane were the price cost 100$ and in your cash on hand is only 99$, will the cashier will allow you to give the ticket? Always remember that rules is a rule which is equivalent of constitution. So if you want to get the stakes, I guess you better comply it perfectly the task weekly, just very simple as that.
Are you participating in a signature campaign? You observe that there is a condition that you have to meet.
(a) You must make 15 constructive posts per week. (b) You must make 10 constructive posts per week! as it may apply. I am not against this condition but the next one is what I am concerned with.
If you don't reach 10/15 (as the case may be) posts before the end date, you will not receive any stake for the current week.
My question is, what happens to someone who makes 9 posts in case (a), and 13 posts in case (b)? Is it fair to deny anyone who has made more than 75% post for the week? Could there be a somewhat reward for such people?
Please share your thoughts. What will be the best way to reward signature campaign?
(a) You must make 15 constructive posts per week. (b) You must make 10 constructive posts per week! as it may apply. I am not against this condition but the next one is what I am concerned with.
If you don't reach 10/15 (as the case may be) posts before the end date, you will not receive any stake for the current week.
My question is, what happens to someone who makes 9 posts in case (a), and 13 posts in case (b)? Is it fair to deny anyone who has made more than 75% post for the week? Could there be a somewhat reward for such people?
Please share your thoughts. What will be the best way to reward signature campaign?
I consider this a very good topic, because even though I often follow the signature of the gift, until now I have never experienced an event until everything is not in accordance with the rules.
but there is indeed a good thing if, what you say can be a concern of the gift manager, because it could be when doing the post is in accordance with the provisions, but when there is an inspection there is a post that is deleted, then it will not comply with the rules even though we were previously make it based on rules.
indeed there must be consideration for what has been done, because when doing it right. at least there is its own calculation rather than not giving any value.
Jump to: