Topic: Rewarding signature campaign, are you satisfied? - page 9. (Read 3945 times)
For me, I am very satisfied with the signature campaign. because in my opinion, the highest payment in a bounty hunter is a signature. although indeed sometimes in participating in signature campaigns we must fulfill a large number of weekly posts. but that did not dampen my enthusiasm for participating in a signature campaign.
I was satisfied from signature campaign but long time ago i have never participated campaign now i would like to work for bounty campaigns and it is good to me because through this i can earn multiple coins and it has so many good projects in these days i want to make more coins in the market and then in future i have to use these for a good purpose.
I participated in one subscription where there was a condition to do no more than 15 shares and no more than 15 shares or posts were specified. In a word, I made 15 reposts and several posts. As a result, when I checked the results table, I had "0". In the Telegram, the manager said that it was possible to do only 12 reposts and 3 posts, and therefore I did not receive points as a punishment. I consider this decision unfair. I was not lazy, I did more, which means it was better for the project, but in the end I was underestimated. I do not consider that surplus is badly.
I believe that the person participating in the signature of the company first reads the conditions, and then decides to agree to these conditions or not! You will not pay the company if it prescribed you to build a house in the contract, but did not complete its work! Of course, I want everything to be perfect in paying for my work, but this is not always the case! Another question is if the conditions have changed during the execution of the task ....
It all depends on the Campaign Manager and the participants, If the participant is going good every week and one week he is short of 1 post then i think some campaign managers accept it and they will count that 1 post in next week. But if the participant make this as a every week habit then i think he wont get payment for other weeks. Some campaign managers are very strict and just follow the rules and dont pay you.
Bounty manager has the full right to approve its own rules of bounty campaign, if these rules are clear and transparent. If the rules stated that you must write at least 15 posts a week, the bounty manager has every right not to give you stakes for 14 posts and less.
I don't think that that there is a good bounty campaign this year,
Or am I the only one who had join a signature campaign that turns out to be a scam or ends up to be super dump in the market.
Well, you just chose the wrong campaign. I know that people still continue to earn tokens. You now have a good signature campaign) Or am I the only one who had join a signature campaign that turns out to be a scam or ends up to be super dump in the market.
I don't think that that there is a good bounty campaign this year,
Or am I the only one who had join a signature campaign that turns out to be a scam or ends up to be super dump in the market.
Or am I the only one who had join a signature campaign that turns out to be a scam or ends up to be super dump in the market.
each signature campaign has its own rules for making posts every week, before you join in the signature you must have read it and if you fill out the form it means you are able to make 10/15 posts every week, if you don't achieve that means You break the initial agreement and you are indeed not eligible to get a stake if it is not reached
In my opinion, you raised a very correct topic of conversation. Different bounty managers have different requirements, some require 10 mandatory posts, some 15, some are willing to pay even 30 posts, but for those who make fewer posts according to the established norm, they do not get paid. I think this is unfair.
Signature campaigns were not popular until late last year to mid this year, since then the values are rewards have decreased and thereby decreasing the popularity and interest again. Just like every other bounties with their rules, signature campaigns have theirs rules and if flaunted one are denied of the stakes, however I do not go for campaigns that ask for more than 12 posts per week and should be short lived
I am very unsatisfied with signature campaigns at the moment, because during the last 5 months I have took part in 3 signature campaigns. One team has reduced the budget by x10, another team distributed coins but is still not live on exchanges and the last one dropped like x10 from the ICO price.
This rule always written at the time of start of the bounty and if you are not agreed with those terms, why you go to join that campaign as it is mandatory to follow rules to get your stakes/coins. It is also like a job work and we have to do our job as demanded to get paid.
So far as it's a condition, it is supposed to be confirmed by everyone with no exceptions. However, people get their post detected in course of the week and in such cases some bounty managers consider and reward you accordingly. Some take BM look at your posts quality and if they are satisfied they can give you full stakes for that week.
Are you participating in a signature campaign? You observe that there is a condition that you have to meet.
(a) You must make 15 constructive posts per week. (b) You must make 10 constructive posts per week! as it may apply. I am not against this condition but the next one is what I am concerned with.
If you don't reach 10/15 (as the case may be) posts before the end date, you will not receive any stake for the current week.
My question is, what happens to someone who makes 9 posts in case (a), and 13 posts in case (b)? Is it fair to deny anyone who has made more than 75% post for the week? Could there be a somewhat reward for such people?
Please share your thoughts. What will be the best way to reward signature campaign?
(a) You must make 15 constructive posts per week. (b) You must make 10 constructive posts per week! as it may apply. I am not against this condition but the next one is what I am concerned with.
If you don't reach 10/15 (as the case may be) posts before the end date, you will not receive any stake for the current week.
My question is, what happens to someone who makes 9 posts in case (a), and 13 posts in case (b)? Is it fair to deny anyone who has made more than 75% post for the week? Could there be a somewhat reward for such people?
Please share your thoughts. What will be the best way to reward signature campaign?
There are some bounty managers who still count your post as complete but some also are strict and must comply of what is the rule said. If I were the bounty manager I would not be greedy if they got 75% posting I will give her or his stake 100%.
Not really I only manage to get 1 legit campaign this year,
And the reward that I got is so small so for me I am not satisfied with it.
And the reward that I got is so small so for me I am not satisfied with it.
I am satisfied. Dont you think that it would be too much for bountyhunters if they do what they want it get money for this? Dont be lasy and posts as much as needed
I think that it is absolutely fair not to reward those who didnt complete the task. Bountyhunters are employees. Do employees work as they want? I dont think so
Yes, I'm very satisfied in joining signature campaigns since I only join signature campaigns whose campaign managers have good trust rating and big bounty pool for sig campaign because I dont want my effort to be put to waste and not be paid after a few months of participating.
I think that people that perform different jobs to receive the same tocheny , one person has made 5 posts and the other 10 , as everywhere in every field who makes more he gets everything , and who is cunning with nothing.
Jump to: