Rewarding signature campaign, are you satisfied? - page 6.

rhyo3232

member

Activity: 482

Merit: 10

https://www.empirehotels.io/

Quote from: MainIbem on August 16, 2018, 10:16:54 AM

Are you participating in a signature campaign? You observe that there is a condition that you have to meet.

(a) You must make 15 constructive posts per week. (b) You must make 10 constructive posts per week! as it may apply. I am not against this condition but the next one is what I am concerned with.

If you don't reach 10/15 (as the case may be) posts before the end date, you will not receive any stake for the current week.

My question is, what happens to someone who makes 9 posts in case (a), and 13 posts in case (b)? Is it fair to deny anyone who has made more than 75% post for the week? Could there be a somewhat reward for such people?

Please share your thoughts. What will be the best way to reward signature campaign?

I think it's fair! Why? because before starting and registering with a company signature and doing it, you have read the rules and what to do to get the shares! well of course if you can't post as many rules as you won't get anything.

sekop

member

Activity: 378

Merit: 10

The results of each ICO that has been followed vary. Valuable results can usually be obtained from ICO who are also qualified. Many of the ICO only produce a small amount and the price decreases quickly when it has been distributed to participants and investors. For ICO results, current prices tend to be small because the market price factor also decreases. Be careful when choosing ICO, many fail in the middle of the road, and many of them are also scams.

ololajulo

sr. member

Activity: 2240

Merit: 270

SOL.BIOKRIPT.COM

there are cases in the past where bounty participants are allowed to make more post in subsequent week to make up for his/her post but that does not happen again. They realize how competitive this is now and are ready to stick with rule no matter the condition. I appreciate also that the bounty managers dont pick post from one's profile and deduct from previous recorded but count post per week on ones profile. most cases post are deleted and this always affect the post counted every week.

JeBro

member

Activity: 714

Merit: 10

Living is easy with eyes closed ...

In my opinion, it would be more fair to pay a signature campaign for each publication without taking into account the required number of posts. However, if the requirements of the mandatory presence of 10 or 15 posts per week are set by the employer, then they must be met.

coinsycrip09

full member

Activity: 910

Merit: 100

Quote from: cewekimut on December 14, 2018, 09:43:17 PM

It should make 10/15 posts every week, I don't think it will be difficult and of course, it can be achieved. But that also depends on the Bounty manager because sometimes this spreadsheet is not actively updated every week. So maybe when updated by the Bounty manager there were a number of posts that had been deleted.

yeah, that's why i think it would be better if we exceed 1 to 2 posts from the limit determined by the bounty manager.
so that we do not lose the stake if at any time our post disappears one.

kendedes

sr. member

Activity: 728

Merit: 250

Security and Privacy Features on the Blockchain

Quote from: MainIbem on August 16, 2018, 10:16:54 AM

Are you participating in a signature campaign? You observe that there is a condition that you have to meet.

(a) You must make 15 constructive posts per week. (b) You must make 10 constructive posts per week! as it may apply. I am not against this condition but the next one is what I am concerned with.

If you don't reach 10/15 (as the case may be) posts before the end date, you will not receive any stake for the current week.

My question is, what happens to someone who makes 9 posts in case (a), and 13 posts in case (b)? Is it fair to deny anyone who has made more than 75% post for the week? Could there be a somewhat reward for such people?

Please share your thoughts. What will be the best way to reward signature campaign?

I think if the rules already been decided form the start, then there is no problem with that, cause joining the project with that rule applied means we already agree with the rules.
And it would be different story if the rules were changed at the middle or at the end of the campaign that cause the participant to loose their chance to get any reward.

kicauklaten

sr. member

Activity: 840

Merit: 251

quite satisfied with the current campaign. any existing rules show that the campaign necessarily wants maximum results also from the level of the bounty hunter. when bargaining for lightening the thing I think is reasonable. so of course if not pleased with existing rules could leave the campaign only and creates its own rules.

cewekimut

sr. member

Activity: 798

Merit: 250

It should make 10/15 posts every week, I don't think it will be difficult and of course, it can be achieved. But that also depends on the Bounty manager because sometimes this spreadsheet is not actively updated every week. So maybe when updated by the Bounty manager there were a number of posts that had been deleted.

zauna35

sr. member

Activity: 812

Merit: 287

By registering with the signature company you automatically agree to the conditions set forth by the organizer of the bounty .. if 10 posts are written, 10, not 7, not 12, but 10 will be counted ... is this fair? of course fair

ryap12

member

Activity: 700

Merit: 14

Quote from: shooleh on December 14, 2018, 09:23:56 PM

All returned to the rules made by the Bounty manager and if they violated they would certainly not get shares. I also often find that participants do not reach the weekly post target, but still get shares. I think there are some managers who are very strict and there are managers who are not too strict.

Yes, all goes to the bounty manager's decision. But really? Just making 15 post in the bitcointalk thread isn't that hard to work for an entire week. Each post will only cost you 0.5 - 2 minutes and you have 10,080 minutes in a week.

shooleh

member

Activity: 616

Merit: 10

Personal Text: Revolusi industri erotis di Blockc

All returned to the rules made by the Bounty manager and if they violated they would certainly not get shares. I also often find that participants do not reach the weekly post target, but still get shares. I think there are some managers who are very strict and there are managers who are not too strict.

elite070

copper member

Activity: 112

Merit: 0

www.codex.one

Quote from: MainIbem on August 16, 2018, 10:16:54 AM

Are you participating in a signature campaign? You observe that there is a condition that you have to meet.

(a) You must make 15 constructive posts per week. (b) You must make 10 constructive posts per week! as it may apply. I am not against this condition but the next one is what I am concerned with.

If you don't reach 10/15 (as the case may be) posts before the end date, you will not receive any stake for the current week.

My question is, what happens to someone who makes 9 posts in case (a), and 13 posts in case (b)? Is it fair to deny anyone who has made more than 75% post for the week? Could there be a somewhat reward for such people?

Please share your thoughts. What will be the best way to reward signature campaign?

At the moment I also experienced that when you work too much but not meet the requirements, I feel sad. The stakes are not counted and the entire week I felt is wasted. Maybe for a solution to this, I should be more responsible and put more efforts and time to my works.

TIDOVEE

sr. member

Activity: 1246

Merit: 255

I think I'm trying to understand you want those managers to be considerate that at least there could be a reason why some people could not totally make the number of post requred and if they tried to a meaningful percent, their effort should not be a waste.
Well, that's a goof reasoning. It is painful to lose reward after a good effort, but unfortunately a little effort is not what is rewarded here, it is total obedience that is needed. Nothing more, nothing less.

Altf4

member

Activity: 322

Merit: 10

The rewarding now of signature campaign now is not satisfying , this is because of the market falldown of price now ,and the bounty campaign are still extending their signature campaign ,this is because the ICO of the various campaign project ,did not meet the targetted softcap and hardcap , so in other side it can not gave the proper value of token during the rewarding of tokens because of the low value of the market.

debby070

copper member

Activity: 140

Merit: 0

www.codex.one

Quote from: MainIbem on August 16, 2018, 10:16:54 AM

Are you participating in a signature campaign? You observe that there is a condition that you have to meet.

(a) You must make 15 constructive posts per week. (b) You must make 10 constructive posts per week! as it may apply. I am not against this condition but the next one is what I am concerned with.

If you don't reach 10/15 (as the case may be) posts before the end date, you will not receive any stake for the current week.

My question is, what happens to someone who makes 9 posts in case (a), and 13 posts in case (b)? Is it fair to deny anyone who has made more than 75% post for the week? Could there be a somewhat reward for such people?

Please share your thoughts. What will be the best way to reward signature campaign?

It is just a simple rule to follow, it is like a terms and agreement that you will need to comply in order to get what you want, follow the rules and you will get rewarded, I think there is no reason to specially treat signature bounty hunters the way you think.

sixexgames

full member

Activity: 406

Merit: 100

One Social Network

If they pay people who don't follow the rules, it's actually stealing from those who DID follow the rules. If I'm in a bounty campaign I always make sure I make my quota of 10 posts. I post 2 times a day Monday through Friday and 1 time on Saturday and Sunday.

jerrison

full member

Activity: 1442

Merit: 106

Quote from: MainIbem on August 16, 2018, 10:16:54 AM

Are you participating in a signature campaign? You observe that there is a condition that you have to meet.

(a) You must make 15 constructive posts per week. (b) You must make 10 constructive posts per week! as it may apply. I am not against this condition but the next one is what I am concerned with.

If you don't reach 10/15 (as the case may be) posts before the end date, you will not receive any stake for the current week.

My question is, what happens to someone who makes 9 posts in case (a), and 13 posts in case (b)? Is it fair to deny anyone who has made more than 75% post for the week? Could there be a somewhat reward for such people?

Please share your thoughts. What will be the best way to reward signature campaign?

i think there is no issues with the signature campaign terms and conditions and stakes rewards system as the conditions are not strict that one can not adhere to. if you divide the posts to be made within a week, you will observe that you are supposed to make an average of two comments a day which is not a difficult task.

fathur01

full member

Activity: 700

Merit: 100

If you first study the project and only after start taking part in it, then you will be satisfied. Of course this does not always work, but in most cases it really works.

plr

member

Activity: 1162

Merit: 24

This is the first time I saw this kind of recommendation, because 15 post a week that is just two post daily is not that really hard if you are serious in your bounty campaign, the only problem that we have to concern with is the success of the campaign that we are promoting, or we will not get a reward if it fail.

bitcoin31

hero member

Activity: 1834

Merit: 523

It depends to the requirements of the campaign and how much you get you can think thay if that is enough or not.
RemeRemember depends also to your rank and weeks that you join in the campaign.

Topic: Rewarding signature campaign, are you satisfied? - page 6. (Read 3945 times)