Topic: Rewarding signature campaign, are you satisfied? - page 5. (Read 3945 times)
I think this will depend on how the ico or bounty campaign give its reward to bounty hunters. Because some of the ico projects gives reward in such way they give coins per week, in this case the allocated bounty pool for signature would never meet since they use coins per week in reward. Unlike stake per week would be given, it is better.
It depends on my participated Bounty campaigns but most of the bounty campaigns I participated is worth it. They give me a better amount of rewards that a particular participants would satisfy. So basically I just don't base my satisfaction in one campaign that I participated before that's why it is really depends on the bounty Hunter if he joined a better campaigns.
I'm not, signature campaign seems to be the hardest bounty campaign, the rules for signature campaign is too strict, but the rewards for signature bounty campaign still small, most bounty have allocation for signature bounty campaign only equal to content campaign.
I think it is fair enough. Because the bounty hunters that are signing up on the signature campaign know the rules and the said rules has no compromise act. So they know the task that they are up to and know the consequence if they didn't follow the rules.
Are you participating in a signature campaign? You observe that there is a condition that you have to meet.
(a) You must make 15 constructive posts per week. (b) You must make 10 constructive posts per week! as it may apply. I am not against this condition but the next one is what I am concerned with.
If you don't reach 10/15 (as the case may be) posts before the end date, you will not receive any stake for the current week.
My question is, what happens to someone who makes 9 posts in case (a), and 13 posts in case (b)? Is it fair to deny anyone who has made more than 75% post for the week? Could there be a somewhat reward for such people?
Please share your thoughts. What will be the best way to reward signature campaign?
(a) You must make 15 constructive posts per week. (b) You must make 10 constructive posts per week! as it may apply. I am not against this condition but the next one is what I am concerned with.
If you don't reach 10/15 (as the case may be) posts before the end date, you will not receive any stake for the current week.
My question is, what happens to someone who makes 9 posts in case (a), and 13 posts in case (b)? Is it fair to deny anyone who has made more than 75% post for the week? Could there be a somewhat reward for such people?
Please share your thoughts. What will be the best way to reward signature campaign?
well we join signature campaign after we read and accept the rule that BM made.
if what they stated we should made 15 post per week so we should comply with the rule.
rule was made to be obeyed.
it all depends on the company if the rules for exclusion were originally established or it will most likely not be counted .But there are popadajutsja methodically administrators and may include
What you just need to do is to follow their rules, you are the one who joined at the first place, it is their regulation is needed to follow just easy as that, If you post the required post count, then expect to have a stake.
Cases like this I think have happened a lot and that happens in every different Bounty manager. But we also have to go back to the original rules and that must be done. Whatever Bounty managers do must be respected and supported because of what they do for all campaign participants. If we find an error, we must immediately notify the Bounty manager.
if for example rules 15 posts every week, and only 13 posts, there will be no stakes. and posts that do not reach the stake will not be taken into account the following week. so you must always reach the target post, if you can increase it. for example if the rules are 15 posts, then posting 20 posts will be safer because there must be some posts that are considered less constructive. and if you reach all the stake, then you will get a reward with a value according to your rank, and in my opinion, it is very satisfying.
if that happen case a will not get stake for a week, and case b still get reward stake, because the minimum post is reached.
I believe that such people need to count at least half of the reward as they, too, tried
Are you participating in a signature campaign? You observe that there is a condition that you have to meet.
(a) You must make 15 constructive posts per week. (b) You must make 10 constructive posts per week! as it may apply. I am not against this condition but the next one is what I am concerned with.
If you don't reach 10/15 (as the case may be) posts before the end date, you will not receive any stake for the current week.
My question is, what happens to someone who makes 9 posts in case (a), and 13 posts in case (b)? Is it fair to deny anyone who has made more than 75% post for the week? Could there be a somewhat reward for such people?
Please share your thoughts. What will be the best way to reward signature campaign?
(a) You must make 15 constructive posts per week. (b) You must make 10 constructive posts per week! as it may apply. I am not against this condition but the next one is what I am concerned with.
If you don't reach 10/15 (as the case may be) posts before the end date, you will not receive any stake for the current week.
My question is, what happens to someone who makes 9 posts in case (a), and 13 posts in case (b)? Is it fair to deny anyone who has made more than 75% post for the week? Could there be a somewhat reward for such people?
Please share your thoughts. What will be the best way to reward signature campaign?
if you have been involved in this forum, of course you have to allow the requirements. if we are participating in signature campaign, it is like we are employing to someone and we have to allow and obey the rules. when we don't obey, we get nothing reward. however, if we obey the rule not in 100%, then the employer gives dispensation, it is worried that the employee will be underestimate to the rules and it will harm the business. it is a simple sample for answering the question.
Frankly, when I was a member the market was better and I was making good money from bounty campaigns but right now I can't earn money because ICO's are going very bad and by taking into consideration I am a full member right know
The way to solve the lack of posts per week is to to do at least one extra post incase one of the threads you posted on gets deleted. This would otherwise result in you not meeting the requirements and therefore not receiving any stakes
I think that bounty managers shouls give half stakes or maybe more. People we working a lot and if they forgot about 1 post, it's not serious to give 0 stakes and wait the next week
I don't think so. The bounty manager will not give stakes if we cannot reach the target number of posts that are clearly written in the rules. If we have joined a bounty, that means we agree and must complete the rules well in order to get a stake. Therefore, before joining a bounty, make sure you understand the rules properly, adjust to your respective abilities. 
I think that bounty managers shouls give half stakes or maybe more. People we working a lot and if they forgot about 1 post, it's not serious to give 0 stakes and wait the next week
Are you participating in a signature campaign? You observe that there is a condition that you have to meet.
(a) You must make 15 constructive posts per week. (b) You must make 10 constructive posts per week! as it may apply. I am not against this condition but the next one is what I am concerned with.
If you don't reach 10/15 (as the case may be) posts before the end date, you will not receive any stake for the current week.
My question is, what happens to someone who makes 9 posts in case (a), and 13 posts in case (b)? Is it fair to deny anyone who has made more than 75% post for the week? Could there be a somewhat reward for such people?
Please share your thoughts. What will be the best way to reward signature campaign?
(a) You must make 15 constructive posts per week. (b) You must make 10 constructive posts per week! as it may apply. I am not against this condition but the next one is what I am concerned with.
If you don't reach 10/15 (as the case may be) posts before the end date, you will not receive any stake for the current week.
My question is, what happens to someone who makes 9 posts in case (a), and 13 posts in case (b)? Is it fair to deny anyone who has made more than 75% post for the week? Could there be a somewhat reward for such people?
Please share your thoughts. What will be the best way to reward signature campaign?
Good suggestion but i doubt it will be looked into. Rules are rules and its often there to take advantage of those that break it even slightly. Rewarding a signature posts of 7/10 or 12/15 should be considered in my honest opinion. I think Its fair for both parties
in my opinion, stakes system or tokens that are paid weekly is good enough, but it's good that every manager gives relief to bounty hunters who don't make a post, for example, if the rule is 15 posts per week, but bounty hunters are only able to make 7 posts then their stake or token can be reduced by 50%
Are you participating in a signature campaign? You observe that there is a condition that you have to meet.
(a) You must make 15 constructive posts per week. (b) You must make 10 constructive posts per week! as it may apply. I am not against this condition but the next one is what I am concerned with.
If you don't reach 10/15 (as the case may be) posts before the end date, you will not receive any stake for the current week.
My question is, what happens to someone who makes 9 posts in case (a), and 13 posts in case (b)? Is it fair to deny anyone who has made more than 75% post for the week? Could there be a somewhat reward for such people?
Please share your thoughts. What will be the best way to reward signature campaign?
(a) You must make 15 constructive posts per week. (b) You must make 10 constructive posts per week! as it may apply. I am not against this condition but the next one is what I am concerned with.
If you don't reach 10/15 (as the case may be) posts before the end date, you will not receive any stake for the current week.
My question is, what happens to someone who makes 9 posts in case (a), and 13 posts in case (b)? Is it fair to deny anyone who has made more than 75% post for the week? Could there be a somewhat reward for such people?
Please share your thoughts. What will be the best way to reward signature campaign?
Why do you make staff up? There're rules which are clear enough. Ofc, administrators often clean the forum, and some threads are deleted. That's why always do a bit more than you have to do.
There were times, they were very pleased with the payments of subscription companies, but now there are only hopes for a cheerful and fruitful future!
Of course, everything has been properly arranged and considered. Indeed, there must be positive and negative. If we experience such a problem, I'd better ask directly to the gift manager. If we have reported to the Bounty manager, it will definitely be followed up soon.
Jump to: