Topic: Rewarding signature campaign, are you satisfied? - page 4. (Read 3945 times)
This condition is not only set for Signature campaigns alone but also facebook and twitter, remember bounty campaign is set up to promote the project and they need more exposure as long as possible, and if these is allow to shift the goal post for some people this will resulted in abuse because of those people that do farm accounts
Personally, I can say that the subscription gives a good additional income. I always try to connect the subscription then when it turns out. I try to write posts as much as I need and even more. And I recommend everyone to participate in the subscription as a very useful and informative company.
Of course not, as you can see the payments like tears and not like rewards
This is unfortunately true. The pay for working in bounties is really low. I really thought i could earn more, but so far i have only been able to earn a few dollars. Whether the work really worth it, i doubt more and more.Are you participating in a signature campaign? You observe that there is a condition that you have to meet.
(a) You must make 15 constructive posts per week. (b) You must make 10 constructive posts per week! as it may apply. I am not against this condition but the next one is what I am concerned with.
If you don't reach 10/15 (as the case may be) posts before the end date, you will not receive any stake for the current week.
My question is, what happens to someone who makes 9 posts in case (a), and 13 posts in case (b)? Is it fair to deny anyone who has made more than 75% post for the week? Could there be a somewhat reward for such people?
Please share your thoughts. What will be the best way to reward signature campaign?
(a) You must make 15 constructive posts per week. (b) You must make 10 constructive posts per week! as it may apply. I am not against this condition but the next one is what I am concerned with.
If you don't reach 10/15 (as the case may be) posts before the end date, you will not receive any stake for the current week.
My question is, what happens to someone who makes 9 posts in case (a), and 13 posts in case (b)? Is it fair to deny anyone who has made more than 75% post for the week? Could there be a somewhat reward for such people?
Please share your thoughts. What will be the best way to reward signature campaign?
It depends on the campaign rules and before you do the campaign the rules are clear. Although there are campaigns that gives pro rated rewards rules should still prevail.
Of course not, as you can see the payments like tears and not like rewards
This is unfortunately true. The pay for working in bounties is really low. I really thought i could earn more, but so far i have only been able to earn a few dollars. Whether the work really worth it, i doubt more and more.
I am disappointed with the current bounty activities because they have almost become a scam and our hunters have become victims of scams.
Well, I think we can not impose their own rules in their game , they decide how best and how many messages they need , I think there is nothing difficult to follow the rules and you all will pay, of course it would be good if more projects paid in eth for the work
all the rules and payments promised by the campaign manager, everything is complete in the regulations, and if we are not paid for our work, maybe we are not in accordance with existing regulations
I won more than $300 in rewards through signing events, but the current bounty activity is too much fraud, making it difficult to get the profit you need by signing.
Of course, the signature campaign in today's market conditions is becoming one of the most reliable and useful ways to generate income. But for this it is necessary to study and follow the rules of participation in order to avoid common mistakes and wasted time.
hero member
Activity: 2660
Merit: 651
Want top-notch marketing for your project, Hire me
Yes, it is fair not to receive any stake, as long as you have not met the conditions and tasks imposed by that bounty campaign. If you go to the store and you want to buy a bread and you do not have half the amount, you will not get half a bread. The same applies to cryptocurrency. It is recommended even to write more messages than the number required by the project, so that the message thread can be deleted later, your message will disappear and you will have 9 messages again.
I agreed with what you said because rule are rules and they are not meant to be broken. However, it a glaring because most of the bounty campaign manager usually post their rules and regulations openly. Although, we also have a situation where some bounty campaign manager dont post their rules openly and that I dont support.
Well, I think we can not impose their own rules in their game , they decide how best and how many messages they need , I think there is nothing difficult to follow the rules and you all will pay, of course it would be good if more projects paid in eth for the work
Are you participating in a signature campaign? You observe that there is a condition that you have to meet.
(a) You must make 15 constructive posts per week. (b) You must make 10 constructive posts per week! as it may apply. I am not against this condition but the next one is what I am concerned with.
If you don't reach 10/15 (as the case may be) posts before the end date, you will not receive any stake for the current week.
My question is, what happens to someone who makes 9 posts in case (a), and 13 posts in case (b)? Is it fair to deny anyone who has made more than 75% post for the week? Could there be a somewhat reward for such people?
Please share your thoughts. What will be the best way to reward signature campaign?
(a) You must make 15 constructive posts per week. (b) You must make 10 constructive posts per week! as it may apply. I am not against this condition but the next one is what I am concerned with.
If you don't reach 10/15 (as the case may be) posts before the end date, you will not receive any stake for the current week.
My question is, what happens to someone who makes 9 posts in case (a), and 13 posts in case (b)? Is it fair to deny anyone who has made more than 75% post for the week? Could there be a somewhat reward for such people?
Please share your thoughts. What will be the best way to reward signature campaign?
I am not against the rules of bounty campaigns for as long as it is being stated in the announcement thread before the campaign started. Also of the number of posts per week I am not against about it but the thing that I am questioning is that there are some campaigns that they said 15 constructive posts per week but they will start counting from.your end posts, the problem is even you reach 20 post it is not counted if they count it from the ending post tou had last time. Because sometimes our post was deleted.
The way to solve the lack of posts per week is to to do at least one extra post incase one of the threads you posted on gets deleted. This would otherwise result in you not meeting the requirements and therefore not receiving any stakes
Exactly, we should follow the rules as stated in the campaigns. Good managers however do give benefits to those who are short by one posts for the week, but then you have to cover it up by making an extra post the following week, after all you are working as an advertiser for the project and have to complete the work if you need the payment / stakes.
Of course not, as you can see the payments like tears and not like rewards
Yes, it is fair not to receive any stake, as long as you have not met the conditions and tasks imposed by that bounty campaign. If you go to the store and you want to buy a bread and you do not have half the amount, you will not get half a bread. The same applies to cryptocurrency. It is recommended even to write more messages than the number required by the project, so that the message thread can be deleted later, your message will disappear and you will have 9 messages again.
I don't hate the rules of participating in bounty activities. What I hate is that after I have done all my work seriously, the bounty has become a scam.
There are conditions attached which you must fulfil. Some campaigns states clearly that if you make less than 10 quality posts per week it won't be counted, even if its 9 posts,it won't be counted for that week. However, i believe even if the posts are not complete but provided the participants posts up to 80% is ok, that's fair enough.
At least I was pleased with the awards of the projects in which I took part and they pleased me that this time we will see soon
There mixed satisfaction, because it all depends on the kind of bounty campaign you are joining, sometimes you are satisfied, especially if the outcome of the project is good , there are also time that there is no satisfaction, especially if the project did not reach the softcap ,you are not rewarded according to what is due to you.
I'm not, signature campaign seems to be the hardest bounty campaign, the rules for signature campaign is too strict, but the rewards for signature bounty campaign still small, most bounty have allocation for signature bounty campaign only equal to content campaign.
If you want to get good rewards from signature, you must increase your level. With my level I am always satisfied with my signature rewards. For op, I know what do you feel bro, but what we can do, they make the rule, my tips if they ask 10 post give them a bonus by making 11 or 12 post, it can be a security to avoid deleted post.
Jump to: