Topic: Rewarding signature campaign, are you satisfied? - page 10. (Read 3945 times)
I've joined the signature campaign for several times, and some of them pay a good reward but some of them doesn't pay good, i mean the reward is a rather a lot, but the price of the coins isn't good enough.
it all depends on the company if the rules for exclusion were originally established or it will most likely not be counted .But there are popadajutsja methodically administrators and may include
Yes, this is a case to case basis different project and company have their own rules. So for me I think its better to choose campaign that their rules will suit to your style or way of doing the campaign. Because in signature campaign some required you to post 15 per week others just 9 post so its individual decision which project they will join.
I think some campaing's rules are kinda too hard. I think they just could pay less to people who makes less posts. That will be fair. But they don't doing it. And it makes me doubt in a lot of things about them.
I have taken a part in 3 bounty campaigns (3rd one is ongoing right now) and they all have been (or are) signature campaigns.
The first campaign was really successful - made 2 months pay with 3 weeks.
The second campaign was all nice apart of the part that they didn't pay out
. About 2 months wasted, they never told me what I did wrong.
And the campaign I'm in right now seems again like a good one
- team is active and all seems good.
The first campaign was really successful - made 2 months pay with 3 weeks.
The second campaign was all nice apart of the part that they didn't pay out
. About 2 months wasted, they never told me what I did wrong.And the campaign I'm in right now seems again like a good one
- team is active and all seems good.
Every bounty have its own rule and those rules are published at the start of the bounty and if you are not agreed with their rules, you can leave that but you cannot question their rulings.
I believe that the payment should take place in a full week, if 15 posts are necessary, it means you need to do 15 otherwise confusion will start, and managers will have much more work to check
I think rule is rule, before a bounty hunter sign up for signature campaign he/she understand the weekly requirement and I don't see it as an unfair thing if the person didn't get stake by not following the rule.
How would you like the bounty campaign manager to do if you have written fewer messages less than what is specified in the specific conditions of joining the ICO signature campaign? . Let's say for ten messages you should have counted two steaks. You have made eight posts. Do you think that the manager should have proportionally less, that is, 1.6 steaks? No one, of course, will do this. There are certain conditions with which you agree to join, and they must be fulfilled.
There are times that we are not satisfied and there are also time that we are also satisfied , but ay first we can blame the manager or admin of the project because they are also trying to make to promote the ICO project to reach the projected soft cap or even the hard cap, so if things will be worst , we still continue to support because of the too many ICOs there are much competetion , so they ate tryong hard to make the project succesful.
To be fair, I think that signature bounty rewards are satisfactory. We should know that these teams are not just paying you, and individual, but so many others who participated in the bounty scheme. I just think that they should do better with time duration of distribution of the bounty rewards, it shouldn't take so much time to be distributed.
Are you participating in a signature campaign? You observe that there is a condition that you have to meet.
(a) You must make 15 constructive posts per week. (b) You must make 10 constructive posts per week! as it may apply. I am not against this condition but the next one is what I am concerned with.
If you don't reach 10/15 (as the case may be) posts before the end date, you will not receive any stake for the current week.
My question is, what happens to someone who makes 9 posts in case (a), and 13 posts in case (b)? Is it fair to deny anyone who has made more than 75% post for the week? Could there be a somewhat reward for such people?
Please share your thoughts. What will be the best way to reward signature campaign?
Rules is rules and whats being stated should really be followed because before you do apply on the campaign it is already understandable that you do agree on the terms posted on op which means if you haven't met the post required then you wont really received any stakes unless if manager do took some consideration but it would be only good on 1 week only and no another chance if you do commit it again.(a) You must make 15 constructive posts per week. (b) You must make 10 constructive posts per week! as it may apply. I am not against this condition but the next one is what I am concerned with.
If you don't reach 10/15 (as the case may be) posts before the end date, you will not receive any stake for the current week.
My question is, what happens to someone who makes 9 posts in case (a), and 13 posts in case (b)? Is it fair to deny anyone who has made more than 75% post for the week? Could there be a somewhat reward for such people?
Please share your thoughts. What will be the best way to reward signature campaign?
Once you are on a campaign then follow all the rules then you should be fine. If not then you would simply get "0" stakes on that week.
Are you participating in a signature campaign? You observe that there is a condition that you have to meet.
(a) You must make 15 constructive posts per week. (b) You must make 10 constructive posts per week! as it may apply. I am not against this condition but the next one is what I am concerned with.
If you don't reach 10/15 (as the case may be) posts before the end date, you will not receive any stake for the current week.
My question is, what happens to someone who makes 9 posts in case (a), and 13 posts in case (b)? Is it fair to deny anyone who has made more than 75% post for the week? Could there be a somewhat reward for such people?
Please share your thoughts. What will be the best way to reward signature campaign?
(a) You must make 15 constructive posts per week. (b) You must make 10 constructive posts per week! as it may apply. I am not against this condition but the next one is what I am concerned with.
If you don't reach 10/15 (as the case may be) posts before the end date, you will not receive any stake for the current week.
My question is, what happens to someone who makes 9 posts in case (a), and 13 posts in case (b)? Is it fair to deny anyone who has made more than 75% post for the week? Could there be a somewhat reward for such people?
Please share your thoughts. What will be the best way to reward signature campaign?
Unfortunately (or should I say fortunately?) things work like this in the real world, and in any company, institution or formal or informal organization there are rules and conditions that must be met by all concerned. That is why before joining a signature campaign the rules should be read well, because once you send your application to join, you are tacitly accepting the rules. Therefore, if you believe that you are not able to comply with the minimum rules of a campaign, then you should abstain from participating in it.
I recently returned to the forum, but judging by the reviews, some companies pay really well, especially for a signature, so I decided to try to participate in one of the projects I liked, let's see what happens.
Signauture campaign now it s not satisfactory. The participants are too many so the rewards will be too small. I like to join manager taht limit sig camp participants. it will earn better than unlimited members. Strict manager is important because he will disqualify the lazy members. I think income from sig campaign is getting lower now.
As long as I follow the signature campaign, of course I have to follow the rules because I have made 9 posts with the rules of having to make 10 posts in 1 week, but what happened I did not get stake that week even though I have posted 90% of what they ask, then from the above case it is clear we have to make a post in accordance with the applicable rules and if we make a post of more than 10 then we still get a stake and I think that is fair enough for me.
Are you participating in a signature campaign? You observe that there is a condition that you have to meet.
(a) You must make 15 constructive posts per week. (b) You must make 10 constructive posts per week! as it may apply. I am not against this condition but the next one is what I am concerned with.
If you don't reach 10/15 (as the case may be) posts before the end date, you will not receive any stake for the current week.
My question is, what happens to someone who makes 9 posts in case (a), and 13 posts in case (b)? Is it fair to deny anyone who has made more than 75% post for the week? Could there be a somewhat reward for such people?
Please share your thoughts. What will be the best way to reward signature campaign?
(a) You must make 15 constructive posts per week. (b) You must make 10 constructive posts per week! as it may apply. I am not against this condition but the next one is what I am concerned with.
If you don't reach 10/15 (as the case may be) posts before the end date, you will not receive any stake for the current week.
My question is, what happens to someone who makes 9 posts in case (a), and 13 posts in case (b)? Is it fair to deny anyone who has made more than 75% post for the week? Could there be a somewhat reward for such people?
Please share your thoughts. What will be the best way to reward signature campaign?
if you only finish outside the exact conditions it will not be accepted and will not receive shares in that week, because it is an obligation to post 15 or 10 yes we must be able to do it because from the beginning we already know the terms, so in my opinion it is fair and reasonable. .
Yes most of the time I was satisfied with token reward given by a certain campaign. Sometimes it doesn't provide an enough value to me in times of trading, but I can find it more challenging during the holding period.
Other hunters were frustrated, but they don't have to feel it because in every project it needs to reach the hardcap. We cannot assure it will be met, so it's expected the token given to bounty participants will be reduced and it also happen to me twice on the previous projects I had.
Other hunters were frustrated, but they don't have to feel it because in every project it needs to reach the hardcap. We cannot assure it will be met, so it's expected the token given to bounty participants will be reduced and it also happen to me twice on the previous projects I had.
Yeah, every BM has their rules for th signature campaign. I always participate in the signature campaign. So far, I follow the rules because that is what I must fulfil. When I'm supposed to make at least 10 posts per week, I will do more, about at least 12 posts to anticipate when there are deleted thread or posts. I think that it is fair enough because the BM has already clearly states on the rules.
Are you participating in a signature campaign? You observe that there is a condition that you have to meet.
(a) You must make 15 constructive posts per week. (b) You must make 10 constructive posts per week! as it may apply. I am not against this condition but the next one is what I am concerned with.
If you don't reach 10/15 (as the case may be) posts before the end date, you will not receive any stake for the current week.
My question is, what happens to someone who makes 9 posts in case (a), and 13 posts in case (b)? Is it fair to deny anyone who has made more than 75% post for the week? Could there be a somewhat reward for such people?
Please share your thoughts. What will be the best way to reward signature campaign?
Sometimes I'm satisfied but sometimes not because some of bounty project a good rewards to participants they give us a small amount of reward after months of working with them. I hope they give a fair reward to who joined signature campaign. (a) You must make 15 constructive posts per week. (b) You must make 10 constructive posts per week! as it may apply. I am not against this condition but the next one is what I am concerned with.
If you don't reach 10/15 (as the case may be) posts before the end date, you will not receive any stake for the current week.
My question is, what happens to someone who makes 9 posts in case (a), and 13 posts in case (b)? Is it fair to deny anyone who has made more than 75% post for the week? Could there be a somewhat reward for such people?
Please share your thoughts. What will be the best way to reward signature campaign?
Whether it's fair or not is subjective, I've been in quite a few signature campaigns and I think some bounty managers are more flexible than others, equally if they don't give me the stakes because I don't complete the required weekly post, I can't do anything, since the rules are pretty clear on the subject and I agreed before entering the bounty.
Jump to: