Topic: Rewarding signature campaign, are you satisfied? - page 8. (Read 3945 times)
If that's the rule, I mean that's the rule. You should just do it too avoid problems. Besides, every one of your post is paid so be diligent.
This issue is in the hands of the bounty participant.
Making shit posts can can lead to that. Do it should be stopped.
Then create as many posts as possible, in order not to fall victim again.
Making shit posts can can lead to that. Do it should be stopped.
Then create as many posts as possible, in order not to fall victim again.
Are you participating in a signature campaign? You observe that there is a condition that you have to meet.
(a) You must make 15 constructive posts per week. (b) You must make 10 constructive posts per week! as it may apply. I am not against this condition but the next one is what I am concerned with.
If you don't reach 10/15 (as the case may be) posts before the end date, you will not receive any stake for the current week.
My question is, what happens to someone who makes 9 posts in case (a), and 13 posts in case (b)? Is it fair to deny anyone who has made more than 75% post for the week? Could there be a somewhat reward for such people?
Please share your thoughts. What will be the best way to reward signature campaign?
I have seen some bounty campaign managers who are very strict with this rules. A participant can even be short of one post yet still receive zero stake, whereas some may just overlook and award you the full stake. This is usually at the sole discretion of the bounty managers to either amend the rules along the line, or keep strictly to it. (a) You must make 15 constructive posts per week. (b) You must make 10 constructive posts per week! as it may apply. I am not against this condition but the next one is what I am concerned with.
If you don't reach 10/15 (as the case may be) posts before the end date, you will not receive any stake for the current week.
My question is, what happens to someone who makes 9 posts in case (a), and 13 posts in case (b)? Is it fair to deny anyone who has made more than 75% post for the week? Could there be a somewhat reward for such people?
Please share your thoughts. What will be the best way to reward signature campaign?
Are you participating in a signature campaign? You observe that there is a condition that you have to meet.
(a) You must make 15 constructive posts per week. (b) You must make 10 constructive posts per week! as it may apply. I am not against this condition but the next one is what I am concerned with.
If you don't reach 10/15 (as the case may be) posts before the end date, you will not receive any stake for the current week.
My question is, what happens to someone who makes 9 posts in case (a), and 13 posts in case (b)? Is it fair to deny anyone who has made more than 75% post for the week? Could there be a somewhat reward for such people?
Please share your thoughts. What will be the best way to reward signature campaign?
(a) You must make 15 constructive posts per week. (b) You must make 10 constructive posts per week! as it may apply. I am not against this condition but the next one is what I am concerned with.
If you don't reach 10/15 (as the case may be) posts before the end date, you will not receive any stake for the current week.
My question is, what happens to someone who makes 9 posts in case (a), and 13 posts in case (b)? Is it fair to deny anyone who has made more than 75% post for the week? Could there be a somewhat reward for such people?
Please share your thoughts. What will be the best way to reward signature campaign?
In my own opinion, All of Bounty campaign has regulation and has participant we need to follow. Limiting their posts or has a maximum and minimum post to have a basis when they count their participants earning. Having a rules and regulation can be a way to have a piece mind though we have diffrent opinion.
This year, I am not satisfied with the profiit given as reward for the hardwork of the participants. The worse scenario is having no profit at all this year, from a bounty project due to project failure which is due to the influence of continuous market downfall thid year. Unlike last year, whereas profit are reasonable from bounty projects especiallh during the bullrun. But the case at this moment is way different.
Legit question which bounty managers should consider. 
Best way to reward a signature bounty is also in my opinion giving stakes per post. Like in your example if someone has 9 posts, pay for 9 posts and if someone has 13 posts, pay for 13 posts. But set a maximal limit of 10 or 15 posts per week which are paid, this decision will avoid spam. Pay every post would in this limit would be very fair.
Best way to reward a signature bounty is also in my opinion giving stakes per post. Like in your example if someone has 9 posts, pay for 9 posts and if someone has 13 posts, pay for 13 posts. But set a maximal limit of 10 or 15 posts per week which are paid, this decision will avoid spam. Pay every post would in this limit would be very fair.
We have to fulfill the requirements and if they are not met there will be no reward simple as that. If the requirement is weekly 10 posts it means, that is the minimum but you can write 11 or 12 posts for the case if some of your posts is deleted by the forum admin or the whole
tread could be deleted as well.
tread could be deleted as well.
Over the past 5 months I have not received payments from a single project, they are all moved to the middle - the end of December, and it must be borne in mind that the project will need additional time to get listed to the exchange. I am absolutely not satisfied.
Are you participating in a signature campaign? You observe that there is a condition that you have to meet.
(a) You must make 15 constructive posts per week. (b) You must make 10 constructive posts per week! as it may apply. I am not against this condition but the next one is what I am concerned with.
If you don't reach 10/15 (as the case may be) posts before the end date, you will not receive any stake for the current week.
My question is, what happens to someone who makes 9 posts in case (a), and 13 posts in case (b)? Is it fair to deny anyone who has made more than 75% post for the week? Could there be a somewhat reward for such people?
Please share your thoughts. What will be the best way to reward signature campaign?
Of course it is fair not to reward such people, because they did not fulfill the terms of the contract with the project, but how else is it possible? If we consider the picture in General, then the question arises - what if the company does not fulfill its promises to reward, change the conditions of participation in the bounty of the company? Here everyone acts as he thinks it is right, so the company should not be trusted. (a) You must make 15 constructive posts per week. (b) You must make 10 constructive posts per week! as it may apply. I am not against this condition but the next one is what I am concerned with.
If you don't reach 10/15 (as the case may be) posts before the end date, you will not receive any stake for the current week.
My question is, what happens to someone who makes 9 posts in case (a), and 13 posts in case (b)? Is it fair to deny anyone who has made more than 75% post for the week? Could there be a somewhat reward for such people?
Please share your thoughts. What will be the best way to reward signature campaign?
It depends on each campaign because due to such market situation we are forced to deal with a lot of campaigns that are ending without any payment or with a dramatic budget reduces. Hope things will change soon.
In my opinion, you should follow the conditions of participation in the signature campaign without question. If you do not agree with this, then perhaps this work is not for you. But this applies only to the bounty of honest managers. If the conditions change constantly and in the middle of the week, it is possible that such a bounty Manager is simply not trustworthy.
You should understand the rules. For example if you join a game there is also a rules that you should follow, if you did not meet that rules you loose. Its just like on signature campaign, we shoukd follow their rules to earn a reward. Read first their rules and understand.
Are you participating in a signature campaign? You observe that there is a condition that you have to meet.
(a) You must make 15 constructive posts per week. (b) You must make 10 constructive posts per week! as it may apply. I am not against this condition but the next one is what I am concerned with.
If you don't reach 10/15 (as the case may be) posts before the end date, you will not receive any stake for the current week.
My question is, what happens to someone who makes 9 posts in case (a), and 13 posts in case (b)? Is it fair to deny anyone who has made more than 75% post for the week? Could there be a somewhat reward for such people?
Please share your thoughts. What will be the best way to reward signature campaign?
(a) You must make 15 constructive posts per week. (b) You must make 10 constructive posts per week! as it may apply. I am not against this condition but the next one is what I am concerned with.
If you don't reach 10/15 (as the case may be) posts before the end date, you will not receive any stake for the current week.
My question is, what happens to someone who makes 9 posts in case (a), and 13 posts in case (b)? Is it fair to deny anyone who has made more than 75% post for the week? Could there be a somewhat reward for such people?
Please share your thoughts. What will be the best way to reward signature campaign?
This will never be the end of what you say. As a result, you express your opinion about stretching, but it is very clear that there is no limit to stretching. There are thousands of people who can exploit that.
I am very unsatisfied with signature campaigns at the moment, because during the last 5 months I have took part in 3 signature campaigns. One team has reduced the budget by x10, another team distributed coins but is still not live on exchanges and the last one dropped like x10 from the ICO price.
Perhaps you have participated in the pool campaign too large, and the completion of the ICO. They felt that the participants were too few and the bonus tokens did not match the amount sold in the ICO. That's reason
I am satisfied about the signature campaigns in which I participated and I think they can come up with any rules they want since they are trying to make sure that the participants are posting for real and with interest.
The managers that do not give any reward because signature campaign participate make an incomplete post is doing the right think. Fortunately we have several bounty campaigns with their rules, just choice the one you are capable to work with. We even have campaigns that accept only five post per week.
What can say in this purpose because now a days Maximum bounties campaign is scams and they never paying payment. Last signature campaign my bounty project dead due to price declination.
There are official rules for all bounty companies that everyone should follow! Why someone performs them and receives a reward, and who is not and also wants to receive a reward?
Before you accept the bounty terms, you all read them and agree to it - if you don't have personal time to write 10 messages a week - that's your problem.
Before you accept the bounty terms, you all read them and agree to it - if you don't have personal time to write 10 messages a week - that's your problem.
each signature campaign has its own rules for making posts every week, before you join in the signature you must have read it and if you fill out the form it means you are able to make 10/15 posts every week, if you don't achieve that means You break the initial agreement and you are indeed not eligible to get a stake if it is not reached
And that's very important to comply with the rules if you wanted to have your stake, allowing yourself to read those rules and making it sure that everything is being understood correctly so afterwards you will be able to enjoy your stake, though not everything around are good but you must find good bounty managers and projects that will not scam the project and will pay accordingly. 
Are you participating in a signature campaign? You observe that there is a condition that you have to meet.
(a) You must make 15 constructive posts per week. (b) You must make 10 constructive posts per week! as it may apply. I am not against this condition but the next one is what I am concerned with.
If you don't reach 10/15 (as the case may be) posts before the end date, you will not receive any stake for the current week.
My question is, what happens to someone who makes 9 posts in case (a), and 13 posts in case (b)? Is it fair to deny anyone who has made more than 75% post for the week? Could there be a somewhat reward for such people?
Please share your thoughts. What will be the best way to reward signature campaign?
(a) You must make 15 constructive posts per week. (b) You must make 10 constructive posts per week! as it may apply. I am not against this condition but the next one is what I am concerned with.
If you don't reach 10/15 (as the case may be) posts before the end date, you will not receive any stake for the current week.
My question is, what happens to someone who makes 9 posts in case (a), and 13 posts in case (b)? Is it fair to deny anyone who has made more than 75% post for the week? Could there be a somewhat reward for such people?
Please share your thoughts. What will be the best way to reward signature campaign?
You see signature bounty campaigns have practically the highest rewards among other campaigns. That's why bounty managers make such strict rules for the participants. And I think it's rather fair because they limit the minimum amount of posts. That's the point. If you make less then minimum than you are out. Fully agree. But what they could really improve is the motivation to do more posts than required. For instance if you make twice as mush posts as the minimum number you will get more stakes etc. And limit the maximum reward as well. That will be really cool.
Jump to: