Topic: Rewarding signature campaign, are you satisfied? - page 11. (Read 3945 times)
I am currently participating in a signature campaign, I think the rules issued by the bounty manager are fair enough, in the rules written minimum post a week is 10, then we must post according to target. if we can only post 9 in a week, then that is our mistake and of course we will not be rewarded. If we participate in the signature campain, then of course we must follow the rules set by the bounty manager, and when our posts are lacking, it is our fault
The bigger problem regarding signature campaign is ICO project management reduces the allocated signature funds from the bounty campaign or they don't pay as they bounty Ann announces. About incomplete post there must be some relaxation to give reduced stakes based on the task completed out of targeted posts. Also as a Bounty hunter one must obey the rules of the bounty campaign to complete the assign task weekly.
Yes, I always got good rewards through the signature campaign! Of course, because I'm a Member, I'm proud to demonstrate this position, but in relation to blog campaigns, signature campaign is not behind in terms of rewards and as I'm always active in the forum, I find it incredible to be paid to post opinions and some shitopinions. 
It's okay with me to earn small rewards as far as it's worth my effort to participate in such program I believe as a reward I earn still it has a good value in market and can have a potential to grow more. It's been good here in crypto in where we can expect earnings without investment.
Yes, I always got good rewards through the signature campaign! Of course, because I'm a Member, I'm proud to demonstrate this position, but in relation to blog campaigns, signature campaign is not behind in terms of rewards and as I'm always active in the forum, I find it incredible to be paid to post opinions and some shitopinions.
That is rule and we can againts it, and all bounty managers have their rights to make decision whether participants get stake or not. I know it is hard if we almost reach minimum post and not get stake, and you know what is worse than that? you make post with minimum requirements on rule, and topic that you have posted on that is deleted
In every business, rule is very important. Before you joined the campaign, you saw the rules and they are clearly stated. It is now left to you if you can abide to the rules. If you are not comfortable with it and you know you cannot follow it duly, then there is no need to join. If the manager decides not to give you any stake, he is right.
Had it been he allows you to bridge the rule by posting less, then others too will do the same and that might lead to a faulty campaign.
Had it been he allows you to bridge the rule by posting less, then others too will do the same and that might lead to a faulty campaign.
I think that the rules are necessary in order to obey them, so if you need to make 10 posts, then you NEED to make at least 10 posts.
I am satisfied with any project that pays out the rewards at this point since most of them seem to be making us wait for so long before they actually pay out the coins. By then the price of the coins would have dropped so much that they are not worth much anymore. But so far I am satisfied with the rewards that I have gotten from campaigns
Are you participating in a signature campaign? You observe that there is a condition that you have to meet.
(a) You must make 15 constructive posts per week. (b) You must make 10 constructive posts per week! as it may apply. I am not against this condition but the next one is what I am concerned with.
If you don't reach 10/15 (as the case may be) posts before the end date, you will not receive any stake for the current week.
My question is, what happens to someone who makes 9 posts in case (a), and 13 posts in case (b)? Is it fair to deny anyone who has made more than 75% post for the week? Could there be a somewhat reward for such people?
Please share your thoughts. What will be the best way to reward signature campaign?
Before you join in any campaign there is already a rule that they post and all of this requirements should be accomplish. I think it is fair because it is already clear in the rules that you will not get any stakes if you did not meet the required task and you know the consequence if you didn't fulfill your work. (a) You must make 15 constructive posts per week. (b) You must make 10 constructive posts per week! as it may apply. I am not against this condition but the next one is what I am concerned with.
If you don't reach 10/15 (as the case may be) posts before the end date, you will not receive any stake for the current week.
My question is, what happens to someone who makes 9 posts in case (a), and 13 posts in case (b)? Is it fair to deny anyone who has made more than 75% post for the week? Could there be a somewhat reward for such people?
Please share your thoughts. What will be the best way to reward signature campaign?
Think, that conditions for signature which requires administrator-acceptable. If someone thinks that you need to make a lot of 15 or 10 messages-then you can choose other companies. There is such which require to do 7 or 5 messages.
If you care that you cannot write 10 or 15 messages, then just do not participate in the bounty companies. In my opinion it is quite easy and if you are afraid that a purge of this forum will be deleted some messages, write larger number of commentary.
Every campaign manager is different and has different perspectives about rewards. But at the end rules and rules. They are created to be respected, so normally if someone doesn't have 15 approved posts at the end of the week, he/she shouldn't receive the reward. Of course, there could be an extra rule where the manager says that users will receive rewards even if they didn't made enough posts but they will be lower than normal.
I participate in the bounty campaigns and those rules seem reasonable to me. I think they have the right to make their own rules. It doesn't bother me to make the number of posts they want. It is worth doing it!
all the rules given in my opinion do not impose your work in your daily life. if you are active in the forum, you may be able to achieve the rules given in the signature campaign. and in my opinion it is appropriate for those who have not succeeded in completing the task and they do not get a stake on that week, whatever the reason if the rules are not done correctly the consequence you do not get a stake or profit
Are you participating in a signature campaign? You observe that there is a condition that you have to meet.
(a) You must make 15 constructive posts per week. (b) You must make 10 constructive posts per week! as it may apply. I am not against this condition but the next one is what I am concerned with.
If you don't reach 10/15 (as the case may be) posts before the end date, you will not receive any stake for the current week.
My question is, what happens to someone who makes 9 posts in case (a), and 13 posts in case (b)? Is it fair to deny anyone who has made more than 75% post for the week? Could there be a somewhat reward for such people?
Please share your thoughts. What will be the best way to reward signature campaign?
I think before any signature campaign participant sign up to join the campaign, he or she must have gone through the rules guiding the campaign and signing up means agreement to the terms and condition of the campaign. Therefore anything short if that is not accepted because if 75 percent opportunity is given, participants will take it for granted, so no need of creating such. (a) You must make 15 constructive posts per week. (b) You must make 10 constructive posts per week! as it may apply. I am not against this condition but the next one is what I am concerned with.
If you don't reach 10/15 (as the case may be) posts before the end date, you will not receive any stake for the current week.
My question is, what happens to someone who makes 9 posts in case (a), and 13 posts in case (b)? Is it fair to deny anyone who has made more than 75% post for the week? Could there be a somewhat reward for such people?
Please share your thoughts. What will be the best way to reward signature campaign?
I believe that the condition is a condition. And if you took the job, you have to do it to the end and completely. A large number of people take part in the campaign and all of them must be equal and follow the rules equally.
It would be cool if the number of stacks was considered depending on the number of posts, that is, for example, Full Member receives for 15 posts per week 5 stacks, then for 10 he would receive 3.3 stacks. But of course no one will do so in order to save money. But I think if there was such a bounty campaign it would be very popular.
Hi, I do not see the bad in the rules of subscription campaigns.
The rules are created to fulfill them.
There are subscription campaigns where you need 5 messages per week, and there are campaigns where you are paid for each message.
The rules are created to fulfill them.
There are subscription campaigns where you need 5 messages per week, and there are campaigns where you are paid for each message.
75% of the subscription is fully worthy in my opinion. If it is judged by the rules, it still hasn’t fulfilled the conditions and this is decided by each manager bounty campaigne. 10-15 messages are easy to do here, where there were still bounty signature where 25 messages are required. We need new rules for bounty then there will be a development of the whole blockchain industry.
Are you participating in a signature campaign? You observe that there is a condition that you have to meet.
(a) You must make 15 constructive posts per week. (b) You must make 10 constructive posts per week! as it may apply. I am not against this condition but the next one is what I am concerned with.
If you don't reach 10/15 (as the case may be) posts before the end date, you will not receive any stake for the current week.
My question is, what happens to someone who makes 9 posts in case (a), and 13 posts in case (b)? Is it fair to deny anyone who has made more than 75% post for the week? Could there be a somewhat reward for such people?
Please share your thoughts. What will be the best way to reward signature campaign?
Join the ICO signature campaign, you accept the terms and conditions listed there. Failure to comply with the conditions for writing a certain number of messages leads to not charging rates for the week. This is true. I do not think that the bounty manager should charge fewer bids based on fewer written messages. It is quite difficult and will lead to confusion.(a) You must make 15 constructive posts per week. (b) You must make 10 constructive posts per week! as it may apply. I am not against this condition but the next one is what I am concerned with.
If you don't reach 10/15 (as the case may be) posts before the end date, you will not receive any stake for the current week.
My question is, what happens to someone who makes 9 posts in case (a), and 13 posts in case (b)? Is it fair to deny anyone who has made more than 75% post for the week? Could there be a somewhat reward for such people?
Please share your thoughts. What will be the best way to reward signature campaign?
There is another problem here. You write the required number of messages, however the forum deletes several of them for various reasons, including due to the deletion of the topic, its transfer to the archive, and so on. In this regard, you are not charged rates. By the way, this problem is very common.
Jump to: