Topic: Royse777 is Casino Critique - page 5. (Read 3924 times)

I badly need a break. I will write some bullshit tomorrow. It's already 1 AM and I can not sleep. It's been a couple of days I cannot sleep. I used to post my photos and my family photos on social media. Why are those fuckers searching for my personal information? How they are related to my forum account? What if they use my family photos to harm me? I didn't kick anyone's balls. There are a lot of scammers and Unethical people on the forum and they making money from it. I didn't scam anybody. I got scammed multiple times. People making fun of me. People taking advantage of my illness.

I guess if your last name is "Bitches" you kinda have to name your child like this:




You might want to take a break. I don't see how digging your hole deeper makes any sense for you now.

As for harm, there was something about bonuses that you tried to double-dip with your sockpuppets. I can't be arsed to look it up, but again - stop digging or someone won't be so lazy.

What is the point of blurring the image while posting the source link? This is a dummy website used as a dummy template, nothing else. The website link was never published anywhere, and I am curious how and where you found it. What did you want to achieve by posting this? A couple of merits?

I am one hundred percent sure the link was never posted before.
Why are you so interested in me? Looking for my personal information and everything else. I already said I am not an Anonymous.


I accept my bad things. I was dishonest about multiple accounts on the forum. What else? Did I scam anyone? Does anyone get any harm due to my lie? Did I lie about anyone else?

Keep your hand over your body and answer if you can. Are you 100% Honest? You never lied?

---

Now I am seriously scared of internet wolves. I didn't care about my security or personal information before. There was a time I used my Facebook status to save my wallet's private keys. That's much dumb I am.

Your concern for your privacy is a load of bull. Don't use the term as a shield to hide behind when you are being a prick. People who care about their privacy do not publish their real name, address, phone number or email address on the web for anyone to see. If you are truly concerned about your privacy, then you should be more careful when posting personal information online.


Source: http://www.itsnaim.com/#contact



The fact that you were banned from the forum was never a issue, as far as I know. Many members even supported you in your ban appeal thread. It became, however, an issue when it was discovered that you disrespected the community by ban evading and lying about it. Surely you can tell the difference?


Yes, if they knew about your dishonesty, it should have mattered to them. Your forum background is your reputation, and that's kind of important here.  


That's a moot point now.


EDIT: added an archived version of the site
EDIT 2: removed an archived version of the site (everyone can find it on their own)

Some people exist in the world who care about privacy. They keep their promises, and Royse777 is not the only one who respects others' privacy. People even hide others' privacy when they know the person is trying to correct his mistakes (Mine was an incorrect way to correct mistakes) if they think he is unlikely to scam others. The world is full of good people; we just don't realize them. Loyce respected others' privacy until he saw a reason to disclose it.



Does it matter to a company to know whether I am banned or not? Suppose they know. Does it matter to them? Should they care about my forum background, or should they care about the other projects that I have done? BTW, I am not on the project for a couple of days now. CC is Supposed to announce that.

No it is not necessary. But I think this was an unnecessary move from you. I was trusting you like I did some others.


For casino critique project we need people who will work there, believe in the project. Why it matters if a user is banned?
When a campaign manager is hiring a participant, what does he consider? He consider user who will follow his rules. He does care less how good a poster is. Have you not seen it from your example.
As a project owner my concern is who will fit to my needs or better say our needs. Naim seemed a good fit who is hardworking, I offered him and he accepted. What does it has to do with someone who is banned forum? The forum is not sponsoring the project or the forum does not have a rules such like a ban user from the forum can not start a bitcoin project or involve in a bitcoin project.

Now about hiding CC from my main account.

1. It's an official account. May be it worth to know who is behind it but should it be mandatory, is a project obliged by some rules that they will have to announce it from their own account? 

2. After bitlucy there were few users including two specific users who are waiting to destroy anything that I will do or take, do you think it was good for the project to announce that CC is the project I am going to start. I simply did not feel secure to do so.

Now since you brought it open, you made my life harder.   

When I read that post, I assumed he meant his real name, not his other forum accounts:

The one in the project was/is naim027, it was already publicly known he was banned for plagiarism. Only the ban evasion wasn't known to us at that time.

Ifi that happens, you should care and fight to have them removed. Retaliation tags are never acceptable. To be fair: I don't think I've seen retaliation from Royse777 ("or friends") because of negative feedback on Royse777.

Well, in view of recent events, I, who did not promise to keep the secret (I was simply asked for) am going to confirm that Royse777 is Casino Critique, which I could prove with the PM, but I don't think it will be necessary.

Yes Royse777 not only helped to keep secret that AnotherAlt was Naim027, a known cheater and plagiarist while evading the ban, but also included him in his Casino Critique project.

Right now I'm hesitating because at the very least I'm going to leave him a neutral negative spirit tag, if not a negative tag directly and I don't care if those of you who are his friends fill me with retaliatory negative feedbacks.

I will think about it in the next few hours.

It's been a while since I've been in the reputation section, and, in fact, I think I'm going to end up putting it on ignore because I'm a bit fed up with the unnecessary drama, sometimes stirred up by alts. At first I enjoyed coming here more, as it's like the gossip on Bitcointalk, but I'm getting fed up.

I would like to make a reflection that has been going through my mind.

I know what Casino Critique's main account is.

And I think that hiding it in the end has been detrimental, because, in my opinion, that person has a pretty decent reputation, I'd say. Although not perfect. That person sent me a PM telling me about the project and offering me a free chip. I did not promise them that I would not tell who that person is, although I understood that they preferred not to disclose it. I didn't remember anything the PM said about no disclosing and I had to look at the PM again before writing this post to realize that it said:: "...Casino Critique is my official account. Please keep it unpublished."

In my case, I have not disclosed it but not for money or anything else, because I am not involved in the project and I have had little to no relationship with the people involved during my time in the forum. I simply understand that the people on the project prefer not to disclose it, and I respect that.

The only thing I could have been involved in would have been to invest some chips, but it didn't convince me, as it didn't convince almost anyone else. It seems that the project will continue despite the adversity of lack of funding and if it is finally a successful project will be mainly due to persistence, effort and faith in the project that have those who make up the team.

Although I think it would have been better to say who Casino Critique is, I don't think this issue has had any influence on the funding. I think such big numbers on a new project is what people don't see clearly.

I just prefer to improve my financial situation in a boring but safe way: DCA to the S&P 500, DCA Bitcoin and some RE.

It's not just Royse, but there are members who won't like certain managers for a number of reasons and hence they will launch such posts against them only to satisfy themselves, but the result is always all in vain. Some may have hard feelings about not being accepted and others might have jealousy.

Also, these people use random newbies accounts which shows them that they can't stand their arguments from their original accounts.

Well, from what it looks, it seems he stopped... for now.

Speaking of all these new accounts creating topics in order to cause some friction and then disappear in a thin air. It's likely Royce777 created some enemy or enemies probably from signature campaigns or bounties as he was a manager. The common thing about these account is they seem to be bitter about campaign managers
1. https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.60963524
2. https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/is-this-allowed-5412164

Haha, that's funny, Someday someone will come up with the conclusion that both of them are brothers and doing all this drama to promote their casino
I know this is not true because there are better ways to promote the casinos and not by the trolls.
 
Are we going to get to a conclusion on this, or this is going to be a never ending debate forever???

Oh, I didn't notice Royse777 was already here.
So, You are started responding to him again? What's the point? Do you believe you will be able to satisfy him? If so, You are wrong. TrollyBag is not going to stop. Now, I am a bit suspicious about Casino Critique and TrollyBag. Why do I feel like Mr. JollyBad is behind the project and doing all this drama just to promote the platform and spread it over the forum?

I don't know Royse777 and I don't want to say you are right and Royse777 is wrong or you are wrong and Royse777 is right. What I want to say is that you dare not reveal the sins of others with your real account. From my point of view, you look like a coward.

Frightened?
I thought I was in your ignore list from long time including others, what changed in between?

I love my dog, we are good friends and loyal. when sometimes it asks too much attention I fake my anger. It then hides behind the doors and pretends not seeing me. My dog is not coward. It observes me and waits for its time to start playing again.

Having me in the ignore list is another lie from you. You only use the word and use it when you are unable to have a liberal discussion. It's a trick for you when you are running out of your nonsense arguments. You did not have any answer for my last post because the data shows you are a liar. So like my dog, you are watching and patiently pretending that you are not seeing the posts until I cool off.

Stop playing your word games in topics/posts related to me from any of your accounts. Whatever you had to say you said it in my trust page. I don't hide behind ignore list excuse so I will find you and response your nonsense accordingly. Coward!

I have added you back where you belong on my ignore list along with the tiny clique of trolls that chased me for a while before giving up and all because I refused to believe your nonsense related to the Bitlucy/Royse777 scam 

Yawn LOL
How could you deny some data.

Just look at your post history. Last one week how many posts you made and how many of them are related to me. Go and count the numbers.

Look at the number of posts you made in this topic, look at the number of posts you made on the bitlucy withdrawal topic, look at other topics created related to me. Who has the most number of responses?

You are obsessed with me. How could anyone will not suspect that all those alt are not you just to create new conversion when another conversation is dead. You are even talking to yourself just to create conversation. See.

All these you are doing to discredit my reputation, you are doing good though. Wherever you are having chance you are not missing it to insult me. Meta, reputation, scam accusation, gambling which board you left untouched? Why wouldn't you? After all I am your new subject after 1xbit.

You are obsessed about me, obsessed to discredit everything I have done and do or will do. Do yourself a favor, before lying check your data to back that come out from pressing your keyboard. Something tells me, in real life you are a frustrated loser living a lonely life.

@JollyGood, I don't need you to respect me.  I have enough self-respect for both of us.

Speaking of self-respect, one lesson I pushed onto my children; self-respect can often be demonstrated by one's ability to take criticism.  

The OP should answer this but I probably speak for most when saying in essence every member operating a legitimate project should freely be allowed to try to fundraise.

Maybe the OP was a victim of the Bitlucy/Royse777 scam therefore he is holding grudges or maybe he does not want a scam to take place but I am curious about why he is convinced Royse777 is a hidden member of this particular project. If Royse777 is not connected to this project then the OP is bringing unnecessary attention here but if Royse777 is connected then by all means the OP can raise concerns because after all the Bitlucy/Royse777 scam did occur.

I hope the OP would clarify his position and post using their real account.

You are wrong. I am not using alt-accounts to either discredit you or to keep highlighting the Bitlucy/Royse777 scam.

These are virtually my sentiments exactly.

You mentioned the names, let me comment. I have a lot of time for Hhampuz but lost any little respect I had left for DireWolfM14 some time back. Even if a reputable member was acting as escrow I would dismiss that as a plus-point for a project because he was not part of the team really and controlled no notion of where the project was going, he would just be collecting his commission on escrows.

If there is just one member remaining anonymous and if that member happened to be associated with a scam casino a few months ago in capacity of Partner and Marketing Director and made bold claims putting their own reputation on the line then it is clear nobody especially well respected members should backing the project.

I understand your perspective when you say the name remaining anonymous is not a big deal because an escrow account collects the funds and there are other reputable members who trust the anonymous one. For me it is not enough to either trust the project or believe it will be successful.

That sort of secrecy would not help at all but thus far the balance in their address is still steady at 0.005 BTC, most probably a team member deposited it there.

Though several members have decided to keep the name quiet, that anonymous member seems to have let the cat out of the bag themselves. Thank you for mentioning it was just one member. Hopefully they will attach their username to the project and provide reasons why they wanted to remain in the shadows.

As the days go by, if I see this project releasing notes and there is merit to it I would be a strong backer but right now I see nothing that makes me see this as a potential business.

I don't know for sure, and I'm not sure how many people are on the fence about investing in CC, with the deciding factor being the single member of the team remaining anonymous.  Now that I'm writing that thought out, it probably doesn't matter too much--but at the very least it'd put this controversy (no matter what its importance) to rest.

No, of course they're not.  But as I said, even without knowing the legal names of the people behind the bitcointalk usernames, those usernames have positive/neutral/negative reputations associated with them.  If this was a project where they said they weren't even naming the team by their bitcointalk usernames, I'm pretty sure there would be no faith that it wouldn't turn out to be a scam (and rightfully so).