Topic: Royse777 is Casino Critique - page 8. (Read 3924 times)

Lolz, the worst kind of accusation on this forum is one without any form of evidence, I believe alot of users have mentioned this in their comment on this thread, but what I want you to understand is that, without any form of evidence, your accusation against Royse777 is nothing other than spam.
And I know you know that your accusation post if spam, this is why you didn't make this post with your real/main account, but rather choose to hide behind an alt account.
What exactly did you or do you hope to achieve from this?

I checked the website. It's a joke. They say "buy one get one free" for the private sale, maximum 1000 chip for private sale. What if someone, as an example, has 2 BTC addresses. It reminds me of the "pay 1 btc, get 2 btc back, maximum 5 btc per person". Are you going to confiscate his funds, like you justify confiscating funds of all players on the casinos advertised here lol

These are individuals with no hope of achieving anything useful for other humans. They can only live hiding behind their screens and scamming others. So even if the project is not a scam in itself, it will be advertising scams as it is done on this forum

And @DireWolf14 being the one "just holding the keys" as he claims is another joke. The reality is he is to be trusted to verify receipts, which is another job, and nobody knows if he's done any of this before (if he's ever got a job before anyway)

When I was approached to assist with escrow I was told the goal was to raise a specific dollar amount (expressed in USD) that is less than 1BTC, even at today's price.  But for some, I guess it's easier to shitpost hate, stupidity, and dumb questions directed at sockpuppeting trolls.  Those answers can be found by reading the website, which (by design) is easy to find.

how could I take you into refers if you didn't post on this topic? This is your first post here unless the OP's account is yours or @stfu yahoo registered only to give a response to yahoo62278.
at the beginning of your post, you say that it is justified on your part that you do not use the primary account in this discussion, while at the end of the post you consider it dishonourable if the CC user does not use his main account.


just to be clear, I'm not accusing anyone here, I'm just pointing out the fact that several older (more experienced) members of the forum are involved in the whole thing. someone as part of the team, someone as a 3rd service. That's why I think that the identity behind the CasinoCritique account is not a mystery and there are certainly members who know who manages that account. if it matters at all.

I've been following the whole project a little bit since its first appearance, and we have a similar attitude that this is not a scam scheme. Plus, the funds will be held by two reputable members as an escrow.

You create this thread only to attacked and accused Royse777 of Bitlucy which case I believed has been settled. But you know that your cased has not been settled since then did you pm him or Bitlucy company about the complain?  This your account was created on the September 18, 2022, 07:19:19 PM and you created this thread on the September 18, 2022, 08:28:52 PM. The space is just about 1hour. And I also believe that, your motive of opening this account is to attack Royse777 because of what happened in Bitlucy. Remember he not the owner of the company but was the just a manager who was trying to partner with the company. Therefore, if you are accusing him from Bitlucy issue then you have to bring some real evidences to back up your allegation. Because that case has been closed but is like you were not satisfied with the judgement, so you want to reopen the case again, then evidences are the things lawyers will use to give judgement. As it is, your accusation  is lagging merit, there it is null and void. I also believed that this is not your real account in the forum. You create this account because of Royse777. Please can you state your reasons of the accusation?

I think there's an ANN thread somewhere, but their website (or at least for the fundraising part) is here.

I've gone over the contents of the entire site, but as I was just doing a proofreading and making suggestions, I didn't retain details about the overall picture of how much money they're trying to raise.  10BTC is indeed a lot; I'll have to go back and look to see for myself what their goals are as far as that's concerned.  

What they want to achieve is all spelled out on their website, though, and probably in their ANN thread (I think one exists, anyway).  They're trying to start up a crypto casino review site and form partnerships with, I think, advertisers.  The fine details of their business plan, I have no idea about.

Same here to the first part, and though I'm not part of the team if I suspect anything scammy, I'll blow the whistle faster than a ref with his eyes on a goofy NBA rookie.

Edit: CC has their IBCO page where they're looking for investors (revenue-sharing partners), but I don't see where they've laid out a goal of how much bitcoin they're trying to raise.  Maybe I need more coffee--and I also haven't re-read their website, either.

This thread is a prime example of why I'm getting really tired of the reputation board.  It's gotten to be full of self-important busy-bodies attempting to build their own reputations by besmirching the reputations of others.

To those of you who are concerned about the reputation of CasinoCritique; if you don't like the project, don't invest.  The reason CasinoCritique asked me to assist as an escrow is because he felt that my reputation (along with Hhampuz') would reassure folks that they would not get scammed.  Now, I have one of the signing keys and Hhampuz has another, without at least one us going rogue the funds will make it to where they are destined; i.e. paying for services and the wages of the team members.

What's my involvement?  Just as I described above; I'm holding one of the signing keys.  That's it.  If I'm asked to sign a transaction I will require documentation/invoices/receipts to ensure that the funds aren't being misappropriated.  It's my belief that my integrity and honor are the reasons I was asked in the first place, and if I see anything funny going on with the funds, I will be first to cry foul.  If you trust that at least two members of the Escrow team are not out to scam anyone, then rest assured that the project will not turn into a scam.  That's not the same thing as saying that the project will succeed, that you'll have to assess for yourselves.

As for any speculation to who's behind the CasinoCritique account, you'll just have to keep speculating.  Yes, I do know, but I will not be disclosing that information.  I made a promise to keep it secret, and I intend to honor my word.  But by no means does that mean I will allow a scam to occur under my nose.

Keeping aside for a moment the member/members behind Casino Critique, he/she/they want to raise 10 BTC for what exactly? Do you have any forum links and their official website address?

What are/is Casino Critique supposed to be doing if they ever get started?

True. It is difficult to argue with that point, why would the OP be hiding their identity?

Please try to refrain from using profanities because it really drags the post or the whole thread in to the gutter. Surely we can try to engage in a civil conversation.

It is fine to use an alt account to make some accusations,  but what is not fine is making a baseless accusation. However, there is no crime, I have seen people who woke up and head directly to reputation to outpour their illusionary thinking.

In as much as I support the use of alt accounts when it's absolutely needful, I am somewhat skeptical why the accuser should create a new account with Royse's name. It would have been a generic username that could be re-useable when the need arises.


There's no obligations or whatsoever that demands that Royse777 comes to make some statements here. It is fine he comes up with a statement and it is also fine if he doesn't. Remember Royse777 was involved in one Bitlusy saga, if he is actually launching a new project, it is OK to not associate his identity to it. The personality behind the Royse777 account is a genuine personal who has gathered nice reputation in the forum, but the name Royse777 recently got attacks and somewhat stained. Even in business, it's OK to disassociate a certain brand from the other.

Yet, Op is just a baseless accusation and that is what it remains until proven otherwise.

OP, since there is no evidence for your point, you are just making baseless accusations. I am merely stating a fact, I have no ulterior motive in this.

Can you please explain why you think Royse777 and Casino Critique are related?

Full disclosure: I've been helping to edit the Casino Critique website, and although I'm not part of their team I am involved in this, and therefore my reputation now that I've announced it.  I'm not fact-checking, just editing for grammar and the like.

IMO making a big deal out of who's behind the official CC account is a waste of mental energy, because as I said previously the team members (in other words, the people who'd have their feet under the fire if the project turned out to be a scam) have made their identities known.  If you're going to focus on anything, it ought to be who has control over any funds CC has received so far--and I don't have an answer to that.  To my understanding, no decisions are going to be made about use of funds without the 2-of-3 sig security thing in action, so if you're already starting to point fingers, the targets of said fingers are already there.

Also: I happen to believe that there's no intent to scam investors with the CC project.  I think the members behind it really do want to create a casino review site that's going to succeed.  That said, I do understand the skepticism by OP and others (though I think it's overblown given that the team members are listed by name on the CC website).  This isn't exactly like that case we had a while back where some relatively trusted members misused charity funds.  This a group of forum members whose reputations are worth something to them and likely worth more in potential or actual money than they could get by pulling off a scam by colluding to pull in investment money for a fake casino review site.

I've been wrong before, but my gut and my experience is telling me I'm right on this one.

100% butthurt trolls.

Sure, I know who is behind Satoshi account, and I know all other bitcointalk secrets because I am unwilling member of 33 degree high secret occult dt membership  
I don't care who is behind Casino Critique and I don't care about anything related with this Casino thing, so I think you need to drink your medication or check-in for vacation in your local mental hospital.

I think that it will be barely for someone to understand exactly what you are saying because their is no backups in the exact statement or what you agitating. Any accusation been present do cover with a prove some that when discussing you will no exactly your a point to portray. Only thing i will advice op is to put link to back it's accusation up.

I don't know who cryptohunter is, although I heard of him on the forum I think.

On the one hand I'm not very clear about the OP's accusation either, but on the other hand, what's Royse777's problem in coming to this thread and saying whether or not he's the one running the account?

Here we go, cryptohunter v2.0 is booting at full speed, please stand by while we get to the login screen

I don't know if you are referring to me, although I understand you don't, as I think BitcoinGirl.Club refers to other accounts. In my case, yes, I am an alt. I created this account because I already have an account on the forum and I thought about making a second one, as many people have. In the future I might say which is my main account, or maybe not, or maybe I won't get very far because I'm not sure I have time to manage two accounts, combining them with my daily activities. In any case, I am not obliged to say so.

Yesterday I was looking for a thread of interest to comment on and I saw the other one about Bitlucy.

I have nothing against Royse777, but after what has been said, I think the following:

1. I think it is more likely to be Royse777 who is behind the Casino Critique account than Darkstar_, as explained in the other thread.

2. Without more data, we cannot be sure. I think the OP is probably a shitposter who was tagged by Royse777 and that's why he talks like that.

3. The two escrows know who is behind this account.

4. If it's Royse777, dkbit98 knows it too and in this case what he has written in this thread would be completely dishonest. The fact that he talks about balls, pussy and conspiracy theories, without clearly stating that it is not Royse777 who is behind the account makes me think even more strongly that it is him.

5. If it's Royse777 and some people on the forum know about it, I don't think it's honest for them to hide it. I understand that after what happened, they want to give him a second chance, but we are talking about a lot of money here. The reason for not saying who is behind it is clear, many people will think twice if someone who was involved with Bitlucy is behind the project, no matter how much the community has forgiven him.

This last point applies, even if the person behind the account is not Royse777. Most likely it is someone who has had reputation problems on the forum, and therefore does not use his main account or does not make it clear, either with a neutral tag or by explicitly saying so, that it is that person who is behind it. Hiding this is not honest with potential investors.

Yeah, I was thinking the same, like WTF?

I think there are a lot of people here who resent the managers for not having accepted them or maybe for having been part of the 1xCrap campaign and having been negative trusted.

On the other hand we have to take into account the example of Solosanz, who started making threads in this section and nowadays is in DT2 and in a signature campaign. So let's not be surprised if imitators come out.

maybe they are just angry (although I think it is the same person) because they were not accepted in some of their campaigns. However, they prefer to perform with newly created accounts because they do not want to compromise the possibility of participating in some of their future campaigns.


User CasinoCritique is not the only one in that business, as far as I know, several old members of the forum are involved in it. I believe that it is not difficult to determine if the need arises.

True, there is nothing wrong with using an alt account, but its one thing to create an alt account and then provide some solid evidence for the claims (in that case I don't think that people would complain about using an alt) and completely different to do what OP did - zero proof, just some baseless accusations.


He doesn't have squat. If he had, he would already provide it.

The 'referee' always lets the match go on though, telling the players to wear a tougher skin, it helps so the match goes on without too much stoppages, though we have var for any dangerous foul play.

Members here should know by now that nobody is going to waste their time with reports or accusations without without solid proof, and nobody is going to help you check deeper for that proof, if you feel someone has faulted the rules, then you bring the proof, even if you do so with your 10th account, at least do so with meaningful evidence. I notice many reports these days are out of vendetta against another member, that stinks.