Pages:
Author

Topic: rpietila Wall Observer - the Quality TA Thread ;) - page 15. (Read 907246 times)

legendary
Activity: 1554
Merit: 1000

I'm over being proud of it, though. This place has lost it's glitter.



But you're "Donator"  Shocked

How much do you have to donate to get the elite green sticker?
10BTC

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.2514705
donator
Activity: 2772
Merit: 1019

I'm over being proud of it, though. This place has lost it's glitter.
legendary
Activity: 2324
Merit: 1125
My husband (who is well into the 140s) said that we cannot have meaningful conversations with anyone that is outside of 30 IQ points of another.  This is why those that fall into the 140+ range find the entire world difficult to be in.  LOL  People in the world with 110-120 IQs get along "socially" the easiest it seems.  

Cool concept (even though IQ is a very poor measure of intelligence). It seems to be related to rpietila's rabit hole metaphor. I want to add that you can communicate with people outside your range. It's just tiring and not intellectually rewarding (but can be socially rewarding to some in certain situations).
legendary
Activity: 1554
Merit: 1000
@rpietila

Delete this post if you want, but maybe at the same time, you should rename this thread as the 'donations to the jesus delusionals'.
Maybe just pay him what he wants and wish him well, cos you're continued engagement with this divisive fruitcake, is probably not good for you right now, if ive understood your situation correctly. 
sr. member
Activity: 336
Merit: 265
I - Not able to create value, destined to be a tool in the hands of people in (IV)
II - Able to create value, ability to live independently/collectivistically in a voluntaristic world
III - Able to create value to the extent that money is never the bottleneck as you can always exchange value for money as needed
IV - Able to create money
  IVA - Able to threaten, coerce and bribe, (drone-DU-bomb, etc.) all the world to submit to you
  IVB - Able to just let others follow you, and able to enable the leadership position as well for anyone who wishes to pick it up.

Creating as much money as needed is a lie to yourself. Money can't buy knowledge creation:

It is the knowledge creation which is needed and valuable. Money is a claim on resources, but not a claim on knowledge creation (because it can't be, read my essay linked above).

Knowledge is not money, because money is fungible whereas knowledge is not.

Knowledge creation capability does determine where you fit in my scale above, and I have bolded it for you, AnonyMint. No matter how well off you may be with your knowledge creation skills, if you lack the prerequisites to monetize them (the skills, or the knowledge, or contacts, or any subset), you are still in the early stages of my ladder. Also the environment matters greatly.

When all the things that change the world and impact evolution have shifted to knowledge creation, which money can't buy, then influence over and actual knowledge creation are more valued than money. You can go buy all the useless castles you want, while I change the world. Then we will compare accomplishments.

Also pray tell Satoshi that I can't monetize my Bitcoin killer. He certainly did. But money isn't the goal and he presumably knew that also.

My goal is to move us to the next stage where knowledge creation is important and money (hard resources) less so. Atoms are heavy, but finitely so. Knowledge creation is unbounded. Compare.

In short, your ladder is not a metric of greatest importance. It the illusion that is going to trap the capitalists as we move towards the return of Jesus where resources don't matter any more. Jesus is coming technologically even if not literally.

That is why I suggested you should use your money for good while it still has any relevance. Yeah I am in a rough spot right now financially, but Jesus told me to walk with nothing and stay focused on what is important. (that doesn't mean I am a saint!)

The ones in IVB, have the burden on changing the environment (by replacing the existing world system with a better one) to enable us to move on to the next stage as humanity. When that happens, then your dreaming will become true, but it seems others have to make the transition as you are unwilling to raise your level (which I have done, after we did business together in 2008).

Raising your level in the wrong direction has made you much less likely to have any important impact. You are moving farther away from any sensible decentralized lurch towards the knowledge age with your socialist monetary scheme which is competing directing with the TPTB because it is a power vacuum direction.

Whereas, I am creating technological advances which decentralize and eliminate the power vacuum. And also provides a basic level income for a basic level of work. Which is the way it should be, not some socialistic scheme.

It can never be a truth that money which is created by following leaders is an honest/truthful or nonviolent money system, because it will always be a power vacuum.

Is any of the readers buying this? I think the exact opposite is true.

The only non power vacuum will come from technology that renders concentrated control over wealth impotent over anything other than resource capitalism.

Bitcoin failed because it burns a physical resource.

The positive scaling law of Linus' law is the solution. It is the only positive scaling law of software (technology) engineering. And it also applies to truth in a way that I am going to be the first to bring to a money system.

Please continue thinking of me as lower on your ladder. I am confident that is what they thought of Jesus too as he humbly hung out with the bankers and prostitutes because he said that is where the ripe fruit was for saving souls.


Edit: Adam Smith pointed out that those trying to promote the public interest often do worse than those who work for their own optimum economics, due to the invisible hand (or otherwise stated, "you can't do just one thing" ... see how conversationalists destroyed the rivers by trying to save the wildlife from predator wolves). Your goody-goody socialistic coin is in the same genre of myopia:

https://www.khanacademy.org/economics-finance-domain/macroeconomics/gdp-topic/econ-intro-in-macro-tutorial/v/introduction-to-economics
sr. member
Activity: 336
Merit: 265
Perhaps "Epic" for 1500+ and "OneOfTheAges" for 2000+.

Pointless titles are pointless.

Don't tell me you factor poster's title into your analysis of the post?

Don't tell me you can't read?

I will never attain any of these titles explicitly (which is my preference) ... I prefer to attain it the more challenging way wherein I play the game outside the rules that were dicktated to me.

All those pompous BS goat names and all that crap is entirely useless nonsense. Show me the code! Talk and stored monetary claims on human capital are not as useful. Small innovators are really where the action is. The large capital becomes dumb, methodical, and blinded.
legendary
Activity: 1232
Merit: 1002

My most dangerous action today was to rip open a plastic mesh bag of firewood with a gas lighter. From now on, I will control it as a tool.

Hahahaha Cheesy

I did this also a few years ago and I know the feeling Wink

I'm impressed that you still have them packed up. Smiley
legendary
Activity: 3080
Merit: 1688
lose: unfind ... loose: untight
Perhaps "Epic" for 1500+ and "OneOfTheAges" for 2000+.

Pointless titles are pointless.

Don't tell me you factor poster's title into your analysis of the post?
sr. member
Activity: 336
Merit: 265
Perhaps "Epic" for 1500+ and "OneOfTheAges" for 2000+.

Is there a way to search by Activity? I'm guessing there's not very many of us with 2000+ activity.

I dunno. I only saw that gmaxwell has 2000+ activity.

I am not at your activity level, as I have only 1400 cumulative of all my history of usernames.
legendary
Activity: 3878
Merit: 1193
Perhaps "Epic" for 1500+ and "OneOfTheAges" for 2000+.

Is there a way to search by Activity? I'm guessing there's not very many of us with 2000+ activity.
legendary
Activity: 1148
Merit: 1001
Out of 900k people on board, about 1.0k are Legendary (highest rank based on activity). Most of them have signup year in 2013, a legendary year in Bitcoin for sure. Mine is 2012. Oldest is 2009.


I guess it is nice to be "legendary" in something. Wink

I have certainly gained some wisdom since 2013.  I have rather enjoyed spending much time on Bitcointalk and gleaning from those that I could tell were way beyond me in regards to intelligence.  I often feel like the "little sister" that is trying to understand her much older brother's discussions.  I am fully aware that my IQ is well below most, if not all, on here (mine is 128).  My husband (who is well into the 140s) said that we cannot have meaningful conversations with anyone that is outside of 30 IQ points of another.  This is why those that fall into the 140+ range find the entire world difficult to be in.  LOL  People in the world with 110-120 IQs get along "socially" the easiest it seems.  I do OK at 128-129, but I even feel I am smart enough to see beyond the "veil" of what is going on.  That could just be some God given discernment too though.

But things I have learned since 2013 is that what we consider "money" is something that certainly needs to be held onto loosely.  As I experienced a couple Bitcoin bubbles and found how quickly it could come and then go, it actually helped me let go of some of my worries strangely enough.  I also have way less trust in my government and in USD, which is a very healthy thing I believe.  I look around me and see that most, if not all people I know, put their trust in something that could and most likely will be taken from them.  They will be left holding nothing and become so devastated by that.  It is as if I see people walking towards the edge of a cliff and they are not even aware of it.  I could tell them, but it would be futile.  So I just have to wait and see how this all plays out.  It is all rather fascinating though.  

And this time around, as the bubble hits, I am a bit more humbled and I will take my husband's advice (and Risto's as well) and have a plan so my emotions do not get as involved as they did in 2013.  The SSS (sane simple savings plan) has been charted out and I honestly feel good about it.  We are already completely in the "black" in regards to our Bitcoin holdings.  If we lost all we have today nothing would be "lost" on paper, so that is a great feeling.  So now it is just sitting back and enjoying the ride and seeing how it all plays out.  Hopefully I won't get sucked back into the obsession I dealt with in 2013.  That was a little crazy. Wink

sr. member
Activity: 336
Merit: 265
The latest ordeals are, in my understanding, connected to my latest project Kansanmarkka. I am in a linchpin position to push the worldwide monetary revolution happen, because:

And as I've been trying to tell you, you are creating that problem for yourself unnecessarily. You are trying to replace TPTB with yourself. That is not the correct solution. We don't need more idols (Ten Commandments). Read below...


6) I can create money. Well anyone can, demonstrated by Bitcoin etc. The power of money creation is very potent, as it (mostly alone, with the help of inertia in the compartmentalised world system of course) holds the controllers in power, and its proliferation can dethrone and destroy them. I and some of my friends aimed to be in the position to have "unlimited money", which is the second step from having "all the money required" (see (5)).

The difference with "as much as needed" and "unlimited" is in the time preference. "As much as needed" requires the demonstration of a positive expected value to the "investor", so that you can get all the money you need. This capability I have had approx since 2008-2010, after which I have never been in the situation of "needing" money for doing anything that is worth doing.

"Unlimited" allows for giving money away in unlimited quantities without calculation if it will come back. This is what we are about to demonstrate with Kansanmarkka, hardly even allowing people to convert their existing financial resources to it. The situation now is similar to Bitcoin in 2009 - anyone who can get in, will just receive money in unfathomable quantities, no need (or possibility) to pay for it, except by the means of the effort required.

The points (5) and (6) can be expanded to form a 4-phase value creation ladder:

I - Not able to create value, destined to be a tool in the hands of people in (IV)
II - Able to create value, ability to live independently/collectivistically in a voluntaristic world
III - Able to create value to the extent that money is never the bottleneck as you can always exchange value for money as needed
IV - Able to create money
  IVA - Able to threaten, coerce and bribe, (drone-DU-bomb, etc.) all the world to submit to you
  IVB - Able to just let others follow you, and able to enable the leadership position as well for anyone who wishes to pick it up.

Few people at a time are in IVB - but now more than ever before, and we are more dangerous to the powers than ever before, due to the Internet. Something is going to happen, and is happening soon.

Dangerous (again), does not mean violent. IVA is violent, tyrannical, demonic, to its core. IVB is its diametric opposite, hardly willing to engage in self-defence even.

Creating as much money as needed is a lie to yourself. Money can't buy knowledge creation:

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/economic-devastation-355212 <--- the OP of the Economic Devastation thread
The Rise of Knowledge
http://unheresy.com/Information%20Is%20Alive.html

It is the knowledge creation which is needed and valuable. Money is a claim on resources, but not a claim on knowledge creation (because it can't be, read my essay linked above).

The power to create unlimited money (even by having people follow) is never a desirable power because it is a power vacuum.

It can never be a truth that money which is created by following leaders is an honest/truthful or nonviolent money system, because it will always be a power vacuum.

The foundation of your plan appears to begin with fundamental logic errors. Sorry. IQ tests lie.

Quote from: AnonyMint's whitepaper
Abstract: This paper posits that prior consensus ordering systems are winner-take-all power vacuums without a stable decentralized equilibrium. Satoshi’s proof-of-work (aka “PoW”)¹ and Bitshares’ Delegated Proof-of-Stake (aka “DPoS”)² are examined in some detail as plausible examples of this theory.

[redacted]

---

Power vacuum in the context of this paper means the system has no viable mechanism to maintain an equilibrium of decentralized control and limit the snowballing effect of a vicious cycle feedback loop where influence (centralized control) in the system due to concentrated wealth and economies-of-scale, increases the concentration of the wealth and economies-of-scale in the system. The value of the resource to be captured far exceeds the unrecoverable portion of the (risk + opportunity + whatever) cost to capture it, the net value (analogous to a “selling price” minus cost) doesn't decrease with a decrease in demand from those who can compete to obtain it, and only the one with the most resources can capture it.

[redacted]
sr. member
Activity: 336
Merit: 265
Even then the non-legendary one is 868/1000 in becoming Legendary  Cheesy

We need new levels...

Can we suggest a new "Epic" level to Theymos and/or more blue coins for higher Activity?

I take the meaning of of "epic" to be "the one that stands out through all of the ages".

Another alternative higher level title is "OneOfTheAges".

rpietila you seem to be a donator, so perhaps you can get Theymos's ear.

Perhaps "Epic" for 1500+ and "OneOfTheAges" for 2000+.

Or transpose Epic and Legendary ex post facto.

I will never attain any of these titles explicitly (which is my preference), unless bestowed on me by decree ex post facto as correcting an embarrassment whenif I "kill" Bitcoin. I prefer to attain it the more challenging way wherein I play the game outside the rules that were dicktated to me.
legendary
Activity: 1316
Merit: 1000
Si vis pacem, para bellum
Me too...   Wink
Nice to meet all you living legends...  Grin
legendary
Activity: 1137
Merit: 1035
Bitcoin accepted here
legendary
Activity: 2968
Merit: 1895
I am legendary  Cool



I am legendary too. *





* But, I don't deserve it!  I take my compensation via Sig Campaign.  Hey, I'm retired!  How else am I supposed to get an income anyway?
legendary
Activity: 1330
Merit: 1000
dafar consulting
I am legendary  Cool
legendary
Activity: 1281
Merit: 1000
☑ ♟ ☐ ♚
Holy shit rpietila is back.

*bullish*  Grin

Indeed! Welcome back Risto!

sr. member
Activity: 336
Merit: 265
Holy shit rpietila is back.

*bullish*  Grin

Heh I needed to go back 3 pages, to find a single non-legendary* commenter  Grin

*all accounts combined, AnonyMint (iamback, notback, etc) is legendary

Even then the non-legendary one is 868/1000 in becoming legendagy  Cheesy

We need new levels...

The complete list includes:

ActivityPostsUsernameRegistration DateDate of Last PostDays ActivePosts Per DayHours Online Per Day
5184960AnonyMintMar 24, 2013Sep 6, 2014530.39.42.5
42581TheFascistMindSep 9, 2014Oct 8, 201429.319.84.5
84422UnunoctiumTesticlesOct 9, 2014Dec 11, 201462.36.82.2
28184contagionDec 12, 2014Jan 4, 201523.27.93.4
98508iambackJan 5, 2015Mar 21, 201575.26.82.2
4207819TPTB_need_warApr 9, 2015May 17, 2016403.519.44.7
28222sockpuppet1May 6, 2016May 16, 20169.623.14.6
1822888iamnotbackJun 1, 2016Nov 19, 2016171.516.84.1
140017584[cumulative]Mar 24, 2013Nov 19, 20161304.913.5

Note someone has hacked my old accounts and is posting from them recently. History of the account is here:

http://web.archive.org/web/20160422155904/https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/ununoctiumtesticles-385303;sa=showPosts;start=0

If we could rank Legendary by total posts, I think I would be near the top of the list if not at the top. My cumulative posts exceed that of all the Legendary posters in this thread over the past 3 days combined. Lauda is my statistical equal (but not cohort), except I would argue (that statistics lie because) my posts are of greater technical effort.

Note that both TPTB_need_war and sockpuppet1 were active simultaneously, so the peak posts per day perhaps exceeded 40.

My recent posts per day I guesstimate is below 10. Hopefully I can get it down to 3 - 5.


Edit: I have apparently more than 1/1000th (0.1%) of all BCT posts:

or some alt account

I haven't used any other account in 2017.

If you see any posts on my old accounts in 2017, that is because they've been hacked. I scrambled the passwords, but apparently not well enough. And TPTB_need_war I stopped using it because it was banned but I forgot to scramble the password and it since got hacked into. Archive.org has the historical record of that account before it got hacked. So if they delete or edit it, I can prove it.

And I had no accounts that aren't listed in the link in my signature.
legendary
Activity: 2576
Merit: 1087
Holy shit rpietila is back.

*bullish*  Grin
Pages:
Jump to: