Pages:
Author

Topic: SCAM: Bitcoin SV (BSV) - fake team member and plagiarized white paper - page 77. (Read 25829 times)

full member
Activity: 1120
Merit: 131
hero member
Activity: 1988
Merit: 593
if you are attacked by 51%, then you have to accept the change of Protocol or create a fork with a new name
member
Activity: 574
Merit: 14
I get put off by a fake team, they are just out to enrich their pockets, this altcoin BSV seem to be the worst of them all, even attempting to get all legal with it, This is one project that is doomed to fail because its founder is faketoshi..Oh, I will get to be sued this time. We will laugh lasts.Craig couldnt even tell the difference between Bitcoin and bitcoin
jr. member
Activity: 43
Merit: 1

"I will explain this one final time, then no more. I don't want fame ...
Proof #1 that I'm Satoshi Nakamoto: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dZNtbAFnr-0.
Proof #2 that I'm Satoshi Nakamoto: https://coingeek.com/bitcoin-creator-craig-s-wright-satoshi-nakamoto-granted-us-copyright-registrations-for-bitcoin-white-paper-and-code/.
I created the first true Bitcoin.
Then Roger Ver came along and forked Bitcoin, creating BCH.
Then I forked BCH and created BSV.
Very soon, BTC and BCH is going to ZERO and BSV is going to MOON.
If not, I will eat John McAfee's dick and fuck Bruno's goats."

Said very accurately.
That is, if believe Fake Satoshi’s lies, does it turn out like this?
 BTC -  BCH - BSV
Why would true Satoshi create fork from the fork of his coin? Isn't that stupid?
Fake Satoshi lies at every turn.
legendary
Activity: 1918
Merit: 1570
Bitcoin: An Idea Worth Spending

"I will explain this one final time, then no more. I don't want fame ...
Proof #1 that I'm Satoshi Nakamoto: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dZNtbAFnr-0.
Proof #2 that I'm Satoshi Nakamoto: https://coingeek.com/bitcoin-creator-craig-s-wright-satoshi-nakamoto-granted-us-copyright-registrations-for-bitcoin-white-paper-and-code/.
I created the first true Bitcoin.
Then Roger Ver came along and forked Bitcoin, creating BCH.
Then I forked BCH and created BSV.
Very soon, BTC and BCH is going to ZERO and BSV is going to MOON.
If not, I will eat John McAfee's dick and fuck Bruno's goats."
jr. member
Activity: 126
Merit: 5
Now giving me negative trust for promoting the real Bitcoin.

You guys suck.

You basically admit with this comment that you are trying to confuse people into believing that BSV is Bitcoin. You totally deserve the negative trust.
hero member
Activity: 1120
Merit: 554
I used to like Richard Heart but now he is trying to promote his own scam erc-20 token so he can become a billionaire.  This guy is just another shill like the rest of them that will do anything for money no matter how many people they hurt.
sr. member
Activity: 868
Merit: 278
What is your point exactly?

Our point is that BSV is nothing but a fork of a REAL Bitcoin (In fact it is a fork of a fork) and the team member of BSV is a well known scammer and a liar Craig Wright who is pretending to be Satoshi Nakamoto. This is OUR POINT that is very easy to understand for everyone, except fucking paid shills and a liars like you.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lPbh2ltm1wI&t=503s

BTW 4 of my posts have been deleted in this thread, ive seen less censorship in North Korea.

This is NOT self moderated thread. No one can delete your posts except moderators (For spamming)

If you take Doug Polk or Richard Heart seriously you are an idiot, full stop.

No dude, Richard Heart just said the true. Craig Wright is unable to provide a signed massage from Satoshi's wallet. He just tried to fake it and was exposed. And you know what? Only paid shills and immoral motherfuckers like you will support such scammer. 

https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/4hhreq/how_craig_constructed_the_message_that_he_signed/

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zxMU4C6bGKw

full member
Activity: 520
Merit: 123
What is your point exactly?

Our point is that BSV is nothing but a fork of a REAL Bitcoin (In fact it is a fork of a fork) and the team member of BSV is a well known scammer and a liar Craig Wright who is pretending to be Satoshi Nakamoto. This is OUR POINT that is very easy to understand for everyone, except fucking paid shills and a liars like you.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lPbh2ltm1wI&t=503s

BTW 4 of my posts have been deleted in this thread, ive seen less censorship in North Korea.

This is NOT self moderated thread. No one can delete your posts except moderators (For spamming)

If you take Doug Polk or Richard Heart seriously you are an idiot, full stop.
legendary
Activity: 3010
Merit: 8114
BTC forked out in 2017 with Segwit implementation in August.
BCH forked out in 2018 November with Wormhole Protocol among other implementations.

Between 2017 August and 2018 November, yes, some pushes were made by Bitcoin Cash dev/s because in that period BSV didn't even exist, existed only BCH and BTC.

What is your point exactly?

My point is BSV is not the "real bitcoin."

What coin do you think people discuss the most on this forum, which Craig Wright claims to have founded? (this issue has never been brought up but its part and parcel of CSW saying he is Satoshi)

When your average, non-biased crypto investor is talking about "bitcoin", are they talking about BTC, BCH, BSV, BCD, BTG, or BTCP?

When the media talks about "bitcoin", are they talking about BTC, BCH, BSV, BCD, BTG, or BTCP?

This tactic of trying to confuse/trick people into buying your version of bitcoin instead of BTC has already been fully deployed by the BCH camp with feeble results. Its dishonest, untrustworthy behavior, which is why I don't disagree with Kenzawak's tag.

(ps: if you really think your tag is unfair then you should start a thread in Reputation about it and ask for feedback from other DTs -- this isn't really the proper thread to contest it)
legendary
Activity: 1932
Merit: 1737
"Common rogue from Russia with a bare ass."
4 of my posts have been deleted in this thread, ive seen less censorship in North Korea.

Oh yeah, been there have you?

I realize that the CSW arrogance wears off on his supporters, but seeing as you're not a supreme being like the (not)Doctor you'll just have to obey the forum rules like the rest of us plebs, and stop consecutively posting your off topic shilling.
sr. member
Activity: 868
Merit: 278
What is your point exactly?

Our point is that BSV is nothing but a fork of a REAL Bitcoin (In fact it is a fork of a fork) and the team member of BSV is a well known scammer and a liar Craig Wright who is pretending to be Satoshi Nakamoto. This is OUR POINT that is very easy to understand for everyone, except fucking paid shills and a liars like you.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lPbh2ltm1wI&t=503s

BTW 4 of my posts have been deleted in this thread, ive seen less censorship in North Korea.

This is NOT self moderated thread. No one can delete your posts except moderators (For spamming)
full member
Activity: 520
Merit: 123
These forks come from disagreements amongst miners, if they did not exist, we would have a full on dictatorship. This is the beauty of the Bitcoin economic model. With the UASF Blockstream has literally done the polar opposite in an attempt to limit the blocksize and hold all your funds in their lightning network.

BTW 4 of my posts have been deleted in this thread, ive seen less censorship in North Korea.
full member
Activity: 872
Merit: 120
Where is the lie?

Sorry but that won't work with me.
Not giving you the satisfaction.
Just read the ref in the trust feedback I gave you.

So there is a lie or not? Can you prove or you just libel people for no reason?

Kenzawak's feedback reads as such:

Now giving me negative trust for promoting the real Bitcoin.

Saying BSV is "the real Bitcoin" is a lie. Its a fork of a fork. Did you not see the image I posted earlier which shows that a Bitcoin Cash dev is partly responsible for building your protocol's code?

His statement is only libel if its assertively not true. More people here agree with him that calling BSV "the real bitcoin" is a lie than not. Ergo, no libel has taken place. Using that term at all infers you are considering pursuing some course of legal action, which I guarantee you will not end in your favor. But, do what you gotta do.

BTC forked out in 2017 with Segwit implementation in August.
BCH forked out in 2018 November with Wormhole Protocol among other implementations.

Between 2017 August and 2018 November, yes, some pushes were made by Bitcoin Cash dev/s because in that period BSV didn't even exist, existed only BCH and BTC.

What is your point exactly?
legendary
Activity: 3010
Merit: 8114
Where is the lie?

Sorry but that won't work with me.
Not giving you the satisfaction.
Just read the ref in the trust feedback I gave you.

So there is a lie or not? Can you prove or you just libel people for no reason?

Kenzawak's feedback reads as such:

Now giving me negative trust for promoting the real Bitcoin.

Saying BSV is "the real Bitcoin" is a lie. Its a fork of a fork. Did you not see the image I posted earlier which shows that a Bitcoin Cash dev is partly responsible for building your protocol's code?

His statement is only libel if its assertively not true. More people here agree with him that calling BSV "the real bitcoin" is a lie than not. Ergo, no libel has taken place. Using that term at all infers you are considering pursuing some course of legal action, which I guarantee you will not end in your favor. But, do what you gotta do.
full member
Activity: 872
Merit: 120
I'm sure you don't give a fuck about being tagged.
You're just here to shill BSV and for that you're ready to put on a show. I won't let you use me for that.
/ discussion with you, you're on "ignore" now.


How poetic, libeling for no reason, when confronted to provide proof, you put me on ignore.

You aren't very bright.
hero member
Activity: 658
Merit: 851
I'm sure you don't give a fuck about being tagged.
You're just here to shill BSV and for that you're ready to put on a show. I won't let you use me for that.
/ discussion with you, you're on "ignore" now.
full member
Activity: 872
Merit: 120
Where is the lie?

Sorry but that won't work with me.
Not giving you the satisfaction.
Just read the ref in the trust feedback I gave you.

So there is a lie or not? Can you prove or you just libel people for no reason?
Pages:
Jump to: