Author

Topic: Scientific proof that God exists? - page 127. (Read 845646 times)

member
Activity: 70
Merit: 10
SPIN ICO starts November 7, 2017
September 04, 2017, 05:07:56 PM
Currently we do not have any underlying proof. Just speculations.
Vod
legendary
Activity: 3668
Merit: 3010
Licking my boob since 1970
September 04, 2017, 05:02:03 PM
You think that you can throw a hand full of sand in the air, and after a few billion years it becomes intelligent life.

That's not how evolution works - you're funny.   Grin
hero member
Activity: 1624
Merit: 645
September 04, 2017, 05:01:19 PM
Yeah instead of evolution you should learn first about what is a season.

I understand both.  I paid attention in school.

Cool

You apparently do not, else you would know there could be more seasons a year if its dry/wet patterned seasons instead hot/cold patterned. And on the desert it could be both.

You love science, yet again every single dating method that exists is wrong, would you mind providing a valid method?

Historical - it is the best we have. I was always amazed how it is possible that humans were wandering around caves for 200k years. It had no sense to me. And it can not make any sense. They were like us, speak like us, had the same bodies like us yet they wanted to live in caves for 200k. That is for me personally quite impossible to happen.

You haven't been to a museum in your life? We were not the same.
legendary
Activity: 3906
Merit: 1373
September 04, 2017, 04:49:26 PM
Historical - it is the best we have. I was always amazed how it is possible that humans were wandering around caves for 200k years. It had no sense to me. And it can not make any sense. They were like us, speak like us, had the same bodies like us yet they wanted to live in caves for 200k. That is for me personally quite impossible to happen.

Humans 200,000 years ago were not like us - they didn't look like us, and they certainly didn't speak english.

Your parents lied to you, and as a result reality doesn't make sense to you.

That's why we encourage you to educate yourself so that reality does make sense.

Cool


Mwahahahahaha!

You think that you can throw a hand full of sand in the air, and after a few billion years it becomes intelligent life.

Mwahahahahaha!

You think that some big bang explosion some 13 or 14 billion years ago made the complexity that exists. Have you never looked at an explosion? Look at all the buildings and machinery and life explosions create. Explosions make animals, and plants, and buildings, and humans, and intelligence. You are so funny.

Mwahahahahaha!

You and all your BB/evolution religious buddies are so full of stupidity that even the monkeys in the jungles are smarter. You evolved from monkeys? Even the monkeys are embarrassed when people tell them that they have something like you as a descendent.

Some people think that God made the universe 6000 years ago. And that He set cause and effect into action, and makes all present things through cause and effect activity after 6000 years.

But you think that it was big bang that had that precise control from over 13 or 14 billion years.

Mwahahahahaha!

I gotta hand it to you. You jokers have one of the funniest cults that has ever existed.

Cool
Vod
legendary
Activity: 3668
Merit: 3010
Licking my boob since 1970
September 04, 2017, 04:27:01 PM
Historical - it is the best we have. I was always amazed how it is possible that humans were wandering around caves for 200k years. It had no sense to me. And it can not make any sense. They were like us, speak like us, had the same bodies like us yet they wanted to live in caves for 200k. That is for me personally quite impossible to happen.

Humans 200,000 years ago were not like us - they didn't look like us, and they certainly didn't speak english.

Your parents lied to you, and as a result reality doesn't make sense to you.

That's why we encourage you to educate yourself so that reality does make sense.

Cool

hero member
Activity: 574
Merit: 500
September 04, 2017, 03:49:54 PM
Yeah instead of evolution you should learn first about what is a season.

I understand both.  I paid attention in school.

Cool

You apparently do not, else you would know there could be more seasons a year if its dry/wet patterned seasons instead hot/cold patterned. And on the desert it could be both.

You love science, yet again every single dating method that exists is wrong, would you mind providing a valid method?

Historical - it is the best we have. I was always amazed how it is possible that humans were wandering around caves for 200k years. It had no sense to me. And it can not make any sense. They were like us, speak like us, had the same bodies like us yet they wanted to live in caves for 200k. That is for me personally quite impossible to happen.
hero member
Activity: 1624
Merit: 645
September 04, 2017, 03:44:01 PM
Yeah instead of evolution you should learn first about what is a season.

I understand both.  I paid attention in school.

Cool

You apparently do not, else you would know there could be more seasons a year if its dry/wet patterned seasons instead hot/cold patterned. And on the desert it could be both.

You love science, yet again every single dating method that exists is wrong, would you mind providing a valid method?
Vod
legendary
Activity: 3668
Merit: 3010
Licking my boob since 1970
September 04, 2017, 03:31:01 PM
Awwwwww poor little fellow did not get what he wanted............ awwwww. What was that? A girlfriend?

Stick to the insults - your arguments are worthless.

Cool
hero member
Activity: 574
Merit: 500
September 04, 2017, 03:30:20 PM
Quote
What science do you love?HuhHuh You don't believe in:

Evolution
Biology
Geology
Big bang
Age of earth
Age of the universe
All the methods for those things
And many more

The difference between you and me is that you believe in science, and I know science.

Knowing science would inform you that:

evolution is not science
biology makes evolution less probable, not more
geology is not only about the dating of the earth, actualy its mostly have nothing to do with it.
Big bang is just a theory based on mathematics and on constant that one need to believe in. Science is not about believing but experimenting. No experiments there
Age of earth is mostly based on one constant of radioactive uranium degradation speed. Science is not about believing in constants, but being sure. You cannot be sure that constants were constants, especially when it comes to radioactivity. Radioactivity is based on the temperature. Yeah I know you gave me other methods but this one is the most sure because they had used it to date the earth.
Age of the universe. Again it is based on many constants. None of them is proven to be constant other than in their mathematical models. Thats very unconvincing science at best. Many assumptions are made there that could be otherwise. Again its not an experimental science its only mathematics that one need to believe are true. It should not be called science if I am to be honest. Those are just predictive modelling that is called science for no reason what so ever.
For example a star that is suppose to expand away from us having 1 millions light years of distance. To assume it had gone 1 million years is folly because light years is not time but distance. Why not assume it was 1 millions years light of distance 5k years ago. Now you understand Its just a predictive modeling?


Call it what it is - a predictive modeling based on hypothesis.

And no more

You claim that but that doesn't mean it's the true. Maybe you know more than the majority of scientists.

No I do not. They know a way more than me about mathematical modeling. I know nothing about it, nor I want to know. All I need to know is that modeling on mathematics is usualy wrong in this corrupt world. Lets take for example economic theories based on mathematics. All wrong, and we are in an economic mess. Economic became mathematical modeling as well.

Mathematical modeling is awesome occasion to make money on. Not many people on earth can check you out on it.

All I need to know is that prayer doesn't work to understand god is not real

Awwwwww poor little fellow did not get what he wanted............ awwwww. What was that? A girlfriend?
hero member
Activity: 1624
Merit: 645
September 04, 2017, 03:29:18 PM
Quote
What science do you love?HuhHuh You don't believe in:

Evolution
Biology
Geology
Big bang
Age of earth
Age of the universe
All the methods for those things
And many more

The difference between you and me is that you believe in science, and I know science.

Knowing science would inform you that:

evolution is not science
biology makes evolution less probable, not more
geology is not only about the dating of the earth, actualy its mostly have nothing to do with it.
Big bang is just a theory based on mathematics and on constant that one need to believe in. Science is not about believing but experimenting. No experiments there
Age of earth is mostly based on one constant of radioactive uranium degradation speed. Science is not about believing in constants, but being sure. You cannot be sure that constants were constants, especially when it comes to radioactivity. Radioactivity is based on the temperature. Yeah I know you gave me other methods but this one is the most sure because they had used it to date the earth.
Age of the universe. Again it is based on many constants. None of them is proven to be constant other than in their mathematical models. Thats very unconvincing science at best. Many assumptions are made there that could be otherwise. Again its not an experimental science its only mathematics that one need to believe are true. It should not be called science if I am to be honest. Those are just predictive modelling that is called science for no reason what so ever.
For example a star that is suppose to expand away from us having 1 millions light years of distance. To assume it had gone 1 million years is folly because light years is not time but distance. Why not assume it was 1 millions years light of distance 5k years ago. Now you understand Its just a predictive modeling?


Call it what it is - a predictive modeling based on hypothesis.

And no more

You claim that but that doesn't mean it's the true. Maybe you know more than the majority of scientists.

No I do not. They know a way more than me about mathematical modeling. I know nothing about it, nor I want to know. All I need to know is that modeling on mathematics is usualy wrong in this corrupt world. Lets take for example economic theories based on mathematics. All wrong, and we are in an economic mess. Economic became mathematical modeling as well.

Mathematical modeling is awesome occasion to make money on. Not many people on earth can check you out on it.

All I need to know is that prayer doesn't work to understand god is not real
hero member
Activity: 574
Merit: 500
September 04, 2017, 03:28:27 PM
Yeah instead of evolution you should learn first about what is a season.

I understand both.  I paid attention in school.

Cool

You apparently do not, else you would know there could be more seasons a year if its dry/wet patterned seasons instead hot/cold patterned. And on the desert it could be both.
Vod
legendary
Activity: 3668
Merit: 3010
Licking my boob since 1970
September 04, 2017, 03:24:37 PM
Yeah instead of evolution you should learn first about what is a season.

I understand both.  I paid attention in school.

Cool
hero member
Activity: 574
Merit: 500
September 04, 2017, 03:23:48 PM
What is a spring.

That's something you should have been taught in elementary school, if your parents weren't too busy brainwashing you.

Cool

Yeah instead of evolution you should learn first about what is a season. And that in some area of the earth its not about hot/cold but could be dry/wet. In some places of the earth determining the dry/wet seasons can be tricky.
Vod
legendary
Activity: 3668
Merit: 3010
Licking my boob since 1970
September 04, 2017, 03:16:06 PM
What is a spring.

That's something you should have been taught in elementary school, if your parents weren't too busy brainwashing you.

Cool
hero member
Activity: 574
Merit: 500
September 04, 2017, 03:13:37 PM
Not on the equator genius. It spring after the summer. Hows plants know what time of the year it is? Do they have watches? No. They have vegetation seasons. Sometimes 2 sometimes more times a year.

Spring happens across the entire globe, once per year.

We know this because of tree rings.

Trees do not have watches - consider suing your parents.

Cool

What is a spring. Spring is after the winter. What happens when there is no winter like in the uquator. Plants are using some kind of time devices? Or they simply have the vegation time. They grow, have flowers, fruits, and then they repeat it over again. On the equator vegetations are many times a year.
Vod
legendary
Activity: 3668
Merit: 3010
Licking my boob since 1970
September 04, 2017, 03:07:07 PM
Not on the equator genius. It spring after the summer. Hows plants know what time of the year it is? Do they have watches? No. They have vegetation seasons. Sometimes 2 sometimes more times a year.

Spring happens across the entire globe, once per year.

We know this because of tree rings.

Trees do not have watches - consider suing your parents.

Cool
hero member
Activity: 574
Merit: 500
September 04, 2017, 03:03:21 PM
Unless it lives somewhere near desert then you have no spring genius.

Spring happens across the entire globe.

Your parents were assholes to you.  Instead of giving you the tools to survive, they filled your head with nonsense.

Cool

Not on the equator genius. It spring after the summer. Hows plants know what time of the year it is? Do they have watches? No. They have vegetation seasons. Sometimes 2 sometimes more times a year.
Vod
legendary
Activity: 3668
Merit: 3010
Licking my boob since 1970
September 04, 2017, 03:01:47 PM
Unless it lives somewhere near desert then you have no spring genius.

Spring happens across the entire globe.

Your parents were assholes to you.  Instead of giving you the tools to survive, they filled your head with nonsense.

Cool
hero member
Activity: 574
Merit: 500
September 04, 2017, 03:00:13 PM
No I do not. They know a way more than me about mathematical modeling. I know nothing about it, nor I want to know.

Tree rings are easy to understand.  Every spring a tree grows a new ring.  It's how we know your fairy tale flood didn't happen.

Cool

Unless it lives somewhere near desert then you have no spring genius.

Test on Iq - are there winters on equator? Spring is after the winter yes? Some regions of the world have multiple vegetative seasons. Some 2 some more.
Vod
legendary
Activity: 3668
Merit: 3010
Licking my boob since 1970
September 04, 2017, 02:58:17 PM
No I do not. They know a way more than me about mathematical modeling. I know nothing about it, nor I want to know.

Tree rings are easy to understand.  Every spring a tree grows a new ring.  It's how we know your fairy tale flood didn't happen.

Cool
Jump to: