Topic: Scientific proof that God exists? - page 173. (Read 845582 times)

Alright, I will start from little to big evidences...

There are loads of Crooks making fake ghost videos on YouTube but don't worry, this 2 gentlemen aren't part of them:
Search for MichaelDMagee on YouTube and go through his videos, from Most Viewed to Recent Videos .. or simply use this link to land on his Channel: https://m.youtube.com/channel/UCbAg65u3LLHe2PU8AXx6Vfw

The 2nd gentleman is Luke Millett :  https://m.youtube.com/user/lukesp13/videos?flow=list&sort=dd&view=0&itct=CA4Qui8iEwiE4NzXzJ_QAhUMiBYKHUfxAkU%3D&client=mv-google&gl=NG&hl=en


If you're still not convinced am going to show you one other thing that will enable you go physical with the supernatural.

I will keep an eye on this thread. Goodluck

Obviously we do want proof for your crazy claims.

Take it easy brother. Do you want proof?

I'm getting headaches from reading all the shit people post in this thread, I'm not even kidding. It has been documented that evil spirit exist, where? People were extremely ignorant at the time and to explain all the things they didn't understand, they created god, simple as that. There are thousands of different religions around the world, you think they all encountered supernatural things?

I have strong doubt humans created religion. Humans maybe naturally irreligious. Encounter with the supernatural could have made us religious.

Positive and Negative energy exist.
Good and Evil exist.... It has been documented that Evil spirit exist. If evil spirit exist God may exist as well. Do not hold tight on things you are not 100% sure about.

Interlude:
A little dumb boy who believes a super powerful bearded man created the entire universe in order to have a little planet with nasty human assholes on it that might go extinct at any time (watch any science fiction movie and you'll see this shit fits the genre) also believes that a proven, well established biological fact is science fiction. That is the beautiful work of natural selection, not all specimens have the same abilities and intelligence. Some are really dumb and useless. The good thing about nature is that it won't send our little retarded friend Badecker into a lake of fire just for not believing in it, unless the retard sets his house on fire or something. Science: it does not judge you, it needs no prayers, it needs no money, it just works.

You are making the same confusion as Badecker does regarding the term 'theory'. Theory, in the domain of science, is not even by far the same as the term theory that we use in the day by day conversations. It is the opposite of it. While in regular terms, 'theory' means a unsubstantiated hypothesis, a scientific theory is ' an explanation of some aspect of the natural world that can, in accordance with the scientific method, be repeatedly tested, using a predefined protocol of observations and experiments. Established scientific theories have withstood rigorous scrutiny and are a comprehensive form of scientific knowledge.' So, again, no, the theory of evolution might not end up true, it is true, it works, unlike the practices and principles of religion. Always remember, God appeared in religion, not separate. Creationists, the ones that try to combine science with religion, failing big time in every domain, appeared long after religion already established its dogmas, made its claims, spew its bullshit, brainwashed the populations of our planet. They appeared just by the time religion started to lose credibility in front of truth. Too big of a coincidence, isn't it? And if you are ever worried by atheists, always remember that an atheist is only 1% more atheist than you are, since you believe in one religion out of 4200, most of which have numerous Gods, like hinduism, with 320.000.000 Gods. I guess 1% is even exaggerated in this case.

Thanks again for not being able to refute the proof that God exists:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.10718395
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.14047133
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1662153.40
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.16803380.

We love your lame batches of goofy words. You honor me by them. All the way up to episode 22, and still nothing that refutes the proof that God exists. Come on, muscle-mouth. Substantiate something other than the fact that you can blabber... if you can.

The 99% of scientists that you are talking about, need their job at the university. That's why they lie about their true understanding of things.

The result of the science fiction theory of evolution, is the science fiction evolution.

Darwin's theory has been researched before and after his 'revolutionary' theory and the result of it is the theory of evolution, it is proved to be a fact, there are no holes in it, that is if you understand that it does not explain the 'origin of life' but the evolutionary processes. Creationists and apologists try to use it as a counter (they call it Darwinism, trying to make it look like a dogma) and they say it does not prove the origin of life, that it has holes. They are wrong from the start since the theory of evolution never mentions the origin of life. That is what creationists mostly do, as you can see a clear example in our retarded friend here, Badecker, who 'scientifically' proves the existence of God without being even able to define a God, to establish the characteristics, the identity of the God and why it must be it and not something else. In fact, he even fails to properly establish if there is need for a creator or not. Superficiality, in science, can be very easily spotted and rebutted, regardless the fact that some idiots still go on with the same ideas after a spot on, 100% clear scientific rebuttal.

Evolution Is Mere Theory meaning it may end up not true,Do not forget this
The theory makes alot of sense though but I don't see why God won't be responsible for making evolution possible. Human are even considering building self-replicating machines that are capable of learning from their environment and adapting.

Concept of God maybe unique to human. It's possible that as we advance we may slowly begin come to terms with creationism.

No it is not. 99.9% of scientists agree that evolution is a fact, the only people that are still denying it are retarded creationists. Even religious people accept evolution, as much as 70% of christians agree with it.

Welcome back folks, to episode 22 that proves our Badecker is as stupid as possible, 'The apologistic crybaby and his downfall'.
Although we've had enough material by now, we got very short on the 'humor' part simply because Badecker repeats himself and never comes up with something new. The only thing that gradually increases is his level of stupidity...it's just a scientific thing, he would never get it. He still missuses terms like 'stardust', he 100% does not know what is the difference between cosmic dust and stardust, but it's not the first time. He still bitches about people talking about religion, as if God would be part of science, not religion. He still bitches about people not rebutting his shit links although almost everyone did and he never responded properly, he just kept re-posting the links and acting like a 3 year old by saying 'no, that's not true, I am right'. He also bitches about people rebutting him as a person  and that proves that he is not capable of observing that I am the one rebutting him and the claim that he knows any science at all. The reason why I do it is the same: rebutted his links, he kept acting like a kid and doing some nasty propaganda, so the next step is proving that the guy that posts those links is a stupid, idiotic, brainwashed, hypocrite, mentally ill monkey. It's not a hard job either, any sane person could prove that Badecker is indeed stupid. Even religious people would say the same thing, because he does not make any sense and he can;t make any sense, that is the only reason he only posts the same links over and over again and when it comes to having some scientific debate over it, he can't say anything else besides that, or if he does, the second he speaks he spews out some really stupid shit, like that moment when he debunked himself. He just went in a loop where he bitches, he re-posts, he says something retarded and goes back to bitching, re-posting, and so on. If no scientist could not prove God in absolutely any way until now, the probability of a bitching, narrow minded idiot who knows nothing about science to 'scientifically' prove God, and exactly that God, is actually lower than the probability of God existing. That is why my proof is needed, whether the retard likes it or not. And the episodes will continue until number 100. Stay tuned folks, we're still here!

Here is where you mess up in the things that you say.

God is not KNOWN TO BE fact. It might be fact. But so far nobody KNOWS that it is fact.

 Since god has been proven over and over to not be possible, god is a hoax and religion is just another brainwashing tool.

Perhaps you are right. Perhaps I can find rebuttals right in the stuff in my links. Perhaps I can find circular references there. I am kinda smart in a way. It just might be that I can find these things there.

But you can't. How do we know? Here's how.

You are adamantly against the things that I say. You are so much against them, that you are against me just for saying them. You show this in your posts. What does this mean? Here's what.

If you could find any rebuttals against the proof that God exists, as expressed in my links, you would show them. You would get right into my wording, and show a rebuttal and how it is a rebuttal. You wouldn't sit around rebutting ME. You would rebut the proof that God exists.

You blab all kinds of things against me and how "goofy" I am to suggest that there is proof for God. You attempt to rebut me, as a person, in all kinds of ways. But you can't seem to find a rebuttal for the scientific proof that God exists. BECAUSE IF YOU COULD, YOU WOULD POST IT.

And if I rebutted what you posted, you would rebut my rebuttal to you. But you don't do this. You can't. Because science proves that God exists, just as I explain, and in many other ways.

This means that the only rebuttal you have is to SAY that you have rebuttal. And SAYING alone doesn't rebut anything. In fact it strengthens the thing it is trying to rebut.

God exists, and you are helping to strengthen it as fact in the minds of the readers, simply by not rebutting the proof, yet saying that there is rebuttal.

Animals, Technology, Nature, Plants, Seeds and Foods. These are the scientific measures of existent of the God.

Best answer, so far...   

NONE WHATSOFUCKINGEVER !     

Sci-fi. When you look the whole thing over, and compare the writings, it is all based on non-facts. The links you provide show it right within themselves. And you can find rebuttals to the things in the links, by simply reading the things that are said there, and finding the circular references.