Topic: Scientific proof that God exists? - page 209. (Read 845582 times)

Adam and Eve is a strong proof that God exist. Because if He doesn't who amazingy created Adam and Eve? If that so there are also amazing things that cannot be conceive by our minds as a human beacause God is really powerful and He is God ,if all things about God can be conceive by our minds then He can't be called as God.

There are no proofs, this is the reason I am an atheist , i dont know how can u guys believe in something u have never seen with ur own eyes.

You call it atheism.  I reject all bullshit Bronze Age stories. So no gods, ghosts, spirits or any supernatural forces.  They don't exist because there is no evidence.

Is it possible that supernatural beings exist?  Maybe.
Until there is an evidence I say they don't exist. I will be the first one to change my position once such evidence is discovered.

Saying that atheism does not exist is like saying color black does exist.

I have been talking about proof that God exists, and understanding that the earth is less than 7,000 years old. Look again at the mitochondrial evidence that shows that the earth is probably 6,000 to 6,500 years old. See the "Talking about Atheism..." thread at https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.18643045.

You certainly are welcome to believe your fairy-tale religion that the earth and universe are billions of years old. And why is it a religion? Because you have no proof, and only flawed interpretation of the evidence. Even the scientists who make these age statements, often say that they are unsure.

I know, I know. If your typing skills are good, and if you have a reasonable knowledge of the language, and if you have the time (or are paid to), you can sit around and blab all day.

The point is, your blabbing is simply that, blabbing. Why? Because you can't seem to come up with any logical step-by-step rebutting of the proof that God exists.

The proof has step-by-step application of the scientific laws and evidences. But you haven't been able to rebut it. Poor baby. And like a baby, all you say is blabber. We're ready. Blab some more.

 

Against him? What the fuck are you talking about?
How can I go against something that does not exist?

The onus is on him to give me a brain so that I can think and discard all the Bronze Age mambo jumbo.

If he wanted me to follow some specific book he should have wired my brain accordingly.  So he fucked up with his design.

BTW, read about the Osiris myth, you'll see many parallels with the Jesus myth.

Happy Easter! Osiris has risen (twice).

More talk from you.

Anybody can say that there are cultures older than 10,000 years. But when you get into the details of how they determined this, you find that they really don't know, that their ages are guestimations at best.

There is evidence that some of the earlier pyramids, and the great pyramid were built before the flood. However, what does the Flood have to do with building the pyramids? Those people were less into entropy than we are, and had a lot more strength, and a lot more reproduction fertility. Populations sprang up much faster.

You don't know that you needed any slaves at all to build the pyramids. Some 5-y-o evidence says that the builders were hired professionals.

You are as ignorant as the flat Earthers you deny everything that does not fit your world view.  No matter how strong the proof against it is.

I would gladly attempt to break the proof of God if there was any. Assumptions and interpretations do not belong to the 'proof' section, they belong to the belief section. As a result, the shit that you keep on posting is not proof, it's something that you heard from Bob Dutko's cds and it needs no 'step-by-step rebuttal' (funny how you overuse exactly these words that Bob Dutko overuses when he's pissed off at people laughing at his moronic ideas). Also, you trying to become a bit aggressive is pathetic and only demonstrates how desperate you are in proving you own the truth. Exactly like any other apologist. My conclusion is and will be the same untill you come up with some decent stuff and stop acting like a bitchy, dumb apologist: fuck off and come back when you really thought about something. We can do this for a long time by the way. It's up to you when you drop the bullshit and start being serious.

You are getting to be more like Horace all the time... lots of talk, but nothing to back up anything you say.

You're a kinda sad specimen of humanity. At least stats and af_newbie attempt to break the proof for God down a little. More than likely you can't even read it. What? Does your mama browse the Internet for you? No step-by-step rebuttal of the proof at all!

I certainly support your yakety yak against me and the proof. Since you don't have anything except yakety yak, you are shown for what you are >>> a rambling stooge for some idiot group of idiot atheists. As Han Solo said, "Laugh it up, Fuzzball." All the way to idiot stardom.

We like it. We like it.

Again, the proof for the existence of God links:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.10718395
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.14047133
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1662153.40
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.16803380.

Different parts of the Bible were written by different  Bronze Age people.  Some were vengeful and wanted to kill babies of their enemies and eat them, others were more concerned with the type of clothing they were wearing. At least one writer had a fight with another man and his wife touched other's guy genitals so he wrote this scenario in the Bible and cut off her hand.

What Bible gives you is an insight into Bronze Age minds, how they lived and survived.

To use any of it as a source of guide is just irresponsible.  Unless of course if you think slavery and stoning of people is a good idea.

Killing gays or children who disobey their parents will get you a life sentence whether your God likes or not.

No, dumb fuck, scientific laws are not interpretation. Your bullshit is an interpretation of scientific laws and it is complete fantasy. Stop coming up with hypocrite ways of persuading this discussion in your favour, it will not work. Please fuck off and try to find your own ideas instead of pasting the same links that you've learnt on Bob Dutko's bullshit cd's. Apologist.

Science laws are not interpretations. If you don't like science laws, forget this topic. This topic is about science proof that God exists. However...

If you decide to examine the science laws and how they are applied, remember that God isn't explained at all. The only reason I use the masculine pronoun with Him, is, that that's the way most people understand Him. The scientific proof for Him doesn't explain if He has a gender or not. It doesn't explain any religious aspects of Him. It simply shows that He exists... whatever He may be.

That was my opinion about your hypothesis that you repeatedly posted and nobody even took the time to say how dumb it is. I did not say you don't have the right to express your opinion, I just said it's as dumb as a rock. Notice one thing: the fear that the whole world will go nuts if there is concrete proof of a deity. In the meantime, apologists claim there is a God. They also claim that nobody would ever publish evidence of a God because that would blow up the society so what they interpret as proof is good but nobody would ever recognise it because they fear the change. But that proof would only make us sure that there is a God. At the moment, most of the human beings are already sure that there is a God, without having any proof or evidence of such a thing. So why would the proof be something bad? I'll tell you why: because there is no proof. All the apologists know there is no proof, all these cultist fuckers are aware their proof is complete bullshit so all they have to do is make it look like the scientists, the governments, the media, would never allow such proof to be seen because it would cause instability. That's the only thing apologists can do, blame some people for not publishing their bullshit, creating conspiracies. Deep down they all know it's all bullshit. The hypocrisy of apologists like you or Badecker is that you guys know it's bullshit but you let it be so, because people need to believe in something. You don't respect human beings, you consider yourselves above and you think people need your lies to be better. I've seen many like you, I've even seen apologists who don't believe a single word in the bible but claim that people must follow the teachings of Jesus. Not them, but other people. That is why I am so rude, because all of my curse words can never make up for the shameless insults you bring against all humanity with your hypocrisy and lack of morality. Are you pleased now, apologist?

Why so rude?
Everyone has the right to express their opinion.
But I'm not sure that scientists will publish such evidence even if they exist. It will change the world too much. And cause a resonance in society

Know this: if your 'evidence' would be at least the fraction of an interesting idea, at least someone would argue with you over it. Nobody gives a plain fuck about your hypothesis because it is as delusional and dumb as you are. Go home, you're completely drunk and irrecuperable.

Interpretations are not proof, exact facts are. When everyone tells you that shit you keel posting is a fail, you should get a clue. But apologists don't get too many clues, don't they? As for the proof, you may not pass the burden of proof onto me or anybody else who said they do not believe a God exists. It is your burden, not ours. You claim a God exists, you come with the exact proof. But none of you will since you have no proof. Now do as I said and fuck off outta here, you Bob Dutko ass licker.

Skeptics are comfortable with Evolution but uncomfortable with the Survival hypothesis.
Understanding the evidence supporting survival takes time but it is worth it.
Rebirth is typically a key element of authentic spiritual teachings, this suggests that there should be empirical evidence of Survival. I have posted many examples of this kind of evidence, but never have I seen someone quote it and state that "this evidence could be better explained without Survival because..."

You are so funny. Have you been to the bottom of the oceans lately to check there for God? Many ancient peoples thought that the constellation, Orion, was the place that life came from. Have you been out there to check for God? What? You have it on authority that God doesn't exist in either of those places? What authority? Your own? LOL!

Perhaps you should take a night course in understanding how to interpret science law, so that you can see that God exists from the proof:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.10718395
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.14047133
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1662153.40
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.16803380.

It might even help you learn how to stay on topic.

Are you done with eating shit? Are you happy now, after going around my argument and just coming up with some cultist bullshit? God does not exist. Until there will be a clear, solid proof of a deity, you get the fuck out of here and go eat shit at your local church, that's where you are welcome. If you don't get it the first time, no worry, I'll be here daily to remind people what a hypocrite piece of shit you are and to remind you to fuck off. Much love from a guy who doesn't take kindly to cultists. Now fuck off.