Scientific proof that God exists? - page 292.

Vod

legendary

Activity: 3668

Merit: 3010

Licking my boob since 1970

Quote from: XinXan on March 27, 2015, 12:12:36 AM

Quote from: Vod on March 27, 2015, 12:08:00 AM

I love The Onion!

That and jesus face apearing on toast its definitive proof that god exists. No for real now if God really wanted to make us belive he himself could just come to earth, appear as a giant god and say: Hey im God and yes i really exist.

Why couldn't he come to earth and appear as a gorilla and sign "Hey I'm god"? By not speaking the words he could be testing the intelligence of man.

No one has seen a god - you never know!

XinXan

hero member

Activity: 1064

Merit: 505

Quote from: Vod on March 27, 2015, 12:08:00 AM

I love The Onion!

That and jesus face apearing on toast its definitive proof that god exists. No for real now if God really wanted to make us belive he himself could just come to earth, appear as a giant god and say: Hey im God and yes i really exist.

Vod

legendary

Activity: 3668

Merit: 3010

Licking my boob since 1970

I love The Onion!

bl4kjaguar

hero member

Activity: 546

Merit: 500

Quote from: BADecker on March 26, 2015, 04:13:26 AM

Perhaps we should refrain from such activities for fear of being overcome by malevolent spirits until we understand exactly what is going on, and until we can retain REAL control at all times in the operations.

BADecker,

If exact knowledge and full control was required for all endeavors, then there would be no New World, no Space Program, and quite certainly NO BIBLE!

I advise you not to call my GOD the devil until you know EXACTLY what is going on.

You claim that GOD HIMSELF has real control over the content of the Bible, so then why is God described as "jealous"?
God's messenger Hatonn delivers a message that is both literal and rational; this is what a spiritual teaching should look like.

Here is some more context for our discussion:

Quote from: http://www.phoenixsourcedistributors.com/PJ_09.pdf

If you dally in Satanism; you will attract the “god of the world”, Satan, or his henchmen. I must ask you--how does your minister contact God? How do you commune with Christ? Through prayer? So do the witches and Satanists use prayer! I ask you to use caution and guide yourselves most diligently--HOWEVER, IF YOU LUMP INTO A GROUPING ALL ENERGIES FROM THE BEYOND CONSCIOUSNESS, YOU WILL MISS OF OUR INSTRUCTIONS FOR WE HAVE NO OTHER MEANS OF COMMUNICATION. THROUGH SCRIBES SUCH AS THIS ONE, IS THE MANNER IN WHICH THE FINAL INSTRUCTIONS SHALL COME FORTH FOR IT IS NOT YET TIME FOR OUR PHYSICAL MANIFESTATION UPON YOUR PLACE WITH ALL THE ATTENDANT ATTENTION.

Quote from: http://www.phoenixsourcedistributors.com/PJ_63.pdf

Ambition in itself is a hideous ego monster, tricking you all the way to trust the human consciousness instead of getting God first and, in getting Him, to find a cornucopia of treasure and wisdom, abundance, light and divine love ever flowing. You must know that all desires of the human that you may have in this world of expression and manifestation can be surrendered. When they are surrendered, the divine desiring of God comes into your life and within your being and every expression of that "oneness". Since the God dwells within self, who benefits? To move, with us, along our path there are things which must be overcome in your personalities of desire.

By the way, I still disagree with you about a "jealous/wrathful God"; God is love, and you have called my God the Devil without even so much as pointing out where God's messenger is telling you to do evil.

bl4kjaguar

hero member

Activity: 546

Merit: 500

Quote from: BADecker on March 26, 2015, 04:13:26 AM

Since there is little or no real scientific explanation, we should not be doing this.

The survival hypothesis is a scientific theory because it has passed tests which could falsify it.

You can find the physics to back up rebirth in "HUMAN THE SCIENCE OF MAN".

bl4kjaguar

hero member

Activity: 546

Merit: 500

Quote from: bl4kjaguar on March 26, 2015, 03:30:07 AM

Quote from: the joint on March 25, 2015, 11:57:45 AM

Quote from: bl4kjaguar on March 25, 2015, 09:25:08 AM

Quote from: the joint on March 25, 2015, 02:47:20 AM

Quote from: bl4kjaguar on March 24, 2015, 07:38:49 PM

Quote from: Joshuar on March 24, 2015, 05:42:36 PM

Quote from: bl4kjaguar on March 24, 2015, 05:04:16 PM

Quote from: Joshuar on March 24, 2015, 02:28:04 PM

How do you intend to prove they do exist?

You do not provide an adequate reason to reject the evidence, and so you do not disprove the conclusion (from parsimony) that the source was communicating factual information that had "survived" death.

I see no basis for rejecting the evidence of Eisenbeiss and AECES top 40. You failed to plausibly explain ALL OF THAT, just like BADecker and the joint!!

Hey, leave me out of this one. I didn't make any claims about "souls," nor did I implicate any based upon my claims of Intelligent Design.

You did not engage with the survival hypothesis. Just like Joshuar did not provide adequate reason.

But I didn't make any claim about souls. No claim means there is nothing for you to make a counterclaim against.

I can't be accused of not refuting a certain point in a debate I wasn't participating in.

You questioned whether there was fraud involved. I answered that concern.

The simplest explanation is survival, so you should agree with my claim at this point.

What? No desire to discuss the scientific evidence for the afterlife, the joint?

You are not curious to see how survival of the personality relates to God?

the joint

legendary

Activity: 1834

Merit: 1020

Quote from: BADecker on March 26, 2015, 02:50:44 PM

Quote from: the joint on March 26, 2015, 12:19:39 PM

Quote from: BADecker on March 26, 2015, 03:21:41 AM

Quote from: the joint on March 26, 2015, 02:46:02 AM

Quote from: BADecker on March 26, 2015, 01:17:15 AM

Quote from: the joint on March 25, 2015, 05:23:41 PM

I was curious if you realized that you implicated Genesis as "all mistake."

I wouldn't mind if you explained it to me. However, I am rather impatient. Please do it in as few words as possible.

Thanks.

Sure.

First you say:

Quote

...Quran is perfection of mistakes. In other words, it is entire mistake.

Then I point out:

Quote

...the Quran and the Bible are virtually identical up until the house of Abraham.

Therefore:

- If the Quran is "all mistake," and...
- If the Quran and Bible are initially identical...
- Then the Bible is initially "all mistake" (because it is initially identical to the Quran which you dscribed as "all mistake")

Thanks, again.

Actually, the reverse is true. Even if the beginning of Quran were exactly the same as the beginning of Genesis, the fact that the Quran is against the idea of Jesus salvation for all people, makes the Quran complete imperfection. Beyond this, it makes the Quran a book of blasphemy and hypocrisy. Why? In Genesis, after the first sin in the Garden, God who walked in the Garden in His form as Jesus with the first two people, promised the Messiah.

The whole Bible, including Genesis, is there for the salvation of people through Jesus salvation. Jesus is the Messiah that the Jews say is prophesied about by Moses and other prophets, even though many Jews don't accept Him as such.

Since the Quran promises Heaven (salvation) by personal works righteousness, if it has a mixture of Messiah salvation along with works righteousness salvation, it is mixed-up and self-contradictory.

You should be telling this to yourself, not to me.

If the reverse is true, then why did you say the opposite earlier?

Look, you contradicted yourself earlier and now you're disagreeing with what you had said. Don't tell me "actually, the reverse is true" when the reverse is completely false based upon your earlier words.

All you're doing is essentially claiming you are right no matter what position you take or what you say. It's not my fault you can't keep your thoughts organized.

What does anything you say have to do with anything? The point is, if you are on-topic with all this, you are barely so. Get a life, and get on-topic like I am with my https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.10718395 information, instead of all this rambling. Now, of course, I am only suggesting. Far be it from me to even attempt to order you.

Nobody is more off-topic than you. You are the Jesus of off-topic.

In >200 pages, not once have you demonstrated the ability to provide support for your beliefs.

In >200 pages, despite dozens of specific requests from myself and others, not once have you challenged any of our rebuttals.

We give you point-by-point responses which obliterate your arguments beyond all doubt, and every single time without fail, you ignore them. When you ignore them, you are the one that goes off topic.

Not once have you managed to prove yourself correct, and not once have you managed to prove someone else incorrect.

When you "debate" in this thread, nobody else is ever involved. You contradict yourself so frequently that you are your only opponent.

It's absurdly pathetic when there's only one person involved in a debate, and he still manages to lose (i.e. against himself).

Honestly, you would be a better debater if you were unconscious.

Vod

legendary

Activity: 3668

Merit: 3010

Licking my boob since 1970

Quote from: Joshuar on March 26, 2015, 04:50:31 PM

So I've been keeping track a little. This is the 77th time BADecker has contradicted himself/told a blatant lie.

If you lie, you have to have a good memory. His obviously sucks. Wink

Joshuar

hero member

Activity: 504

Merit: 500

eidoo wallet

Quote from: the joint on March 26, 2015, 12:19:39 PM

Quote from: BADecker on March 26, 2015, 03:21:41 AM

Quote from: the joint on March 26, 2015, 02:46:02 AM

Quote from: BADecker on March 26, 2015, 01:17:15 AM

Quote from: the joint on March 25, 2015, 05:23:41 PM

I was curious if you realized that you implicated Genesis as "all mistake."

I wouldn't mind if you explained it to me. However, I am rather impatient. Please do it in as few words as possible.

Thanks.

Sure.

First you say:

Quote

...Quran is perfection of mistakes. In other words, it is entire mistake.

Then I point out:

Quote

...the Quran and the Bible are virtually identical up until the house of Abraham.

Therefore:

- If the Quran is "all mistake," and...
- If the Quran and Bible are initially identical...
- Then the Bible is initially "all mistake" (because it is initially identical to the Quran which you dscribed as "all mistake")

Thanks, again.

Actually, the reverse is true. Even if the beginning of Quran were exactly the same as the beginning of Genesis, the fact that the Quran is against the idea of Jesus salvation for all people, makes the Quran complete imperfection. Beyond this, it makes the Quran a book of blasphemy and hypocrisy. Why? In Genesis, after the first sin in the Garden, God who walked in the Garden in His form as Jesus with the first two people, promised the Messiah.

The whole Bible, including Genesis, is there for the salvation of people through Jesus salvation. Jesus is the Messiah that the Jews say is prophesied about by Moses and other prophets, even though many Jews don't accept Him as such.

Since the Quran promises Heaven (salvation) by personal works righteousness, if it has a mixture of Messiah salvation along with works righteousness salvation, it is mixed-up and self-contradictory.

You should be telling this to yourself, not to me.

If the reverse is true, then why did you say the opposite earlier?

Look, you contradicted yourself earlier and now you're disagreeing with what you had said. Don't tell me "actually, the reverse is true" when the reverse is completely false based upon your earlier words.

All you're doing is essentially claiming you are right no matter what position you take or what you say. It's not my fault you can't keep your thoughts organized.

So I've been keeping track a little. This is the 77th time BADecker has contradicted himself/told a blatant lie.

bl4kjaguar

hero member

Activity: 546

Merit: 500

Quote from: BADecker on March 26, 2015, 04:17:04 PM

Quote from: bl4kjaguar on March 26, 2015, 04:00:11 PM

Quote from: BADecker on March 26, 2015, 03:46:48 AM

Non-Biblical teachings that seem to be about God may be correct in some areas, but because they are false in other areas, they are not really about God.

God is not jealous or wrathful; God is love.
Instead of trying to "reconcile" these two cointradictions through "the person of Jesus Christ", why not accept that God is love and go from there?

Because they are different points, the thing that I was talking about that you quoted, and the thing that you are talking about. Sometimes we need to talk about different things. Why not continue with my point?

Where have I ever pointed you to a teaching that is false? And by what standard/criteria did you determine that?

It is by no means obvious that "Non-Biblical teachings" will be false no matter what: as I have mentioned to you already, there is no way to prove that a given Scripture is divinely-inspired (this is contrary to what is often taught to Christians), you can only make suggestions about the quality of the writing in the context of the content-source problem.

Quote

Kindly treat me as a little child. Explain the on-topic contradictory statement. If it is not on-topic, you could always start a new thread.

We are qualifying the type of God that exists; for our definition, we will say that God is the ONE BEING, ONE POWER, or ONE SPIRIT; any of these words will work.

To say that the ONE BEING is wrathful and jealous is probably not the right perception; that is not what spirituality is about!

The essence of God is love. God is not wrath and jealousy, yet you have said that others will incur God's wrath and your Bible states that God IS JEALOUS. This is plainly a cointradiction; I even saw it depicted as such in a little Christian pamphlet that I received today (one which is quite popular).

BADecker

legendary

Activity: 3906

Merit: 1373

Quote from: XinXan on March 26, 2015, 04:03:57 PM

Quote from: bl4kjaguar on March 26, 2015, 04:00:11 PM

Quote from: BADecker on March 26, 2015, 03:46:48 AM

Non-Biblical teachings that seem to be about God may be correct in some areas, but because they are false in other areas, they are not really about God.

God is not jealous or wrathful; God is love.
Instead of trying to "reconcile" these two cointradictions through "the person of Jesus Christ", why not accept that God is love and go from there?

There is already a cointradictory statement in the Bible that you do not want to address with me.

Why would i accept anything if there is no proof of it? How does god show us his love exactly? Through war, diseases, hunger?

By not giving us the greater war we are asking for when we reject God and His salvation. By limiting the starvation. By taking us home to a wonderful life in Heaven when we die believing in Him.

Do you want to reject yourself by rejecting God on some mistaken principle that you hold? Go ahead. So you don't understand it. God is God. Either take the only way to eternal life through accepting Him, or be stubborn and go into eternal death. The death thing won't be fun.

Why off-topic all the time? Can't you start a new thread? Oh, I get it. Since you are accepting the eternal death thing, who cares about a little idea like being on-topic, right?

BADecker

legendary

Activity: 3906

Merit: 1373

Quote from: bl4kjaguar on March 26, 2015, 04:00:11 PM

Quote from: BADecker on March 26, 2015, 03:46:48 AM

Non-Biblical teachings that seem to be about God may be correct in some areas, but because they are false in other areas, they are not really about God.

God is not jealous or wrathful; God is love.
Instead of trying to "reconcile" these two cointradictions through "the person of Jesus Christ", why not accept that God is love and go from there?

Because they are different points, the thing that I was talking about that you quoted, and the thing that you are talking about. Sometimes we need to talk about different things. Why not continue with my point?

Better still, why not remain on-topic and start a new thread if this is what you have in mind.

Quote

There is already a cointradictory statement in the Bible that you do not want to address with me.

Jesus said:

Quote

I tell you the truth, unless you change and become like little children, you will never enter the kingdom of heaven.

Kindly treat me as a little child. Explain the on-topic contradictory statement. If it is not on-topic, you could always start a new thread.

XinXan

hero member

Activity: 1064

Merit: 505

Quote from: bl4kjaguar on March 26, 2015, 04:00:11 PM

Quote from: BADecker on March 26, 2015, 03:46:48 AM

Non-Biblical teachings that seem to be about God may be correct in some areas, but because they are false in other areas, they are not really about God.

God is not jealous or wrathful; God is love.
Instead of trying to "reconcile" these two cointradictions through "the person of Jesus Christ", why not accept that God is love and go from there?

There is already a cointradictory statement in the Bible that you do not want to address with me.

Why would i accept anything if there is no proof of it? How does god show us his love exactly? Through war, diseases, hunger?

bl4kjaguar

hero member

Activity: 546

Merit: 500

Quote from: BADecker on March 26, 2015, 03:46:48 AM

Non-Biblical teachings that seem to be about God may be correct in some areas, but because they are false in other areas, they are not really about God.

God is not jealous or wrathful; God is love.
Instead of trying to "reconcile" these two cointradictions through "the person of Jesus Christ", why not accept that God is love and go from there?

There is already a cointradictory statement in the Bible that you do not want to address with me.

XinXan

hero member

Activity: 1064

Merit: 505

Quote from: BADecker on March 26, 2015, 03:00:33 PM

Quote from: XinXan on March 26, 2015, 02:55:28 PM

Quote from: BADecker on March 26, 2015, 02:43:59 PM

Quote from: XinXan on March 26, 2015, 02:36:52 PM

Quote from: BADecker on March 26, 2015, 02:34:24 PM

Quote from: XinXan on March 26, 2015, 12:47:02 PM

Quote from: Buffer Overflow on March 26, 2015, 12:41:12 PM

I don't think he's trolling. It seems to me he fancied himself as some sort of important Bitcointalk religious guru, anyone can goto for advice. Obviously this plan exploded in his face.
I think he's dug himself into such a deep hole, that confused and frightened, he's just saying anything that pops into his head now.

Im suprised the mods allow him to keep posting that link, spamming it over and over and when you show him evidence that the bible is a non sense he avoids talking about it and keeps posting his link

I'm surprised that the mods let you be so off-topic all the time.

Re-posting the link saves space. I could simply post all the information at the link every time. I am trying to be brief, yet stay on-topic.

I know you dont want to talk about the image i posted since you cant refute anything there because it is in the bible and you are trying to avoid it but i will remind you of it each time you post something

Personally, I really don't mind that you are off-topic.

Cheesy

You keep trying to ignore the proofs that the bible is just full of lies and totally inaccurate but THE TRUTH IS HERE FOR EVERYONE ELSE :

http://www.biblicalnonsense.com

Oh, you're just upset that I have proven that God exists, and you can't prove He doesn't.

Cheesy

You cant prove the flying spaguetti monster doesnt exist, can you? But i can prove the bible is stupid

http://www.biblicalnonsense.com

Right there

BADecker

legendary

Activity: 3906

Merit: 1373

Quote from: Buffer Overflow on March 26, 2015, 03:01:19 PM

Quote from: BADecker on March 26, 2015, 02:56:30 PM

Words are easy, especially when you decide to write a simple line or two.

I'm typing on a phone. Compared to a proper keyboard it's slow and hardwork.

Great work, man! I'm not the OP, but I would let you be off-topic just for that.

Buffer Overflow

legendary

Activity: 1652

Merit: 1016

Quote from: BADecker on March 26, 2015, 02:56:30 PM

Words are easy, especially when you decide to write a simple line or two.

I'm typing on a phone. Compared to a proper keyboard it's slow and hardwork.

BADecker

legendary

Activity: 3906

Merit: 1373

Quote from: XinXan on March 26, 2015, 02:55:28 PM

Quote from: BADecker on March 26, 2015, 02:43:59 PM

Quote from: XinXan on March 26, 2015, 02:36:52 PM

Quote from: BADecker on March 26, 2015, 02:34:24 PM

Quote from: XinXan on March 26, 2015, 12:47:02 PM

Quote from: Buffer Overflow on March 26, 2015, 12:41:12 PM

I don't think he's trolling. It seems to me he fancied himself as some sort of important Bitcointalk religious guru, anyone can goto for advice. Obviously this plan exploded in his face.
I think he's dug himself into such a deep hole, that confused and frightened, he's just saying anything that pops into his head now.

Im suprised the mods allow him to keep posting that link, spamming it over and over and when you show him evidence that the bible is a non sense he avoids talking about it and keeps posting his link

I'm surprised that the mods let you be so off-topic all the time.

Re-posting the link saves space. I could simply post all the information at the link every time. I am trying to be brief, yet stay on-topic.

I know you dont want to talk about the image i posted since you cant refute anything there because it is in the bible and you are trying to avoid it but i will remind you of it each time you post something

Personally, I really don't mind that you are off-topic.

Cheesy

You keep trying to ignore the proofs that the bible is just full of lies and totally inaccurate but THE TRUTH IS HERE FOR EVERYONE ELSE :

http://www.biblicalnonsense.com

Oh, you're just upset that I have proven that God exists, and you can't prove He doesn't.

Cheesy

BADecker

legendary

Activity: 3906

Merit: 1373

Quote from: psybits on March 26, 2015, 02:53:32 PM

Quote from: Buffer Overflow on March 26, 2015, 02:51:55 PM

Quote from: BADecker on March 26, 2015, 02:42:05 PM

The thing that really has me stumped is, why do these people want to disprove God? Or if they aren't trying to do that, why would they want to hide the truth of God's existence?

Science cannot prove or disprove god. I wrote this way back on page #3 all those months ago. Shame you ignored it. Would of saved you a lot of typing. You'll learn.

I think your confused between the difference of believing in a god and believing in a religion.

Yes sometimes it does seem like trying to fit a square peg in a round hole when it comes to "scientifically" proving god.

Did you read the stuff at my https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.10718395 link? stuff that proves the existence of God?

BADecker

legendary

Activity: 3906

Merit: 1373

Quote from: Buffer Overflow on March 26, 2015, 02:51:55 PM

Quote from: BADecker on March 26, 2015, 02:42:05 PM

The thing that really has me stumped is, why do these people want to disprove God? Or if they aren't trying to do that, why would they want to hide the truth of God's existence?

Science cannot prove or disprove god. I wrote this way back on page #3 all those months ago. Shame you ignored it. Would of saved you a lot of typing. You'll learn.

I think your confused between the difference of believing in a god and believing in a religion.

Words are easy, especially when you decide to write a simple line or two. If you would read my stuff at https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.10718395 slowly, even you might come to understand that God's existence has been proven there.

Topic: Scientific proof that God exists? - page 292. (Read 845654 times)