Scientific theories are/have/will be tested, peer reviewed, and gone over many times, at least making them plausible. Religion is just blind faith in a random thing someone made in the past to explain things they couldn't understand.
Yet, the testing has produced so few results with regard to the interpretations which become theory adjustments, that there almost isn't any reasons to go on, except for the applications to the real world that the results of the testing provide, results that are produce by practical application of the tests, through engineering.
As long as "science" continues to come up with fantastic, stupid theories like Big Bang, 13 or 14 billion year universe, life from evolution, dark matter and dark energy, the sun and stars being powered by nuclear reactions, molten core of the earth, and multitudes of other fantastic things that it can't begin to prove by any stretch of the imagination, science is more of a religion than science, even though it uses the scientific method to test out and produce many results.
Science theory of today is far more a religion than any of the other religions of the world, and its god is the scientific theorist.
You really, really need to go learn and study before saying things like that. Earlier on you said that we didn't know what the wind was, to which I embarrassingly corrected you.
You didn't correct me at all. You simply said some stuff. You really need to study about the difference between theory and actuality.
Now, you're saying that we don't know that the sun is fueled by fusion reactions, which we have basically replicated on earth already. The atomic bomb hello, have you ever heard of it? Ever heard of nuclear power plants that are operating right now and utilize Fission?
There you go again, mixing up the issue. And it is intentional.
What does the fact that nuclear reactions exist, have to do with whether or not the sun operates by nuclear reactions? Nothing. You are either completely non-scientific, or else you want simple minded people to believe that scientists can determine things just by saying them. We have never been to the sun, have never scooped out part of it to analyze it, have not determined that there is absolutely not other method by which the sun can operate. In fact, electric cosmos theory fits the operation of the sun far better than nuclear theory.
Now I know the reason why you believe in the bible mumbo jumbo, because you have no clue of what's going on in the world.
Read the Bible. It fits the things observed in nature, and in the actual sociology of mankind, far better than any scientific observations or theories.
There you go again, listing more neat ideas that have absolutely no fact to back what is being suggested by the ideas. In fact, the only reasons that many of the theories are still theories is that many scientists keep wanting them to be theories, and keep on saying that they are theories, so that people think that they are theories, when in fact they have been debunked as theories over and over, again and again, time after time... like the idea of life from evolution.
When science can show that there is no possible other way that the sun can operate, then some of your reference material that the sun is nuclear might be accurate. However, even then, if the steps for the nuclear reactions in the sun haven't been proven, such ideas are simply ideas only. There might be other, different, steps.
Simply because science has provided a plausible method that shows that the sun could be nuclear,
doesn't mean that the sun IS nuclear. It all lies in the realm of theory or ideas. When theory or ideas are touted as fact, they become religion or at least similar to religion.
