It's NOT off topic, your bible is off topic, in that it has no evidence, tree's are alive, and alive, according to you, by the grace of your god, shame you cant grace us with an explanation of why your god, if he is all so powerfull, would bend you over and tan yer fuckin arse wi the evidence, a Sequioa tree.. oh, I forgot, you cant be bent over if your going up and down it, just to get a 'FEEL' for god's stubble..
The TREE's help us breath, not god. All plants help us breath, not god, you pray to god I stop this, but he continue's to prove I am more worthy of the evidence by giving me more, to smack yer arse with.
By your definition of god to the members here, The tree's are god's creature's. Your only problem, is the tree's prove the bible timeline as complete and utter shit, and hence you refuse your god, by denying your god, why should we even bother here? The only folks talking to you after denying such evidence, is YOU and your alias's, for no SANE man would talk to you after ignoring the Sequoia Tree.
Edit: The Sequoia tree, and Pinus Longavea, are PHYSICAL, and hence SCIENTIFIC proof that the bible and/or it's timeline, is a catholic scam, why? because the only one stupid enough to deny THIS evidence, are stupid enough to be you, or agree with you.
You dont speak of the truth when it ACTUALLY matter's, and hence, you are a false prophet.. a Liar. Your own book warns us about you.
It is not a catholic scam. Catholics are no longer stuck in the medieval mindset, they have accepted geological time, evolution in the form of theistic evolution (see Teilhard de Chardin), and it was a catholic priest, Lemaitre, who first formulated the Big Bang theory. There's quite some shit going on in the catholic church, and the current pope Francis has a lot of work trying to clean it up, but denying obvious reality like evolution, cosmology and the age of the earth is no longer their thing.
BADecker's form of Christianity is a different kind, something only espoused by some weird fundamentalists. Like Jehova Witnesses, Adventists; on the other side the Wahhabists and Salafist of Saudi Arabia and ISIS; but most common and powerful are the "evangelicals" of the USA, which I guess his cult is part of. Likely he is ashamed of saying the name of his cult, since he avoided it so far.
Ok, I'll say I was wrong to say catholic, but here in scotland, the catholic's in ireland are well known for paedofeelya, even the church tried to cover it up.. anyway, apologies to the catholics.. I'll say bible scam.
My form of proof is a sequoia, and a 5064 year old pinus longavea that clearly survived the biblical flood, it is still alive today, and probably will be when the bible's last pages are used to wipe our arse with cause they wiped all tree's off the face of the earth so w forget this MASSIVE peice of un-deniable evidence.
I think the only way to find scientific proof in this case is to take it to the same level as dreams. Can we scientifically prove we dream? No, although we can record rem sleep, so in effect, recording rem sleep proves we dream or not, depending on how deep a sleep we are in.. this is akin to my waking up to a thought of the audio application, called Sequoia.. incidently, when I needed evidence myself the most, if BADecker's claim that god does everything through us is true, then clearly, according to this assumption, god answered my prayer. This should be classed as evidence for the existance of god, but since he and a lot of other people think I talk shit, then god can never be proved, for the method I have just written is being ignored. Meaning god CANT exist in the mindset of man, only FAITH in the HOPE he is charitable to show exist's does. Like he did when I remembered the tree.
