You have no more credibility with me. 
You failed to keep your word. Is that acceptable and moral? Intelligent?
Topic: Scientific proof that God exists? - page 444. (Read 845654 times)
You failed to keep your word. Is that acceptable and moral? Intelligent?
If you want someone to take you seriously, don't say you believe in a 2,000 year old book written by stoners.
I never said it and you can't prove that I believe in the Bible; I deny that. I said a man should (try to) know everything, or at least something about everything.
You are implementing an "inquisition" by abusing me and our agreement with your presumption of guilt.
Do you really admit to being a liar, a cheat, and an abusive slanderer? Yes/No? Non-response is tacit admission and this is your final chance.
Sorry dude, your lack of proof has failed to convince me.
I suggest you go back to the cult this sunday and get some new lines - or maybe consult with the other brainwashed people on this thread.
You have no more credibility with me.
If you want someone to take you seriously, don't say you believe in a 2,000 year old book written by stoners.
I never said it and you can't prove that I believe in the Bible; I deny that. I said a man should (try to) know everything, or at least something about everything.
You are implementing an "inquisition" by abusing me and our agreement with your presumption of guilt.
Do you really admit to being a liar, a cheat, and an abusive slanderer? Yes/No? Non-response is tacit admission and this is your final chance.
Could you quote the statement of mine justifies your negative trust?
Sure, answer my question first:
Do you have any proof that your god has given you different instructions within the last two millennium?
Not fair; I fulfilled my side of the bargain. Now prove that I deserve your negative trust. You are in breach of contract.
Meh, just talk to the tooth fairy and make me disappear.
You can't justify your dis-trust, but you lied and broke your promise; you abused the system and dis-trusted for NO REASON.
Do you tacitly admit to all of these things, or will you forcefully deny them?
You will deny my allegation by keeping your word if you have any morals at all.
I'll stick with my morality and my intelligence. 
If the tooth fairy is not available, try the easter bunny.
If you want someone to take you seriously, don't say you believe in a 2,000 year old book written by stoners.
Could you quote the statement of mine justifies your negative trust?
Sure, answer my question first:
Do you have any proof that your god has given you different instructions within the last two millennium?
Not fair; I fulfilled my side of the bargain. Now prove that I deserve your negative trust. You are in breach of contract.
Meh, just talk to the tooth fairy and make me disappear.
You can't justify your dis-trust, but you lied and broke your promise; you abused the system and dis-trusted for NO REASON.
Do you tacitly admit to all of these things, or will you forcefully deny them?
You will deny my allegation by keeping your word if you have any morals at all.
I'll stick with my morality and my intelligence.
Could you quote the statement of mine justifies your negative trust?
Sure, answer my question first:
Do you have any proof that your god has given you different instructions within the last two millennium?
Not fair; I fulfilled my side of the bargain. Now prove that I deserve your negative trust. You are in breach of contract.
Meh, just talk to the tooth fairy and make me disappear.
Could you quote the statement of mine justifies your negative trust?
Sure, answer my question first:
Do you have any proof that your god has given you different instructions within the last two millennium?
Not fair; I fulfilled my side of the bargain. Now prove that I deserve your negative trust. You are in breach of contract.
Do you have any proof that your god has given you different instructions within the last two millennium?
When it comes to God's messengers, there can be no proof; adequate understanding is encompassed by something called the "content-source problem", and also depends on the wisdom of the one absorbing the content, i.e. that one's ability to recognize truth.
When it comes to God's messengers, there can be no proof; adequate understanding is encompassed by something called the "content-source problem", and also depends on the wisdom of the one absorbing the content, i.e. that one's ability to recognize truth.
So the answer is you have no proof?
Why then do you believe?
Why don't you believe in the tooth fairy? No proof for that either. How about aliens? How about purple rectangles that make green toast?
What makes you believe in one fairy tale and not another?
Why should I speak to an abusive liar? That is worse than even a priest!
Are you tacitly admitting that you are an abusive liar?
Why don't you believe in the tooth fairy? No proof for that either. How about aliens? How about purple rectangles that make green toast?
What makes you believe in one fairy tale and not another?
Do you have any proof that your god has given you different instructions within the last two millennium?
When it comes to God's messengers, there can be no proof; adequate understanding is encompassed by something called the "content-source problem", and also depends on the wisdom of the one absorbing the content, i.e. that one's ability to recognize truth.
When it comes to God's messengers, there can be no proof; adequate understanding is encompassed by something called the "content-source problem", and also depends on the wisdom of the one absorbing the content, i.e. that one's ability to recognize truth.
So the answer is you have no proof?
Why then do you believe?
Why don't you believe in the tooth fairy? No proof for that either. How about aliens? How about purple rectangles that make green toast?
What makes you believe in one fairy tale and not another?
Why should I speak to an abusive liar? That is worse than even a priest!
Are you tacitly admitting that you are an abusive liar?
Do you have any proof that your god has given you different instructions within the last two millennium?
When it comes to God's messengers, there can be no proof; adequate understanding is encompassed by something called the "content-source problem", and also depends on the wisdom of the one absorbing the content, i.e. that one's ability to recognize truth.
When it comes to God's messengers, there can be no proof; adequate understanding is encompassed by something called the "content-source problem", and also depends on the wisdom of the one absorbing the content, i.e. that one's ability to recognize truth.
So the answer is you have no proof?
Why then do you believe?
Why don't you believe in the tooth fairy? No proof for that either. How about aliens? How about purple rectangles that make green toast?
What makes you believe in one fairy tale and not another?
Are you tacitly admitting that you are an abusive liar?
If not, prove that I deserve your negative trust. It sounds to me like you dis-trust on the basis of a religious discussion and not any particular statement that I made.
Here, I am answering your question for free:
Do you have any proof that your god has given you different instructions within the last two millennium?
When it comes to God's messengers, there can be no proof; adequate understanding is encompassed by something called the "content-source problem", and also depends on the wisdom of the one absorbing the content, i.e. that one's ability to recognize truth.
If not, prove that I deserve your negative trust. It sounds to me like you dis-trust on the basis of a religious discussion and not any particular statement that I made.
Here, I am answering your question for free:
Do you have any proof that your god has given you different instructions within the last two millennium?
When it comes to God's messengers, there can be no proof; adequate understanding is encompassed by something called the "content-source problem", and also depends on the wisdom of the one absorbing the content, i.e. that one's ability to recognize truth.
Sure, answer my question first:
Do you have any proof that your god has given you different instructions within the last two millennium?
Do you have any proof that your god has given you different instructions within the last two millennium?
Well, to answer that I will need either 50 BTC for the link or removal of the negative trust.
In return for one of these, I will not call you an abusive liar for failing to prove that I deserve your negative trust.
You can't answer it. I'll answer it for you.
There has been zero writings of any god in over 2,000 years. When people believed in your god, they also believed the world was flat, and the sun moved around the earth.
Sure, answer my question first:
Do you have any proof that your god has given you different instructions within the last two millennium?
Do you have any proof that your god has given you different instructions within the last two millennium?
Well, to answer that I will need either 50 BTC for the link or removal of the negative trust.
In return for one of these, I will not call you an abusive liar for failing to prove that I deserve your negative trust.
Nope. I'm going to stick with common sense. You lose.
Agnosticism is not common sense?
That is what I have been posting about...
Could you quote the statement of mine justifies your negative trust?
Sure, answer my question first:
Do you have any proof that your god has given you different instructions within the last two millennium?
(lol - arguing with intelligent people sucks, eh? Try going to a picnic on sunday instead and chatting with people not in your cult)
Nope. I'm going to stick with common sense. You lose.
Agnosticism is not common sense?
Spencer's "First Principles" is not common sense?
Could you quote the statement of mine which justifies your negative trust?
I am afraid that I will have to call you an abusive liar if not.
Again, I don't need to prove the tooth fairy exists. YOU DO.
Why do you keep repeating the same arguments? Have you not been to a cult meeting in a while? No new lines?
Why do you keep repeating the same arguments? Have you not been to a cult meeting in a while? No new lines?
I keep repeating Spencer's arguments; you keep repeating the presumption that I believe in the Bible or the Tooth Fairy.
Read Spencer or pay me 0.05 BTC for each question answered.
Nope. I'm going to stick with common sense. You lose.
Again, I don't need to prove the tooth fairy exists. YOU DO.
Why do you keep repeating the same arguments? Have you not been to a cult meeting in a while? No new lines?
Why do you keep repeating the same arguments? Have you not been to a cult meeting in a while? No new lines?
I keep repeating Spencer's arguments; you keep repeating the presumption that I believe in the Bible or the Tooth Fairy.
Read Spencer or pay me 0.05 BTC for each question answered.
My intelligence is superior to anyone that believes in a 2,000 year old book written by stoners. 
You are operating under a religious belief yourself:
"the beliefs which Science has forced upon Religion, have been intrinsically more religious than those which they supplanted."
I am glad that you are happy where you are, but your intelligence will never be superior to Spencer's so long as you fail to read his treatise (quoted above).
My intelligence is superior to anyone that believes in a 2,000 year old book written by stoners. (quoted above)
Come on - doesn't your cult give you the lines to combat common sense??
That's not relevant to our discussion--you failed to prove it.
A 2,000 year old book. You are gullible and took it as truth.
Prove it.
Again, I don't need to prove the tooth fairy exists. YOU ARE THE ONE CLAIMING IT..
Why do you keep repeating the same arguments and ignoring the same questions? Have you not been to a cult meeting in a while? No new lines?
My intelligence is superior to anyone that believes in a 2,000 year old book written by stoners.
You are operating under a religious belief yourself:
"the beliefs which Science has forced upon Religion, have been intrinsically more religious than those which they supplanted."
I am glad that you are happy where you are, but your intelligence will never be superior to Spencer's so long as you fail to read his treatise (quoted above).
My intelligence is superior to anyone that believes in a 2,000 year old book written by stoners. (quoted above)
Come on - doesn't your cult give you the lines to combat common sense??
That's not relevant to our discussion--you failed to prove it.
A 2,000 year old book. You took it as truth.
Prove it.
Tell us how your god created a MALE and FEMALE of every animal.
Then, when it came to the most important, he created ONLY MALE. He then saw man was lonely and created a female, as an afterthought.
Talk about Misogyny
Do you hate women as well, or is that an aspect of your god that you ignore?
Then, when it came to the most important, he created ONLY MALE. He then saw man was lonely and created a female, as an afterthought.
Talk about Misogyny
Do you hate women as well, or is that an aspect of your god that you ignore?
Jump to: