Author

Topic: Scientific proof that God exists? - page 441. (Read 845565 times)

legendary
Activity: 3906
Merit: 1373
October 13, 2014, 02:26:59 PM
people are full of flaws).
So are the God(s) described on known religions, making them nothing but human imagination.
Of course, maybe none of the God(s) are flawed, and the only flaws lie in the people who think They are flawed.

 Cheesy
So you're saying that there are flaws in people like Hawking, in comparison to the average believer?  Roll Eyes

Everyone is a little bit flawed, at least. No disrespect meant but, most average believers can walk. That wasn't the point, however.

Smiley
legendary
Activity: 3906
Merit: 1373
October 13, 2014, 02:24:03 PM
(Deuteronomy 22:28-29 NLT)
 
Quote
   If a man is caught in the act of raping a young woman who is not engaged, he must pay fifty pieces of silver to her father.  Then he must marry the young woman because he violated her, and he will never be allowed to divorce her.

What kind of lunatic would make a rape victim marry her attacker?  Answer: God.


The idea is protection of the child and the parents at the same time. Some other opetions:
1. You could execute all three;
2. You could execute the mother and fetus and punish the guy;
3. You could let the state or the parents raise the child, and execute the guy.

There isn't any happy solution. The idea is that the kid gets as normal of a life as possible. That's with two parents. Besides, these things were somewhat the way things were done in those days, all over the place, not simply at God's command.

However, these days, when Stockholm Syndrome sets in, some rape victims marry their attacker voluntarily.

Vod, you're kinda talking nonsense.

Smiley
sr. member
Activity: 252
Merit: 250
October 13, 2014, 12:22:46 PM
i guess fucking is important, but God is more important
legendary
Activity: 1148
Merit: 1001
October 13, 2014, 11:22:04 AM
(Deuteronomy 22:28-29 NLT)
 
Quote
   If a man is caught in the act of raping a young woman who is not engaged, he must pay fifty pieces of silver to her father.  Then he must marry the young woman because he violated her, and he will never be allowed to divorce her.

What kind of lunatic would make a rape victim marry her attacker?  Answer: God.


naturally someone you want to have sex with is someone you love right?

so why would you want to separate the 2 by putting one in jail and making them marry someone else when they're released in 34 years

wounds can heal.  but effectively separating them so you can't resolve the problem just makes it worse

I just want to add that much of the Old Testament is a historical book/documents.  Much of what happens in the books is not what God desires but it is an account of the culture and the choices that were made during that time.  It was never God's intentions for people to rape, or have multiple wives and so on.  The laws for rape at this time were made for the protection of women.  Women were treated as property, much like some societies even today where dowries are paid.  If a women was raped she would be perceived as not desirable to marry her so it was better for the women to be married if raped, as weird as it seems to us in our society.  Not ideal of course, but that is the way it was.
sr. member
Activity: 252
Merit: 250
October 13, 2014, 10:29:52 AM
(Deuteronomy 22:28-29 NLT)
 
Quote
   If a man is caught in the act of raping a young woman who is not engaged, he must pay fifty pieces of silver to her father.  Then he must marry the young woman because he violated her, and he will never be allowed to divorce her.

What kind of lunatic would make a rape victim marry her attacker?  Answer: God.


naturally someone you want to have sex with is someone you love right?

so why would you want to separate the 2 by putting one in jail and making them marry someone else when they're released in 34 years

wounds can heal.  but effectively separating them so you can't resolve the problem just makes it worse
Vod
legendary
Activity: 3668
Merit: 3010
Licking my boob since 1970
October 13, 2014, 04:38:56 AM
(Deuteronomy 22:28-29 NLT)
 
Quote
    If a man is caught in the act of raping a young woman who is not engaged, he must pay fifty pieces of silver to her father.  Then he must marry the young woman because he violated her, and he will never be allowed to divorce her.

What kind of lunatic would make a rape victim marry her attacker?  Answer: God.
sr. member
Activity: 378
Merit: 250
Knowledge could but approximate existence.
October 12, 2014, 11:38:15 PM
No one can prove this thread valid or not.  Relax folks.  Ether way, it's all good.  
As "they" say, "Cool story, bro."

Since it could not, prior limakasidian entropism, be conclusively demonstrated that anything existed beyond one's own mind, scientific evidence was accepted by faith and, therefore, was not proof.

However, as revealed below, one may now proceed beyond solipsism unto a belief in a literal everything without yielding unto faith.


These are interesting perspectives; however, it would seem His entropism has not been heard.

Entropism, dervied from solipsism, starts at the belief that nothing exists beyond one's own mind. From their, it then proceeds to assert that the sentience of that mind deomonstrates the existence of that required for it - some tendancy or tendancy to become less orderly, the consciousness occupied another state. From there, it is then postulated that this/these tendencies, begetting entropy, could, in having propagated a state of a mind out of nothing, are sufficient for some form of ex nihilo generation.

From this, entropism proceeds unto an absolute tendancy to become less orderly. In considering this, and the capabilities of those tendancies previously mentioned, it is determined that absolute entropy of this tendancy would prove sufficient for ex nihilo generation of everything, including its own self.

From that, it is determined, within entropism, that, by an absolute tendancy to become less orderly, the sum of existence is absolute entropy.
full member
Activity: 231
Merit: 100
October 12, 2014, 11:36:37 PM
No one can prove this thread valid or not.  Relax folks.  Ether way, it's all good. 
sr. member
Activity: 378
Merit: 250
Knowledge could but approximate existence.
October 12, 2014, 11:34:07 PM
No one can prove or not. Life is faith
As "they" say, "Cool story, bro."

Since it could not, prior limakasidian entropism, be conclusively demonstrated that anything existed beyond one's own mind, scientific evidence was accepted by faith and, therefore, was not proof.

However, as revealed below, one may now proceed beyond solipsism unto a belief in a literal everything without yielding unto faith.


These are interesting perspectives; however, it would seem His entropism has not been heard.

Entropism, dervied from solipsism, starts at the belief that nothing exists beyond one's own mind. From their, it then proceeds to assert that the sentience of that mind deomonstrates the existence of that required for it - some tendancy or tendancy to become less orderly, the consciousness occupied another state. From there, it is then postulated that this/these tendencies, begetting entropy, could, in having propagated a state of a mind out of nothing, are sufficient for some form of ex nihilo generation.

From this, entropism proceeds unto an absolute tendancy to become less orderly. In considering this, and the capabilities of those tendancies previously mentioned, it is determined that absolute entropy of this tendancy would prove sufficient for ex nihilo generation of everything, including its own self.

From that, it is determined, within entropism, that, by an absolute tendancy to become less orderly, the sum of existence is absolute entropy.
member
Activity: 70
Merit: 10
October 12, 2014, 11:29:35 PM
No one can prove or not. Life is faith
full member
Activity: 161
Merit: 100
October 12, 2014, 10:33:13 PM
The usual garbage full of fallacies and misinformation...

So quick to shoot it down did you even read it?
sr. member
Activity: 378
Merit: 250
Knowledge could but approximate existence.
October 12, 2014, 09:49:57 PM
However, as revealed below, one may now proceed beyond solipsism unto a belief in a literal everything without yielding unto faith.

If belief in a literal everything is justified, then so too is god(s)?
Yes, within limakasidian entropism, all Gods exist.
member
Activity: 112
Merit: 10
☯YIN YANG KING☯
October 10, 2014, 03:05:12 AM
Ever wonder why an Almighty would need "your help" for something?
Well... ALL of the known Gods do. That alone is the biggest flaw of them all.

No "man" is an island.  Wink
legendary
Activity: 2674
Merit: 2965
Terminated.
October 10, 2014, 12:40:24 AM
people are full of flaws).
So are the God(s) described on known religions, making them nothing but human imagination.
Of course, maybe none of the God(s) are flawed, and the only flaws lie in the people who think They are flawed.

 Cheesy
So you're saying that there are flaws in people like Hawking, in comparison to the average believer?  Roll Eyes
legendary
Activity: 3906
Merit: 1373
October 09, 2014, 09:52:14 PM
And quantum mechanics is retarded for thinking that we are moving from the future into the past!   Cheesy

so the sheer majority of people are protarded...

With God, they have been prewarded.   Cheesy
legendary
Activity: 1834
Merit: 1019
October 09, 2014, 09:50:23 PM
And quantum mechanics is retarded for thinking that we are moving from the future into the past!   Cheesy

so the sheer majority of people are protarded...
legendary
Activity: 3906
Merit: 1373
October 09, 2014, 09:46:16 PM
And quantum mechanics is retarded for thinking that we are moving from the future into the past!   Cheesy
legendary
Activity: 1834
Merit: 1019
October 09, 2014, 09:44:09 PM
legendary
Activity: 3906
Merit: 1373
October 09, 2014, 09:36:58 PM
Ever wonder why an Almighty would need "your help" for something?
Well... ALL of the known Gods do. That alone is the biggest flaw of them all.

He doesn't "need" anything. He allows us to live and act as a gift, to us!   Cheesy

I mean, you give gifts to your gerbils, don't you?
hero member
Activity: 770
Merit: 500
October 09, 2014, 09:35:37 PM
Ever wonder why an Almighty would need "your help" for something?
Well... ALL of the known Gods do. That alone is the biggest flaw of them all.

There's so many different ways to think about that.

Their gods could be wanting humanity's "help" through prayer etc, as a way to unify people, or provide strict moral guidelines...+100 more.

Jump to: