Pages:
Author

Topic: Scientific proof that God exists? - page 6. (Read 845706 times)

newbie
Activity: 100
Merit: 0
September 03, 2021, 09:33:36 AM
Scientists cannot even prove, how the world is formed other than big bang theory, let alone god.

YOUR earth did not exist until the big bang pushed the sperm into an egg in your mum. The video of what is called a mother ship being pushed out of the sun is YOU entering the egg seen from inside the egg, as it is ejected to find the body you were sent to drive.
newbie
Activity: 100
Merit: 0
September 03, 2021, 09:03:58 AM
And THANK YOU Daniel91, for helping me find myself, the scientific proof that your god exist's. Well Done.

Case closed. ha!

Nah, cant do that, so let's try sumat new.

What name of the plethora that I have a right to use, according to the star's... would you rather I use for the new world order's FAKE religion?

Hahahah...

It would be lucifers turn to be sacrificed!
newbie
Activity: 100
Merit: 0
September 03, 2021, 08:19:53 AM
In recent development's, I had to face a judge. This is a matter of court record, so very provable.

Are you James Dalgleish Laidlaw? asks the court puppet.

I am not that man, I reply. (scots law, say this if you dis-agree with your criminal record.)

You are not that man? What is your name?

Well, according to gematria, the math's used by freemasonry, I am Jesus Christ.

You are claiming to be Jesus Christ? Would you like me to remand you in custody?

Obviously not, but I cannot argue with the science.

What is your full name? (as above)

What is your date of birth? 8.2.1969

Given new date.

Trial Diet on 22nd oct. The darkest, most powerful day of the year for masonic ritual.

This is all FACT, and took place in Edinburgh Sheriff Court. Google it.

Now it's official. BADecker.

You see, in order for me to face myself before seeing myself, I have to know myself.

So I learn, and learnt from here too, and continue to evolve, and thus is where I am at:

The male in me is Jesus Christ.

The Female in me is Lucifer

And my Balance of good and evil is maintained by the height of man's intelligence, the monkey mind, same monkey mind above the origional egyptian cadacus, removed by the UK's National Heathen Service (NHS), where they sample all our blood for drinking.

I heard the plea of the pachacouti tribe. I agree not to have an overturning of space-time (masonic or religious initiation) on the condition no more sacrifce has taken place since i got the message. But to be safe, I'll say from the point of posting this.

Take the hint, watch all be destroyed, this will cease when the sacrificing does.

For religious peoples, this has profound significance. Jesus in court? Lucifer in court? The NEW HUMAN, the mayans predicted, in court?

The child of EARTH and Starry HEAVEN? The MONKEY KING?

The sphinx looks to the EARTH MONKEY with the mind of a CHILD who sit's on a globe and dreams of the stars.

Take it away and all will pay.

We are living out the same cycle as written of in the bible. You see, the event's in the bible never did take place. They are doing so NOW.

Dead or alive, I will always be Pachacouti, Jesus, Lucifer, to name a few.

It's written in my stars.

And my name.

Ra Amen, prince of air, feeder of fire.

The Monkey God.

Destroyer of the serpent race.

I feed the fire, the serpents who will burn with their desire.

Watch this.

When you first get to the pyramid of gizeh, you arrive at the base. 756 feet per side. x 4 = 3024

The pachacouti tribes prophecy begins with 'it rained for 30 days and 30 nights'.

Thirty times twenty four hours = 3024.

In the periodic table, 3024 is the gold that lead to saturn to reveal who I am. An inverse process of Alchemy.

Freemasons hid it from themselves using the one name they are not allowed to use, and hence protected their own diety... lucifer, as is proven by their 18th degree password, hose-anna, blasted out over the uk airwaves in the late 60's - early 70's.... An inverse way of hiding lucifer, is to show jesus to lesser level bro's, creating fear of looking into the truth.

Faithless - God is a DJ. Question is, who's god? Here I am, a multitude of names, all the children of this so called god... yet these names are god to some.

You see, the monkey king gives death the utchat, (all seeing eye AND aether stream, (the breath of the fire of the sun)), and in return recieves a globe called planet earth, that those who still have a soul, see.

And hence the confusion of flat earth theory.

The monkey holds us in our form as human beings between heaven and earth. There IS no hell but hell on earth, created by enemies of the monkey king, those who deserve being sucked into the void, to meet my friend Osiris. Their own sould soul.

Incidently called Sould by the egyptians, as a sold soul should be.

Ungrateful bastards.

They live in 'A' flat earth above normal folks head's, 96 feet high in the collective conciousnous to be exact.

It's not that I'm telepathic. But I'm the most qualified to know they can certainly hear me. Their denial state's I'm telepathic.

They accept they hear Lucifer.

Hows your religion holding up with your paedophilia BADecker?

Still BAD when you deck HER?

You must by now have realised that lucifer is delighting in her glory at the use of her image on earth.

A fantisiser who masturbates of taking the female target of the fantasy from behind, creates a male on earth who will suffer like the woman who might have.

This is known as the revenge of lucifer on all males who blame woman for their fall, when they are the ones, swallowing their own seed, loving their butt's destruction.

I am Jesus Christ, son of god, as is proven in court. A closed court. Amen.

I mean c'mon, can't have lucifer in jail now can we?

Figure it out, it's all f'n true!!!

Say's this so called atheist... and agreed in court.

Pachacouti, aka Ra Amen, the name I proved to my father, I am.

The evidence is clear. A court accept's my scientific evidence for being lucifer, jesus, and the child of EARTH MONKEY GOD, known in Japan as the Ninja Monkey KING, in the form of the lunar monkey, born 8.2.1969 Nonetheless, Now I can walk the streets, seeing fear in the serpent race. Cant have them afraid of their god now BADecker huh? So I'll convince them I'm Jesus. aka Lucifer.

Just keep in mind. I dont exist.

But court is final.

I have shown a court the same evidence written here.

If the son of god exists, then he is scientific proof of his own father.

And hence, in the end, I'll say LEGALLY, scientific proof of god's SON is proven. He writes this.

I'll leave the rest for y'all to discuss, now that all you can do is take the piss out of whatever god your comments actually prove,

you FEAR...

GOD!
full member
Activity: 1386
Merit: 132
Precision Beats Power and Timing Beats Speed.
August 29, 2021, 08:35:22 PM
hero member
Activity: 1466
Merit: 973
August 29, 2021, 01:05:33 PM
jr. member
Activity: 56
Merit: 2
August 14, 2021, 03:57:49 PM
What do you think?
Please share your opinion about this article.


101 Proofs For God

A growing list of common sense Proofs for God.

Proof for God, #65 Mitochondrial Eve and Y-Chromosome Adam

 Genetic scientists seem to be in general agreement that we are all descendants of one woman and one man. This research was fairly recent, starting about 1978. They, of course, do not believe in the creation story of Adam and Eve in the Bible, but their conclusions are getting closer and closer.

In case you have not heard about this, it makes very interesting reading. But I think it raises a number of profound challenges to the Theory of Evolution.

The scientists base the above conclusions on the known facts of human reproduction, specifically on properties of the sperm and egg. .....
Full article read here: http://101proofsforgod.blogspot.com/2014/07/65-mitochondial-eve-and-y-chromosome.html


nice article. thanks for your sharing. The theory of evolution is a theory that can be both believed and disproved. What matters is our progress from a primitive life to technology! I wonder if the primitive evolutionary breakdown had ever peaked before? Has the mystery of the pyramids been solved?
legendary
Activity: 3990
Merit: 1385
August 12, 2021, 11:37:24 AM




You and the post above yours are right on. God is so powerful that he can interrupt the cause and effect process, make His miracle fit right in, and leave not a trace of spontaneity. It's going to take thousands of years of investigation before we will even begin to figure out how God does it.

Cool
legendary
Activity: 3388
Merit: 3514
born once atheist
August 10, 2021, 08:00:10 PM


newbie
Activity: 42
Merit: 0
June 30, 2021, 07:13:41 AM
I don't think science will be able to enlighten up on the matter, science is based on facts and god is metaphysical.
newbie
Activity: 16
Merit: 1
June 29, 2021, 04:06:14 AM
Scientists cannot even prove, how the world is formed other than big bang theory, let alone god.
legendary
Activity: 4522
Merit: 3426
June 28, 2021, 12:18:33 PM
My real point here is that you can make up any numbers that you want (as you and I both demonstrated) and there is no way to validate them, so any claims of proof by probability cannot be valid.
Zero isn't a number. Zero is lack of existence.

I guess you are waxing philosophical here (zero is a number) in order to avoid acknowledging the fact that you have failed to prove scientifically that God exists.

Maybe you could try to prove mathematically that God ≠ 0.
legendary
Activity: 3990
Merit: 1385
June 28, 2021, 12:01:41 AM
And we have proof of billions of things having been made, ...
You claim that there are billions of machines with provable makers. Fine. I claim that there are trillions of machines without provable makers. Therefore, the probability of a machine having a maker is 1/1000.
That's where you make your mistake.
The trillions of machines without provable makers are really not only as you said, but also they are trillions of machines that easily might have makers. Those trillions cancel themselves out as being part of the equation.
Find five or ten machines that provably DON'T have a maker... or even one such machine... so we can pit them/it against the billions of machines that we KNOW have makers. That way we'll have a start in your direction.

My real point here is that you can make up any numbers that you want (as you and I both demonstrated) and there is no way to validate them, so any claims of proof by probability cannot be valid.

Zero isn't a number. Zero is lack of existence.    Cool
hero member
Activity: 2002
Merit: 534
June 27, 2021, 02:56:59 AM
In past scientists created a god element that could mimic any element but it was unstable and couldn't last for a long time.

A god element? I haven't heard of that one yet. How does it work? It can mimic all other elements? This sounds interesting and very complex. How can the god element just change from a solid state, to liquid or gas? This probably requires a lot of energy. Also if this could be produced in large quantities than the military will likely start include it their arsenal.
legendary
Activity: 3990
Merit: 1385
June 26, 2021, 02:19:54 PM
The dude who made the first post is just another storyteller, lol

Trouble is, he doesn't tell nearly enough of the story.     Cool
legendary
Activity: 4522
Merit: 3426
June 25, 2021, 05:27:19 PM
And we have proof of billions of things having been made, ...
You claim that there are billions of machines with provable makers. Fine. I claim that there are trillions of machines without provable makers. Therefore, the probability of a machine having a maker is 1/1000.
That's where you make your mistake.
The trillions of machines without provable makers are really not only as you said, but also they are trillions of machines that easily might have makers. Those trillions cancel themselves out as being part of the equation.
Find five or ten machines that provably DON'T have a maker... or even one such machine... so we can pit them/it against the billions of machines that we KNOW have makers. That way we'll have a start in your direction.

My real point here is that you can make up any numbers that you want (as you and I both demonstrated) and there is no way to validate them, so any claims of proof by probability cannot be valid.
legendary
Activity: 3990
Merit: 1385
June 25, 2021, 03:27:07 PM
And we have proof of billions of things having been made, ...

You claim that there are billions of machines with provable makers. Fine. I claim that there are trillions of machines without provable makers. Therefore, the probability of a machine having a maker is 1/1000.

That's where you make your mistake.

The trillions of machines without provable makers are really not only as you said, but also they are trillions of machines that easily might have makers. Those trillions cancel themselves out as being part of the equation.

Find five or ten machines that provably DON'T have a maker... or even one such machine... so we can pit them/it against the billions of machines that we KNOW have makers. That way we'll have a start in your direction.

Cool
legendary
Activity: 4522
Merit: 3426
June 24, 2021, 01:57:22 AM
And we have proof of billions of things having been made, ...

You claim that there are billions of machines with provable makers. Fine. I claim that there are trillions of machines without provable makers. Therefore, the probability of a machine having a maker is 1/1000.
legendary
Activity: 3990
Merit: 1385
June 23, 2021, 10:35:40 PM
The water cycle is a tiny machine in the loads of machines that make up the universe. Machines have makers. A maker great enough to make the universe is consistent with the definition of our word "God."

Tiny or not, it means that you cannot claim that all machines have makers. Of course, there exist machines that have makers, but you can't use that statement to prove that the universe was made by a god (how ever you define "god"), because the universe can be one of those machines with no maker.

And while we are rehashing your broken proof, remember that we can't use probability as an argument here, since we have no way to measure it.

Absolutely can! Consider. There are about 5,000 years of people history that we can confirm really happened on earth. Confirmation comes through examining speech patterns and applying them to what is written on ancient clay tablets. We also have a little DNA from the past.

In this 5,000 years we have found all kinds of machines and made-things. What do we know about these machines and made-things?
1. For some of them, we know who made them.
2. For some of them, we have a pretty good idea who made them... evidence.
3. For some we don't know who made them.
4. For many, if we want to stand off a little way and be objective, we don't know that they were made... and we don't know that they weren't made.

But here's the real clincher.
1. We have proof that multitudes of machines and made-things were made, often knowing who the makers were.
2. But we don't have proof that even one thing or machine was not made... just popped spontaneously into existence for no reason.

If there were only 5 things in the universe, and we only knew for a fact that one of them was made, where's the evidence that at least one of the 5 was not made?... since the other 4 might or might not have been made?

But the universe is full of things. And we have proof of billions of things having been made, because many of the makers are still alive. And we have strong evidence that the books that talk about the makers of other things are not lying. And even many of the things that we don't know were made, look like other things that we know WERE made.

So, find us the proof for something that was not made... so that we know absolutely that it exists without having been made. Prove it. Don't prove it for countless thousands of things. Don't turn to theories. Show us the proof for just one. Proof that it could absolutely not have been made and yet exists.

In other words, all we have is two things:
1. Billions of machines have makers;
2. We don't know.

We don't know of even one thing for a fact that doesn't have a maker. Some of us consider that all machines have makers. Some others just keep on playing the lottery.

Cool
legendary
Activity: 4522
Merit: 3426
June 23, 2021, 11:01:51 AM
The second is that the universe is a machine made up of machines. All machines that we know of have makers. ...
I have already demonstrated that the water cycle is a machine with no known maker. Therefore, you cannot claim that "all machines that we know of have makers". Furthermore, the lack of evidence of the water cycle being created without a maker is not proof that it has a maker. Inability to prove a statement is not proof that the opposite of the statement is true.
The water cycle is a tiny machine in the loads of machines that make up the universe. Machines have makers. A maker great enough to make the universe is consistent with the definition of our word "God."

Tiny or not, it means that you cannot claim that all machines have makers. Of course, there exist machines that have makers, but you can't use that statement to prove that the universe was made by a god (how ever you define "god"), because the universe can be one of those machines with no maker.

And while we are rehashing your broken proof, remember that we can't use probability as an argument here, since we have no way to measure it.
newbie
Activity: 44
Merit: 0
June 23, 2021, 08:38:48 AM
In past scientists created a god element that could mimic any element but it was unstable and couldn't last for a long time.
Pages:
Jump to: