Pages:
Author

Topic: should women be blamed for wearing daring dress thus reason they were raped - page 5. (Read 10604 times)

hero member
Activity: 560
Merit: 500
Well IMO women should not be blamed for wearing daring dresses for the reason why they were raped. I think that women being raped can be avoided by them not going near drunk man wandering around the streets but this is not a solution just prevention. IMO the solution to this is to impose a law about that matter.
hero member
Activity: 2744
Merit: 541
Campaign Management?"Hhampuz" is the Man
Not all of them should be blamed because they were raped not all women are giving a motive to a men because some men are getting to be naughty especially when they were drunk and some other women are also getting naughty when they were drunk i guess but not all women . Some women are just claiming that they were raped but the real thing is they also want it to happen .
legendary
Activity: 3598
Merit: 2386
Viva Ut Vivas
If the raper is a nigger or another Islamic beast, it is the one to blame, without anything to be thought about. Then, in case of two people of the same race, it has to be discussed.
I expect this to be sarcastic but yeah sometimes in reality that is happening. Bad thing to see people quickly judge person because of how they are born.

The interpretation of my words depends on where you live. In Europe, especially in Sweden, you'll see that what I say has to be taken the literal way. There "refugees" rape little girls and have nothing else to tell them other than : a Black cock needs to be merited. Then, the mondialist-leftism hide this and tell the people that it was a Swedish man, and he gets close to nothing in penalty.

Change the laws then. Do you know why Sweden is having the highest prevalence of violent rape in the world? Because the punishment is so lenient. Take the case of some immigrant, who arrives in Sweden from Somalia or Pakistan. If he rapes a woman in his home country, then the relatives of the victim will beat him to pulp. But if he does the same crime in Sweden, then he will be left off with a fine of $50 or $100.

I have already expressed my point of view on the subject, but maybe not in English. If a man rapes a girl who's from its own people, cut the dick. If it's an immigrant, cut the head. This is for virgin girls, so most likely children. In case of a non-virgin girl, married, the same thing. If she's not virgin and not married, one hundred whiplashes would be enough I think.

Why in you extremely strange view would you change the sentencing depending on whether the victim was married a virgin or a single unmarried woman ? Rapes rape, You should be given the harshest sentence available and there shouldnt be any change in sentence because you deem 1 womans life as worth less than anothers. You all need to move into 2016, this isnt the middle ages anymore.

It's from a pure fact side, aside from the psychology. If the girl was virgin, she loses something, while the non-virgin one loses nothing. It's just another cock for her.
What? it has nothing to do with the girl if she is virgin or not ,she still loses something that is her dignity. The two has no difference, they are both being rape and the who has been traumatized, a force sex is always a bad thing because it is unintentional. That doesn't mean a girl is not virgin he has nothing to lose anymore. If you'd been a boxer for example and you'd suddenly being punched in the face without your consent, should I say you have nothing to lose because you've been on the ring exchanging punches before. It is so different because even I for example that is a boxer still will be shocked on why the other guy punched me without my consent.

The virgin girl is pure. If she gets raped, then she isn't anymore. The non-virgin girl just take another cock. There's nothing lost. She might lose its dignity, if she have some, but the virgin girls lose it too, in addition to its purity. That's why the virgin girl is worst that the non-one.

How can you prove she was a virgin?
hero member
Activity: 588
Merit: 500
Gloire à la Victoire !
If the raper is a nigger or another Islamic beast, it is the one to blame, without anything to be thought about. Then, in case of two people of the same race, it has to be discussed.
I expect this to be sarcastic but yeah sometimes in reality that is happening. Bad thing to see people quickly judge person because of how they are born.

The interpretation of my words depends on where you live. In Europe, especially in Sweden, you'll see that what I say has to be taken the literal way. There "refugees" rape little girls and have nothing else to tell them other than : a Black cock needs to be merited. Then, the mondialist-leftism hide this and tell the people that it was a Swedish man, and he gets close to nothing in penalty.

Change the laws then. Do you know why Sweden is having the highest prevalence of violent rape in the world? Because the punishment is so lenient. Take the case of some immigrant, who arrives in Sweden from Somalia or Pakistan. If he rapes a woman in his home country, then the relatives of the victim will beat him to pulp. But if he does the same crime in Sweden, then he will be left off with a fine of $50 or $100.

I have already expressed my point of view on the subject, but maybe not in English. If a man rapes a girl who's from its own people, cut the dick. If it's an immigrant, cut the head. This is for virgin girls, so most likely children. In case of a non-virgin girl, married, the same thing. If she's not virgin and not married, one hundred whiplashes would be enough I think.

Why in you extremely strange view would you change the sentencing depending on whether the victim was married a virgin or a single unmarried woman ? Rapes rape, You should be given the harshest sentence available and there shouldnt be any change in sentence because you deem 1 womans life as worth less than anothers. You all need to move into 2016, this isnt the middle ages anymore.

It's from a pure fact side, aside from the psychology. If the girl was virgin, she loses something, while the non-virgin one loses nothing. It's just another cock for her.
What? it has nothing to do with the girl if she is virgin or not ,she still loses something that is her dignity. The two has no difference, they are both being rape and the who has been traumatized, a force sex is always a bad thing because it is unintentional. That doesn't mean a girl is not virgin he has nothing to lose anymore. If you'd been a boxer for example and you'd suddenly being punched in the face without your consent, should I say you have nothing to lose because you've been on the ring exchanging punches before. It is so different because even I for example that is a boxer still will be shocked on why the other guy punched me without my consent.

The virgin girl is pure. If she gets raped, then she isn't anymore. The non-virgin girl just take another cock. There's nothing lost. She might lose its dignity, if she have some, but the virgin girls lose it too, in addition to its purity. That's why the virgin girl is worst that the non-one.
full member
Activity: 210
Merit: 100
Well let us look at it this way


I'm a guy..I wear a 'daring outfit' or heck just stroll down the street nude....so does this mean that women will be 'inflamed' with lust and rape me?

really....naw it is the attackers fault for doing what they know is wrong...your thread is just an excuse to blame the person getting raped on some perceived dress code

Everybody should be able to walk around clothed or not and not be blamed for some idiot not controlling him/herself to say otherwise means that

if a woman (or man) is wearing a daring outfit...that is a 'free pass' for rape..as an argument it is a load of bullsh*t....





They used to blame women because it is unlikely to see woman strolling around nude, but when they saw it on a beach they are unlikely not to do those horrible acts. It is the people doing such stupid reason and being agreed upon the society that you should put yourself in order to abide by societies standards. And I say societies standards suck.
copper member
Activity: 2898
Merit: 1465
Clueless!
Well let us look at it this way


I'm a guy..I wear a 'daring outfit' or heck just stroll down the street nude....so does this mean that women will be 'inflamed' with lust and rape me?

really....naw it is the attackers fault for doing what they know is wrong...your thread is just an excuse to blame the person getting raped on some perceived dress code

Everybody should be able to walk around clothed or not and not be blamed for some idiot not controlling him/herself to say otherwise means that

if a woman (or man) is wearing a daring outfit...that is a 'free pass' for rape..as an argument it is a load of bullsh*t....



full member
Activity: 210
Merit: 100
If the raper is a nigger or another Islamic beast, it is the one to blame, without anything to be thought about. Then, in case of two people of the same race, it has to be discussed.
I expect this to be sarcastic but yeah sometimes in reality that is happening. Bad thing to see people quickly judge person because of how they are born.

The interpretation of my words depends on where you live. In Europe, especially in Sweden, you'll see that what I say has to be taken the literal way. There "refugees" rape little girls and have nothing else to tell them other than : a Black cock needs to be merited. Then, the mondialist-leftism hide this and tell the people that it was a Swedish man, and he gets close to nothing in penalty.

Change the laws then. Do you know why Sweden is having the highest prevalence of violent rape in the world? Because the punishment is so lenient. Take the case of some immigrant, who arrives in Sweden from Somalia or Pakistan. If he rapes a woman in his home country, then the relatives of the victim will beat him to pulp. But if he does the same crime in Sweden, then he will be left off with a fine of $50 or $100.

I have already expressed my point of view on the subject, but maybe not in English. If a man rapes a girl who's from its own people, cut the dick. If it's an immigrant, cut the head. This is for virgin girls, so most likely children. In case of a non-virgin girl, married, the same thing. If she's not virgin and not married, one hundred whiplashes would be enough I think.

Why in you extremely strange view would you change the sentencing depending on whether the victim was married a virgin or a single unmarried woman ? Rapes rape, You should be given the harshest sentence available and there shouldnt be any change in sentence because you deem 1 womans life as worth less than anothers. You all need to move into 2016, this isnt the middle ages anymore.

It's from a pure fact side, aside from the psychology. If the girl was virgin, she loses something, while the non-virgin one loses nothing. It's just another cock for her.
What? it has nothing to do with the girl if she is virgin or not ,she still loses something that is her dignity. The two has no difference, they are both being rape and the who has been traumatized, a force sex is always a bad thing because it is unintentional. That doesn't mean a girl is not virgin he has nothing to lose anymore. If you'd been a boxer for example and you'd suddenly being punched in the face without your consent, should I say you have nothing to lose because you've been on the ring exchanging punches before. It is so different because even I for example that is a boxer still will be shocked on why the other guy punched me without my consent.
hero member
Activity: 588
Merit: 500
Gloire à la Victoire !
If the raper is a nigger or another Islamic beast, it is the one to blame, without anything to be thought about. Then, in case of two people of the same race, it has to be discussed.
I expect this to be sarcastic but yeah sometimes in reality that is happening. Bad thing to see people quickly judge person because of how they are born.

The interpretation of my words depends on where you live. In Europe, especially in Sweden, you'll see that what I say has to be taken the literal way. There "refugees" rape little girls and have nothing else to tell them other than : a Black cock needs to be merited. Then, the mondialist-leftism hide this and tell the people that it was a Swedish man, and he gets close to nothing in penalty.

Change the laws then. Do you know why Sweden is having the highest prevalence of violent rape in the world? Because the punishment is so lenient. Take the case of some immigrant, who arrives in Sweden from Somalia or Pakistan. If he rapes a woman in his home country, then the relatives of the victim will beat him to pulp. But if he does the same crime in Sweden, then he will be left off with a fine of $50 or $100.

I have already expressed my point of view on the subject, but maybe not in English. If a man rapes a girl who's from its own people, cut the dick. If it's an immigrant, cut the head. This is for virgin girls, so most likely children. In case of a non-virgin girl, married, the same thing. If she's not virgin and not married, one hundred whiplashes would be enough I think.

Why in you extremely strange view would you change the sentencing depending on whether the victim was married a virgin or a single unmarried woman ? Rapes rape, You should be given the harshest sentence available and there shouldnt be any change in sentence because you deem 1 womans life as worth less than anothers. You all need to move into 2016, this isnt the middle ages anymore.

It's from a pure fact side, aside from the psychology. If the girl was virgin, she loses something, while the non-virgin one loses nothing. It's just another cock for her.
legendary
Activity: 1008
Merit: 1000
★YoBit.Net★ 350+ Coins Exchange & Dice
If the raper is a nigger or another Islamic beast, it is the one to blame, without anything to be thought about. Then, in case of two people of the same race, it has to be discussed.
I expect this to be sarcastic but yeah sometimes in reality that is happening. Bad thing to see people quickly judge person because of how they are born.

The interpretation of my words depends on where you live. In Europe, especially in Sweden, you'll see that what I say has to be taken the literal way. There "refugees" rape little girls and have nothing else to tell them other than : a Black cock needs to be merited. Then, the mondialist-leftism hide this and tell the people that it was a Swedish man, and he gets close to nothing in penalty.

Change the laws then. Do you know why Sweden is having the highest prevalence of violent rape in the world? Because the punishment is so lenient. Take the case of some immigrant, who arrives in Sweden from Somalia or Pakistan. If he rapes a woman in his home country, then the relatives of the victim will beat him to pulp. But if he does the same crime in Sweden, then he will be left off with a fine of $50 or $100.

I have already expressed my point of view on the subject, but maybe not in English. If a man rapes a girl who's from its own people, cut the dick. If it's an immigrant, cut the head. This is for virgin girls, so most likely children. In case of a non-virgin girl, married, the same thing. If she's not virgin and not married, one hundred whiplashes would be enough I think.

Why in you extremely strange view would you change the sentencing depending on whether the victim was married a virgin or a single unmarried woman ? Rapes rape, You should be given the harshest sentence available and there shouldnt be any change in sentence because you deem 1 womans life as worth less than anothers. You all need to move into 2016, this isnt the middle ages anymore.
hero member
Activity: 588
Merit: 500
Gloire à la Victoire !
If the raper is a nigger or another Islamic beast, it is the one to blame, without anything to be thought about. Then, in case of two people of the same race, it has to be discussed.
I expect this to be sarcastic but yeah sometimes in reality that is happening. Bad thing to see people quickly judge person because of how they are born.

The interpretation of my words depends on where you live. In Europe, especially in Sweden, you'll see that what I say has to be taken the literal way. There "refugees" rape little girls and have nothing else to tell them other than : a Black cock needs to be merited. Then, the mondialist-leftism hide this and tell the people that it was a Swedish man, and he gets close to nothing in penalty.

Change the laws then. Do you know why Sweden is having the highest prevalence of violent rape in the world? Because the punishment is so lenient. Take the case of some immigrant, who arrives in Sweden from Somalia or Pakistan. If he rapes a woman in his home country, then the relatives of the victim will beat him to pulp. But if he does the same crime in Sweden, then he will be left off with a fine of $50 or $100.

I have already expressed my point of view on the subject, but maybe not in English. If a man rapes a girl who's from its own people, cut the dick. If it's an immigrant, cut the head. This is for virgin girls, so most likely children. In case of a non-virgin girl, married, the same thing. If she's not virgin and not married, one hundred whiplashes would be enough I think.
legendary
Activity: 3752
Merit: 1217
If the raper is a nigger or another Islamic beast, it is the one to blame, without anything to be thought about. Then, in case of two people of the same race, it has to be discussed.
I expect this to be sarcastic but yeah sometimes in reality that is happening. Bad thing to see people quickly judge person because of how they are born.

The interpretation of my words depends on where you live. In Europe, especially in Sweden, you'll see that what I say has to be taken the literal way. There "refugees" rape little girls and have nothing else to tell them other than : a Black cock needs to be merited. Then, the mondialist-leftism hide this and tell the people that it was a Swedish man, and he gets close to nothing in penalty.

Change the laws then. Do you know why Sweden is having the highest prevalence of violent rape in the world? Because the punishment is so lenient. Take the case of some immigrant, who arrives in Sweden from Somalia or Pakistan. If he rapes a woman in his home country, then the relatives of the victim will beat him to pulp. But if he does the same crime in Sweden, then he will be left off with a fine of $50 or $100.
legendary
Activity: 2702
Merit: 1468


Had a discussion with friends over this while we drink inside a bar.
so should women be blamed for wearing daring dress like showing their belly button and cleavage why they got raped?

Complemented on, hit on, yes.  Raped no.

It is like saying you should rob rich people, because they flaunt their stuff.

But if you are a criminal, go ahead: rape, rob and kill.  Justify it with your alcohol induced logic:

"she looked like she wanted it, so I raped her"
"he was rich so he would not mind if I rob him"
"that old lady was really old, she would die anyway...so I helped her by killing her"

etc.etc.

You should not rape any woman even if she was walking around naked.

legendary
Activity: 2198
Merit: 1032
This is nothing but sexist. Why should women change their dressing habits because men can't control themselves? Such men need to be sent to hospitals, that is the solution. However, I'd still argue that some women go over a certain limit when it comes to 'daring dresses'.
But there's not much thinking nowadays so why should the men give it a deeper thought especially if alcohol is already involved.
A healthy mind does not do something like this, regardless of alcohol or not.

If women wear simple and complete dresses not daring dresses then they will be less attractive to men , Women wear these kind of dresses to attract Men and hence Men try to rape the women etc.  But men should have self control on it .
And i guess it should not be banned as it is the part of Current Fashion .
legendary
Activity: 3374
Merit: 1824
If the raper is a nigger or another Islamic beast, it is the one to blame, without anything to be thought about. Then, in case of two people of the same race, it has to be discussed.
I expect this to be sarcastic but yeah sometimes in reality that is happening. Bad thing to see people quickly judge person because of how they are born.

The interpretation of my words depends on where you live. In Europe, especially in Sweden, you'll see that what I say has to be taken the literal way. There "refugees" rape little girls and have nothing else to tell them other than : a Black cock needs to be merited. Then, the mondialist-leftism hide this and tell the people that it was a Swedish man, and he gets close to nothing in penalty.

Woah, racism is a big issue there. Here, in our country discrimination of LGBT and strict drugs implementation is our big issue.

It's true that immigrants coming from completely different cultures and traditions.
For them women are not human being but sexual objects.
What western countries can do now in order to protect women from rape?
In short term no so much. We can't change their thinking over night.
Police should watch areas around refugees camps but also we should start their education about social norms and laws in the West.
It's very bad rule that media and police trying to hide such incidents from the public.


 
full member
Activity: 182
Merit: 100
If the raper is a nigger or another Islamic beast, it is the one to blame, without anything to be thought about. Then, in case of two people of the same race, it has to be discussed.
I expect this to be sarcastic but yeah sometimes in reality that is happening. Bad thing to see people quickly judge person because of how they are born.

The interpretation of my words depends on where you live. In Europe, especially in Sweden, you'll see that what I say has to be taken the literal way. There "refugees" rape little girls and have nothing else to tell them other than : a Black cock needs to be merited. Then, the mondialist-leftism hide this and tell the people that it was a Swedish man, and he gets close to nothing in penalty.

Woah, racism is a big issue there. Here, in our country discrimination of LGBT and strict drugs implementation is our big issue.
hero member
Activity: 588
Merit: 500
Gloire à la Victoire !
If the raper is a nigger or another Islamic beast, it is the one to blame, without anything to be thought about. Then, in case of two people of the same race, it has to be discussed.
I expect this to be sarcastic but yeah sometimes in reality that is happening. Bad thing to see people quickly judge person because of how they are born.

The interpretation of my words depends on where you live. In Europe, especially in Sweden, you'll see that what I say has to be taken the literal way. There "refugees" rape little girls and have nothing else to tell them other than : a Black cock needs to be merited. Then, the mondialist-leftism hide this and tell the people that it was a Swedish man, and he gets close to nothing in penalty.
full member
Activity: 210
Merit: 100
If the raper is a nigger or another Islamic beast, it is the one to blame, without anything to be thought about. Then, in case of two people of the same race, it has to be discussed.
I expect this to be sarcastic but yeah sometimes in reality that is happening. Bad thing to see people quickly judge person because of how they are born.
newbie
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
You must be very complexed, to jump on the person of the opposite sex, from a position of strength, no matter how he/she dressed.
hero member
Activity: 588
Merit: 500
Gloire à la Victoire !
If the raper is a nigger or another Islamic beast, it is the one to blame, without anything to be thought about. Then, in case of two people of the same race, it has to be discussed.
sr. member
Activity: 1456
Merit: 267
Buy $BGL before it's too late!
definitely not! there is never any reason why rape should be done. I mean yes it may warrant attention when women wear daring clothes, however, it's not, on any level, correct to justify rape because of that
Pages:
Jump to: