^^It is understandable to have "just in case KYC" rule, that is understandable for all the shady stuff people are doing, when they try many different scamming stuff then you ask for their KYC and that is the problem. However there are people who ask for stuff like scammers and double spenders and other stuff, casinos have to protect themselves so that is understandable. What I do not understand is the type of situation where KYC is a requirement even to start gambling and that is almost always bad, I try to never stay in those places.
Why would anyone who did nothing wrong get the KYC question even before gambling? That makes no sense, there should be no law regarding that and as we can see with plenty of casinos they do not ask for it, so the other ones that ask for it for "legal" reasons are lying for sure or they are running their business horribly. This place should be a great example for all others, they are doing it the right way.
I agree that we can talk about something as long as we want, if bitsler is asking KYC then it is important topic. As long as it is even casino world that would still be good. Nobody can tell others what they can talk about or not talk about, it would be a sad world if that was an option for some people, dictators do that and we are free of dictators on bitcointalk.
What I think the issue here is that we got an "answer" but we are not happy with it, just because they said "it is the rules and we have to follow it" doesn't mean that we have to accept their excuse and continue. So, what do we have in our hands? Either ignore here and never gamble again and just forget that this place ever existed, or try to explain what can be done so that I will continue to gamble here, we picked the second option.
