Here I agreed with you about few things which are clearly saying if we have no Manchester City with their deep pockets then surely this Premier League is having more competitiveness and better place for the teams like Liverpool and Arsenal, but they ruin this all and won their last six titles with just all money. Even many are expecting punishment for them, but I am not positive about this all because they can bring changes as they wanted with this all case is taking too much time which is also creating confusion about this all.
Liverpool and Chelsea are going to be had interesting season which will be give how things will be work for them after having new coach, and we will have Arsenal and Manchester City again at the top spots as well.
The Pep money talk is becoming a pretty tiresome excuse because Chelsea, Manchester United, and Liverpool have all spent more than City in recent years (Liverpool fans don't come with Net spend excuses, go and check City net spend), and City are still miles ahead of these teams.
It's about managing a successful project and making smart buying choices. Manchester City and Pep would never pay as much for Caicido, Enzo, Nunez, and Rice as other clubs did. Pep has been replacing outgoing players with less expensive ones over the last three seasons, whereas other clubs have been sacking and scrapping their teams every season and rebuilding them from scratch.
Chelsea, Manchester United, Arsenal, and Liverpool (now) are all in rebuilding phase, which Manchester City finished five years ago. Other teams are far behind Pep; it is not about the money; if it were about the money, Chelsea and Manchester United would win or compete every season.
