Topic: [SSD] Sonic - 1st TOR with functional anon send - Steganography based Anon App - page 93. (Read 284877 times)
September 25, 2014, 11:18:02 AM
Ah well, C-cex fiasco has given a very cheap entry point to anyone who is not currently invested in SSD. I am sorry for all those who lost coins on C-Cex, what a shoddy operation.
September 25, 2014, 11:05:48 AM
Where can i download the wallet, i still get the same error?
??
?? 
September 25, 2014, 08:09:08 AM
Quote
[9/23/2014 7:26:53 AM] argakiig: just to confirm though all coins are gone corret?
[9/23/2014 7:27:34 AM] C-CEX.com: yes, I have to have 1464924 SSD coins
[9/23/2014 7:27:46 AM] C-CEX.com: but wallet balance is 8.32
[9/23/2014 7:27:34 AM] C-CEX.com: yes, I have to have 1464924 SSD coins
[9/23/2014 7:27:46 AM] C-CEX.com: but wallet balance is 8.32
Quote
[9/20/2014 6:57:10 AM] argakiig: how long was your vacation?
[9/20/2014 6:57:33 AM] C-CEX.com: 3 weeks
[9/20/2014 6:58:00 AM] C-CEX.com: "blocks":21599 synced?
[9/20/2014 6:58:01 AM] argakiig: and you didn't have anyone checking anything while you were gone. TBH doesn't seem that smart to me
[9/20/2014 6:57:33 AM] C-CEX.com: 3 weeks
[9/20/2014 6:58:00 AM] C-CEX.com: "blocks":21599 synced?
[9/20/2014 6:58:01 AM] argakiig: and you didn't have anyone checking anything while you were gone. TBH doesn't seem that smart to me
Quote
[9/23/2014 8:52:26 AM] argakiig: http://puu.sh/bKLiy/bbf27f9597.txt
[9/23/2014 8:52:41 AM] argakiig: that is a listing of the balances on the addresses you sent me
[9/23/2014 8:52:47 AM] argakiig: shows transactions
[9/23/2014 8:53:25 AM] argakiig: you were staking users coins ...
[9/23/2014 8:59:29 AM] C-CEX.com: yes, so what's in result?
[9/23/2014 9:00:40 AM] argakiig: still looking into it
[9/23/2014 9:00:58 AM] argakiig: and I had asked you when the wallet was setup to not stake customers coin
[9/23/2014 9:01:01 AM] argakiig: that's dirty
[9/23/2014 8:52:41 AM] argakiig: that is a listing of the balances on the addresses you sent me
[9/23/2014 8:52:47 AM] argakiig: shows transactions
[9/23/2014 8:53:25 AM] argakiig: you were staking users coins ...
[9/23/2014 8:59:29 AM] C-CEX.com: yes, so what's in result?
[9/23/2014 9:00:40 AM] argakiig: still looking into it
[9/23/2014 9:00:58 AM] argakiig: and I had asked you when the wallet was setup to not stake customers coin
[9/23/2014 9:01:01 AM] argakiig: that's dirty
Holy shit! CCEX, what are you doing??? 3 weeks vacation??? You lost 1.5 millions of SSD!
Maybe you should cancel all your next vacations and make a full BTC refund to all your customers affected to your negligence?
Hahah. That's dirty C-Cex!
September 25, 2014, 07:13:12 AM
Vote for best POD developer, win this for argakiid!
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/vote-for-the-best-podcoinsource-evaluted-coin-795723
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/vote-for-the-best-podcoinsource-evaluted-coin-795723
September 25, 2014, 06:47:08 AM
to be completely fair, the CCEX fiasco is whats accelerating the inevitable for SSD. But even without CCEX f***ups, SSD value was going downhill sub 1k sat regardless. No pump groups backing this up whatsoever. Bagholding investors arent about to pump this themselves lol.
The first mistake was naming this coin SONIC SCREW DRIVER.
lmao.
way to be taken seriously.
The first mistake was naming this coin SONIC SCREW DRIVER.
lmao.
way to be taken seriously.
shouldnt you be annoying others in the XST and NXT threads.........
we still have plenty of buys and moveable volume. once dev release's more info about the app we can start to move up.
on another note, welcome to the ignore list kid. go back to following your NXT scam crap and back to XST where they think their shit dont stink.
September 25, 2014, 04:53:32 AM
Hello Everyone,
We have finished our investigation of the recent SSD issue and found the exact reasons for this. It was not a fork as SSD dev thought, or as we thought a double spend attack.
C-CEX had many withdraws and deposits showing on the blockchain that prove we were never on the wrong fork occuring between the 10th and the 21st of September and I know many of you were stating this to us as well. http://www.argakiig.us/blockchain/ssd/
After the wallet upgrade that we did on the 20th, resync and rescan did not find any discrepenacies of the wallet balance and actual user's balances.
The reason why people were unable to withdraw coins in the past couple days was actually due to a wallet issue that allowed it to generate pre-existing wallet addresses after we upgraded and recompiled.
Due to this we had 19 duplicate addresses that belonged to 38 accounts which were sharing deposits. When deposits came to these addresses it was being credited to both accounts on our exchange as these accounts had duplicate wallet addresses. This is how people started selling coins that were being credited to their account despite them not actually depositing them. Of course it is human nature to take advanatge of the situation and If I was a normal trader I probably would have sold coins that did not belong to me too so I do not blame those people. I will say it would have been "nice" if someone had alerted us they were receiving SSD that were not theirs but again I understand. This however, led to our wallet getting emptied of SSD.
Wallet returned previously used addresses instead of really generating the new ones, this should be investigated and explained by the developer. We have not encountered this issue in over 300 wallets from the past so this is an isolated problem.
Now this puts all of us in a bit of a bind because this was a wallet issue and nothing more. I do value everyone who uses our exchange though (everyone I've worked with knows this) and In the effort to keep those affected from completely losing coins/btc we are going to give 300 satoshi per coin lost in the form of a BTC credit. I repeat this does not mean C-CEX did anything wrong I simply do not want people upset with nothing to show for. The btc will be distributed over the next 7 days to the accounts affected.
If anyone who did receive coins that were not theirs and wishes to give them back to those affected by this that is up to their good nature at this point. I am truly sorry this issue happened and we have implemented an extra check in our system to safeguard from this type of thing happeneing again.
-Pride of C-CEX
EDIT: We had an independent developer and upcoming PoD verifier look at the code as well just for further verification.
https://twitter.com/CryptoRussian
We have finished our investigation of the recent SSD issue and found the exact reasons for this. It was not a fork as SSD dev thought, or as we thought a double spend attack.
C-CEX had many withdraws and deposits showing on the blockchain that prove we were never on the wrong fork occuring between the 10th and the 21st of September and I know many of you were stating this to us as well. http://www.argakiig.us/blockchain/ssd/
After the wallet upgrade that we did on the 20th, resync and rescan did not find any discrepenacies of the wallet balance and actual user's balances.
The reason why people were unable to withdraw coins in the past couple days was actually due to a wallet issue that allowed it to generate pre-existing wallet addresses after we upgraded and recompiled.
Due to this we had 19 duplicate addresses that belonged to 38 accounts which were sharing deposits. When deposits came to these addresses it was being credited to both accounts on our exchange as these accounts had duplicate wallet addresses. This is how people started selling coins that were being credited to their account despite them not actually depositing them. Of course it is human nature to take advanatge of the situation and If I was a normal trader I probably would have sold coins that did not belong to me too so I do not blame those people. I will say it would have been "nice" if someone had alerted us they were receiving SSD that were not theirs but again I understand. This however, led to our wallet getting emptied of SSD.
Wallet returned previously used addresses instead of really generating the new ones, this should be investigated and explained by the developer. We have not encountered this issue in over 300 wallets from the past so this is an isolated problem.
Now this puts all of us in a bit of a bind because this was a wallet issue and nothing more. I do value everyone who uses our exchange though (everyone I've worked with knows this) and In the effort to keep those affected from completely losing coins/btc we are going to give 300 satoshi per coin lost in the form of a BTC credit. I repeat this does not mean C-CEX did anything wrong I simply do not want people upset with nothing to show for. The btc will be distributed over the next 7 days to the accounts affected.
If anyone who did receive coins that were not theirs and wishes to give them back to those affected by this that is up to their good nature at this point. I am truly sorry this issue happened and we have implemented an extra check in our system to safeguard from this type of thing happeneing again.
-Pride of C-CEX
EDIT: We had an independent developer and upcoming PoD verifier look at the code as well just for further verification.
https://twitter.com/CryptoRussian
Fuck you scam. I Buy 1700sat and give 300sat. return my coin. I loss 210,000 SSD
C-CEX is SCAM
Wow, C-CEX not taking the blame and addressing the problems to human nature and wallet issues...wtf you running an exchange for?
I would say, just take the bullit, your internal audit on the exchange is not solid. Better improve this, instead of adding more coins or doing scam ico's.
Fortunate my SSD are not on C-CEX!
I hope you compensate all accounts that were involved.
September 25, 2014, 04:42:50 AM
to be completely fair, the CCEX fiasco is whats accelerating the inevitable for SSD. But even without CCEX f***ups, SSD value was going downhill sub 1k sat regardless. No pump groups backing this up whatsoever. Bagholding investors arent about to pump this themselves lol.
The first mistake was naming this coin SONIC SCREW DRIVER.
lmao.
way to be taken seriously.
The first mistake was naming this coin SONIC SCREW DRIVER.
lmao.
way to be taken seriously.
September 25, 2014, 02:50:59 AM
To me the C-Cex response response doesn't make sense. Besides their complaints about the double deposit which is not really anything but their issue, I remember people complaining that they couldn't withdraw SSD. That was ages ago in the crypto timeline. If people couldn't withdraw due to their lack of funds because of their 'wallet problem' then surely they should have picked up a red flag much faster.
I cannot figure how they can try blame the dev for when they weren't paying attention to their own wallets.
I cannot figure how they can try blame the dev for when they weren't paying attention to their own wallets.
September 25, 2014, 02:15:34 AM
FYI, there is a vote here
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/vote-for-the-best-podcoinsource-evaluted-coin-795723
to decide which is the best Proof of Developer coin - sure to go and vote for SSD!
THIS +1https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/vote-for-the-best-podcoinsource-evaluted-coin-795723
to decide which is the best Proof of Developer coin - sure to go and vote for SSD!
Thanks to the people who've voted already, SSD is one of the top contestants - a little more than a dozen more votes and it will be in first place:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/vote-for-the-best-podcoinsource-evaluted-coin-795723
September 25, 2014, 12:25:25 AM
C-CEX, describe argakiig to me.
Does he look like a bitch?
Because you just tried to fuck him like a bitch. And argakiig doesn't like to get fucked by anyone except Mrs. argakiig.
"The path of the righteous man is beset on all sides by the greedy and selfish men
Blessed are those who shepherd others through the valley of darkness, for they truly are their brothers keeper
And I shall come down upon thee with great vengeance and furious anger those who would poison and destroy my brothers
And you shall know my name is the LORD when I strike down upon thee"
Does he look like a bitch?
Because you just tried to fuck him like a bitch. And argakiig doesn't like to get fucked by anyone except Mrs. argakiig.
"The path of the righteous man is beset on all sides by the greedy and selfish men
Blessed are those who shepherd others through the valley of darkness, for they truly are their brothers keeper
And I shall come down upon thee with great vengeance and furious anger those who would poison and destroy my brothers
And you shall know my name is the LORD when I strike down upon thee"
Dude. That was awesome.
September 24, 2014, 11:46:33 PM
C-CEX, describe argakiig to me.
Does he look like a bitch?
Because you just tried to fuck him like a bitch. And argakiig doesn't like to get fucked by anyone except Mrs. argakiig.
"The path of the righteous man is beset on all sides by the greedy and selfish men
Blessed are those who shepherd others through the valley of darkness, for they truly are their brothers keeper
And I shall come down upon thee with great vengeance and furious anger those who would poison and destroy my brothers
And you shall know my name is the LORD when I strike down upon thee"
Does he look like a bitch?
Because you just tried to fuck him like a bitch. And argakiig doesn't like to get fucked by anyone except Mrs. argakiig.
"The path of the righteous man is beset on all sides by the greedy and selfish men
Blessed are those who shepherd others through the valley of darkness, for they truly are their brothers keeper
And I shall come down upon thee with great vengeance and furious anger those who would poison and destroy my brothers
And you shall know my name is the LORD when I strike down upon thee"
September 24, 2014, 10:18:15 PM
FYI, there is a vote here
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/vote-for-the-best-podcoinsource-evaluted-coin-795723
to decide which is the best Proof of Developer coin - sure to go and vote for SSD!
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/vote-for-the-best-podcoinsource-evaluted-coin-795723
to decide which is the best Proof of Developer coin - sure to go and vote for SSD!
September 24, 2014, 10:15:23 PM
Hello Everyone,
We have finished our investigation of the recent SSD issue and found the exact reasons for this. It was not a fork as SSD dev thought, or as we thought a double spend attack.
C-CEX had many withdraws and deposits showing on the blockchain that prove we were never on the wrong fork occuring between the 10th and the 21st of September and I know many of you were stating this to us as well. http://www.argakiig.us/blockchain/ssd/
After the wallet upgrade that we did on the 20th, resync and rescan did not find any discrepenacies of the wallet balance and actual user's balances.
The reason why people were unable to withdraw coins in the past couple days was actually due to a wallet issue that allowed it to generate pre-existing wallet addresses after we upgraded and recompiled.
Due to this we had 19 duplicate addresses that belonged to 38 accounts which were sharing deposits. When deposits came to these addresses it was being credited to both accounts on our exchange as these accounts had duplicate wallet addresses. This is how people started selling coins that were being credited to their account despite them not actually depositing them. Of course it is human nature to take advanatge of the situation and If I was a normal trader I probably would have sold coins that did not belong to me too so I do not blame those people. I will say it would have been "nice" if someone had alerted us they were receiving SSD that were not theirs but again I understand. This however, led to our wallet getting emptied of SSD.
Wallet returned previously used addresses instead of really generating the new ones, this should be investigated and explained by the developer. We have not encountered this issue in over 300 wallets from the past so this is an isolated problem.
Now this puts all of us in a bit of a bind because this was a wallet issue and nothing more. I do value everyone who uses our exchange though (everyone I've worked with knows this) and In the effort to keep those affected from completely losing coins/btc we are going to give 300 satoshi per coin lost in the form of a BTC credit. I repeat this does not mean C-CEX did anything wrong I simply do not want people upset with nothing to show for. The btc will be distributed over the next 7 days to the accounts affected.
If anyone who did receive coins that were not theirs and wishes to give them back to those affected by this that is up to their good nature at this point. I am truly sorry this issue happened and we have implemented an extra check in our system to safeguard from this type of thing happeneing again.
-Pride of C-CEX
EDIT: We had an independent developer and upcoming PoD verifier look at the code as well just for further verification.
https://twitter.com/CryptoRussian
We have finished our investigation of the recent SSD issue and found the exact reasons for this. It was not a fork as SSD dev thought, or as we thought a double spend attack.
C-CEX had many withdraws and deposits showing on the blockchain that prove we were never on the wrong fork occuring between the 10th and the 21st of September and I know many of you were stating this to us as well. http://www.argakiig.us/blockchain/ssd/
After the wallet upgrade that we did on the 20th, resync and rescan did not find any discrepenacies of the wallet balance and actual user's balances.
The reason why people were unable to withdraw coins in the past couple days was actually due to a wallet issue that allowed it to generate pre-existing wallet addresses after we upgraded and recompiled.
Due to this we had 19 duplicate addresses that belonged to 38 accounts which were sharing deposits. When deposits came to these addresses it was being credited to both accounts on our exchange as these accounts had duplicate wallet addresses. This is how people started selling coins that were being credited to their account despite them not actually depositing them. Of course it is human nature to take advanatge of the situation and If I was a normal trader I probably would have sold coins that did not belong to me too so I do not blame those people. I will say it would have been "nice" if someone had alerted us they were receiving SSD that were not theirs but again I understand. This however, led to our wallet getting emptied of SSD.
Wallet returned previously used addresses instead of really generating the new ones, this should be investigated and explained by the developer. We have not encountered this issue in over 300 wallets from the past so this is an isolated problem.
Now this puts all of us in a bit of a bind because this was a wallet issue and nothing more. I do value everyone who uses our exchange though (everyone I've worked with knows this) and In the effort to keep those affected from completely losing coins/btc we are going to give 300 satoshi per coin lost in the form of a BTC credit. I repeat this does not mean C-CEX did anything wrong I simply do not want people upset with nothing to show for. The btc will be distributed over the next 7 days to the accounts affected.
If anyone who did receive coins that were not theirs and wishes to give them back to those affected by this that is up to their good nature at this point. I am truly sorry this issue happened and we have implemented an extra check in our system to safeguard from this type of thing happeneing again.
-Pride of C-CEX
EDIT: We had an independent developer and upcoming PoD verifier look at the code as well just for further verification.
https://twitter.com/CryptoRussian
Fuck you scam. I Buy 1700sat and give 300sat. return my coin. I loss 210,000 SSD
C-CEX is SCAM
September 24, 2014, 09:46:35 PM
Well, I think I know what is going on here. I'm thankful for tx42, the dev, all the people who have helped, and I will be staying far away from CCEX!!
Can't wait to see more detail/instruction on this app! I'd like to know more about it.
Can't wait to see more detail/instruction on this app! I'd like to know more about it.
Hell yes... Thank you Argakiig, TX42, and all those involved.
Bittrex, nor any other exchanges were affected. Bottom line, C-Cex dropped the ball, whether or not it was intentional, that will never be known, but the ball was dropped. Own up to it and quit blaming the devs.
September 24, 2014, 08:49:53 PM
Downloaded your android app but encounter some issues.
How to send SSD coin to android when no SSD address on wallet?
What is the 2FA for ?
On Window Wallet, an error message appear.
The procedure entry point of EVP_aes_128_ctr could not be located in the LIBEAY32.dll ??
How to send SSD coin to android when no SSD address on wallet?
What is the 2FA for ?
On Window Wallet, an error message appear.
The procedure entry point of EVP_aes_128_ctr could not be located in the LIBEAY32.dll ??
SonicVortex has finally arrived
http://puu.sh/bLLeq/db62ad8b39.jpg http://puu.sh/bLLfl/4253a555ab.jpg
Android App (To follow on Playstore shortly)
Accompanying QT
Windows Manual
Windows Automatic
Mac DMG
Source
Relays
Source
Windows
Mac Inbound Tomorrow
Jar Needed for Relay
F5-Steganography Library
Directions and Daemons are forthcoming
SonicVortex is a way to hide encrypted transactions by steganography.
You take a picture, author a transaction, then SonicVortex embeds the encrypted transaction in a picture. It uses the f5 steganography algorithm, which uses matrix encoding to hide the picture, making it almost impossible to detect that any hidden communication is present.
Moreover, the encryption is state-of-the-art AES/GCM encryption, suitable for banks and governments. So even in the highly unlikely event that any communication becomes suspected, it is impossible for an adversary to ascertain the nature of the communication. Thus, your transaction is hidden and protected from even the most powerful adversaries.
Additionally, AES/GCM protects against any changes to the encrypted, hidden transaction. If just one pixel of the picture is changed, it will be detected and the transaction rejected.
http://puu.sh/bLLeq/db62ad8b39.jpg http://puu.sh/bLLfl/4253a555ab.jpg
Android App (To follow on Playstore shortly)
Accompanying QT
Windows Manual
Windows Automatic
Mac DMG
Source
Relays
Source
Windows
Mac Inbound Tomorrow
Jar Needed for Relay
F5-Steganography Library
Directions and Daemons are forthcoming
SonicVortex is a way to hide encrypted transactions by steganography.
You take a picture, author a transaction, then SonicVortex embeds the encrypted transaction in a picture. It uses the f5 steganography algorithm, which uses matrix encoding to hide the picture, making it almost impossible to detect that any hidden communication is present.
Moreover, the encryption is state-of-the-art AES/GCM encryption, suitable for banks and governments. So even in the highly unlikely event that any communication becomes suspected, it is impossible for an adversary to ascertain the nature of the communication. Thus, your transaction is hidden and protected from even the most powerful adversaries.
Additionally, AES/GCM protects against any changes to the encrypted, hidden transaction. If just one pixel of the picture is changed, it will be detected and the transaction rejected.
September 24, 2014, 08:40:30 PM
Tough day. Hopefully everything works out. The app looks fairly fascinating.
September 24, 2014, 07:55:08 PM
Well, I think I know what is going on here. I'm thankful for tx42, the dev, all the people who have helped, and I will be staying far away from CCEX!!
Can't wait to see more detail/instruction on this app! I'd like to know more about it.
Can't wait to see more detail/instruction on this app! I'd like to know more about it.
+1 looking forward to POC and more details of the app!
September 24, 2014, 07:06:07 PM
Well, I think I know what is going on here. I'm thankful for tx42, the dev, all the people who have helped, and I will be staying far away from CCEX!!
Can't wait to see more detail/instruction on this app! I'd like to know more about it.
Can't wait to see more detail/instruction on this app! I'd like to know more about it.
September 24, 2014, 06:55:44 PM
The RPC commands are different from peer messaging. RPC commands are done in the appropriately named module called "rpcwallet.cpp". So this "reuse" flag does not apply to RPC commands as ExD might claim upon seeing but not understanding this code.
I checked where reuse was used, I'm aware that it was called with "false" param and that's why I haven't pasted code that Altcoin4life pasted in the thread. But you seems to be smartass telepath here, assuming lots of things about what people think or understand.
I understand enough: you don't do your research before you spout off. That's all I need to know.
September 24, 2014, 06:55:12 PM
The RPC commands are different from peer messaging. RPC commands are done in the appropriately named module called "rpcwallet.cpp". So this "reuse" flag does not apply to RPC commands as ExD might claim upon seeing but not understanding this code.
I checked where reuse was used, I'm aware that it was called with "false" param and that's why I haven't pasted code that Altcoin4life pasted in the thread. But you seems to be smartass telepath here, assuming lots of things about what people think or understand.
Jump to: