Author

Topic: Stake.com - The Leading Crypto Casino - Drake, UFC, Everton, Alfa Romeo F1 Team - page 468. (Read 277127 times)

legendary
Activity: 2086
Merit: 1058
The wager requirements are standard for the last few months, it was $2k per week but now the overall wager has to be over $3k in the last 7 days. The active chatting session and betting at the same time increase the chances of getting rain. Being eligible doesn't mean users will get rain due to increased traffic, more online users, lots of bots, etc.
Honestly these are not things that you should be aiming at to get something in return. As I have always said gamble the way you want to gamble and if you can earn something from it then it is great, if you are participating in anything because of it then it is great but at the end of the day if you are not going to be reaching those levels by playing the way you want to play and have to strain yourself financially and risk your bankroll just because you want to reach those numbers, then it would be a very wrong thing to do.

This is why I never check those type of promotions or rains or any marketing related stuff, I just get it if I deserve it, and if not I just move on.
I never really understood the need for rains to be given to players that wager a certain amount of money. I mean I am usually not above that limit and would never be above that limit so I have a bias towards this situation I get it, but seriously, isn't the amount too big? I am not a spammer, I am not here to get rains, I do not just register and wait for rain drops, I wouldn't do that and there are some people who would do that, isn't there a way to find the difference?

Right now, as a person who gambles around 400-500 dollars wagering amount per month, I am seen same as the guy who wagers none, or wagers 10 bucks per week, there should be a difference between me and a spammer. Having thousands of wagering requirement surely must be putting a lot of people like me out of contention for rain drops and I feel like that could be slightly unfair.
hero member
Activity: 2058
Merit: 538
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform

The wager requirements are standard for the last few months, it was $2k per week but now the overall wager has to be over $3k in the last 7 days. The active chatting session and betting at the same time increase the chances of getting rain. Being eligible doesn't mean users will get rain due to increased traffic, more online users, lots of bots, etc.

I don't really understand the requirements for sure this week I collect one ticket means my wager is around $ 1000 or in this month my total wager is $15k
I don't know which one is eligible , today i got a big rain $100 in one rain https://imgur.com/cF7poWc  I know it's just luck it's even the biggest rain I've ever seen. Obitrice is the username that spreads the rain same user when I got $44 yesterday.


That is a nice shareable amount, luckily you have been on the eligible list during rain Cheesy
It is random, in the last few weeks there were more than 14k online due to promos, raffles, streams, etc. Btw, I know this user from Stake chat too, doing generous rains usually but never cached a big one from him Grin

This user comes suddenly without warning even he didn't write anything in the room chat he still does it every day the last time I saw a $95 rain for 5 users
unfortunately I was not included  Smiley during the race event there was a lot of high rollers and made rains this is a christmas blessing apart from the promotion of  stake.
By the way the level up paid me $ 44 not bad for spending $ 25.
No idea where he printing his Stake dollhairs😀
Regardless of high rollers, usually Stake chat is messy no matter it is 1$ or 10$ raining.
Level up promo paid $45 here too but my account was not eligible for 30k level up slot challenge due to the misunderstanding. Lately contacted support and prize sent to vault manually(270$).
legendary
Activity: 1946
Merit: 1026
In Search of Incredible
If thats true then stake will have yet another problem. They said next monthly will be mid January, but last monthly was 1st of December.
So all wagering from beginning of December won't count towards monthly bonus??
I didn't understand the monthly on 1st and post monthly on 16th anyway. They should have done it the other way around, that would have been much smarter.
Don't worry about that. Stake always gives precious bonuses to their users. Still the players aren't satisfied and they always want more. AFAIK, monthly bonus is calculated since last monthly bonus. Their live support help center page also says it (which is written and updated by ’Milan’). But Stake VIP club page says that monthly bonus is based on last 30 days wagerd amount. Anyway, based on my experience it depends on our wager since last monthly bonus time.

legendary
Activity: 2716
Merit: 1092
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform

The wager requirements are standard for the last few months, it was $2k per week but now the overall wager has to be over $3k in the last 7 days. The active chatting session and betting at the same time increase the chances of getting rain. Being eligible doesn't mean users will get rain due to increased traffic, more online users, lots of bots, etc.

I don't really understand the requirements for sure this week I collect one ticket means my wager is around $ 1000 or in this month my total wager is $15k
I don't know which one is eligible , today i got a big rain $100 in one rain https://imgur.com/cF7poWc  I know it's just luck it's even the biggest rain I've ever seen. Obitrice is the username that spreads the rain same user when I got $44 yesterday.


That is a nice shareable amount, luckily you have been on the eligible list during rain Cheesy
It is random, in the last few weeks there were more than 14k online due to promos, raffles, streams, etc. Btw, I know this user from Stake chat too, doing generous rains usually but never cached a big one from him Grin

This user comes suddenly without warning even he didn't write anything in the room chat he still does it every day the last time I saw a $95 rain for 5 users
unfortunately I was not included  Smiley during the race event there was a lot of high rollers and made rains this is a christmas blessing apart from the promotion of  stake.
By the way the level up paid me $ 44 not bad for spending $ 25.
jr. member
Activity: 38
Merit: 1


If thats true then stake will have yet another problem. They said next monthly will be mid January, but last monthly was 1st of December.
So all wagering from beginning of December won't count towards monthly bonus??

I didn't understand the monthly on 1st and post monthly on 16th anyway. They should have done it the other way around, that would have been much smarter.
member
Activity: 2436
Merit: 57
Primedice.com & Stake.com
🎬 [$2,000] Gary's Favorite: Ant Man| Wheel Challenge🐜



Win a bet on Wheel with a 39.60x multiplier (Risk: High and Segments: 40) and the Bet ID needs to end on number 1.
0.03 USD minimum bet amount (in any currency).

Giveaway's Topic: https://stakecommunity.com/topic/49613-%F0%9F%8E%AC-2000-garys-favorite-ant-man-wheel-challenge%F0%9F%90%9C/



A special #NFL edition of the preview this week as the main focus turns to this weekend's #CFBPlayoff matches:

https://news.stake.com/nfl-2021-week-17-betting-tips/
hero member
Activity: 2058
Merit: 538
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
The wager requirements are standard for the last few months, it was $2k per week but now the overall wager has to be over $3k in the last 7 days. The active chatting session and betting at the same time increase the chances of getting rain. Being eligible doesn't mean users will get rain due to increased traffic, more online users, lots of bots, etc.
Honestly these are not things that you should be aiming at to get something in return. As I have always said gamble the way you want to gamble and if you can earn something from it then it is great, if you are participating in anything because of it then it is great but at the end of the day if you are not going to be reaching those levels by playing the way you want to play and have to strain yourself financially and risk your bankroll just because you want to reach those numbers, then it would be a very wrong thing to do.

This is why I never check those type of promotions or rains or any marketing related stuff, I just get it if I deserve it, and if not I just move on.
As always said it is better to be in profit rather than chasing boosting bonuses/reload. In the last weeks, I was down a lot then realized boosting reload doesn't worth it at all. Better to be in profit instead of getting $200 reload boost by VIP Host after a 10k$ loss.
donator
Activity: 4760
Merit: 4323
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform

The wager requirements are standard for the last few months, it was $2k per week but now the overall wager has to be over $3k in the last 7 days. The active chatting session and betting at the same time increase the chances of getting rain. Being eligible doesn't mean users will get rain due to increased traffic, more online users, lots of bots, etc.

I don't really understand the requirements for sure this week I collect one ticket means my wager is around $ 1000 or in this month my total wager is $15k
I don't know which one is eligible , today i got a big rain $100 in one rain https://imgur.com/cF7poWc  I know it's just luck it's even the biggest rain I've ever seen. Obitrice is the username that spreads the rain same user when I got $44 yesterday.



Wow, that's awesome for you.  Congratulations.  I didn't even know that getting rained on was a thing.  Stake has so many giveaways nowadays and I see so many different small deposits from one giveaway or another.  I've never seen rain drop into my account though.  I guess I need to keep my eyes open a bit more and perhaps look around the site a while and discover all the ways that someone can get free money from Stake.  I'm sure there are more programs like rain that I'm not aware of but should be.  Smiley
legendary
Activity: 2884
Merit: 1117
The wager requirements are standard for the last few months, it was $2k per week but now the overall wager has to be over $3k in the last 7 days. The active chatting session and betting at the same time increase the chances of getting rain. Being eligible doesn't mean users will get rain due to increased traffic, more online users, lots of bots, etc.
Honestly these are not things that you should be aiming at to get something in return. As I have always said gamble the way you want to gamble and if you can earn something from it then it is great, if you are participating in anything because of it then it is great but at the end of the day if you are not going to be reaching those levels by playing the way you want to play and have to strain yourself financially and risk your bankroll just because you want to reach those numbers, then it would be a very wrong thing to do.

This is why I never check those type of promotions or rains or any marketing related stuff, I just get it if I deserve it, and if not I just move on.
hero member
Activity: 2058
Merit: 538
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform

The wager requirements are standard for the last few months, it was $2k per week but now the overall wager has to be over $3k in the last 7 days. The active chatting session and betting at the same time increase the chances of getting rain. Being eligible doesn't mean users will get rain due to increased traffic, more online users, lots of bots, etc.

I don't really understand the requirements for sure this week I collect one ticket means my wager is around $ 1000 or in this month my total wager is $15k
I don't know which one is eligible , today i got a big rain $100 in one rain https://imgur.com/cF7poWc  I know it's just luck it's even the biggest rain I've ever seen. Obitrice is the username that spreads the rain same user when I got $44 yesterday.


That is a nice shareable amount, luckily you have been on the eligible list during rain Cheesy
It is random, in the last few weeks there were more than 14k online due to promos, raffles, streams, etc. Btw, I know this user from Stake chat too, doing generous rains usually but never cached a big one from him Grin
member
Activity: 2436
Merit: 57
Primedice.com & Stake.com
Conquer the Casino this week has been extended for a further seven days 🗓



That's a whole extra week to get yourself a share of $25,000 in prizes

Play now: https://stake.com/promotions/promotion/conquer-the-casino



Beautiful 😍

#WATWHU

:wq
copper member
Activity: 258
Merit: 49
The API seems to show that your actual target multiplier was 1.14:
~snip~
It's really weird that the frontend displays 1.13, but it's likely just a rendering bug. It doesn't make a whole lot of sense for Stake to try to cheat over $2 bets. Do you happen to remember what multiplier you were going for at the time?
I am guessing there could be some rounding out error? ~
~ I checked mine all and they seem fine, but here we are with a proof of one guy not getting fair results, so they should make the announcement and defense against this.
How the games actually works there! I have also observed some unusual result while I'm setting the target multiplier from 1.13× to 1.16×. To make it clear, when I'm setting the target multiplier at 1.13

The bet details shows
  • Multiplier: 1.13×
  • Target :1.12×

The multiplier and target shows correctly in their bet view model if my target multiplier is out of 1.13× to 1.16× range. But their system shows 0.01× less target when I'm inputting the ‘target multiplier’ in that range.



I have also made a video while I was checking this out. If you haven't understood my above statement then see this video to realize it properly: https://youtu.be/59p-0yjQ88M

Edit: I just asked their support and they said, it is a visual glitch and it will be fixed soon


This is a fun one! This problem is actually based on how your browser does its maths, coupled with how we round numbers on the frontend.

We use the following equation to visually ensure all our numbers on limbo are rounded in a visually pleasing manner (to two decimal places.)

Code:
const getFloorMultiplier = (num) => (Math.floor(num * 100) / 100).toFixed(2);

With regards to why this showing different to what is expected for the instances expressed:

Quote
This fails because the internal floating point representation of 1.13 is very slightly less than 1.13 - multiplying that by 100 doesn't produce 113 but 112.99999999999998578915 and then rounding that down takes it to 1.12.

You can test this by opening your console in the browser (right click anywhere screen > select 'inspect' > choose 'console')

From there you can type in the following:

Code:
1.13 * 100

As you can see we get the following results.



When put all together, this is the result:



If you try with the numbers expressed above, you will find that it also spits out an absurd result for the instance of 1.16 too. Rest assure that this is just visually rendered incorrectly based on your browser and has no actual influence or affect on the result of your bet. I have whipped together a slight edit in the codebase that will consider target multipliers already rounded, which should technically solve the visual discrepancy experienced.
full member
Activity: 377
Merit: 110
Hmm and what when player make /rain ?

Rain may come anytime without any prior notice, all players can make rain in the chat.
Players on the site usually make a rain once they win big, so there is no specific time when or which player will make rain in chat.
If you want to catch some rain, what you need to do is to chat actively (but dont spam) and meet the wager requirement.


I see that you are making massive useless posts without knowing topic.
I was asking if you need 3k to catch /rain from player. Not straight tip, you shouldnt check only my post.
legendary
Activity: 3500
Merit: 1354
Hmm and what when player make /rain ?

Rain may come anytime without any prior notice, all players can make rain in the chat.
Players on the site usually make a rain once they win big, so there is no specific time when or which player will make rain in chat.
If you want to catch some rain, what you need to do is to chat actively (but dont spam) and meet the wager requirement.

legendary
Activity: 2716
Merit: 1092
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform

The wager requirements are standard for the last few months, it was $2k per week but now the overall wager has to be over $3k in the last 7 days. The active chatting session and betting at the same time increase the chances of getting rain. Being eligible doesn't mean users will get rain due to increased traffic, more online users, lots of bots, etc.

I don't really understand the requirements for sure this week I collect one ticket means my wager is around $ 1000 or in this month my total wager is $15k
I don't know which one is eligible , today i got a big rain $100 in one rain https://imgur.com/cF7poWc  I know it's just luck it's even the biggest rain I've ever seen. Obitrice is the username that spreads the rain same user when I got $44 yesterday.



Everybody can get rain from other users. The requirement is only for "rainbot" rains from stake.

Not sure because I had tried it several times rainbot prioritizes users who have wager and active chat. are you active in chat room and have you tried it?
Sometimes even though I have fulfilled the requirements Rainbot ignores me too this is what makes me sure that wager is needed.
full member
Activity: 377
Merit: 110

The wager requirements are standard for the last few months, it was $2k per week but now the overall wager has to be over $3k in the last 7 days. The active chatting session and betting at the same time increase the chances of getting rain. Being eligible doesn't mean users will get rain due to increased traffic, more online users, lots of bots, etc.

I don't really understand the requirements for sure this week I collect one ticket means my wager is around $ 1000 or in this month my total wager is $15k
I don't know which one is eligible , today i got a big rain $100 in one rain https://imgur.com/cF7poWc  I know it's just luck it's even the biggest rain I've ever seen. Obitrice is the username that spreads the rain same user when I got $44 yesterday.



Everybody can get rain from other users. The requirement is only for "rainbot" rains from stake.
Hmm and what when player make /rain ?
hero member
Activity: 2058
Merit: 538
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
🎰 [Over $2,000] Stake 3 Slots Challenge | Week 71



Win a bet with 40x or higher multipliers on slot: Forest Fortune.
Minimum bet is 10c (0.10 USD). Any bets that are on the fun play/with nothing staked will not count.

Giveaway's Topic: https://stakecommunity.com/topic/49638-%F0%9F%8E%B0-over-2000-stake-3-slots-challenge-week-71/



As 2021 nears its end we want to know one thing...

What was your biggest win on Stake for the year?

Extra points if you post the bet slip below:

https://twitter.com/Stake/status/1475678021428432898
Already done Cool
legendary
Activity: 1946
Merit: 1026
In Search of Incredible
The API seems to show that your actual target multiplier was 1.14:
~snip~
It's really weird that the frontend displays 1.13, but it's likely just a rendering bug. It doesn't make a whole lot of sense for Stake to try to cheat over $2 bets. Do you happen to remember what multiplier you were going for at the time?
I am guessing there could be some rounding out error? ~
~ I checked mine all and they seem fine, but here we are with a proof of one guy not getting fair results, so they should make the announcement and defense against this.
How the games actually works there! I have also observed some unusual result while I'm setting the target multiplier from 1.13× to 1.16×. To make it clear, when I'm setting the target multiplier at 1.13

The bet details shows
  • Multiplier: 1.13×
  • Target :1.12×

The multiplier and target shows correctly in their bet view model if my target multiplier is out of 1.13× to 1.16× range. But their system shows 0.01× less target when I'm inputting the ‘target multiplier’ in that range.



I have also made a video while I was checking this out. If you haven't understood my above statement then see this video to realize it properly: https://youtu.be/59p-0yjQ88M

Edit: I just asked their support and they said, it is a visual glitch and it will be fixed soon
member
Activity: 622
Merit: 36

The wager requirements are standard for the last few months, it was $2k per week but now the overall wager has to be over $3k in the last 7 days. The active chatting session and betting at the same time increase the chances of getting rain. Being eligible doesn't mean users will get rain due to increased traffic, more online users, lots of bots, etc.

I don't really understand the requirements for sure this week I collect one ticket means my wager is around $ 1000 or in this month my total wager is $15k
I don't know which one is eligible , today i got a big rain $100 in one rain https://imgur.com/cF7poWc  I know it's just luck it's even the biggest rain I've ever seen. Obitrice is the username that spreads the rain same user when I got $44 yesterday.



Everybody can get rain from other users. The requirement is only for "rainbot" rains from stake.
hero member
Activity: 2100
Merit: 546
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
The API seems to show that your actual target multiplier was 1.14:



It's really weird that the frontend displays 1.13, but it's likely just a rendering bug. It doesn't make a whole lot of sense for Stake to try to cheat over $2 bets. Do you happen to remember what multiplier you were going for at the time?
I am guessing there could be some rounding out error? I mean not like there is an obvious and big difference, it is a small one so I am guessing there could be something regarding the rounding up error there, that seems like only plausible thing that comes to my mind. Obviously I am not affiliated with Stake so I can't talk on their behalf, mine is just a guess by some guy who doesn't even understand the concept 100% perfectly well, I am just assuming here.

The real results will come in when Stake takes a look at this and tells something, Eddie or Stunna has to say something about this. They even did the whole provably fair foundation thingy so they must be really certain about their provably fair situation, I checked mine all and they seem fine, but here we are with a proof of one guy not getting fair results, so they should make the announcement and defense against this.
Jump to: