Topic: Syscoin vs Bitbay - page 7. (Read 13156 times)

Cmon sidjwang be a good sport. Why dont you like stenography? Lets get back on target and talk about how bitbay owns yall in the side by side. What was it you were saying about data retention on the blockchain creating bloat? What data is centralized on sys in regards to the market which alleviates these concerns for you? Did your 2.0 swap retain any blockchain history info from the previous 1.0 version other than current address holdings? How much data was lost?

Is 2.1 when you guys get sued for using an ebay logo? Did you integrate etsy? Is there a browser integration for instagram filters? Or are you guys reconsidering your reconsidering of the swap and everything else you hyped 2.0 to be? Because it looks like you just updated the front end so it doesn't look like it is from 1998 and added a centralized escrow function.

There are other projects like SDC with no ipo no premine no instamine no nothing just small community developments that have done just as much if not more then other coins with shady history's...we managed to get this far without anyone getting ripped off..why couldn't your devs/ maybe because there not quiet as competent i would dare say...the only people who get suckered are the ones who blindly follow things without question...clearly not anyone you want to trust your hard earned money with...let alone develop a financial system..

OK y'all are getting off topic af and need some real info here. SDC was deringed due to a bug in the ring sig implementation which means you did exaggerate things cryptohunter. The code is quite good and many improvements have been made which show that sidjwang also doesn't know what hes talking about. He is a pure troll. Stealth addresses were still intact, noone lost funds as in the new eth hack, no one person was even doxxed. All this happened before the market release so no risk really. It only affected a small portion of the chain. It was all patched in less than a week due to an active and smart community and devs.

Dadon cool your jets. DAAAAMN SON quadruple posts... knowwutimean?

I would like to get back on topic and rewind to my posts @sidhujag:
and
Neither of which were addressed or responded to.

1. that's your choice - i wish others shared those sentiments.
2. you seem to care because you keep bringing it up?
3. you need improve on your comprehension ( and spelling). Matter of perspective.

it is 'you're disgusting'

I'm sorry you feel that way

Cmon sidjwang be a good sport. Why dont you like stenography? Lets get back on target and talk about how bitbay owns yall in the side by side. What was it you were saying about data retention on the blockchain creating bloat? What data is centralized on sys in regards to the market which alleviates these concerns for you? Did your 2.0 swap retain any blockchain history info from the previous 1.0 version other than current address holdings? How much data was lost?

Is 2.1 when you guys get sued for using an ebay logo? Did you integrate etsy? Is there a browser integration for instagram filters? Or are you guys reconsidering your reconsidering of the swap and everything else you hyped 2.0 to be? Because it looks like you just updated the front end so it doesn't look like it is from 1998 and added a centralized escrow function.

1. would never be stupid enough to put my money with anyone who would even consider holding an ico..so don't really care your problem
2. since you don't know either don't care either
3. you clearly called the devs scammers i called your dev stupid...my opinion..yours is a baseless accusation almost slander.... your disgusting

oh drops the mic.... well they can post it here also then..still yet too see anyone come forward..im sure you will rally a few sock puppet accounts soon no doubt

^^^
Who is this

SDC ? that broken pile of junk that caused many previous investors to lose a fortune because their code was trash?

Those investors were ripped off, they were scammed. They though they were investing in something that worked. Not some broken contraption that would reduce their net BTC worth. I heard (maybe just a conspiracy theory )this was an intentional flaw and the devs there had their buy orders in ready to scoop all those cheap coins up. This mean the scammers are still involved with your project. I'm not sure which is worse. You can't code reliable code or you want to manipulate and hoard all the coins to dump later.

either way clearly not anyone you want to trust your hard earned money with...let alone develop a financial system..

Just think what mistakes they will code into something this complex. I wouldn't list an old pair of shoes on your market place. Now please make your own thread. The OP asked for a comparison between 2 serious projects sys and bay. He does not want to be drawn into investing in poorly coded broken trash that will fail and leave him in financial ruin.

The other guy discussing sdc seemed more reasonable but you only understand the direct approach i see with no room for cordial discussion. Now stop attacking other projects and make fair comparisons on the tech or you'll draw others to your level and SDC is a sitting duck in that case.

If you seek to make fair comparison now based on the tech of the projects at this date then fair enough. If you seek go outside of this and add other factors to the comparison then we must do the same. Your usual posting style is not suitable to cordial discussion. Tone it down else get the same in return.

No need, there is an uncensored thread already:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1200091.new#new

No one will fall in your game and pathetic attempt of bringing Shadowcrash some pr.

Drops the Mic, Im out.