Topic: Syscoin vs Bitbay - page 9. (Read 13156 times)

There are other projects like SDC with no ipo no premine no instamine no nothing just small community developments that have done just as much if not more then other coins with shady history's...we managed to get this far without anyone getting ripped off..why couldn't your devs/ maybe because there not quiet as competent i would dare say...the only people who get suckered are the ones who blindly follow things without question...clearly not anyone you want to trust your hard earned money with...let alone develop a financial system..

Believe what you want.  Bitbay's miniscule daily trading volume speaks for itself...  No one is interested in Bitbay.  Good luck with your investment.

Explain your crazy logic because it does not make any sense.

Why should an investor not invest with bitbay. You are obviously struggling are you not?

Yes I would not invest with a known scammers project but these scammers tried to ruin the project (david is the project) after taking 4 5ths of the devlopment funds and dumping all their bay trying to crush the coin.

I explain already why you are foolish to continue with this assumption and yet you continue.

A project should only be treated as a pariah if there are scammers running the project or benefiting from it in any way. Why would you think that a project that has been the victim of a scam should be shunned? David has stuck around with hardly any funding working for free and you say there is an ethical reason investors would have not to invest with bitbay.

I already gave you and example but I will post it here again since you obviously did not read it.

You need to realise the people that now make up the bitbay community and the developer are the SCAMMED not the SCAMMERS???

It's like saying people who had their house broken into and burned have a dirty past and you will not have anything to do with them.

Please think about what you are saying before making yourself look more foolish.

Explain your logic or refrain from repeating groundless statements.

When i invest in things I tend to research them first. I think david building this with no development funds is more to his credit than if he had of had funds to work with don't you?

I can only imagine you are related in some way to those scammers that tried to scam everyone and destroy the project. Either that or you're a secret investor of a competing project.

Sorry for pointing out the truth on Bitbay.  But that's what really happened.  The dev got conned into believing they were creating something legit but then Bob and co. had other ideas.  BTER was involved too.

And BAY has no volume...  Look how much is being traded daily.  Not one serious investor is touching BAY with a 10 foot pole.  A lot of people are bagholding BAY and are really frustrated.

Well regardless of the intentions now it's still a tainted past..yes sdc isn't perfect we had that bug in the code..but our origins are clean at least.

David did not know the project was going to be scammed or dumped.. if he had known I'm sure he wouldn't have gone through.. anyways he already had invested so much work in it so it's kinda hard to give up on that cause of some pump and dump scheme ruining it all.. anyways just like syscoin which had its ico funds stolen we kept going.. the market rewards those who don't give up in the face of bad actors trying to ruin the project

Wow you found that article congrats!! You must know so much now more than me!

The 'Dev' David HAS created a legit project and not just that, one of the more advanced projects in the whole of crypto!

If your going to go down that angle Isn't Lisk just crypti getting a rebrand? Which was a BobSurplus project? So in theory Lisk is a Bob coin??

Is 2.1 when you guys get sued for using an ebay logo? Did you integrate etsy? Is there a browser integration for instagram filters? Or are you guys reconsidering your reconsidering of the swap and everything else you hyped 2.0 to be? Because it looks like you just updated the front end so it doesn't look like it is from 1998 and added a centralized escrow function.

We wanted a discussion..you wanted dictatorial authority over A conversation on a thread you didn't start..these are the results..reap what you sow

The above is a little dated and many improvements have been made but this is the preview of our up coming Alpha

You cant have a discussion with an SDC troll.. never going to happen.. tried many times thus giving up. Just look at the way you came in and started ripping into anything sys... I get it you guys wanted to corect Sebastien and "put him in his place" with a healthy overdose of SDC. Nice one linking entire OP, your just so subtle in your ways.

Bloat wont be an issue like I said period. Links are serving images.. its simple. I get what you are doing and your audience is much different than Sys, moreso than bay. Theres more to reveal with Sys soon I cant get into details but stay tuned for 2.1 release where I will answer your guys questions in depth. Anyways goodluck with the thread and your coin(hope your anon works out although i doubt it), anyone reading can see for themselves. This thread has now been hijacked by SDC trolls and we are back to 0 knowledge discussions. /end thread. U can have your last word below kiddos.

Nope you are.  Know your history bud:  http://cointelegraph.com/news/chat-logs-allegedly-show-bter-creating-and-pumping-its-own-coin

Bitbay's dev thought he was creating a legit project but Bobsurplus and co. had other plans. 

Is whaleshark one of your puppet accounts or did he start the thread if he did.. not your call please hold your silence or shut the fuck up because the discussion is going to happen with or without your motherfucking blessing because this is not your thread and this is the fucking internet not north korea! don't tell me where i can discuss anything! sdc relates to these two projects and the OP was comparing the two projects because obviously he was intending on investing! so he is has the right to learn about other projects that may or may not offer more then the two already discuseed..stop trying to censor me got it! this isn't your thread, this isn't your world..open discussions are aloud, crypto was invented to take power away from people just like YOU who want to control everything to suit their agenda...not going to happen

Every piece was dedicated to sys, so don't claim I hijack anything. I won't dicuss our project any further, but I will remain in the topic.
You can't just call everyone a troll that happens to doubt the architecture of your sofware.

I'm not storing images in the blockchain, I hope you aren't either. Care to elaborate on your design?
you can check out the dev branch and figure out why.
Yeah go find the needle in the haystack. I get it, you'd rather not have me analyze your method.
Please elaborate how you're getting the images across the network, please don't use a centralized server for this too  


I believe blockchain would serve a better model for large scale adoption

As I've stated, please crunch the numbers on this one.

Does sys support blockchain pruning of expired listings at this very moment?

What components involve centralized services?
In regards to services like DirectBTC, does it properly route that traffic when a proxy is selected?

"DirectBTC was intentionally coded the way it was because of usability purposes.."
Can you properly define these usability purposes?

"Most of the guys points dont make any sense."
Just like your grammar. Please prove them wrong if you're going to make a statement like that.

You're probably a good programmer, but you just don't seem like a reasonable guy who is able to have a proper debate about the tech he's creating.

Greetings,
Kewde

Cmon sidjwang be a good sport. Why dont you like stenography? Lets get back on target and talk about how bitbay owns yall in the side by side. What was it you were saying about data retention on the blockchain creating bloat? What data is centralized on sys in regards to the market which alleviates these concerns for you?

Not gonna get into it on this thread but SDC is off the radar for me after recent events aswell as my experience with their community.. i know others share similar experiences. Lets stick to bay and sys plz last time I ask, otherwise I fail to participate in any healthy debates. Make a new thread.

we didn't hijack this thread! all legitimate projects deserve recognition don't they? so tell me please when everything about the sdc project has been not only fair but also extremely productive...why don't we get to be compared also?...shouldn't be a problem since the only legitmate competition to SYS is OB..right?

SO obvious that SDC trolls would come in here and hijack the thread... first of all your pretty stupid if you are storing images on the blockchain... and SYS won't have any scaling issues in regards to storage OR bandwidth more than bitcoin itself... you can check out the dev branch and figure out why. Most of the guys points dont make any sense. DirectBTC was intentionally coded the way it was because of usability purposes.. once a better solution is available it will be easy to switch it (CLTV implementation won't be any better for users currently). Anyways keep the discussion between Sys and Bay, where it should belong... open your own thread if you want to compare SDC to Sys thanks.

How would p2p market offers "keep-alive"? you have to have channels of nodes that ping each other contiiously now multiple that with say 10k nodes that all have some kind of offer in the same channel...I'd say at some point the "keep-alive" model starst to breakdown whereas the blockchain model thrives... the "keep-alive" model may work for smaller to medium sized networks but I believe blockchain would serve a better model for large scale adoption, especially once something like LN arrives.

We're being viewed as some group that tries to make a darknet market, but that is certainly not the goal.
Privacy is power, and thus paramount. People deserve to have power over their own life and in a world where mass surveillance is a thing, someone must provide the tools to cope with it.

Ring signatures are done, we're still discussing possible features based upon it and some minor improvements. We've had a bug that deanonymized us, we're glad that only a minor part of the total tokens pool was compromised (somewhere about 20% IIRC). We're making efforts on porting our ring signature library to the masses to be used in other C++ projects, this will spark more notice of it and peer review.


Also a word of advice, don't ever compare yourself to OB.
If you're going to shoot the king, you better make sure you kill him.

That was never our teams goal, out teams goal was to deliver the true vision of Satoshi as we believe it to be, a completely decentralized and private ( if you wish it to be) economic platform  made by the people for the people.
silkroad 2.0 was basically just a marketing headline by Vice's motherboard publication for an article they published on outr project and OB
P.S I really hope more people get behind SDC the team has really worked hard..just look at the passion and intelligence in the above post to catch a small glimpse inside the minds of our amazing dev team