SO obvious that SDC trolls would come in here and hijack the thread... first of all your pretty stupid if you are storing images on the blockchain... and SYS won't have any scaling issues in regards to storage OR bandwidth more than bitcoin itself... you can check out the dev branch and figure out why. Most of the guys points dont make any sense. DirectBTC was intentionally coded the way it was because of usability purposes.. once a better solution is available it will be easy to switch it (CLTV implementation won't be any better for users currently). Anyways keep the discussion between Sys and Bay, where it should belong... open your own thread if you want to compare SDC to Sys
thanks.
How would p2p market offers "keep-alive"? you have to have channels of nodes that ping each other contiiously now multiple that with say 10k nodes that all have some kind of offer in the same channel...I'd say at some point the "keep-alive" model starst to breakdown whereas the blockchain model thrives... the "keep-alive" model may work for smaller to medium sized networks but I believe blockchain would serve a better model for large scale adoption, especially once something like LN arrives.
Every piece was dedicated to sys, so don't claim I hijack anything. I won't dicuss our project any further, but I will remain in the topic.
You can't just call everyone a troll that happens to doubt the architecture of your sofware.
I'm not storing images in the blockchain, I hope you aren't either. Care to elaborate on your design?
you can check out the dev branch and figure out why.Yeah go find the needle in the haystack. I get it, you'd rather not have me analyze your method.
Please elaborate how you're getting the images across the network, please don't use a centralized server for this too
I believe blockchain would serve a better model for large scale adoption
As I've stated, please crunch the numbers on this one.
Does sys support blockchain pruning of expired listings at this very moment?
What components involve centralized services?
In regards to services like DirectBTC, does it properly route that traffic when a proxy is selected?
"DirectBTC was intentionally coded the way it was because of usability purposes.."
Can you properly define these usability purposes?
"Most of the guys points dont make any sense."
Just like your grammar. Please prove them wrong if you're going to make a statement like that.
You're probably a good programmer, but you just don't seem like a reasonable guy who is able to have a proper debate about the tech he's creating.
Greetings,
Kewde