T20 and T20I cricket prediction and discussion - page 1333.

romero121

legendary

Activity: 3234

Merit: 1214

Casinopunkz - Anonymous Crypto Casino

Quote from: ReiMomo on November 15, 2021, 01:11:49 PM

Quote from: Iranus on November 15, 2021, 10:38:26 AM

Quote from: GbitG on November 15, 2021, 06:25:40 AM

Australian's are mostly play very good in big games, so they have done in semifinal and final we can say they are real champions of cricket with ability of having change things very quickly. After lost against England no one was expecting they can do like this but after this lost Warner and Hazelwood both fight back in very good way Adam Zampa was also very useful in critical situations.
New Zealand done some better in last few years but still they need more time because first they were mostly losing in semifinals now they have habit of losing in finals so losing three finals in 6 years really matter of worry but still good thing they were able to win test championship against team like India.

I think New Zealand needs to find some really hard-hitting batsmen for their one-day and t20 squad. I know they have that type of player but if you don't score in the depth overs, u can't win in t20 and also in ODI in some cases. And their whole batting order needs to be more strengthened. Because Cricket is becoming a game of batsmen day by day.

I feel NZ has best batsmen now in the line and the last match was fantastic. I feel the bowlers have to be looked at. Need to bring in few more best spinners who is more capable of taking more wickets. What I observed in the final match is, NZ players missed few catches which led them really loose the match. Warner and Marsh were on fire. If NZ had controlled the runs and caught the wickets came in, they would have been the winner as the score 170 plus was not easily chase-able in finals.

Mistakes from New Zealand were the drops, other than that there is nothing to say. Because the batsmen did their responsibility scoring 170 runs which is good. From the bowling side, the bowlers did the best to stop. But, they weren't capable doing it as the batsmen were in fire crashing everyone's bowling.

My strong belief for the winning of Australia against New Zealand is the ground. Dubai grounds are much supportive for second batting. This has been experienced throughout the tournament.

ReiMomo

sr. member

Activity: 2366

Merit: 305

Duelbits - $100k Bonus/week

Quote from: Iranus on November 15, 2021, 10:38:26 AM

Quote from: GbitG on November 15, 2021, 06:25:40 AM

Australian's are mostly play very good in big games, so they have done in semifinal and final we can say they are real champions of cricket with ability of having change things very quickly. After lost against England no one was expecting they can do like this but after this lost Warner and Hazelwood both fight back in very good way Adam Zampa was also very useful in critical situations.
New Zealand done some better in last few years but still they need more time because first they were mostly losing in semifinals now they have habit of losing in finals so losing three finals in 6 years really matter of worry but still good thing they were able to win test championship against team like India.

I think New Zealand needs to find some really hard-hitting batsmen for their one-day and t20 squad. I know they have that type of player but if you don't score in the depth overs, u can't win in t20 and also in ODI in some cases. And their whole batting order needs to be more strengthened. Because Cricket is becoming a game of batsmen day by day.

I feel NZ has best batsmen now in the line and the last match was fantastic. I feel the bowlers have to be looked at. Need to bring in few more best spinners who is more capable of taking more wickets. What I observed in the final match is, NZ players missed few catches which led them really loose the match. Warner and Marsh were on fire. If NZ had controlled the runs and caught the wickets came in, they would have been the winner as the score 170 plus was not easily chase-able in finals.

Iranus

hero member

Activity: 1792

Merit: 534

Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform

Quote from: GbitG on November 15, 2021, 06:25:40 AM

Australian's are mostly play very good in big games, so they have done in semifinal and final we can say they are real champions of cricket with ability of having change things very quickly. After lost against England no one was expecting they can do like this but after this lost Warner and Hazelwood both fight back in very good way Adam Zampa was also very useful in critical situations.
New Zealand done some better in last few years but still they need more time because first they were mostly losing in semifinals now they have habit of losing in finals so losing three finals in 6 years really matter of worry but still good thing they were able to win test championship against team like India.

I think New Zealand needs to find some really hard-hitting batsmen for their one-day and t20 squad. I know they have that type of player but if you don't score in the depth overs, u can't win in t20 and also in ODI in some cases. And their whole batting order needs to be more strengthened. Because Cricket is becoming a game of batsmen day by day.

Minecache

legendary

Activity: 2184

Merit: 1024

Vave.com - Crypto Casino

Quote from: UmerIdrees on November 15, 2021, 05:46:32 AM

Baber Azam made 303 runs while David Warner from Australia made 289 runs.
How come the puppet ICC give the player of the tournament as David Warner.
This is an unfair decision as Baber scored these runs in 6 innings and warner took 7 innings to score even less runs.

Food for thought...

Well, we've seen ICC do this before and the explanation was like this- As Babar made the most runs, he should have been the player of the tournament. But his team didn't win the cup, and as Australia won the cup and Warner scored 289 (only 14 less than Babar) Warner's runs were more impactful for his team. So Warner is the player of the tournament.

onecall123

sr. member

Activity: 2156

Merit: 323

Quote from: UmerIdrees on November 15, 2021, 05:46:32 AM

Baber Azam made 303 runs while David Warner from Australia made 289 runs.
How come the puppet ICC give the player of the tournament as David Warner.
This is an unfair decision as Baber scored these runs in 6 innings and warner took 7 innings to score even less runs.

Food for thought...

https://i.imgur.com/0k5SwC6.png

I don't get the point. Does the Player of the Tournament award have to be given to the person who has made the most runs throughout the tournament? In total, 289 runs were scored at an average of 48.16, including a crucial half-century in the final. Warner may have less runs, but he deserves it. He is the Player of the Tournament at the 2021 T20 World Cup. Warner wins the trophy because he brought the team to the finals, but Baber Azam does not. While I understand Pakistani fans' frustration, the facts remain the same.

virasog

legendary

Activity: 3206

Merit: 1174

Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform

Quote from: Iranus on November 15, 2021, 06:15:14 AM

Quote from: Sithara007 on November 14, 2021, 09:41:37 PM

Quote from: noormcs5 on November 14, 2021, 09:23:49 PM

I don't understand why everyone is saying that since Australia won the toss, they have won the match. Even though toss played an important role, but Australian batsmen played really well to chase the target of 170+ runs. Not all teams will be able to chase this target in the final of a world cup match.

In this tournament, the toss played a very crucial role. It can't be denied. The majority of the matches between teams of equal strength were won by teams batting second. Even minnows like Namibia and Scotland were able to terrorize the test nations, when they won the toss and sent the opposition to bat. Now it will be difficult to say whether New Zealand would have won the match, if the toss was won by their captain. They were severely weakened by the injury to Devon Conway. Williamson batted well, but he ran out of company at the end.

Well for NewZealand Williamson batted well and Trent boult bowled really well. Other than that no one really helps their cause. Australia did well in both batting and bowling. Josh Hazlewood bowled really well along with Adam Zampa. Indian batting Marsh and Warner almost gave the NewZealand bowlers nightmare.

If we analysis the batting of both the teams, then we shall find the NewZealand batting was dominated by one man, that is Williamson and no other player have scored with the same rate. If Williamson was out early, NewZealand would not be able to make this total. Almost all Australian batsmen played their part in the win.

GbitG

sr. member

Activity: 1008

Merit: 407

Quote from: Iranus on November 15, 2021, 06:15:14 AM

Quote from: Sithara007 on November 14, 2021, 09:41:37 PM

Quote from: noormcs5 on November 14, 2021, 09:23:49 PM

I don't understand why everyone is saying that since Australia won the toss, they have won the match. Even though toss played an important role, but Australian batsmen played really well to chase the target of 170+ runs. Not all teams will be able to chase this target in the final of a world cup match.

In this tournament, the toss played a very crucial role. It can't be denied. The majority of the matches between teams of equal strength were won by teams batting second. Even minnows like Namibia and Scotland were able to terrorize the test nations, when they won the toss and sent the opposition to bat. Now it will be difficult to say whether New Zealand would have won the match, if the toss was won by their captain. They were severely weakened by the injury to Devon Conway. Williamson batted well, but he ran out of company at the end.

Well for NewZealand Williamson batted well and Trent boult bowled really well. Other than that no one really helps their cause. Australia did well in both batting and bowling. Josh Hazlewood bowled really well along with Adam Zampa. Indian batting Marsh and Warner almost gave the NewZealand bowlers nightmare.

Australian's are mostly play very good in big games, so they have done in semifinal and final we can say they are real champions of cricket with ability of having change things very quickly. After lost against England no one was expecting they can do like this but after this lost Warner and Hazelwood both fight back in very good way Adam Zampa was also very useful in critical situations.
New Zealand done some better in last few years but still they need more time because first they were mostly losing in semifinals now they have habit of losing in finals so losing three finals in 6 years really matter of worry but still good thing they were able to win test championship against team like India.

Iranus

hero member

Activity: 1792

Merit: 534

Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform

Quote from: Sithara007 on November 14, 2021, 09:41:37 PM

Quote from: noormcs5 on November 14, 2021, 09:23:49 PM

I don't understand why everyone is saying that since Australia won the toss, they have won the match. Even though toss played an important role, but Australian batsmen played really well to chase the target of 170+ runs. Not all teams will be able to chase this target in the final of a world cup match.

In this tournament, the toss played a very crucial role. It can't be denied. The majority of the matches between teams of equal strength were won by teams batting second. Even minnows like Namibia and Scotland were able to terrorize the test nations, when they won the toss and sent the opposition to bat. Now it will be difficult to say whether New Zealand would have won the match, if the toss was won by their captain. They were severely weakened by the injury to Devon Conway. Williamson batted well, but he ran out of company at the end.

Well for NewZealand Williamson batted well and Trent boult bowled really well. Other than that no one really helps their cause. Australia did well in both batting and bowling. Josh Hazlewood bowled really well along with Adam Zampa. Indian batting Marsh and Warner almost gave the NewZealand bowlers nightmare.

UmerIdrees

hero member

Activity: 2464

Merit: 877

Baber Azam made 303 runs while David Warner from Australia made 289 runs.
How come the puppet ICC give the player of the tournament as David Warner.
This is an unfair decision as Baber scored these runs in 6 innings and warner took 7 innings to score even less runs.

Food for thought...

Swordsoffreedom

legendary

Activity: 2996

Merit: 1136

Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform

Quote from: UmerIdrees on November 14, 2021, 11:00:44 PM

Quote from: bilal_jan321 on November 14, 2021, 12:49:09 AM

Quote from: UmerIdrees on November 13, 2021, 11:18:43 PM

Yes, the New Zealand is one of those teams who are constantly performing without being noticed too much. Also their team is not very much experienced but have good commitment and performance. They have won against India & England and if they won today, this would mean that they have won against all the big three teams. However, they were unable to beat the most strongest team of the tournament that is Pakistan.

It doesn't matter whether they have beaten Pakistan or not. NZ is in the final while Pakistan is back home. NZ must end this habit of losing WC finals, they have never won any major ICC tournament except ICC champions trophy in 2000. As far as today game is concerned, as everyone saying TOSS will be the key. You won toss, you won WC.

Again they have lost the finals and unable to change their perception as they are not the finishers of the big tournaments. Also they can't beat the good teams of the tournaments like Australia and Pakistan. That's another reason why they are afraid of playing cricket with good teams and habit of running away from the playing fields. Had they played the series with Pakistan, they would have got more experience and would be a much better team.

Well, I wouldn't say that playing against Pakistan would have made them a better team instantly because it doesn't work like that. You have to grind to get better. But if they did play against Pakistan, they could spot their weakness and work on that.

UmerIdrees

hero member

Activity: 2464

Merit: 877

Quote from: bilal_jan321 on November 14, 2021, 12:49:09 AM

Quote from: UmerIdrees on November 13, 2021, 11:18:43 PM

Yes, the New Zealand is one of those teams who are constantly performing without being noticed too much. Also their team is not very much experienced but have good commitment and performance. They have won against India & England and if they won today, this would mean that they have won against all the big three teams. However, they were unable to beat the most strongest team of the tournament that is Pakistan.

It doesn't matter whether they have beaten Pakistan or not. NZ is in the final while Pakistan is back home. NZ must end this habit of losing WC finals, they have never won any major ICC tournament except ICC champions trophy in 2000. As far as today game is concerned, as everyone saying TOSS will be the key. You won toss, you won WC.

Again they have lost the finals and unable to change their perception as they are not the finishers of the big tournaments. Also they can't beat the good teams of the tournaments like Australia and Pakistan. That's another reason why they are afraid of playing cricket with good teams and habit of running away from the playing fields. Had they played the series with Pakistan, they would have got more experience and would be a much better team.

Sithara007

legendary

Activity: 3346

Merit: 1352

Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform

Quote from: noormcs5 on November 14, 2021, 09:23:49 PM

I don't understand why everyone is saying that since Australia won the toss, they have won the match. Even though toss played an important role, but Australian batsmen played really well to chase the target of 170+ runs. Not all teams will be able to chase this target in the final of a world cup match.

In this tournament, the toss played a very crucial role. It can't be denied. The majority of the matches between teams of equal strength were won by teams batting second. Even minnows like Namibia and Scotland were able to terrorize the test nations, when they won the toss and sent the opposition to bat. Now it will be difficult to say whether New Zealand would have won the match, if the toss was won by their captain. They were severely weakened by the injury to Devon Conway. Williamson batted well, but he ran out of company at the end.

noormcs5

hero member

Activity: 2856

Merit: 618

Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform

Quote from: ibuddy122505 on November 14, 2021, 08:45:51 PM

Quote from: 7788bitcoin on November 14, 2021, 05:12:52 PM

Quote from: Mahdirakib on November 14, 2021, 02:26:37 PM

They won the game easily without any difficulties. New Zealand did a slow start and it was the main reason for their loss. Because, the pitch was batting friendly. Williamson played a great innings but his effort didn't help them to win the match. Starc was costly today. Australia played for the trophy from the start of their batting. The first T20 world cup win for team Australia.

The team batting second is always wins the match and the final was not an exception either. The first few overs the wicket is really difficult to bat and New Zealand was struggling to score runs and the toss was always a crucial factor, if the World Cup was conducted in India then i think the results would have been entirely different.

Indeed, Toss won the WC2021 and this is what very normal situation of this T20 World Cup. After seeing whole tournament's pattern, second batters dominate on chasing but first batters did a slow start and was struggling. Finch is really fortunate in winning the toss. Australia should maintain his captaincy for some more years. Anyway, playing in sub continent like in India the trend would have been different.

I don't understand why everyone is saying that since Australia won the toss, they have won the match. Even though toss played an important role, but Australian batsmen played really well to chase the target of 170+ runs. Not all teams will be able to chase this target in the final of a world cup match.

ibuddy122505

sr. member

Activity: 1066

Merit: 261

Quote from: 7788bitcoin on November 14, 2021, 05:12:52 PM

Quote from: Mahdirakib on November 14, 2021, 02:26:37 PM

They won the game easily without any difficulties. New Zealand did a slow start and it was the main reason for their loss. Because, the pitch was batting friendly. Williamson played a great innings but his effort didn't help them to win the match. Starc was costly today. Australia played for the trophy from the start of their batting. The first T20 world cup win for team Australia.

The team batting second is always wins the match and the final was not an exception either. The first few overs the wicket is really difficult to bat and New Zealand was struggling to score runs and the toss was always a crucial factor, if the World Cup was conducted in India then i think the results would have been entirely different.

Indeed, Toss won the WC2021 and this is what very normal situation of this T20 World Cup. After seeing whole tournament's pattern, second batters dominate on chasing but first batters did a slow start and was struggling. Finch is really fortunate in winning the toss. Australia should maintain his captaincy for some more years. Anyway, playing in sub continent like in India the trend would have been different.

7788bitcoin

legendary

Activity: 2282

Merit: 1023

Quote from: Mahdirakib on November 14, 2021, 02:26:37 PM

They won the game easily without any difficulties. New Zealand did a slow start and it was the main reason for their loss. Because, the pitch was batting friendly. Williamson played a great innings but his effort didn't help them to win the match. Starc was costly today. Australia played for the trophy from the start of their batting. The first T20 world cup win for team Australia.

The team batting second is always wins the match and the final was not an exception either. The first few overs the wicket is really difficult to bat and New Zealand was struggling to score runs and the toss was always a crucial factor, if the World Cup was conducted in India then i think the results would have been entirely different.

Mahdirakib

legendary

Activity: 1946

Merit: 1026

In Search of Incredible

Quote from: eaLiTy on November 14, 2021, 12:33:02 PM

Australia won their first T20 World Cup, a team no one even gave a chance to reach the final let alone win the cup. The common theme is the team chasing won the matches and in both the semi final and in the final, every team chasing won the match chasing with one over to spare. Warner regained his form at the right moment and they played well to win their first World Cup and once again New Zealand is disappointed after reaching the final.

They won the game easily without any difficulties. New Zealand did a slow start and it was the main reason for their loss. Because, the pitch was batting friendly. Williamson played a great innings but his effort didn't help them to win the match. Starc was costly today. Australia played for the trophy from the start of their batting. The first T20 world cup win for team Australia.

HUSTLER

member

Activity: 185

Merit: 10

Quote from: ene1980 on November 14, 2021, 01:55:00 PM

Quote from: CDC AP on November 14, 2021, 01:40:47 PM

~
Well as I Said Australia had a great chance because they lost only one wicket and that happenned, amazing victory for australia and i am very happy for them, no one said that Australia will win this world cup, every one was saying india england or pakistan but look what australia has done, they have won the final and almost with one sided affair and chased the total very easily .

It is a fact that no one gave a chance for Australia to win the World cup and i wonder what the odds would be before the tournament started for Australia to win the cup, i am sure the odds will be crazy high. India and England were the favorites coming into the world cup and once the tournament started everyone gave Pakistan a chance to win because of their performance and finally Australia went away with the cup Cheesy

.

Even the australians have not predicted for australia win specially after a group stage match against england where they were beaten very badly but after that they just kept on improving their game and they totally deserved to win this world cup. They have beaten two strong teams with good mometum in semi-finals and finals. Warner also proved a point that he is still a match winner because of his performance is both semis and the finals.

ene1980

hero member

Activity: 2002

Merit: 535

Quote from: CDC AP on November 14, 2021, 01:40:47 PM

~
Well as I Said Australia had a great chance because they lost only one wicket and that happenned, amazing victory for australia and i am very happy for them, no one said that Australia will win this world cup, every one was saying india england or pakistan but look what australia has done, they have won the final and almost with one sided affair and chased the total very easily .

It is a fact that no one gave a chance for Australia to win the World cup and i wonder what the odds would be before the tournament started for Australia to win the cup, i am sure the odds will be crazy high. India and England were the favorites coming into the world cup and once the tournament started everyone gave Pakistan a chance to win because of their performance and finally Australia went away with the cup Cheesy

.

CDC AP

full member

Activity: 463

Merit: 102

Quote from: Sithara007 on November 14, 2021, 11:26:19 AM

Quote from: CDC AP on November 14, 2021, 11:18:50 AM

Australia had a average start to the powerplay. They lost aron finch early but michell marsh has started well till now and warning is setting himself in.
The score is 43-1 after 6 overs which a bit low but the most important thing that warner is still there and if he can be there for bit longer then he can play spin well and can be a big plus in the chase. Lets see what happens.

I disagree. Australia didn't played well in the powerplay. They lost Finch and the run rate plummeted after he got out. At this point, the match still looks 50/50 for me. Both Warner and Mitchell Marsh are at 26 now. But the difference is that Warner took twice as many deliveries as Marsh to reach there (26 vs 13). One thing is sure.. this match is going to go down the wire. I am rooting for New Zealand, but I am not too sure that they'll lift the trophy. Australia are very good finishers and they always perform to their best during the finals.

Well as I Said Australia had a great chance because they lost only one wicket and that happenned, amazing victory for australia and i am very happy for them, no one said that Australia will win this world cup, every one was saying india england or pakistan but look what australia has done, they have won the final and almost with one sided affair and chased the total very easily .

teosanru

hero member

Activity: 2114

Merit: 619

Quote from: eaLiTy on November 14, 2021, 12:33:02 PM

Australia won their first T20 World Cup, a team no one even gave a chance to reach the final let alone win the cup. The common theme is the team chasing won the matches and in both the semi final and in the final, every team chasing won the match chasing with one over to spare. Warner regained his form at the right moment and they played well to win their first World Cup and once again New Zealand is disappointed after reaching the final.

True, I am really disappointed by the choice of venue by BCCI and ICC for the world cup all the games were too biased, no matter how good you play, batting first increases your winning chance by almost 30-40% which is really too much, if you see the whole world cup it was altogether a world cup for the batsmen, no bowler was able to win the match for his team because no bowler could ball well in the second innings primarily due to dew and pitch conditions. I feel ICC should give equal relevance to these factors while deciding their venues, if matches are happening in Asia keep them in summers so they aren't hampered this much by dew.

Topic: T20 and T20I cricket prediction and discussion - page 1333. (Read 251000 times)