I feel upsets are good for this sport as it boosts those unseeded players confidence for future tournaments, it’ll be interesting if one of those players makes it to semis or finals. The match between Federer vs Edmund was a really easy one for Federer, honestly I felt little disappointed that Edmund didn’t offer stiff competition to him. I had no doubt in my mind about Hurkacz winning the match, he’s deserved this victory there’s no doubt about this.
Definitely, we need some upsets, not just in Tennis but in all other sports as well. Otherwise, the game will be predictable and it's possible that the sports will die. I mentioned before the actual match between Federer and Edmund could be interesting, as I think that Edmund will offer something different, I think this is the first time the the two will face each other, so there is the possibility of upset. However, we have seen what had happened, Federer is too good even at this point in his career.
I agree that upsets are good for tennis and all sports in general but its not good for people betting which is why I don't bet on tennis that much in these tournaments. Grand Slams seem to be better to bet in but we also get upsets in GS as well so it does make it hard at times to bet.
In the first quarter final Raonic is currently leading winning the first set comfortably however the young Kecmanovic is fighting back in the second set but not sure if it will be enough to beat Raonic. Monfils v Thiem will be an interesting match to see, I'm thinking Thiem should get the win here.