Not saying that they are equally talent.
I'm saying that as we grow old we tend to get defensive to certain aspect of our life/things which we grow up with, its not 70s 80s or 2000s anymore. Modern cricket is changed for good or bad dramatically, we can't do much about except embrace and enjoy the change.
How could we expect same from the modern bowlers (Pace or spin) when there is restrictions on fielding, Ball, Bouncers etc? Not fair IMO
As far as I know, these restrictions impacted pace bowlers 95% of the times. Spinners were not much affected. Obviously spinners are not going to bowl any bouncers.. Look at the T20 leagues. The spin bowlers are in great demand, while the pace bowlers (Steyn, Starc, Anderson.etc) are not getting good offers. The ICC could have made it neutral, but they specifically targeted the pace bowlers. On top of that, with every passing year we have less number of tracks which support quality fast bowling.
Fielding restriction effected the spinners most. 2 new ball formula equally bad for both streams (Pace-Spin). Bouncer is for pacer anyway.
I think you didn't get to watch last India tour of SA and ENG? Pacers dominated the series by miles when compared to Batsmen and spinners in all 8 tests ( 3 SA + 5 ENG) and then you also missed the Eng vs Ire, average score was 150ish if i'm not wrong.
Here are the some comments on first page of this thread.
LOL England 52/7 and against a team like Ireland.
Lol was about to send comment and he's gone
67/9
What next after this? Ireland bowled out with in 30 overs too?