Topic: The longer the bounty, the fewer the earnings? - page 67. (Read 7706 times)
With the same bounty and reward conditions, you can wear a 1 month signature and earn $ 1,000. Or you can stretch a similar campaign for 6 months and also earn 1 thousand dollars. In this case, your monthly income will be a little over $ 150.
If the project extends the ICO period several times, it means that they have problems with Fund raising. Here it is necessary to think about further participation in the project. There's a chance the pool will be cut at the end.
And it is not a pity to leave the company for which time was spent, only because there is a probability that less will pay. You can never be sure of anything, bounty like a casino - you do not know where you will find, where you will lose
You should leave that bro.
Your friend says true the longer the bounty the lowest the earning.
go for short bounty like 4 to 8 weeks maximum.
Your friend says true the longer the bounty the lowest the earning.
go for short bounty like 4 to 8 weeks maximum.
there is some truth. the amount of earnings is affected by many factors. the number of participants, the amount of capital, the number of coins, the value of coins for the ICO.
A friend of mine said that the payout depends on the quantity of participants and the sum of money for bounty.
He also said that a certain percent is more preferable than a fixed sum for bounty.
He also said that a certain percent is more preferable than a fixed sum for bounty.
My friend just told me recently that he is leaving the bounty that we both joined last January. The ICO has been delayed many times and it is getting longer. He said that the longer the bounty period of an ICO, the fewer the coins that you will earn. So it is true based from your experience? Should I also leave or stay?
If you have the same account rank, then of course more tokens will be earned by the one that takes part longer in this company's bounty. 
My friend just told me recently that he is leaving the bounty that we both joined last January. The ICO has been delayed many times and it is getting longer. He said that the longer the bounty period of an ICO, the fewer the coins that you will earn. So it is true based from your experience? Should I also leave or stay?
Not really mate; the factors that affects the earnings from a bounty campaign is: (1) The number of joiners. The more people in a project, the more the projected profit would be divided; (2) The quota they are trying to reach. A project usually targets a quota that they aim to get through crowdfunding, and commonly, when they don't reach it that affects how much rewards they would give out; (3) The alloted percentage of earnings from the campaign you joined. Each campaign department of a bounty program has different percentages of allotment from the total amount they gained during their marketing stages. Usually, they extend projects to actually earn more and give a chance for them to gain more investors.
It's not always true. The higher your rank in this forum the higher your stakes and the more you earn from the bounty. And it also depends on the total supply of that project and their ico price price is also a factor to consider.
My friend just told me recently that he is leaving the bounty that we both joined last January. The ICO has been delayed many times and it is getting longer. He said that the longer the bounty period of an ICO, the fewer the coins that you will earn. So it is true based from your experience? Should I also leave or stay?
Is that so? I think it depends on their budget, if the budget allocated for the bounty campaigns remains the same no matter how long will the campaign runs, i think the payment also will remain the same. The problem is bounty hunter want a short term campaign and easy earnings but they are right. Long period ICOs is not too advisable, they will have to work long also.
No, I don't agree with your friend's opinion . Different projects, different payment . Here as lucky ...
I agree with your friend. after all, there is a difference that you would have finished the campaign for a month and got$ 200 and the fact that it will last for three months. and the reward doesn't change.
He is right.The longer the bounty, the fewer the tokens you are likely to earn. This is because people keep on joining and joining untill the day the campaign itself ends. If you are a signature campaign participant and you are a junior member, its even worse.you do the posting for three months and a hero member post for a week and gets more than you. 
so i read every commentar in this thread. and i do agree that many good projects had a longterm ico and bounty phase. especially when crypto went down, not many ppl decided to spend money on ico, because nearly every ico crashed right after the start.
My friend just told me recently that he is leaving the bounty that we both joined last January. The ICO has been delayed many times and it is getting longer. He said that the longer the bounty period of an ICO, the fewer the coins that you will earn. So it is true based from your experience? Should I also leave or stay?
Well this is understandable. The more time acting Bounty campaign, the more new participants. Accordingly, there are more bets and the value of 1 bet falls.
Delaying an ico implies that they are not sure collect money that they desire. But it's too hard to find any ico without a delayings past 3 months. If you don't trust it, change the campaign.
If the team carries ICO many times then it seems that they can not assemble a software cap. It follows that the team can not raise funds. Therefore, most likely earnings on this bounty will be small.
If you have a lower rank then that could possibly be the case
My friend just told me recently that he is leaving the bounty that we both joined last January. The ICO has been delayed many times and it is getting longer. He said that the longer the bounty period of an ICO, the fewer the coins that you will earn. So it is true based from your experience? Should I also leave or stay?
Not really. But the longer the bounty and ISO, the less likely that the project will collect the necessary amount for development. From personal experience know. EOS is an exception 
This is possible since more members will be able to join especially if the manager will not place a limit on the number of participants. The more participants there are, the more ways the bounty pool will be divided making the amount of tokens lesser per stake. This is just how the system works in this kind of scenario. Something that we should accept and stop complaining about.
Jump to: