Sorry I didn't see this one but I notice it now.
Well,,, steemit if this is steem the one I am a bit familiar with for me it perhaps fails on distribution.
I made a steem scam thread a few days after it was released. I will explain why.
So
The steem dev made it POW but didn't release a windows miner and did a few other things to make it very tough to mine indeed.
Someone managed to mine a big chunk so steem dev got mad and reversed it and started over because he didnlt like anyone else mining the tokens.
Now that would to me make it a total and utter scam. I thought it was at this point.
However now the dev says he needs to do this for legal reasons (not allowed to premine) and to get all the coins else the idea can't really work out I mean he has to pay the tokens to the posters from somewhere.
So that seems legit ....and i was thinking okay perhaps its not a big scam or not as bad as i thought.
Smooth also told me it is kind of unfair but that there was a full ledger for these tokens. I view smooth as pretty reliable so I finished off moaning about steem and forgot about it.
However someone once told me that steem was quite gameable and those with the vast bulks of the coins the devs and the smart people like smooth who worked out to mine a good amount without going crazy and taking the devs share ...got more power in upvoting and controlling the payouts etc. Now (not saying smooth himself did anything wrong because he seems quite a decent person to me) but others who would have the power to create other steem accounts and make sure those accounts were paid out nicely.... hmm just sounds a bit open to scamming to me. When things are open to scamming I prefer to call them a scam or at least a scheme. We are building trustless decentralised services here. I don't think there should be any point where trust is required. And if trust is never required then scamming is not possible. This is the kind of projects I like to encourage.
Now also this person makes bitshares, but leaves and starts steem, but leaves and makes eos? not saying this isnt allowed but all this jumping from one project to another seems ....hmmm
Now the disclaimer here on steem is.
1. I don't know if this kind of gaming is not possible really and there are measures in place to prevent it. But i cant see how.
2. Steem seemed a great design and even some well known devs say the coding and design has merit.
This thread if for open analysis not to be just my opinion so i would love some very smart people to explain if steem was wide open to being a money making scheme by devs and the original handful of miners that grabbed all the tokens whilst others were held out on purpose. Or if that is not the case.
If it seems steem is clean then let's shoot it up on the poll. Perhaps it is okay and meets the real project criteria after all. To me the distribution doesnt look good.... but if im proven wrong then fair enough.