Topic: The road to the End of Religion: How sex will kill God - page 27. (Read 37219 times)

Religion always has the greatest part of itself based on God. Why? Because God created all things. And when He did this, He created the laws for moral living right in the heart of mankind who He made. Our first parents corrupted this law when they sinned the first time. We are the beneficiaries of that first sin and the corrupted law, both in the corruption of nature around us, and of the corruption of the law in our hearts.

The first part of the law in our hearts has to do with recognizing and honoring God. Because of the corruption of the law in our hearts, we often don't think about God like we should. We feel the law in our hearts, so we react to it. But because it is corrupted, we miss parts of it. Sometimes the thing we miss or forget is the part about God. Yet, we all know He exists, even though we cover Him up in our hearts... some of us more, and others less, just like some of us sin this way more and others that way more.

Religion has got nothing to do with God anymore,  maybe people need to be free of boundaries,  they'll feel and see God more clearly.

I understand completely. I even have reactions like that when I don't want to respond for some reason. Too bad you don't want to respond. It might have been an eye opener for both of us, what you had to say. Of course, maybe you simply don't have a response. Oh, well.



EDIT: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y0c5nIvJH7w

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JKHUaNAxsTg

Yikes, you're really damaged bro. I'm so sorry. *hug*

One interesting thing about reason is that Graham Hancock and 4 or 5 others are proving that 12,500 years ago there was a worldwide civilization, a trading organization, that was advanced in some of the sciences beyond what we are. While I don't personally believe the times that they set down, it seems that Solon told Plato that the destruction of Atlantis happened at a time that corresponds to 12,500 years ago.

The point is that religion isn't dying. If it were, it would have died back with the people of Atlantis - the Atlantis that Graham Hancock and his cohorts are proving existed through archeological means. As it is, Atlantis is simply the end of the world through the great flood of Noah's day... the flood that God did because people tried to destroy true religion back then.

Graham Hancock Breaks the Set on TED Censorship, Lost Civilizations & War on Consciousness - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0BrDF5WLyQs

‘Magicians of the Gods’, snapshots of a work in progress - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KcPgIphDWGY

Quest for the Lost civilization - Graham Hancock (FULL MOVIE) - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T5DNvYMtkyk

Modern science is way off in left field regarding things of the past. They are so because of money and politics, and they are leading a whole bunch of atheists, like you, far afield from the truth in such a way that is bringing about your destruction from God. Wake up to the strength of religion. Nobody can destroy religion. Atheism is simply another example of a misguided religion.

How perceptive you are. I'm not advocating killing God or anything else, as if you or I had any impact whatsoever! I'm simply pointing out my observation that the death of religion has already begun and there's nothing any of us can do to stop it.

Technology giveth, technology taketh away. Woe unto all ye who stubbornly cling to the ways of the past.

This Century's Forecast: Orgasms, reason, and science win. Violence, ignorance, and superstition (theism) lose.

What?  Mozart is so totally great.  There's nothing quite like this.  Six voices in three rounds.   FUck, I don't think Miley Cyrus can match this. 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C78HBp-Youk

Well maybe she could do one of the six orals.


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leck_mich_im_Arsch

For someone who advocates killing God you sure do adopt the persona of a preacher giving a sermon.

BTW that wasn't an answer to my question, and I am still waiting on those scientific studies that prove gender norms are not biologically driven in any way.

Implying sex is abnormal and unnatural among three or more people?

All consensual sex is natural, healthy, and fun. Doesn't matter their gender, or color, or how many participants there are. This self-evident truth is at this very moment being discovered by young people all over this planet.

Religion, by contrast, is unnatural, unhealthy, and - worst of all sins - boring.

 I think, sex is a normal and natural thing between two peoples. Sex will advance civilization. It will not destroy people and kill the God.

I am merely a humble servant of Truth. All myths deserve to be destroyed, for they are worms eating away at the immortal tree of Truth.

No reply to my earlier comments? I guess thats how you cope when someone calls you out on your inconsistencies and lack of logic.

Here is a fun video showing how social justice warriors are basically indistinguishable from neonazis.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z-ZX5V4Qft4

Religions are like wars, unfortunately they never finished.

What does it matter? God blesses me because He loves me, and because of what I write.

Yes, of course we're all doomed to die. It's not about life and death, it's about maximizing quality of life and minimizing suffering for the greatest number of people possible - efficiency of happiness.

You write much, but understand little.

Cute little TED video. It forgets one major thing. All people die. Life means nothing in the long run.

When you look around the world today, you can see that all the violence of 2,000 years ago is still acceptable in some parts of the world. And even the parts of the world where it is not so acceptable, it is still acceptable in small scale. Consider what happens if somebody doesn't pay his income taxes in America. Yet, while income taxes are called voluntary, they really are slavery over people who don't want to pay.

In addition, not all people of 2,000 years ago were violent war mongers. Among all peoples and races and nations there have been times of peace. Using reason and logic to suggest that people are evolving rather than devolving, is merely something that a few shrewd people are doing to pull the wool over the eyes of the rest of the people, people who have devolved to the point that the wool can be pulled over their eyes.

2,000 years ago slavery,  torture, rape, and violent conquest of neighbors were all socially acceptable and commonplace.

For entertainment, these people forced slaves to butcher each other in gladiatorial combat, boiled cats alive in oil, publicly crucified political opponents, and burned heretics alive at the stake.

The Long Reach of Reason explains well why we've socially progressed nonstop since the dawn of the age of reason.

Please explain on how he is butt hurt or displaying willful ignorance?