Topic: There IS life after DEATH: Scientists reveal shock findings - page 5. (Read 6478 times)

1. Aether.

2. Cause and effect.

What a trooper. Proof you've watch the whole video!

 

Hope that link was relevant to this thread. I thought it was.

  at the second to last guy in the Q&A

About NDE:

Is there a world wide conspiracy a la flat earth and nasa?

Or why dont we have massive research if everything is true? Where are the nobel prices?

I know there was one real study planned by the EU about that topic but that study was pretty bad as the results were.

You arent able to have a debate. If you have no argument you are trying to insult people and changing topics. Additionaly you always choose to ignore arguments from your opposition in a debate.

Lone anarchist kid - your describtion of yourself fits pretty good.

Exploring Non-local Consciousness



Published on Dec 10, 2014

Exploring Non-local Consciousness with Dean Radin (Senior Scientist at IONS), Neil Theise (Professor of Pathology and of Medicine), Julia Mossbridge (Cognitive Neuroscientist), John Hagelin (Quantum Physicist), Menas Kafatos (Quantum Physicist) and Rudolph Tanzi (Professor of Neurology, Harvard University), moderated by Cassandra Vieten (President of IONS)

Because you fuckers keep running around colluding with each other to tell me how to live and what I believe I have to fight you and counter your bullshit and this happens everywhere, it doesn't matter whether it's Feminists, Islamists, Christians, you're all the fucking same. I think the worst part is above all else that you're actually that arrogant you all think you can tell me what I can and can't do with my own fucking dick.

If you want to have your debates fine, but piss off with your micro-managing bullshit and fanaticism.

Hey Lethn,


If you truly want to be left alone, why do you keep coming back to this thread?

Is There A Soul? Beyond Belief - ABC - Dr. Sam Parnia


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w1JarYYWDfQ

Because NDEs have many common core elements, this suggests that they are spiritual voyages outside of the body. Through the visions and experiences common to all dying people, one can learn more about the spiritual journey that begins with death. It stands to reason that these accounts are valid and suggestive of the non-physical reality, similarly, this veridical perception case shows that physical perceptions during NDEs are valid. Why would perception of non-physical phenomena during NDE be any different? Why would it not be veridical in its own right?

The evidence is extensive; it could be that you have not entirely grasped the significance and interconnectedness of the evidence: http://www.near-death.com/science/evidence.html

You're the one who started this whole fucking mess, own up to it, what I'm saying is that just because there is a life after death, doesn't mean it involves god, for all you know it could be some random thing involving spirits or another life beyond this one without any gods at all. The reason I say you know nothing, is because you genuinely know nothing, you're jumping to conclusions and trying to shove religion down my throat claiming it's all God despite having no fucking proof. Also, as has been said by other people the scientist isn't necessarily saying this is actual evidence of an after life to begin with.

Amazing really how two supposedly ideologically different people are both using the same tactics on me, because just like Criptix you're claiming I've wrote shit that I haven't despite all the post history being made public for everybody to see.

Just how fucking deluded are you two?

As I've said a million times, it could be, that you're wrong about there being a God at all and if there is some kind of spirituality in death it's unlike anything we've imagined as human beings yet. It's so fucking arrogant of you to declare one way or the other without any evidence, all you're doing is citing the opinion of somebody else there is no empirical and measurable data for what you're describing.Now, I don't discount the idea that there could be some form of it, if there were proper research done, however you just pointing at the opinion of somebody else and going "SEE?" doesn't mean a thing.

The only one being close minded here is you thinking that merely quoting somebody elses opinion or theory means you're automatically correct, this is how religions get started in the first place you all point to the fucking bible or whatever holy book you want to worship and go "Look! These people centuries ago who didn't even know what fucking gravity is have the answers to how life was created and what happens in the after life! They're so smart! Lets all worship them and do whatever they say!" seriously, only a genuine moron thinks that way about religion.

That really annoyed me especially as somebody who's on the centre in the political compass and is an Anarchist, fucking close minded, I'm not the one going around declaring things as fact without having properly investigated it first for fucks sake, get a grip on yourself.

Speaking of aliens, how the fuck is somebody like you going to react if we really do find alien life? I'm not sure I'd want someone like you anywhere near them, stop acting like you know the answer to everything and use your brain for once, instead of trying to attack me when I just want to find out the truth of the matter instead of just go "God did it" and won't go along with your bullshit.

Hold on a minute, let's stay on topic:
Firstly, atheists cannot claim that there is a lack of evidence for the afterlife, and you (Lethn) cannot dampen my curiosity by telling me that I have no clue what I am talking about, your assertions are simply lacking in substance and evidence, and you have ignored arguments with real substance like the main ones I have put forward; here they are again:

Dr. Parnia's AWARE study is evidence that mind exists independent of brain, that awareness continues beyond its physical "container". You have no reason to say that I am making up the actual truth of the matter. What exactly am I making up?

It is more elegant and far easier to accept as a working hypothesis that sentience exists as a potential at the source of creation, and the strongest evidence has already been put on the table: Everything to be observed in the universe implies consciousness.

You assert that theists are making up the truth of the matter, but all that I have posted is sound conclusions based on observed evidence and also a reference to other eminent researchers and their educated opinions, with no substantial rebuttal from you.

Your arguments come from ignorance, you infer that I am wrong from the fact that it is not known to be true, but in this case it was documented, so what is your argument against this case study? Why don't you address the evidence?

I suggest you search for the evidence for these things; think clearly and intelligently assess the sources when presented. What is so disturbing about gathering information about NDEs to make your own conclusion? What is so disturbing about learning about possible alien communications or inspired communications of any variety? How are you expecting to learn the truth about the afterlife anyway? The evidence indicates that you can influence the hereafter in this life, it comes from study of NDEs which are spiritual voyages. Here is the evidence that refutes physicalism, it is here in this thread, so I believe this should impel atheists to become more open-minded about these topics.

Here is a valuable paper about how to evaluate the source of anomalous communication based on the content, the author presents a case study; I think it is a useful "field guide"; I also like A Field Guide to Critical Thinking by James Lett:
http://www.rivier.edu/faculty/pcunningham/research/problem_of_seths_origin.pdf

Please point to where I have said that in my post history.

So far, "life" is a supremely complex grouping of chemicals and energies that are acting and reacting on each other in ways that, if their reacting stops, it can't be started again... at least not by any method and means that we are even close to knowing.

Since we can barely reactivate life that is simply taking a "break" for a few moments, how are we ever going to see the complexities of life after death without even acknowledging it?

So you would also choose to ignore radio signals from aliens just like evidence for life after death?

There is no hope for a serious investment in studying spiritual activities. Why? Because there is no money in chasing ghosts.

Unless... Unless there is a strong feeling ghosts are responsible for Global Warming, and a need to tax the family members related to them...

THEN money will poor in...

OK, let's face the facts.
There are many things science can't explain yet and one is question who we are?
Just flash and bones or there is something more?
Religious people believe that we are not just simple physical body but also spirit.
There are so many ''life after death'' experiences that science just can't ignore it or deny it.
Talks with spirits? Spiritual visions? Dreams?
It's really time that science start serious research about this spiritual phenomena.

Welcome to bitcointalk.org

 

Bitcointalk full of Zweisteins.

There is more evidence for flat earth then life after death!

Much smart so intelligent