Time to stand up to the XT shills here! - page 11.

da2ce7

legendary

Activity: 1222

Merit: 1016

Live and Let Live

Quote from: HostFat on November 08, 2015, 12:30:45 PM

Again, he has never stopped working on Bitcoin, whenever it was Bitcoin XT or Bitcoin Core.

This part is quite true, he was working on Bitcoin Core, then switched to XT when his pull request was rejected:
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/6341

History of Gavin's Pull Requests for Bitcoin Core:
https://github.com/bitcoinxt/bitcoinxt/pulls?q=author%3Agavinandresen

You can see how the Bitcoin Core > Bitcoin XT > Bitcoin Core chronological fits quite nicely.

It also matches up very nicely with the aforementioned mailing list posts.

I want to make it clear that I'm not suggesting that Gavin is a *bad actor*, I'm just supplying evidence to support my claim that Bitcoin XT is considered a laughing stock from the Bitcoin Technical Community.

I do think that it is fair to suggest that Gavin was interested in Bitcoin XT more than Bitcoin Core for a period of time as Bitcoin XT accepted his BIP 101 pull requests.

dothebeats

legendary

Activity: 3542

Merit: 1352

Cashback 15%

Quote from: LiteCoinGuy on November 08, 2015, 06:22:20 AM

Quote from: Stringer Bell on November 08, 2015, 06:00:32 AM

Users "knight22" and "meono", and their ilk, don't posses any other skill they can use to earn a living.

So they must resort to shilling. Can you imagine dedicating your whole day to spreading lies?

What a pathetic existence they must live. When you look back on your life, will you feel proud for attempting to destroy one of the most positive developments mankind has ever seen?

maybe they just want a solution in the blocksize debate? maybe they just want bitcoin to succeed and scale?

hopefully the next 3 months will bring that solution.

@HostFat

good point. to be static at this stage means death.

Am also thinking of the same. Though I somehow feel that Hearn and Gavin's position as lead devs is somehow iffy, still bitcoin's block size limit shouldn't be static at all and just be changed when the problem is already there. Actually what they propose is great, it's just that the way they want to implement is, well, not that good imo.

StateOfAffairs

newbie

Activity: 16

Merit: 0

Forking bazstards! I don't quite understand the issue here, what are the shills going to achieve on a forum that's behind Bitcoin?

HostFat

staff

Activity: 4256

Merit: 1203

I support freedom of choice

Again, he has never stopped working on Bitcoin, whenever it was Bitcoin XT or Bitcoin Core.

You can go and check even on the pull request on Bitcoin Core.
Even while he wasn't adding code, he was checking the pull requests from the others.

They were a totally false statements from people that were trying to demolish his image the community.

Nothing has changed, you are just seeing the reality and thinking that something has changed, while it has not.

nicked

full member

Activity: 175

Merit: 100

I use this thread to decide which users to put on my ignore list.

da2ce7

legendary

Activity: 1222

Merit: 1016

Live and Let Live

Quote from: HostFat on November 08, 2015, 11:16:29 AM

Quote from: da2ce7 on November 08, 2015, 10:51:48 AM

The XT crew have made lowcows of themselves. Even Gavin has moved back to working on Bitcoin Core (on github).

He has never stopped.
All the claim from idiots that he was stopped developing on Bitcoin was pure shit Roll Eyes

Well there was a period where he directly contributed to Bitcoin XT, providing a total of 5 pull requests:
https://github.com/bitcoinxt/bitcoinxt/pulls?q=author%3Agavinandresen

For the same period, other than promoting his BIP 101, he was notably very quite on the Bitcoin Core github.

More recently he has become involved in many technical discussions over on the Bitcoin Core Github.

I think that you can track the change after this particular message to the mailing list:
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2015-September/011220.html

Instead of going the lolcow route (aka the one Mike Hearn took), Gavin has made a concerted effort to re-gain some trust in with the Bitcoin Development community.

Oh and if you are wondering what the 'lolcow' post was. Here it is:
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2015-September/011304.html

gambit1

hero member

Activity: 980

Merit: 508

I'll do it.

DOWN WITH BIGGER BLOCKS. DOWN WITH NODES AND XT AND GAVIN COWS!!! UP WITH SMALLER BLOCKS. KEEP THINGS THE SAME. cHANGE THINGS BUT KEEP THEM THE SAME.

DOWN WITH SHILLs!!!

Where's my cheque?

vodaljepa

hero member

Activity: 658

Merit: 500

We need an anti XT shill force

da2ce7

legendary

Activity: 1222

Merit: 1016

Live and Let Live

Quote from: gambit1 on November 08, 2015, 11:00:54 AM

Is that cow in your signature Gavin cause it looks like Fernando Torres.

It is actually Sacha Baron Cohen in his publicity event for the movie Brüno. Quite a fitting profile picture for this forum, I think.

hdbuck

legendary

Activity: 1260

Merit: 1002

Quote from: brg444 on November 08, 2015, 11:42:41 AM

Quote from: HostFat on November 08, 2015, 11:16:29 AM

Quote from: da2ce7 on November 08, 2015, 10:51:48 AM

The XT crew have made lowcows of themselves. Even Gavin has moved back to working on Bitcoin Core (on github).

He has never stopped.
All the claim from idiots that he was stopped developing on Bitcoin was pure shit Roll Eyes

Maybe all of you should get back to reality
http://forums.prohashing.com/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=650&p=2467

The altcoin post...

Someone should seriously ban you it's shame how desperate you are

yet another example of theymos' leniency.

great altcoin wet dreaming post, staff boy.

brg444

hero member

Activity: 644

Merit: 504

Bitcoin replaces central, not commercial, banks

Quote from: HostFat on November 08, 2015, 11:16:29 AM

Quote from: da2ce7 on November 08, 2015, 10:51:48 AM

The XT crew have made lowcows of themselves. Even Gavin has moved back to working on Bitcoin Core (on github).

He has never stopped.
All the claim from idiots that he was stopped developing on Bitcoin was pure shit Roll Eyes

Maybe all of you should get back to reality
http://forums.prohashing.com/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=650&p=2467

The altcoin post...

Someone should seriously ban you it's shame how desperate you are

HostFat

staff

Activity: 4256

Merit: 1203

I support freedom of choice

Quote from: da2ce7 on November 08, 2015, 10:51:48 AM

The XT crew have made lowcows of themselves. Even Gavin has moved back to working on Bitcoin Core (on github).

He has never stopped.
All the claim from idiots that he was stopped developing on Bitcoin was pure shit Roll Eyes

Maybe all of you should get back to reality
http://forums.prohashing.com/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=650&p=2467

gambit1

hero member

Activity: 980

Merit: 508

Is that cow in your signature Gavin cause it looks like Fernando Torres.

da2ce7

legendary

Activity: 1222

Merit: 1016

Live and Let Live

The XT crew have made lowcows of themselves. Even Gavin has moved back to working on Bitcoin Core (on github).

It is kinda funny seeing Coinbase come out in support for XT, since the entire technical community has moved on.

To make it short:

XT is treated as joke. (in the technical community).

Shocked

gambit1

hero member

Activity: 980

Merit: 508

I don't know that much about the topic; I feel like a newcomer to the Israel/Palestine conflict. I know some of the basics I suppose but the level of vitriol is amazing.

Who should I support? Also if anyone needs any "paid shills" my rates are quite reasonable Grin

. (That last part was a joke, I should probably point that out). Roll Eyes

Posum578

sr. member

Activity: 336

Merit: 250

The rise of block size to 2MB or higher is essential in the next two years to make bitcoin usable for most people and not to increase the transaction fee too much.

Denker

legendary

Activity: 1442

Merit: 1014

I agree that concerning the blocksize something has to happen. And I believe we will solve this issue.
But I will never support XT to achieve this. There are several other options and in december we will see it.
And I wonder why again the XT guys try to make trouble.Hearn isn't even going to HK and is acting like a small kid who doesn't get what he wants. That guy means pure trouble imo.

I say it again.Yes to blocksize increase as far as possible under the conditions that Bitcoin stays decentralized as much as possible.Go with 2 or 4 MB whatever.
But no to XT!!!!

Amph

legendary

Activity: 3206

Merit: 1069

Quote from: erre on November 08, 2015, 06:40:33 AM

Come on, XT is only a way to democratically and gradually increase block size . Maybe it is not the final or the best solution, but 7 tx per second is really too few yo imagine a working btc economy.... We need this to be resolved BEFORE it becomes an issue.

the proble is that xt pretend to add features that they think they are useful when they are clearly not, like that shit about the IP traceability

the problem is the limit? good, fix that only, don't touch anything else, this cna be implemented easily in core, without changing its name to fancy thing like XT/zeta/super ....

hdbuck

legendary

Activity: 1260

Merit: 1002

Quote from: erre on November 08, 2015, 06:40:33 AM

Come on, XT is only a way to democratically and gradually increase block size . Maybe it is not the final or the best solution, but 7 tx per second is really too few yo imagine a working btc economy.... We need this to be resolved BEFORE it becomes an issue.

erre

legendary

Activity: 1666

Merit: 1205

Come on, XT is only a way to democratically and gradually increase block size . Maybe it is not the final or the best solution, but 7 tx per second is really too few yo imagine a working btc economy.... We need this to be resolved BEFORE it becomes an issue.

Topic: Time to stand up to the XT shills here! - page 11. (Read 10601 times)