Manchester United are in need of a defensive midfielder, we know that they have Casemiro, but they can't always rely on Casemiro alone, because when he is absent or out of form, their weaknesses are very visible. Their other midfielders are more attack-minded and that's a problem when they need a defensive midfielder who can cut out the opposition from midfield.
It's a good signing and I think it suits their needs, yes even though we know that in some positions they don't look fully ready either.
Amrabat status is quite important and indeed Manchester United need to anticipate when Casemiro is absent, at least if you look at the statistics between Casemiro and Amrabat there is not much difference in their defense which is quite promising. But the focus on sharp attackers until now we can't have high hopes, let alone Hojlund can't guarantee recovery in a short time. It's a shame that mainstay defender Erik Ten Hag is still out for a long time due to injury. If Martinez recovers, maybe the back line can be more solid.
Many people are seeing Amrabat as a replacement or backup of Casemiro. This is not how I .seeing it. U less Erik 10 is seeing differently from me and allign with what majority is saying. I do think that both Casemiro and Amrabat may be starting simultaneously for Manchester United which will not be a bad gesture. This will enable Bruno to help attack without having to return to defence every now and then. Amrabat is a faithful fellow and his presence in the Manchester United squad will make a big difference.
Yes, it is very possible, so they can focus more on defense, because if you look at the ability, Casemiro actually has good attacking abilities, it's just not as good as his role as a defensive midfielder. This kind of rotation in a match would be very likely, and it's possible that Erik Ten Hag could give one of these two players a new role if they are deployed together.
But if that happens there may have to be a sacrifice, or they may change their defensive line slightly.
Sevilla team is relatively ahead of other teams in terms of performance. I would think that Sevilla do not have the type of players that PSG have, yet this team is still able to outshine PSG.
The question is since when sevilla was in the same group as PSG? Did you watch the UCL draw or what? You were saying a nonsense thing. You had no idea about the current placement of Sevilla.. What you have said above was totally non sense thing that will never happen. Im sure that you don't even know which teams have been playing in the same group as sevilla. PSG was not in the same group as sevilla.
How can you say that if PSG will outshine PSG? What a non sense thing. You can at least watch the result from the draw. It will give you at least a small knowledge about that.
It's uncertain whether you're aware of the PSG group placement.
Patience my friend, maybe he meant PSV not PSG, I can still tolerate it because of the difference of one letter.
A little reminder, Sevilla will be in group B with Arsenal, PSV and Lens. While PSG will be in group F which we call the hell group joined by Borussia Dortmund, AC MIlan and Newcastle.
But I also disagree that Sevilla are better than PSV now, aren't we sure to see their performance lately? And lately Sevilla's performance is far from what is expected, they won 3 consecutive defeats from their first 3 matches in La Liga. While PSV they managed to sweep 3 wins in their first 3 matches in the Eredivisie.