Guardiola's strategy in the final may be questioned a lot because it looks different from before until reaching the final.
City would not win the UCL unless Pep stops thinking too much in the most important games of the competition, like the final yesterday, there was absolutely no reason not to stick with the team set-up that they have been using right from the group stage, I don't think I've watched a City match this season were they started without a defensive midfielder, but Pep chose to do so in the final, it's unacceptable to be honest, and Pep can take quite a lot of blame for city's failures last night.With Manchester City's achievements and performance while Guardiola was coach, it was indeed extraordinary, so it is not wise for
Manchester City's failure to blame Guardiola. Chelsea managed to beat Man City in the final was a little lucky, and not because of
Guardiola's bad strategy. If we look at the match statistics of the two teams are almost the same, this proves that both teams do have
the same chance of winning. But Chelsea players are a little better off taking the opportunity to become a goal.
Yes indeed that is characteristic of Chelsea when playing, they rely on counterattacks through the speed of the players they did the same thing to Barcelona a few years ago and won. I'm not sure Pep forgot about that he must have prepared something for it just that we didn't see in the last match. I think there is something that has not been issued by Pep.
