Topic: [Ultracoin] [Est. Feb 2014] ~ ASIC Resistant & Ultrafast 6 Second Transactions! - page 154. (Read 381060 times)
March 01, 2015, 05:59:49 AM
Marketcap is horrible! And volume! Couldn't u get a bitcoin mag or website to do an article on a year of UTC or something. My investment is worth nothing now! Why not do new wallet giveaways etc etc. Has our community leader lost interest?
February 28, 2015, 08:27:09 AM
can u guys help to set config file to mine with an AMD 5500 HD series in YACMiner ?
we need your GPU-Ram size, your pool-worker Logindata and your gpu-versionhttp://ht4u.net/reviews/2010/amd_ati_radeon_hd5550_roundup/index2.php
February 28, 2015, 07:23:16 AM
can u guys help to set config file to mine with an AMD 5500 HD series in YACMiner ?
February 27, 2015, 11:40:01 AM
Who makes no loss with mining? And if yes, how many hash/watt do you have? My value is 23.125Hash/Watt and I make loss.
Quote
•Difficulty retarget over 10 blocks (Max 8% Up, 16% Down)
is this property still active? For weeks we have larger fluctuations than 8% over 10 Blocks. Up to 125% and more. (example: yacminer 550diff -> 1300diff in 10 blocks)It's -16%/+8% per block, not every 10 blocks, so a max cumulative adjustment of 441% down over 10 blocks or 185% up over 10 blocks is possible.
February 27, 2015, 06:46:07 AM
Who makes no loss with mining? And if yes, how many hash/watt do you have? My value is 23.125Hash/Watt and I make loss.
freeze trading is how? Quote
•Difficulty retarget over 10 blocks (Max 8% Up, 16% Down)
is this property still active? For weeks we have larger fluctuations than 8% over 10 Blocks. Up to 125% and more. (example: yacminer 550diff -> 1300diff in 10 blocks)
February 27, 2015, 02:34:37 AM
Who makes no loss with mining? And if yes, how many hash/watt do you have? My value is 23.125Hash/Watt and I make loss.
Quote
•Difficulty retarget over 10 blocks (Max 8% Up, 16% Down)
is this property still active? For weeks we have larger fluctuations than 8% over 10 Blocks. Up to 125% and more. (example: yacminer 550diff -> 1300diff in 10 blocks) February 26, 2015, 06:18:43 AM
... two weeks of 130% luck are not normal! ....
As an NOOB 130% luck for 2 weeks would be awesome for me
It's the other way around - 130% is bad luck - 80% for example is good luck
February 26, 2015, 05:55:41 AM
... two weeks of 130% luck are not normal! ....
As an NOOB 130% luck for 2 weeks would be awesome for me
February 25, 2015, 11:11:15 PM
Still have UTC coins and keychains forsale!
Only $2USD each! pay in UTC, BTC, LTC, Doge!
I have a bunch currently in stock. Get a nice piece of Crypto Memorabilia to display to friends!
http://www.cryptomemorabilia.com/product-category/utcmem/
collector coin
keychain
-Brian Gleason
Only $2USD each! pay in UTC, BTC, LTC, Doge!
I have a bunch currently in stock. Get a nice piece of Crypto Memorabilia to display to friends!
http://www.cryptomemorabilia.com/product-category/utcmem/
collector coin
keychain
-Brian Gleason
February 25, 2015, 12:54:39 PM
Hello .
ultrablockparty : last 24 hours : 362 valid blocks found - 164 KH/s
utc.tumblingblock : last 24 hours : 256 valid blocks found - 168 KH/s
utc2.tumblingblock : last 24 hours : 864 valid blocks found - 494 KH/s
Hashrates 3 pools: 164 + 168 + 494 = 826 (KH/s)
Blocks found (24 hours) : 362 + 256 + 864 = 1482 (blocks)
utc2.tumblingblock hashrate : 494 / 826 = 59.8%
utc2.tumblingblock found block : 864 / 1482 = 58.2%
59.8% hashrate vs 58.2% blocks found . I see that is normal .
I can't solo . I don't know how create pool.
ultrablockparty : last 24 hours : 362 valid blocks found - 164 KH/s
utc.tumblingblock : last 24 hours : 256 valid blocks found - 168 KH/s
utc2.tumblingblock : last 24 hours : 864 valid blocks found - 494 KH/s
Hashrates 3 pools: 164 + 168 + 494 = 826 (KH/s)
Blocks found (24 hours) : 362 + 256 + 864 = 1482 (blocks)
utc2.tumblingblock hashrate : 494 / 826 = 59.8%
utc2.tumblingblock found block : 864 / 1482 = 58.2%
59.8% hashrate vs 58.2% blocks found . I see that is normal .
I can't solo . I don't know how create pool.
No one is currently using the anonymous UTC pool if you want to try it out. Port 4242 is static diff 1.
-o stratum+tcp://pool.ultracoin.net:4242 -O
Does the anonymous pool pay out like a P2P pool with your portion of reward payment send to your address on every found block?
It is a NOMP pool. Every block found pays out. Nothing stays in the wallet after the block matures. You find it and 70 blocks later you get a payout.
February 25, 2015, 12:50:38 PM
I have been noticing something weird about this hieu1010 too.
Whenever he is in the pool luck goes down 20-30%
Last two days he was gone and luck was even below 100%, but before that and now that he is back on the pool luck has staidly gone bad again!!!
Now Kracko is going to say that this is normal, but two weeks of 130% luck are not normal!
Whenever he is in the pool luck goes down 20-30%
Last two days he was gone and luck was even below 100%, but before that and now that he is back on the pool luck has staidly gone bad again!!!
Now Kracko is going to say that this is normal, but two weeks of 130% luck are not normal!
Things have been weird for the last 2-3 weeks without any change to the pools or the wallet. I haven't had time to run it down because I've been focusing on the wallet and the OneClick app.
utc.tumblingblock.com is disconnected frequently . Ultrablockparty hasn't static diff. If share diff below 1, cgminer gets HW errors . I don't know where to go.
Ultrablockparty has a static diff of 1 on port 5555.
February 25, 2015, 12:48:56 PM
I'm downloading the new wallet, I guess that as a troll, my opinion will be ULTRA important, and might double the price if positive .... 
Well its not bad, not at all:
+ Loads much faster
+ Uses less CPU power (still havent tested it extensivly)
+ Userfriendly GUI
+ with NF16 coming the mining function might be of use too
- I don't like the colors
- I see some text overlaying issues
So, good job Kracko, who did you pay to do it for you
JK
Well its not bad, not at all:
+ Loads much faster
+ Uses less CPU power (still havent tested it extensivly)
+ Userfriendly GUI
+ with NF16 coming the mining function might be of use too
- I don't like the colors
- I see some text overlaying issues
So, good job Kracko, who did you pay to do it for you
JK 
February 25, 2015, 12:43:43 PM
Hello .
ultrablockparty : last 24 hours : 362 valid blocks found - 164 KH/s
utc.tumblingblock : last 24 hours : 256 valid blocks found - 168 KH/s
utc2.tumblingblock : last 24 hours : 864 valid blocks found - 494 KH/s
Hashrates 3 pools: 164 + 168 + 494 = 826 (KH/s)
Blocks found (24 hours) : 362 + 256 + 864 = 1482 (blocks)
utc2.tumblingblock hashrate : 494 / 826 = 59.8%
utc2.tumblingblock found block : 864 / 1482 = 58.2%
59.8% hashrate vs 58.2% blocks found . I see that is normal .
I can't solo . I don't know how create pool.
ultrablockparty : last 24 hours : 362 valid blocks found - 164 KH/s
utc.tumblingblock : last 24 hours : 256 valid blocks found - 168 KH/s
utc2.tumblingblock : last 24 hours : 864 valid blocks found - 494 KH/s
Hashrates 3 pools: 164 + 168 + 494 = 826 (KH/s)
Blocks found (24 hours) : 362 + 256 + 864 = 1482 (blocks)
utc2.tumblingblock hashrate : 494 / 826 = 59.8%
utc2.tumblingblock found block : 864 / 1482 = 58.2%
59.8% hashrate vs 58.2% blocks found . I see that is normal .
I can't solo . I don't know how create pool.
No one is currently using the anonymous UTC pool if you want to try it out. Port 4242 is static diff 1.
-o stratum+tcp://pool.ultracoin.net:4242 -O
Does the anonymous pool pay out like a P2P pool with your portion of reward payment send to your address on every found block?
February 25, 2015, 12:34:31 PM
Hello .
ultrablockparty : last 24 hours : 362 valid blocks found - 164 KH/s
utc.tumblingblock : last 24 hours : 256 valid blocks found - 168 KH/s
utc2.tumblingblock : last 24 hours : 864 valid blocks found - 494 KH/s
Hashrates 3 pools: 164 + 168 + 494 = 826 (KH/s)
Blocks found (24 hours) : 362 + 256 + 864 = 1482 (blocks)
utc2.tumblingblock hashrate : 494 / 826 = 59.8%
utc2.tumblingblock found block : 864 / 1482 = 58.2%
59.8% hashrate vs 58.2% blocks found . I see that is normal .
I can't solo . I don't know how create pool.
ultrablockparty : last 24 hours : 362 valid blocks found - 164 KH/s
utc.tumblingblock : last 24 hours : 256 valid blocks found - 168 KH/s
utc2.tumblingblock : last 24 hours : 864 valid blocks found - 494 KH/s
Hashrates 3 pools: 164 + 168 + 494 = 826 (KH/s)
Blocks found (24 hours) : 362 + 256 + 864 = 1482 (blocks)
utc2.tumblingblock hashrate : 494 / 826 = 59.8%
utc2.tumblingblock found block : 864 / 1482 = 58.2%
59.8% hashrate vs 58.2% blocks found . I see that is normal .
I can't solo . I don't know how create pool.
No one is currently using the anonymous UTC pool if you want to try it out. Port 4242 is static diff 1.
-o stratum+tcp://pool.ultracoin.net:4242 -O
February 25, 2015, 11:39:05 AM
@hieu1010
Hashrate is calculated on the basis of how many blocks are solved per time, so basically you are calculating air.
@MemberCount+1
Hashrate is not the problem! I am around 140kH/s and yesterday when I was in the pool everything was OK, but as soon as hieu1010 came back luck dropped 20%.
hieu1010 is not a noob, so I guess he knows what he is doing, and he might doing it on purpose to get more reward, IDK what, why and how but he is messing up the pool. It might be a coincidence but I notice that almost all the blocks that he solves are "GREEN", and leaves the "RED" once for us.
If you want to proove me wrong, switch to http://utc.tumblingblock.com for a few hours and lets see what happens?!!
Hashrate is calculated on the basis of how many blocks are solved per time, so basically you are calculating air.
@MemberCount+1
Hashrate is not the problem! I am around 140kH/s and yesterday when I was in the pool everything was OK, but as soon as hieu1010 came back luck dropped 20%.
hieu1010 is not a noob, so I guess he knows what he is doing, and he might doing it on purpose to get more reward, IDK what, why and how but he is messing up the pool. It might be a coincidence but I notice that almost all the blocks that he solves are "GREEN", and leaves the "RED" once for us.
If you want to proove me wrong, switch to http://utc.tumblingblock.com for a few hours and lets see what happens?!!
i agree with you.
@hieu1010 can you split your mining-farm into 2 pool-accounts? (~70kHashes) I think "Stalin" with his hashpower is for the pool no problem. By the way.... How many cards do you have?
February 25, 2015, 11:24:23 AM
utc.tumblingblock.com is disconnected frequently . Ultrablockparty hasn't static diff. If share diff below 1, cgminer gets HW errors . I don't know where to go.
February 25, 2015, 11:03:16 AM
@hieu1010
Hashrate is calculated on the basis of how many blocks are solved per time, so basically you are calculating air.
@MemberCount+1
Hashrate is not the problem! I am around 140kH/s and yesterday when I was in the pool everything was OK, but as soon as hieu1010 came back luck dropped 20%.
hieu1010 is not a noob, so I guess he knows what he is doing, and he might doing it on purpose to get more reward, IDK what, why and how but he is messing up the pool. It might be a coincidence but I notice that almost all the blocks that he solves are "GREEN", and leaves the "RED" once for us.
If you want to proove me wrong, switch to http://utc.tumblingblock.com for a few hours and lets see what happens?!!
Hashrate is calculated on the basis of how many blocks are solved per time, so basically you are calculating air.
@MemberCount+1
Hashrate is not the problem! I am around 140kH/s and yesterday when I was in the pool everything was OK, but as soon as hieu1010 came back luck dropped 20%.
hieu1010 is not a noob, so I guess he knows what he is doing, and he might doing it on purpose to get more reward, IDK what, why and how but he is messing up the pool. It might be a coincidence but I notice that almost all the blocks that he solves are "GREEN", and leaves the "RED" once for us.
If you want to proove me wrong, switch to http://utc.tumblingblock.com for a few hours and lets see what happens?!!
February 25, 2015, 10:16:37 AM
Hello .
ultrablockparty : last 24 hours : 362 valid blocks found - 164 KH/s
utc.tumblingblock : last 24 hours : 256 valid blocks found - 168 KH/s
utc2.tumblingblock : last 24 hours : 864 valid blocks found - 494 KH/s
Hashrates 3 pools: 164 + 168 + 494 = 826 (KH/s)
Blocks found (24 hours) : 362 + 256 + 864 = 1482 (blocks)
utc2.tumblingblock hashrate : 494 / 826 = 59.8%
utc2.tumblingblock found block : 864 / 1482 = 58.2%
59.8% hashrate vs 58.2% blocks found . I see that is normal .
I can't solo . I don't know how create pool.
ultrablockparty : last 24 hours : 362 valid blocks found - 164 KH/s
utc.tumblingblock : last 24 hours : 256 valid blocks found - 168 KH/s
utc2.tumblingblock : last 24 hours : 864 valid blocks found - 494 KH/s
Hashrates 3 pools: 164 + 168 + 494 = 826 (KH/s)
Blocks found (24 hours) : 362 + 256 + 864 = 1482 (blocks)
utc2.tumblingblock hashrate : 494 / 826 = 59.8%
utc2.tumblingblock found block : 864 / 1482 = 58.2%
59.8% hashrate vs 58.2% blocks found . I see that is normal .
I can't solo . I don't know how create pool.
February 25, 2015, 09:26:15 AM
I review my founded blocks for this pool with the result that all "my" blocks in the last days assign to user hieu1010. 
At least this should be controlled. (display errors etc?) I mine scrypt-chacha/jane arround 2 years, I'm not a newbee. An idea of my side, a restriction of Hashpower per mineraccount (not worker). 140KHash is enough for utc-solomining.
many greetings from saxony
hmm, Supplement ...
over 10min without a block ... whats going on?
... ah ok next block ... *uff*
At least this should be controlled. (display errors etc?) I mine scrypt-chacha/jane arround 2 years, I'm not a newbee. An idea of my side, a restriction of Hashpower per mineraccount (not worker). 140KHash is enough for utc-solomining. many greetings from saxony
hmm, Supplement ...
over 10min without a block ... whats going on?
... ah ok next block ... *uff*
February 25, 2015, 08:11:56 AM
I have been noticing something weird about this hieu1010 too.
Whenever he is in the pool luck goes down 20-30%
Last two days he was gone and luck was even below 100%, but before that and now that he is back on the pool luck has staidly gone bad again!!!
Now Kracko is going to say that this is normal, but two weeks of 130% luck are not normal!
Whenever he is in the pool luck goes down 20-30%
Last two days he was gone and luck was even below 100%, but before that and now that he is back on the pool luck has staidly gone bad again!!!
Now Kracko is going to say that this is normal, but two weeks of 130% luck are not normal!
Jump to: