I'm not completely sure if I even understand the official unofficial rules. In my humble opinion, it seems as though they were not well thought out.
The interpreted definition of spam and trolling is incorrect in the OP. It also doesn't sound very professional to post documents of someone without their consent. That's a breach of privacy. For example, if you repost a photo from someone's Facebook, that's fine because they clearly don't mind sharing their photos as long as it is a public Facebook. Anything that is set private, but posted publicly is a breach of privacy.
I'm not completely sure if I even understand the official unofficial rules.
Unofficial list, as in not made by the admin. Official rules, as in rules that apply in Bitcointalk.
Also, see notice on top of the thread:
In my humble opinion, it seems as though they were not well thought out
These rules were gathered by me from various, sticky threads, advice from administrators and other moderators and my experience as a Bitcointalk moderator.
The interpreted definition of spam and trolling is incorrect in the OP
There is no incorrect definition. It's the definition that applies here (not everywhere in the internet), in Bitcointalk.
It also doesn't sound very professional to post documents of someone without their consent. That's a breach of privacy. For example, if you repost a photo from someone's Facebook, that's fine because they clearly don't mind sharing their photos as long as it is a public Facebook. Anything that is set private, but posted publicly is a breach of privacy.
Q: What about deleting DOXes?
A: Nope, we don't delete them either as long as they are on topic and the information can be obtained legally (no SSNs for example). Why? Because such doxing is just compiling information about a user already available publicly, often via search engines.
