Hello
I have been searching all over trying to find a answer for a issue with my sp10. I know this is a sp20 thread but thought i would try here.
I am having a error come up similar as to another post on here. My cgminer is not running. My asic page looks like this
Uptime:1 | FPGA ver:62
-----BOARD-0-----
PSU[UNKNOWN]: 0->(0w/0w)[0 0 0] (->0w[0 0 0]) (lim=288) 0c 0GH cooling:0/0x0
-----BOARD-1-----
PSU[NEW-MURATA]: 0->(0w/0w)[0 0 0] (->0w[0 0 0]) (lim=288) 0c 0GH cooling:0/0x0
-----BOARD-2-----
PSU[UNKNOWN]: 0->(0w/0w)[0 0 0] (->0w[0 0 0]) (lim=288) 0c 0GH cooling:0/0x0
-----BOARD-3-----
PSU[UNKNOWN]: 0->(0w/0w)[0 0 0] (->0w[0 0 0]) (lim=288) 0c 0GH cooling:0/0x0
LOOP[0] OFF TO:0 ((null))
0: disabled ((null))
1: disabled ((null))
LOOP[1] OFF TO:0 ((null))
2: disabled ((null))
3: disabled ((null))
LOOP[2] OFF TO:0 ((null))
4: disabled ((null))
5: disabled ((null))
LOOP[3] OFF TO:0 ((null))
6: disabled ((null))
7: disabled ((null))
[H:HW:0Gh (500),W:0,L:0,A:0,MMtmp:0 TMP:(25)=>=>=>(0,0)]
Pushed 0 jobs , in HW queue 4 jobs (sw:0, hw:0)!
min:0 wins:0[this/last min:0/0] bist-fail:0, hw-err:0
leading-zeroes:0 idle promils[s/m]:0/0, rate:0gh/s asic-count:0 (wins:0+0)
Fan:0, conseq:0
AC2DC BAD: 0 0
R/NR: 0/0
RTF asics: 0
FET: 0:250 1:250
0 restarted 0 reset 0 reset2 0 fake_wins
0 stuck_bist 0 low_power 0 stuck_pll 0 runtime_dsble
0 purge_queue 0 read_timeouts 0 dc2dc_i2c 0 read_tmout2 0 read_crptn
0 purge_queue3 0 bad_idle
0 err_murata
No Adapter
I had to do a reboot of the machine with a SD card as it was sitting for about 6 months
Any help would be great. Thanks
Topic: Unofficial Spondoolies SP20 thread - page 4. (Read 126242 times)
The SP20s were amazing units, probably the most quality miner we've ever had or will have considering all factors like build quality, case, reliability, scalability, ect. Picking them up for $330 each, shipped, one year ago was probably the smartest move I've ever made with mining. I had to go into debt to get the $15,000 for the deal, and I normally would never do this and strongly advise against it. But this time it worked out big time.
Whats always been crazy to me is if they had stated the stock mining speed as something like 800Ghs with the ability to do extreme overclocking they could have advertised a 0.35W/Ghs or so efficiency. Considering that a Bitmain S7 gets 0.25-0.30W/Ghs it makes the SP20 way ahead of its time. Also consider the fact that you could have bought 5 SP20 units for $1,660 a year ago and run them at 800Ghs, for a total of 4,000Ghs at an efficiency equal to an Avalon 6 and almost to a S7, and you have it right there.
I think these SP20s were sold at a loss or so I heard. It explains why they never did another batch despite demand. They still go for over $400 each on the open market, and for good reason. These things run like tanks and failure rate is almost non existent. I can't say enough about the quality of these units and Im sad to say I don't think spondoolies can or will ever follow up with a miner of this quality at a competitive price in this market. I would LOVE for them to prove me wrong though.
Whats always been crazy to me is if they had stated the stock mining speed as something like 800Ghs with the ability to do extreme overclocking they could have advertised a 0.35W/Ghs or so efficiency. Considering that a Bitmain S7 gets 0.25-0.30W/Ghs it makes the SP20 way ahead of its time. Also consider the fact that you could have bought 5 SP20 units for $1,660 a year ago and run them at 800Ghs, for a total of 4,000Ghs at an efficiency equal to an Avalon 6 and almost to a S7, and you have it right there.
I think these SP20s were sold at a loss or so I heard. It explains why they never did another batch despite demand. They still go for over $400 each on the open market, and for good reason. These things run like tanks and failure rate is almost non existent. I can't say enough about the quality of these units and Im sad to say I don't think spondoolies can or will ever follow up with a miner of this quality at a competitive price in this market. I would LOVE for them to prove me wrong though.
Totally agree with the above. Over engineered and the best software interface of any miner. Very flexible to configure.
The ability to adjust the applied voltage was key for me:
1) If I needed a PS, I adjusted the voltage to about 0.63V and ran 2 on one 1200w PS.
2) During the summer, in an uncooled, ventilated desert garage, I ran them at 1,000 Ghs each at high fan speed and kept the chips below 125C
Will be interesting to see how low they can be undervolted.
Whats always been crazy to me is if they had stated the stock mining speed as something like 800Ghs with the ability to do extreme overclocking they could have advertised a 0.35W/Ghs or so efficiency. Considering that a Bitmain S7 gets 0.25-0.30W/Ghs it makes the SP20 way ahead of its time.
I've never seen that high of efficiency out of my SP20, 0.45w/GH seems to be about the limit (818 Mh/s using 370 watts, 0.452w/GH at .59 v to be picky, my unit does NOT run reliably at any lower undervolt).
Still the best of it's generation, just too bad they pushed the "high hashrate" side over the "high efficiency" side on their marketing.
I just wish I'd had the money to buy them when they were cheap.
8-(
How many people are still running the SP20? Love them but need more efficient models
I'm still running 4 of them. Just this morning a power outage caused one of them to lose the web interface when the power returned (but it was still mining at the pool perfectly and was still accessible via SSH). I didn't find the solution here even though I searched for it. I did manage to fix it myself, so I'm dropping off the solution for it in case anyone else encounters this. My instructions are for Linux so Windows users will need to translate them into something usable on Windows.
The problem (lost web interface) is most likely caused by a corrupt/missing /etc/lighttpd/lighttpd.conf file (mine was empty) causing the lighttpd to fail to start.
In my case I had three other working SP20s so I used scp to grab the file from another SP20 (replace x.x.x.x with the IP address of your good SP20):
Code:
scp [email protected]:/etc/lighttpd/lighttpd.conf ./Desktop
After verifying you got the correct file from a good SP20, send it to the broken SP20 (replace x.x.x.x with the IP address of the broken SP20):
Code:
scp ./Desktop/lighttpd.conf [email protected]:/etc/lighttpd/lighttpd.conf
Then SSH into the broken SP20 and start lighttpd (replace x.x.x.x with the IP address of the broken SP20):
Code:
The web interface should be working again.
^^ Troll? ^^
Yeah, I fed the troll...Big time...But my post was still just as informative and relevant. Right?
Yeah, I fed the troll...Big time...But my post was still just as informative and relevant. Right?
How many people are still running the SP20? Love them but need more efficient models
I got four running at my home.
They are nice hardware to play with.
I think you must have the Watts and GH ratio switched. Using the 2.2 W/GH and 850 GH, that would mean a power draw of well over 1800 Watts. That just makes zero sense for an SP20. At 850 GH, what is the power draw in watts?
Is it possible that it's really 2.2 GH/W?
Right now I am running the SP20 at 0.6V, with 100W Max PSU Power per Unit. The stats are 850GH/s and 375W @ Wall.
If I set the voltage or power any lower, I see that the SP20 will not start mining. Is there any other setting that I am missing.
You are right, must double check. It's 2.2GH/s per watt at the wall.
BTW, is there any way to get to 3GH/s per watt with the SP20?
The best you could get from an SP20 was around 0.33W/Ghs as I've always calculated it, and most I've seen calculate it as well. That might not be at the wall though. Im not sure how many ways we can do this but if you are getting 750Ghs, and you expend 250W, your usage is 0.33W/Ghs.
I guess that's 3Ghs per Watt. So the math were using is the same just expressed in different forms. I think mine is more commonly used is all.
I might be overestimating this SP20 efficiency by a little now that I think about it. I get cheap power so I never went that low besides just to see what they could do. I think the best you could get was something like 0.35w/Ghs which brought your speed down to 700-800Ghs or so. The problem with that is unless you have absurd power prices your better off bumping it up to 1,100-1,200Ghs which was about 0.6W/Ghs, basically matching the S5 pound for pound.
How many people are still running the SP20? Love them but need more efficient models
I got four running at my home.
They are nice hardware to play with.
I think you must have the Watts and GH ratio switched. Using the 2.2 W/GH and 850 GH, that would mean a power draw of well over 1800 Watts. That just makes zero sense for an SP20. At 850 GH, what is the power draw in watts?
Is it possible that it's really 2.2 GH/W?
You are right, must double check. It's 2.2GH/s per watt at the wall.
BTW, is there any way to get to 3GH/s per watt with the SP20?
The best you could get from an SP20 was around 0.33W/Ghs as I've always calculated it, and most I've seen calculate it as well. That might not be at the wall though. Im not sure how many ways we can do this but if you are getting 750Ghs, and you expend 250W, your usage is 0.33W/Ghs.
I guess that's 3Ghs per Watt. So the math were using is the same just expressed in different forms. I think mine is more commonly used is all.
I might be overestimating this SP20 efficiency by a little now that I think about it. I get cheap power so I never went that low besides just to see what they could do. I think the best you could get was something like 0.35w/Ghs which brought your speed down to 700-800Ghs or so. The problem with that is unless you have absurd power prices your better off bumping it up to 1,100-1,200Ghs which was about 0.6W/Ghs, basically matching the S5 pound for pound.
How many people are still running the SP20? Love them but need more efficient models
I got four running at my home.
They are nice hardware to play with.
I think you must have the Watts and GH ratio switched. Using the 2.2 W/GH and 850 GH, that would mean a power draw of well over 1800 Watts. That just makes zero sense for an SP20. At 850 GH, what is the power draw in watts?
Is it possible that it's really 2.2 GH/W?
You are right, must double check. It's 2.2GH/s per watt at the wall.
BTW, is there any way to get to 3GH/s per watt with the SP20?
How many people are still running the SP20? Love them but need more efficient models
I got four running at my home.
They are nice hardware to play with.
It can't be 2w per gh
you mean 0.22w per gh ?
The SP20s were amazing units, probably the most quality miner we've ever had or will have considering all factors like build quality, case, reliability, scalability, ect. Picking them up for $330 each, shipped, one year ago was probably the smartest move I've ever made with mining. I had to go into debt to get the $15,000 for the deal, and I normally would never do this and strongly advise against it. But this time it worked out big time.
Whats always been crazy to me is if they had stated the stock mining speed as something like 800Ghs with the ability to do extreme overclocking they could have advertised a 0.35W/Ghs or so efficiency. Considering that a Bitmain S7 gets 0.25-0.30W/Ghs it makes the SP20 way ahead of its time. Also consider the fact that you could have bought 5 SP20 units for $1,660 a year ago and run them at 800Ghs, for a total of 4,000Ghs at an efficiency equal to an Avalon 6 and almost to a S7, and you have it right there.
I think these SP20s were sold at a loss or so I heard. It explains why they never did another batch despite demand. They still go for over $400 each on the open market, and for good reason. These things run like tanks and failure rate is almost non existent. I can't say enough about the quality of these units and Im sad to say I don't think spondoolies can or will ever follow up with a miner of this quality at a competitive price in this market. I would LOVE for them to prove me wrong though.
Whats always been crazy to me is if they had stated the stock mining speed as something like 800Ghs with the ability to do extreme overclocking they could have advertised a 0.35W/Ghs or so efficiency. Considering that a Bitmain S7 gets 0.25-0.30W/Ghs it makes the SP20 way ahead of its time. Also consider the fact that you could have bought 5 SP20 units for $1,660 a year ago and run them at 800Ghs, for a total of 4,000Ghs at an efficiency equal to an Avalon 6 and almost to a S7, and you have it right there.
I think these SP20s were sold at a loss or so I heard. It explains why they never did another batch despite demand. They still go for over $400 each on the open market, and for good reason. These things run like tanks and failure rate is almost non existent. I can't say enough about the quality of these units and Im sad to say I don't think spondoolies can or will ever follow up with a miner of this quality at a competitive price in this market. I would LOVE for them to prove me wrong though.
How many people are still running the SP20? Love them but need more efficient models
Still sp20 is a great machine, only issue is that it draws to much power.
Depends on how hard you push it, it can be MORE efficient than an S5 if you undervolt it enough - but then the hashrate drops to S5 territory or less.
2.2 GHs/watt sounds reasonable for a Sp20 undervolted to .605 or so.
Mine did 864GH at .600 volts / 400 wall watts or 1038GH / .610v / 507 ww during my early testing of it on a Seasonic X-1250 (Gold) PS.
Currently pushing around 1450 Ghs / 0.670 / 900ish watts (I've got the power limits set a bit lower on 2 of the loops that tend to run hotter).
How many people are still running the SP20? Love them but need more efficient models
I got four running at my home.
They are nice hardware to play with.
I think you must have the Watts and GH ratio switched. Using the 2.2 W/GH and 850 GH, that would mean a power draw of well over 1800 Watts. That just makes zero sense for an SP20. At 850 GH, what is the power draw in watts?
Is it possible that it's really 2.2 GH/W?
How many people are still running the SP20? Love them but need more efficient models
I got four running at my home.
They are nice hardware to play with.
It can't be 2w per gh
you mean 0.22w per gh ?
How many people are still running the SP20? Love them but need more efficient models
I got four running at my home.
They are nice hardware to play with.
edit: corrected the efficiency
How many people are still running the SP20? Love them but need more efficient models
I got four running at my home.
They are nice hardware to play with.
How many people are still running the SP20? Love them but need more efficient models
sold mine,
Was dooing 1.6thz at around 1350w , now using antminer s5s only.
Still sp20 is a great machine, only issue is that it draws to much power.
How many people are still running the SP20? Love them but need more efficient models
Did you tried another PSU ?
I'm no expert, this looks strange :
Dec 9 20:03:16 miner local1.warn minergate[527]: i2c read word 0x0 0x88 error8
Dec 9 20:03:16 miner local1.warn minergate[527]: INPUT VOLTAGE=0
I2c read error and no voltage
I'm no expert, this looks strange :
Dec 9 20:03:16 miner local1.warn minergate[527]: i2c read word 0x0 0x88 error8
Dec 9 20:03:16 miner local1.warn minergate[527]: INPUT VOLTAGE=0
I2c read error and no voltage
Check the log , your answer is probably there
Dec 9 20:03:16 miner local1.warn minergate[527]: i2c read word 0x0 0x88 error8
Dec 9 20:03:16 miner local1.warn minergate[527]: INPUT VOLTAGE=0
Dec 9 20:03:16 miner local1.warn minergate[527]: DISCOVERING AC2DC 2
Dec 9 20:03:16 miner user.notice root: /etc/init.d/S99watchdog start
Dec 9 20:03:16 miner local1.warn minergate[527]: STACK:
Dec 9 20:03:16 miner local1.warn minergate[527]: /usr/local/bin/miner_gate_arm(_Z11print_stackv+0x44) [0x36c84]
Dec 9 20:03:16 miner local1.warn minergate[527]: /usr/local/bin/miner_gate_arm(_Z13i2c_read_wordhhPii+0x194) [0x286b8]
Dec 9 20:03:16 miner local1.warn minergate[527]: /usr/local/bin/miner_gate_arm(_Z14ac2dc_init_oneP5AC2DCi+0x54) [0x191dc]
Dec 9 20:03:16 miner local1.warn minergate[527]: /usr/local/bin/miner_gate_arm(_Z10ac2dc_initv+0xbc) [0x194f0]
Dec 9 20:03:16 miner local1.warn minergate[527]: /usr/local/bin/miner_gate_arm(main+0x1d8) [0x2dbc8]
Dec 9 20:03:16 miner local1.warn minergate[527]: /lib/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0x110) [0xb6dea040]
Dec 9 20:03:16 miner local1.warn minergate[527]: STACK:
Dec 9 20:03:16 miner local1.warn minergate[527]: /usr/local/bin/miner_gate_arm(_Z11print_stackv+0x44) [0x36c84]
Dec 9 20:03:16 miner local1.warn minergate[527]: /usr/local/bin/miner_gate_arm(_Z13i2c_read_wordhhPii+0x194) [0x286b8]
Dec 9 20:03:16 miner local1.warn minergate[527]: /usr/local/bin/miner_gate_arm(_Z14ac2dc_init_oneP5AC2DCi+0xb0) [0x19238]
Dec 9 20:03:16 miner local1.warn minergate[527]: /usr/local/bin/miner_gate_arm(_Z10ac2dc_initv+0xbc) [0x194f0]
Dec 9 20:03:16 miner local1.warn minergate[527]: /usr/local/bin/miner_gate_arm(main+0x1d8) [0x2dbc8]
Dec 9 20:03:16 miner local1.warn minergate[527]: /lib/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0x110) [0xb6dea040]
Dec 9 20:03:16 miner local1.warn minergate[527]: STACK:
Dec 9 20:03:16 miner local1.warn minergate[527]: /usr/local/bin/miner_gate_arm(_Z11print_stackv+0x44) [0x36c84]
Dec 9 20:03:16 miner local1.warn minergate[527]: /usr/local/bin/miner_gate_arm(_Z13i2c_read_wordhhPii+0x194) [0x286b8]
Dec 9 20:03:16 miner local1.warn minergate[527]: /usr/local/bin/miner_gate_arm(_Z14ac2dc_init_oneP5AC2DCi+0x10c) [0x19294]
Dec 9 20:03:16 miner local1.warn minergate[527]: /usr/local/bin/miner_gate_arm(_Z10ac2dc_initv+0xbc) [0x194f0]
Dec 9 20:03:16 miner local1.warn minergate[527]: /usr/local/bin/miner_gate_arm(main+0x1d8) [0x2dbc8]
Dec 9 20:03:16 miner local1.warn minergate[527]: /lib/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0x110) [0xb6dea040]
Dec 9 20:03:16 miner local1.warn minergate[527]: UNKNOWN AC2DC
Dec 9 20:03:16 miner local1.warn minergate[527]: STACK:
Dec 9 20:03:16 miner local1.warn minergate[527]: /usr/local/bin/miner_gate_arm(_Z11print_stackv+0x44) [0x36c84]
Dec 9 20:03:16 miner local1.warn minergate[527]: /usr/local/bin/miner_gate_arm(_Z13i2c_read_wordhhPii+0x194) [0x286b8]
Dec 9 20:03:16 miner local1.warn minergate[527]: /usr/local/bin/miner_gate_arm(_Z14ac2dc_init_oneP5AC2DCi+0x1e4) [0x1936c]
Dec 9 20:03:16 miner local1.warn minergate[527]: /usr/local/bin/miner_gate_arm(_Z10ac2dc_initv+0xbc) [0x194f0]
Dec 9 20:03:16 miner local1.warn minergate[527]: /usr/local/bin/miner_gate_arm(main+0x1d8) [0x2dbc8]
Dec 9 20:03:16 miner local1.warn minergate[527]: /lib/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0x110) [0xb6dea040]
Dec 9 20:03:16 miner local1.warn minergate[527]: i2c read word 0x0 0x88 error8
Dec 9 20:03:16 miner local1.warn minergate[527]: INPUT VOLTAGE=0
Dec 9 20:03:16 miner local1.warn minergate[527]: DISCOVERING AC2DC 3
Dec 9 20:03:16 miner local1.warn minergate[527]: STACK:
Dec 9 20:03:16 miner local1.warn minergate[527]: /usr/local/bin/miner_gate_arm(_Z11print_stackv+0x44) [0x36c84]
Dec 9 20:03:16 miner local1.warn minergate[527]: /usr/local/bin/miner_gate_arm(_Z13i2c_read_wordhhPii+0x194) [0x286b8]
Dec 9 20:03:16 miner local1.warn minergate[527]: /usr/local/bin/miner_gate_arm(_Z14ac2dc_init_oneP5AC2DCi+0x54) [0x191dc]
Dec 9 20:03:16 miner local1.warn minergate[527]: /usr/local/bin/miner_gate_arm(_Z10ac2dc_initv+0xbc) [0x194f0]
Dec 9 20:03:16 miner local1.warn minergate[527]: /usr/local/bin/miner_gate_arm(main+0x1d8) [0x2dbc8]
Dec 9 20:03:16 miner local1.warn minergate[527]: /lib/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0x110) [0xb6dea040]
Dec 9 20:03:16 miner local1.warn minergate[527]: STACK:
Dec 9 20:03:16 miner local1.warn minergate[527]: /usr/local/bin/miner_gate_arm(_Z11print_stackv+0x44) [0x36c84]
Dec 9 20:03:16 miner local1.warn minergate[527]: /usr/local/bin/miner_gate_arm(_Z13i2c_read_wordhhPii+0x194) [0x286b8]
Dec 9 20:03:16 miner local1.warn minergate[527]: /usr/local/bin/miner_gate_arm(_Z14ac2dc_init_oneP5AC2DCi+0xb0) [0x19238]
Dec 9 20:03:16 miner local1.warn minergate[527]: /usr/local/bin/miner_gate_arm(_Z10ac2dc_initv+0xbc) [0x194f0]
Dec 9 20:03:16 miner local1.warn minergate[527]: /usr/local/bin/miner_gate_arm(main+0x1d8) [0x2dbc8]
Dec 9 20:03:16 miner local1.warn minergate[527]: /lib/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0x110) [0xb6dea040]
Dec 9 20:03:16 miner local1.warn minergate[527]: STACK:
Dec 9 20:03:16 miner local1.warn minergate[527]: /usr/local/bin/miner_gate_arm(_Z11print_stackv+0x44) [0x36c84]
Dec 9 20:03:16 miner local1.warn minergate[527]: /usr/local/bin/miner_gate_arm(_Z13i2c_read_wordhhPii+0x194) [0x286b8]
Dec 9 20:03:16 miner local1.warn minergate[527]: /usr/local/bin/miner_gate_arm(_Z14ac2dc_init_oneP5AC2DCi+0x10c) [0x19294]
Dec 9 20:03:16 miner local1.warn minergate[527]: /usr/local/bin/miner_gate_arm(_Z10ac2dc_initv+0xbc) [0x194f0]
Dec 9 20:03:16 miner local1.warn minergate[527]: /usr/local/bin/miner_gate_arm(main+0x1d8) [0x2dbc8]
Dec 9 20:03:16 miner local1.warn minergate[527]: /lib/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0x110) [0xb6dea040]
Dec 9 20:03:16 miner local1.warn minergate[527]: UNKNOWN AC2DC
Dec 9 20:03:16 miner local1.warn minergate[527]: STACK:
Dec 9 20:03:16 miner local1.warn minergate[527]: /usr/local/bin/miner_gate_arm(_Z11print_stackv+0x44) [0x36c84]
Dec 9 20:03:16 miner local1.warn minergate[527]: /usr/local/bin/miner_gate_arm(_Z13i2c_read_wordhhPii+0x194) [0x286b8]
Dec 9 20:03:16 miner local1.warn minergate[527]: /usr/local/bin/miner_gate_arm(_Z14ac2dc_init_oneP5AC2DCi+0x1e4) [0x1936c]
Dec 9 20:03:16 miner local1.warn minergate[527]: /usr/local/bin/miner_gate_arm(_Z10ac2dc_initv+0xbc) [0x194f0]
Dec 9 20:03:16 miner local1.warn minergate[527]: /usr/local/bin/miner_gate_arm(main+0x1d8) [0x2dbc8]
Dec 9 20:03:16 miner local1.warn minergate[527]: /lib/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0x110) [0xb6dea040]
Dec 9 20:03:16 miner local1.warn minergate[527]: i2c read word 0x0 0x88 error8
Dec 9 20:03:16 miner local1.warn minergate[527]: INPUT VOLTAGE=0
Dec 9 20:03:17 miner daemon.info init: starting pid 619, tty '/dev/ttyO0': '/sbin/getty -L ttyO0 115200 vt100 '
Dec 9 20:03:17 miner local1.warn minergate[527]: ----------------------------------
Dec 9 20:03:17 miner local1.warn minergate[527]: --------FET TOP:9 BOT:9---------
Dec 9 20:03:17 miner local1.warn minergate[527]: ----------------------------------
Dec 9 20:03:17 miner local1.warn minergate[527]: DC2DC ignore temp 0
Dec 9 20:03:17 miner local1.warn minergate[527]: DC2DC ignore temp 0
Dec 9 20:03:17 miner local1.warn minergate[527]: Reading DISABLED ASICS
Dec 9 20:03:17 miner local1.warn minergate[527]: vm.userset_fan_level: 100, vm.voltage_start: 670/670/670/670, vm.voltage_end: 740 vm.vtrim_start: ffef/ffef/ffef/ffef, vm.vtrim_end: 10009
Dec 9 20:03:17 miner local1.warn minergate[527]: ------------ FLAG1 = 0x0 -----------
Dec 9 20:03:17 miner local1.warn minergate[527]: Critical: Started!
Dec 9 20:03:17 miner local1.warn minergate[527]: TAKE ONE BOARD 0 PRESENT:1
Dec 9 20:03:17 miner local1.warn minergate[527]: TAKE ONE BOARD 1 PRESENT:1
Dec 9 20:03:17 miner local1.warn minergate[527]: DC2DC stop all
Dec 9 20:03:17 miner local1.warn minergate[527]: DC2DC Init 0 done OK
Dec 9 20:03:17 miner local1.warn minergate[527]: DC2DC Init 1 done OK
Dec 9 20:03:17 miner local1.warn minergate[527]: DC2DC Init 2 done OK
Dec 9 20:03:17 miner local1.warn minergate[527]: DC2DC Init 3 done OK
Check the log , your answer is probably there
Jump to: