Topic: Unveiling the truth over the major Monero scam - page 3. (Read 69479 times)

This depend on investors not on date and number of website and users that have adopted It. In term of adoption there is only a real crypto that has a real economic weight in daily transaction Bitcoin, all the altcoins that I have mentioned followed however are very far to be standard and are still a small niche.
Scream that Monero is the second coin adopted in darknet is a joke is over the limit of the bullshit. tomorrow I'll open a couple of marketplace that accept shitcoin so I can say that shitcoin is the largest alternative to Bitcoin LOL

this can proof that isn't all true what he stated not that He has mined all for himself... and again you have strategically omitted all the rest of the content of my post for the second time in a row.


I'm not a Bytecoin supporter I have invested only ten dollar in Bytecoin I prefer other cryptocurrencies however Bytecoin whatever thing you can say about developers sincerity, that very likely have lied about the date, was easily available both for free with faucets, with hilariously low prices and easy to mine even with an home PC... Monero was pretty expensive and difficult to mine since day one because of large clusters that original owners\investors dispatched this is a FACT and this is the most important thing when I have to see what coin is more fair and grant a best distribution in real world. So in simpler word if Bytecoin is a scam because of initial mining Monero is a scam far more great and less honest

my question:
your answer:

so, nope, didn't ask you that...

What I said:

your answer:

yes, one indeed, like I said

Then you say:

So can you explain then why transaction volume in dash has gone nowhere since launch? Proof: https://twitter.com/ARKblockchain/status/834841078234767360
Can you explain why anoncoin (launched in june 2013, so older than xmr) has only a marketcap of 25.000$? see here: https://www.coingecko.com/en/coins/anoncoin
I see that you don't even mention BCN anymore, quite telling...


Serious question: will you stop now making a fool of yourself? You have reduced your own credibility to 0...

I'm done here btw, no use continuing this nonsense...

best regards,

The proofs are in the OP I linked to.  If an article published by you in 2012 is written with a pdf processor that only existed in 2014, and if that article (the "white paper") that you SIGNED in 2012 contains links to a discussion thread started in 2013, then you are Dr Who, and you are in possession of a time-travelling Tardis.

Are you asking me to link Darknet websites? seriously? Oh please ....Only ONE accepted XMR...1
even Litecoin that isn't even an anon-coin is way more used and 99,9999% are still Bitcoin only, among newer anon-altcoin Anoncoin is why more used in I2P network, Dash is why more used in onion websites.

Please, tell me which dnm uses another coins besides btc or xmr? This must be the most easy to prove question I asked you... will you avoid it again?
Nope, not "the darknet added xmr", a darknetmarket (dnM) added xmr, on that darknetmarket there are several 'stores' who are accepting xmr as form of payment... get your terminology right please...

If you really do your utmost best to don't see any progress, you off course can...

I wish you the best of luck on your further endeavers, the future will tell who's right...

best regards,

these are not proofs only suspects and conjectures, that are even legit if we have to discuss how transparent have been the developers, however you have ignored 99,9% of the post where I want to know in practice, HOW is supposed to be better a developers that not premine but with emission enterely controlled  by few people with big cluster miners against developers that "maybe" have premined a big slice however everyone was able to get a very large amount of units for free with faucets and an extremely low price

How many Monero you can get? At what price? Who is that sold you Monero? How this assure a better distribution in real world?

First of all isn't the second coin added to the darknet there are others coins used according the community frequented, only a single store added XMR", not "the darknet, despite the very noisy Monero supported have screamed "Monero the new darknet coin". "is being developed" means nothing if isn't "already developed and with these vantages over", while kovri isn't a cryptocurrency feature but an additional tool

This great piece of inquiry is enough:

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/blowing-the-lid-off-the-cryptonotebytecoin-scam-with-the-exception-of-monero-740112

Faking white papers, faking dates 2 years in advance, claiming a launch and dark market usage 2 years ago. 
Bytecoin was launched in april 2014, claiming it was around since 2012, to "explain" that 80% was already (pre)mined.

Come on.

wauw, nice cherry picking on the two last items... multisig, kovri, ... all means nothing then...

the second coin ever to be added on the darknet, mweh, means nothing too... btw if the dnm-owners would be dumb enough to fall for agressive marketing they would've chosen dash. hint: dnm-owners aren't dumb, especially those of large and long standing dnm's...

ah well, you do what you wanna do off course

bye

Bytecoin blockchain isn't stored in memory  too
enormous and lot means nothing...

I have asked you WHAT significant feature they have added. The wallet doesn't even have a block explorer a base feature included in Bytecoin since the start and is slow to start and use much RAM.

Effective usability? Only a single darknet store accepted them and this probably because of very aggressive marketing not because of some new feature. Bytecoin was always a lurker, with not much promotion while Monero staff spend more time on social and advertising than to code is not surprising this but has nothing to do with what I'm stating here.

First of all isn't proven that the developer premined before release, seems more a not properly distributed initial supply. Anyway even considering that developers have premined I would have agree with you if is proven that approach used by other coins assure most fair distribution. Unfortunately isn't the mined amount that decide this but how a common user can get a proportional percentage of the supply. Since the mining network can easily grab the most of supply forcing you to buy from them if you want some coin. Bytecoin was always easily mineable even from an home user with a notebook, was distributed for free in very large amount with faucets. Monero? If you want to get a decent amount of units you have to pay much money to big mining clusters most of them controlled by founders of the coin that have the most of the emission totally in their hands. How is supposed to be more fair this?

dude, give it a rest, you're making a total fool of yourself:
- lmdb implementation so the blockchain doesn't have to be stored in memory anymore
- add full support for fluffy blocks
- switch to Borromean signatures in RingCT
- fixed issues with coinbase transactions
- overhaul of the threading system
- kovri (i2p) development
- optimise blockchain refresh
- major RingCt performance improvements
- multisig is being developed
- an enormous amount of bug fixes
- lots and lots more

Gui-wallet runs pretty decent on my computer btw, don't know what you're doing wrong there...

and to conclude?  Can you explain why xmr gained effective usability last year and BCN did not. If XMR is just a clone like you're implying and totally behind on the curve, then why is the usebase so much larger than that of BCN? Oh, I know, because of evil brainwashing xmr community probably...

now please, go shill for your 86% premined scam somewhere else...

LOL probably you know only how to read the number of commits not the code and what exactly adds in terms of functionality and quality.
What major feature added Monero to the code copy\pasted from Bytecoin? The most valuable and advertised feature of Monero (anon ring signature) is copied from Bytecoin and there isn't any other valuable feature.
There isn't event a decent GUI wallet, with the still in beta release that has less features than the old first GUI Bytecoin wallet released many years ago and uses an embarrassing amount of RAM.
Try again Monero PR

I check github almost daily, xmr is quasi the most active developed alt there is... do you even know how to read github?

And yes, I know what a fork is... kind of pedantic that a newbie-account like you would speak in this condescending tone, I'm here since beginning of 2013, you are here since may 2016 and it tells that you know jack shit about anything...
What you're saying is all forks are copy pasta? Congratz, you just blew what little was left of your credibility.... 2 questions for proof of your ridiculous claims were asked, two times you avoided showing some...

go ahead, make some more empty claims that show you for the empty-headed fool you are.

best regards

Technically, bytecoin was a good cryptocurrency, but with the "backward time machine" story to explain a 80% premine, that's even worse than DASH.  That's not sustainable as a monetary belief system.

del

That is just not true. I and many others in my team have been attacking it relentlessly. 

LOL Monero promoters arrived to flooding this thread with wall of text of nothing.

A group of people (Monero trolls) have copied a good cryptocurrency(Bytecoin) so that they can manage as they want accusing the original developers to be scammers because of high emission in the first period of launch only because they weren't on the boat. This is as fair a Chinese producer that clone a smartphone selling it at higher price compared to the original one, and after that claiming that original producer was a scammer to convince people to buy from him and trying to delegitimize all others competitors with the same bullshit lies, for every altcoins there is a Monero-fag that screams "scam" when his coin is the real scam.

Dude, this thread is 2 years old. I mean there's posts up to this past December, but a lot of this information is irrelevant now.

Monero is thriving and if you look at the charts, it's likely to stay on the upward trend over the course of this year.

Sure 90% of my posts are Monero so I won't talk bad about it, but I actually like this crypto cause its not a scam. It has real potential.

I'm sure not every person cares about being 100% anonymous, but I know a certain market of people who use bitcoin and are getting arrested, and those people will definitely flock to Monero when more arrests start happening. They already have the option to use it, but most haven't cared yet. I think they will care soon enough, but that's all speculation.

Also, about the code thing, Monero is open source. Nobody is sitting there with a ton of money. People don't have all day every day to spend on this shit. The community funds the projects. The development is a little slow, sure, but if it is already $10+ at this point, where will it be when RingCT is mandatory, when there is a mobile wallet, when kovri is implemented.(Although I realize that price does not determine if the coin is successful) You can say whatever you want, but I truly believe that Monero will succeed.

Hell if coinbase adds them, I'm gonna go around to everyone and say I told you so. But I don't know if they would do Monero or not. Would be huge news though.