Pages:
Author

Topic: Up Like Trump - page 42. (Read 572791 times)

legendary
Activity: 1148
Merit: 1048
April 13, 2017, 07:39:20 PM
Everyone can see it!!!!


Except Americans.

We can see it Sad the ones of us if bothers, however, are largely powerless to effect it. This ball is in play.
legendary
Activity: 2324
Merit: 1130
April 13, 2017, 07:37:29 PM
Everyone can see it!!!!


Except Americans.
sr. member
Activity: 630
Merit: 272
April 13, 2017, 07:24:23 PM

Reading is not Trump's forte.   Wink
What did he even have any hobby? Trump in my opinion represents all the stupid and ridiculous that is in man. I wonder how such a mind could become President of America.

Just look at those baby-soft hands.

The only tool he's ever seen was in the mirror.
It seems to me that Trump is the biggest problem Americans. Everything he does does not benefit America. The bombing of Syria it seems to me that this is an attempt to evade investigation in Congress. Trump dark personality.
legendary
Activity: 2324
Merit: 1130
April 13, 2017, 06:49:50 PM

Reading is not Trump's forte.   Wink
What did he even have any hobby? Trump in my opinion represents all the stupid and ridiculous that is in man. I wonder how such a mind could become President of America.

Just look at those baby-soft hands.

The only tool he's ever seen was in the mirror.
member
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
April 13, 2017, 06:42:18 PM

Reading is not Trump's forte.   Wink
What did he even have any hobby? Trump in my opinion represents all the stupid and ridiculous that is in man. I wonder how such a mind could become President of America.
hero member
Activity: 798
Merit: 722
April 13, 2017, 05:17:42 PM
Definitely scared of a Trump president... first thing he'll do is declare war on Mexicans and Muslims... WW3 here we come!

Damn, that was like a year and a half ago...
member
Activity: 112
Merit: 10
April 13, 2017, 09:33:34 AM
The Donald is doing an interesting thing in politics. The US needs a rogue voice to inject some honest opinion and direct conversation in the usual pre-scripted political dialogue. It's also interesting to see how his competitors respond. Some rise (yes rise) to that level of honesty and direct approach, most will not. This could lead voters to vote Democrat (i.e., Hillary) if they think that Trump represents the "crazyiness of the Republican party".
legendary
Activity: 2324
Merit: 1130
April 13, 2017, 06:41:33 AM

Reading is not Trump's forte.   Wink
legendary
Activity: 4690
Merit: 1276
April 13, 2017, 12:51:26 AM
Wow.  Trump has done such a 'shock and awe' 180 degree turn-around from the platform he ran on that even CiaNN's jaws are on the floor.

If I were Trump believed an ounce of what I claimed to have when campaigning, I would think about just going all the way.  I would go through the Obama or 'progressive' agenda and release one element of 'my new plan' every day.

 - Cashless society, and if any technology for embedded microchips has been developed, mandate it's use.

 - Public/private health 'insurance' funded by coercing property owners to sell their property and confiscating profits from fanny/freddy.

 - Eco-friendly human habitats consisting of 240 square feet apartments near mass transportation systems.  Places of work in the same complex as housing when possible.

 - 180 new vaccinations under development and many on the current schedule.  Children AND adults need to be 'caught up'.  At gunpoint if necessary.

 - Free education for as long as anyone wants and guaranteed wages.

 - At least one free gender reversal surgery for everyone.

 - Driverless cars which can not be privately owned.  Only used as taxi.

 - Common Core education with biometric feedback from students sent to central computers in real time.

 - All land upon which rain falls at least once every two years under management of the EPA in order for the people to have 'clean water'.

 - Drills-gone-live to demonstrate the folly of citizens with weapons.  

 - U.N. run 'Strong Cities Network' using input from SPLC and ADL and internationally staffed swat equipped police forces to round up 'domestic extremists' and re-educate them.

 - Massive geo-engineering to save the world from global warming and manipulate weather for a variety of citizen friendly

 - Carbon taxes on everything with proceeds funding the United Nations.

 - Many many more such ideas.  Flip through the Atlantic or National Geographic or the Economist for leads.

full member
Activity: 252
Merit: 100
April 12, 2017, 10:14:31 PM
which is important not to disturb my profession.

what about trump 'how all of you comment?
legendary
Activity: 2324
Merit: 1130
April 12, 2017, 09:37:26 PM

Oh man did we get chumped by the Trump!  The decent first two months was a nice little touch.

I don't want to hear from the scads of people saying 'told you so' based on their 'feelings.'  People should have produced a plausible description of the mechanics backed up by some observations.  Ironically, from day one I warned of a particular theoretical possibility and continued to try (unsuccessfully) to sus out observations which could lend strength or weakness to the idea of this danger.

TruthStreamMedia just did an outstanding piece on the very mechanism I theorized about.  It also relates to my last post where I made some predictions and warnings.  They uncovered the Mercer connection which, in other recent news, is important to consider with respect to Bannon's future undertakings.

I highly recommend that politically sophisticated and computer literate viewers to pay attention to what they are saying here:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rQmIPK7DQh8


Great stuff, thanks @tvbcof
legendary
Activity: 4690
Merit: 1276
April 12, 2017, 09:11:55 PM

Oh man did we get chumped by the Trump!  The decent first two months was a nice little touch.

I don't want to hear from the scads of people saying 'told you so' based on their 'feelings.'  People should have produced a plausible description of the mechanics backed up by some observations.  Ironically, from day one I warned of a particular theoretical possibility and continued to try (unsuccessfully) to sus out observations which could lend strength or weakness to the idea of this danger.

TruthStreamMedia just did an outstanding piece on the very mechanism I theorized about.  It also relates to my last post where I made some predictions and warnings.  They uncovered the Mercer connection which, in other recent news, is important to consider with respect to Bannon's future undertakings.

I highly recommend that politically sophisticated and computer literate viewers to pay attention to what they are saying here:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rQmIPK7DQh8

sr. member
Activity: 263
Merit: 250
April 11, 2017, 11:03:29 PM
Trump is having his weakness exploited ...He did not know US backed or did the bombing in Russia nor the chem attacks.  Syria did not have chems the rebels did...  Then he was shown pictures of children suffering and was presented with options...He acted


No presidents personally are convinced of these or other issues. Always trusted or competent people do it. Therefore, if the intelligence reported and checked this information, then he had to react. But how else would it have happened otherwise?
hero member
Activity: 1134
Merit: 525
Less hops. More wins.
April 10, 2017, 09:40:53 AM
Trump is having his weakness exploited ...He did not know US backed or did the bombing in Russia nor the chem attacks.  Syria did not have chems the rebels did...  Then he was shown pictures of children suffering and was presented with options...He acted

legendary
Activity: 4690
Merit: 1276
April 10, 2017, 04:50:48 AM
Through this all, even as I significantly supported Trump's election, I never gave it much more than a 50/50 chance that he was 'for real'.  After the Syria thing I think that he should be considered likely quite dangerous to most Americans (even if he doesn't get us into a nuclear war or allow the generals to do it.)  As one-time Dem candidate Jim Webb said a year ago when people were trying to figure the guy out, 'a Trump presidency could go either very good or very bad.'  We have to seriously contemplate the 'very bad' as a distinct possibility.  Or at least I'll be doing so.

I'm sure I mentioned it somewhere in this or similar threads, but one of the reasons for the intensive data collections by everyone, but especial the corp parts of corp/gov is to feed what are known as 'rational agents'.  These are programs (for lack of a better description) which act as likenesses of an individual.  Simulations can be run on groups of them and messages can be tuned based on the output.  Currently they are used mostly to market consumer shit.  When someone says to many of the right things it's possible that they have access to this technology.  My rational agent could probably tell the operator that I took negative stories about Trump as a positive thing since I would take it as an indication that he 'was not with them.'  I knew that it was possible that the game was this deep but there were so many amateurish mishaps and close calls that i hoped it were not.

The thing about a rational agent is that while time goes by and features are developed, older data can be re-run.  The data probably goes back to the tests one took in kindergarden and it will be around forever.  I suspect that someone running a typical individual's rational agent will be able to better predict a person's behavior than the person themselves could.

Snowden and/or Greenwald commented once that they were surprised that the nobody took much interest in the news that raw intelligence data was being sent straight to Israel.  (And it surprised me that nobody put that together with the info that Obama/Clinton achieved on Trump and his folks)  The MOU kindly requested that the Israelis delete data on our politicians if it were found but showed no concern for average citizens.  (I'm sure they got right on that request.)  I expected that the data was going into making lists and that we would see it again in this reduced form.

In the later parts of Obama's last term Lynch told us about the game.  The U.N.'s 'Strong Cities Network' would work with info provided through the SPLC (Southern Poverty Law Center) to hunt down 'domestic extremists'.  This is what I was expecting to see and suspect it is a reduction of the same raw data the U.S. govt 'outsourced'.  Basically the lists would be those who needed 're-education'...and eventually possibly worse...

One of the reasons I worked so hard against Clinton is that several decades of observing her tells me that she is a true psychopath who would not only be willing but would be delighted to move into fully operational mode.  I think it only prudent to consider Trump to be capable of selling us out in more or less exactly the same way.  For-warned is for-armed.  You will not be able to cheat the machine (e.g., 'clean up your act') because you cannot edit the older data.

It's also worth note that lists like this are common through history.  More common then not in fact, and there are mass graves left as artifacts.  Also, normal intuition will not produce a good sense of who might be considered a threat or an enemy.  Yuri Bezmenov gave an outstanding example of this phenomenon when describing the lists the Soviets had drawn up for India.  In fact it was these lists and the people who's names surprisingly appeared for termination which finally caused him to defect.

legendary
Activity: 3346
Merit: 1352
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
April 09, 2017, 09:51:26 PM
On Friday night and into Saturday morning, the northern rebel-held town was pummelled once again by Syrian warplanes.
The Sukhoi jets had taken off from al-Shayrat airbase, which just a matter of hours earlier was hit by 59 American Tomahawk cruise missiles, making apparent the limited nature of US President Donald Trump’s intervention.

Close to 15 fighter and bomber jets were destroyed during the American missile attacks. The base apparently had more than two dozen aircraft. Also, some of the damaged aircraft were quickly repaired by the ground staff.
legendary
Activity: 2324
Merit: 1130
April 09, 2017, 05:42:35 PM

Exactly so.  Trump is the Master of Deflection.
legendary
Activity: 3948
Merit: 3191
Leave no FUD unchallenged
April 09, 2017, 05:11:48 PM
Ah...

Excuse me but I thought the point of the attack was a warning against using chemical munitions?

And the second attack did not use chemical munitions.

Some thought the point of the attack was something altogether different:

Quote
The strike [was] the act of a weakened politician who needed to flex his muscles. In an analysis, Xinhua also said Mr. Trump had ordered the strike to distance himself from Syria’s backers in Moscow, to overcome accusations that he was “pro-Russia.”

I mean, the last few weeks haven't exactly been great for Trump and, as distractions go, this is kind of a big "look over here now and ignore all that other stuff that isn't flattering my ego".   Roll Eyes
legendary
Activity: 2926
Merit: 1386
April 09, 2017, 03:46:19 PM

LMAO, when the eggs cost a few million a piece, I'd at least make an omelette for the dog to enjoy, rather than simply throw them into the street.

Im more at, we should have been chill in this, or at least waited a little to act. Preempting the investigation (although I'm pretty sure our intelligence will know more about it than the investigators) seemed brash in the court of global public opinion. Passing this by Congress might have softened the optics on this, but, ultimately would not have changed the outcome, I think.

A "largely ineffectual" military play? What's wrong with that?

Kind of like telling some punks to "watch out, or we'll come and stomp on you."



Well, the punks didn't seem to be listening. There were subsequent gas attacks AFTER Trumps surgical strike, hours after, to be exact. Whoever perpetrated the gas attacks, they wanted to make sure they certainly finished the job.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/04/08/assad-trying-kill-everyone-survived-chemical-attack-says-resident/

I know you are all weird about mainstream media sources, so let me just pull content:


On Friday night and into Saturday morning, the northern rebel-held town was pummelled once again by Syrian warplanes.
The Sukhoi jets had taken off from al-Shayrat airbase, which just a matter of hours earlier was hit by 59 American Tomahawk cruise missiles, making apparent the limited nature of US President Donald Trump’s intervention.





Ah...

Excuse me but I thought the point of the attack was a warning against using chemical munitions?

And the second attack did not use chemical munitions.
legendary
Activity: 1148
Merit: 1048
April 09, 2017, 03:11:03 PM

LMAO, when the eggs cost a few million a piece, I'd at least make an omelette for the dog to enjoy, rather than simply throw them into the street.

Im more at, we should have been chill in this, or at least waited a little to act. Preempting the investigation (although I'm pretty sure our intelligence will know more about it than the investigators) seemed brash in the court of global public opinion. Passing this by Congress might have softened the optics on this, but, ultimately would not have changed the outcome, I think.

A "largely ineffectual" military play? What's wrong with that?

Kind of like telling some punks to "watch out, or we'll come and stomp on you."



Well, the punks didn't seem to be listening. There were subsequent gas attacks AFTER Trumps surgical strike, hours after, to be exact. Whoever perpetrated the gas attacks, they wanted to make sure they certainly finished the job.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/04/08/assad-trying-kill-everyone-survived-chemical-attack-says-resident/

I know you are all weird about mainstream media sources, so let me just pull content:


On Friday night and into Saturday morning, the northern rebel-held town was pummelled once again by Syrian warplanes.
The Sukhoi jets had taken off from al-Shayrat airbase, which just a matter of hours earlier was hit by 59 American Tomahawk cruise missiles, making apparent the limited nature of US President Donald Trump’s intervention.



Pages:
Jump to: